Clinton Therapy & Living Center
2316 Modelle, Clinton, OK 73601 · For profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (580) 205-2460 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0607) — most recent Nov 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $211,014 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-18)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.7% | 13.6% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.9% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.1% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 38.6% | 17.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 2.31 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.14 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 34.2 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 04/18/25, a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to protect residents with exit seeking behaviors. Resident #1 wandered and had exit seeking behaviors, got out of the facility on 02/16/25 and again on 04/09/25. On 04/09/25 Resident #1 eloped and was located a half mile away from the facility on a four-lane busy road. Resident #1's care plan did not address interventions of exit seeking behaviors on 02/16/25 and was not updated until 04/09/25 with interventions. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision and interventions to prevent elopement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wandering and elopement. The DON identified two residents with a high risk for wandering and elopement. Findings: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:50 a.m., the front main doors were locked and signs were placed on the door informing anyone leaving to check with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 09/16/24 at 2:47 p.m., OSDH identified the presence of an immediate jeopardy related to the facility failed to provide supervision for Res #1 to prevent recurring elopements. Res #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #1 was identified by family to be an elopement risk at the time of admit. Res #1 was assessed to be at risk for elopement. A care plan was not initiated until 06/11/24 with referrals to locked units and a gero-psych unit. Res #1 was placed on one on one supervision with every 15 minute visual checks. On 07/09/24, Res #1 eloped from the building and was found several blocks from the facility. The care plan was not updated until 08/16/24. No new information was added to the care plan. On 09/08/24 at 4:10 p.m., Res #1 remained with 15 minute checks, but was last observed by staff at 4:20 p.m. Staff were unable to locate Res #1 at 4:43 p.m. Res #1 was located approximately 0.4 miles east of facility. Res #1 had to cross one set of rail road tracks and a four lane business freeway. Res #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Resident # 8 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, schizoaffective bipolar type, and mood disorder. A Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment, dated 07/21/23, documented Resident # 8's cognition was moderately impaired. A Progress Note, dated 08/01/23, at 9:00 p.m., documented Resident #14 hit Resident #8 two times on the right side of Resident #8's face. An Incident Report, dated 08/02/23, documented Resident # 8 was hit by Resident #14. The clinical health record did not document the physician or police had been notified. On 08/28/23 at 4:16 p.m., the DON was asked about the incident, on 08/01/23. The DON reviewed the clinical health record and stated Resident #8 notified the police on 08/02/23 at 9:59 p.m. The DON was asked if the physician was notified of the incident. The DON stated they did not see any documentation in the clinical health record the physician was notified. 6. Resident #151 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia, hypertension, manic episode, alcoholism, and drug addiction. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Resident #14 was admitted with diagnoses to include dementia with psychotic disturbance, cerebral vascular disease, tobacco use, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, alcohol dependence, and bipolar disorder. A Progress Note, dated 05/20/23 at 4:30 p.m., read in parts, .Received a call from [local police department] that resident was across the street at [another local nursing home] .Staff member from this facility walked over to return resident .Resident will be 1 on 1 till end of shift and will notify oncoming nurse of cont (sic) intervention . The clinical record contained no documentation Resident #14 had been supervised with one on one staff as indicated in the progress note. The record contained no incident report or a report to OSDH for regarding Resident #14's elopement. No further information was provided by the facility. A Progress Note, dated 06/08/23 at 8:33 p.m., read in parts, .attempting to go through exit doors . A Progress Note, dated 07/13/23 at 8:16 p.m., read in parts, .hitting and chasing staff .exit seeking . A Progress Note, dated 07/31/23 at 11:33 p.m., read…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a SNF ABN to 2 (#3 and #26) of 3 sampled residents whose beneficiary notices were reviewed. The administrator identified four residents who were discharged from the facility with Medicare benefit days remaining. Findings: 1. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed Res #3 was admitted to the facility on skilled services on 02/27/25 and discharged from skilled services on 04/11/25 and remained in the facility. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed an ABN was not provided to the resident. 2. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed Res #26 was admitted to the facility on skilled services on 01/13/25 and discharged from skilled services on 02/17/25 and remained in the facility. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed an ABN was not provided to the resident. On 06/05/25 at 8:21 a.m., the administrator stated she was not aware they had to have the ABN form if they stayed in the home.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to transmit MDS assessment data to CMS in the required timeframe for 4 (#7, 10, 21, and #23) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator identified 28 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframe's, revised July 2017, read in part, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframe's. 1. Resident #7's quarterly assessment, completion date 04/21/25, had a submitted date of 05/09/25. The accepted date was documented as 05/09/25. 2. Resident # 10's annual assessment, completion date 03/25/25, had a submitted date of 04/21/25. The accepted date was documented as 04/21/25. 3. Resident #21's quarterly assessment, completion date 03/24/25, had a submitted date of 04/21/25. The accepted date was documented as 04/21/25. 4. Resident #23's quarterly assessment, completion date 04/23/25, had a submitted date of 05/09/25. The accepted date was documented as 05/09/25. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#21) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy Physician Services, read in part, All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if not followed, the reason shall be recorded on the resident's medical record during that shift. A June 2025 order summary report showed Synthroid (a thyroid hormone) 25 micrograms was to be administered in the morning related to hypothyroidism. A Medical Director-Director of Nursing Report, with a medication record review date of 12/17/24, showed the pharmacy identified multiple blanks on the medication administration record for levothyroxine and asked the physician if they wanted to change the administration time away from 6:00 a.m. The report showed the physician did not want to change the administration time. The March medication administration record showed blanks on 03/09/25, 03/10/25, 03/13/25, 03/14/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code MDS assessment data for 2 (#10 and #6) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator identified 28 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #10's annual assessment, dated 03/23/25, had the functional assessment section coded as not assessed. Resident #10's pain section was also coded as not assessed. On 06/04/25 at 3:25 p.m., the DON stated Resident #10's annual assessment, dated 03/23/25, had the pain and functional assessment marked as not assessed. The DON stated Resident #10 was on routine pain management and the assessment was not a complete or accurate assessment. The DON stated the corporate nurse had completed the assessment but could have had a nurse in the facility complete the unassessed areas. 2. Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/18/25, showed the resident was not on hospice services. A physician order, dated 06/30/24, showed the resident was admitted to hospice. On 06/05/25 at 8:26 a.m., the DON reported the resident had been on hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen therapy where obtained for 1 (#3) of 12 sampled residents who were reviewed for physician orders. The administrator identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/30/25 at 12:42 a.m., a nurses note showed, Resident #3 was resting in bed with oxygen on at 4 liters per minute per nasal cannula. Their oxygen saturation was at 88%. A discontinued physician order, start date of 06/05/24 and an end date of 02/27/25, documented the resident was to receive oxygen continuously via nasal cannula at 2 liters to keep oxygen saturation at 91% or above. There were no current orders for oxygen documented. On 06/04/25 at 10:10 a.m., the DON stated they did not see any current order for oxygen, but there should have been because Resident #3 had end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and always had oxygen on.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a catheter for 1 (#25) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for indwelling catheters. The DON identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 06/03/25 at 1:11 p.m., Res #25 was observed sitting on the side of the bed. A catheter bag was observed hanging on the walker. An undated medical diagnosis form for Res #25, showed diagnoses of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites. Physician orders, dated 06/04/25, did not show an order for an indwelling catheter. On 06/04/25 at 4:06 p.m., the DON stated there should have been an order for the indwelling catheter.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multidose vial of a PPD solution was dated upon opening 1 of 1 medication storage room observed. The DON identified 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 06/04/25 at 1:00 p.m., an observation of the medication storage room was performed with the ADON. One multidose vial of Tuberculin PPD was opened and not dated. On 06/04/25 at 1:10 p.m., the ADON stated the multidose vial should have been dated when it was opened.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and update a care plan with interventions for wandering and elopement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wandering and elopement. The DON identified two residents with a high risk for wandering and elopement. Findings: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:50 a.m., an elopement book was observed on the nurses station. Resident #1 was identified in the book as a high risk for wandering and elopement. On 04/18/25 at 9:20 a.m., 9:37 a.m.,11:25 a.m., and 2:30 p.m., Resident #1 was observed ambulating through the facility with staff providing one-on-one supervision. The policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised July 2023, read in part, Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and asssistance to prevent accidents are facility wide priorities.Our individualized, resident-centered approach to safety addresses safety and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to OSDH within two hours of the allegation for three (#13, 24 and #82) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for reporting timely abuse allegations. The administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, All allegations of maltreatment, including neglect, physical abuse,mental abuse,sexual abuse, involuntary seclusion, verbal abuse, injuries of unknown origin, and/or/or misappropriation of resident property, must be reported to the Administrator and Investigated by facility management. The Administrator will immediately report the allegation to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and the local police. 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included cerebral aneurysm and muscle wasting with atrophy. Resident #13's quarterly assessment, dated 07/24/24, documented their cognition was intact. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegations of abuse were investigated for two (#13 and #24) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for investigating allegations of abuse. The administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Abuse Policy and Procedure policy, undated, documented residents have the right to be free from physical abuse and all incidents will be reported to the administrator and investigated immediately. 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included cerebral aneurysm and muscle wasting with atrophy. Resident #13's quarterly assessment, dated 07/24/24, documented their cognition was intact. On 11/04/24 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #24 was observed to exit their room and go into Resident #13's room. Resident #24 was naked. Resident #13 was observed to yell in a loud tone help repeatedly. Staff rushed to Residents #13's room and redirected Resident #24 back to their room while attempting to cover Resident #24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to transmit MDS assessment data to CMS in the required timeframe for two (#7 and #23) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator identified 31 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframe's, revised July 2017, read in part, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframe's. 1. Resident #7's quarterly assessment, completion date 09/25/24, had a submitted date of 11/05/24. The accepted date was documented as 11/05/24. 2. Resident #23's quarterly assessment, completion date 09/25/24, had a submitted date of 11/05/24. The accepted date was documented as 11/05/24. On 11/07/24 at 10:42 a.m., MDS coordinator #1 was asked what was the policy to ensure MDS assessments were submitted in a timely manner. They stated they had 14 days from date of completion to be submitted. They were then asked to review Resident #7 and Resident #23's quarterly MDS assessments with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine temperature and sanitizer concentration and refrigeration temperatures were monitored and logged daily to ensure safe operation and safe storage of potentially hazardous foods during two of two of two kitchen observations. The DON identified 29 residents received nutrition and hydration from the kitchen. Findings: The facility's Dishwashing Machine Use policy, revised 03/2010, documented the temperature and sanitizer concentrations should be monitored and recorded in the facility approved log. On 11/05/24 at 11:18 a.m., there were no logs observed where refrigeration equipment temperatures were to be monitored. On 11/05/24 at 11:26 a.m., [NAME] #2 was observed testing the dish machine temperature and PPM of the sanitizer. An October 2024 dish machine temperature document was observed on the wall and did not have any documentation it was being utilized. On 11/05/24 11:27 a.m., the dietary manager stated the dish machine should be tested and logged on the form before breakfast, lunch and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their legal representative was informed in writing of treatments and side effects of the use of psychotropic medications for one (#24) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for education, alternative treatments, and consents for psychotropic medication treatments. The DON identified 11 residents who had diagnosis of dementia and 18 residents who received psychotropic medications. Findings: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, schizoaffective-bipolar type, delusional disorder, depression, and obsessive compulsive behavior. Resident #24's admission assessment, dated 04/25/24, documented they were taking antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressants on a routine basis. The assessment documented the resident's cognition was severly impaired. Resident #24's physician orders, dated 11/05/24, documented the resident was prescribed the following psychotropic medications: a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, and comfortable home like environment for residents. The administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility Safe Environment policy, read in part, The facility will maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels between 71 and 81 degrees F(Fahrenheit). The policy also read, The facility will be designed, constructed, equipped and maintained to protect the health and safety of residents, personnel and the public. On 11/05/24 at 7:30 a.m., residents were observed in the common area and dining room wearing coats and covered in blankets. The temperature in the dining room was 68.3 degrees F. On 11/05/24 at 7:35 a.m., the corner wall leading into the dining room from the common area was observed. The sheetrock was missing and a metal strip was protruding from the wall. The metal strip was sharp to the touch. This was the main thoroughfare where all residents accessed the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse for one (#13) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, Isolating If the accused person is agitated, [they] will be removed from the area and temporarily separated as a therapeutic intervention until [their] agitation is lowered. {name of facility with held} will implement steps aimed at preventing the accused person from visiting other peoples rooms unattended, until [their] behavior is stabilized. The policy also read, Nursing staff shall document the incident and interventions in the Medical Record. 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included cerebral aneurysm and muscle wasting with atrophy. Resident #13's quarterly assessment, dated 07/24/24, documented their cognition was intact. On 11/04/24 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #24 was observed to exit their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by: a. not reporting abuse to the administrator and investigating immediately; and b. not taking steps to prevent further abuse for two (#13 and #82) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Abuse Policy and Procedure, documented residents had the right to be free from physical abuse, all incidents would be reported to the administrator and investigated immediately, and steps should be immediately implemented to prevent future abuse. 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses which include cerebral aneurysm and muscle wasting with atrophy. Resident #13's quarterly assessment, dated 07/24/24, documented their cognition was intact. On 11/04/24 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #24 was observed to exit their room and go into Resident #13's room. Resident #24 was naked. Resident #13 was observed to yell in a loud…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice services was care planned for one (#31) of three sampled residents reviewed for closed record review. The administrator identified 31 residents resided at the facilty. Findings: An undated Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans policy, read in part , The care plan will identify priority problems and needs to be addressed by the interdisciplinary team, and will reflect the resident's needs and will be complete and current. Resident #31 had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of the brain and dementia. An Order Summary Report, dated 11/05/24, documented Resident #31 had a physician order for hospice. There was no documentation hospice services was care planned. On 11/05/24 at 1:27 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was asked the policy and procedure regarding hospice services and where hospice services was documented. They stated the care plan. They were then asked when was hospice services added to a care plan. They stated immediately. They were asked to review Resident #31's careplan and asked if hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were supplied as ordered for one (#5) of five sampled residents observed during medication administration pass. The administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication and Treatment Orders policy, revised July 2023, read in part, Drugs and biologicals that are required to be refilled must be reordered from the issuing pharmacy not less than three days prior to the last dosage being administered to ensure that refills are readily available. An undated Certified Med Aide job description, read in part, monitor medications to ensure adequate accountability measures were taken when medications are ordered. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, bipolar, depression, and hypertension. A Physician order, dated 06/17/24, documented Resident #5 received clonidine HCL (blood pressure medication) 0.2 mg by mouth three times a day. On 11/05/24 at 7:54 a.m., during an observation of a medication pass, CMA #1 stated Resident #5's clonidine was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was completed for one (#14) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 18 residents who received psychotropic medications. Findings: A Medication and Treatment Orders policy, revised July 2016, read in part, orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. A Medication Orders policy, revised January 2018, read in part, new handwritten orders by the prescriber while in the facility. The nurse on duty at the time the order is received enters it on the physician order sheet/telephone order sheet/electronic medical record. A Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, revised November 2023, read in part, The physician shall respond appropriately by changing or stopping problematic doses or medications. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of brain, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and bipolar type. A Note to Physician/Clinician pharmacy report, dated 09/27/24, documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a care plan after an assessment for high risk of elopement and a documented event of a missing resident for one (#1) of four sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified the census was 32. Findings: Res #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, and bipolar type schizoaffective disorder. A Care Plan, initiated 06/11/24, documented the resident was an elopement risk/wanderer and had a history to leave the facility unattended. Interventions included: a. assess for fall risk, b. distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, or book, c. identify pattern of wandering. Is wandering purposeful, aimless, or escapist? Is resident looking for something? Does it indicate the need for more exercise? Intervene as appropriate. d. monitor for fatigue and weight loss, e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure supervision to prevent an elopement for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The Administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. The MDS coordinator identified three residents who were at risk for elopement. Findings: An Elopement policy, revised 2007, read in part .Staff shall investigate and report all cases of missing residents . Resident #3 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, dementia and delusional disorder. A Wandering Risk Scale, dated 04/29/24 documented Resident #3 was a low risk to wander. A Behavior Note, dated 04/30/24 at 3:01 p.m., .Resident went outside to smoke and [the resident] started to walk off stating [they] was going home. Staff informed this nurse and was able to get [the resident] to come back inside . A Health Status Note, dated 04/30/24 at 9:51 p.m., read in part .does exit seek . A Release of Responsibility for Outside Activity, dated 05/01/24 at 2:30 P.M., had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control for four (#1, #4, #6 and #7) of four sampled residents reviewed for pest control. The Administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Pest Control policy, undated, read in part .Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program .This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents . A Bed Bugs, Preventing and Managing Infestations of policy, revised August 2011, read in part .Staff will employ infection control strategies to prevent and manage infestation of bed bugs .Identification .check resident rooms at night when bed bugs are active .Remove and/or treat all infested materials using non-chemical methods, including: .Washing and drying bedding, linens, and clothing at a high temperature; vacuuming or steam cleaning floors, mattresses, and any porous surfaces that cannot be machine-washed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed their policy to report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator for one (#10) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 31 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Policy and Procedure policy, read in part .Immediate reporting. ALL allegations of maltreatment, including .verbal abuse .must be reported immediately to the Administrator by a Facility employee or immediate supervisor . Resident #10 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure and depressive disorder. On 06/12/24 at 8:40 a.m., CNA #2 was asked if they had ever heard staff curse or talk in a demeaning was to residents. They stated Yes. They were asked who and when. CNA #2 stated, This weekend by the nurses station there was a verbal altercation with [LPN #1] and [Resident #10]. I was coming down the hall heard [Resident #10] called [LPN #1] a bitch. then [LPN #1] stated 'Don't ever call me a bitch you look like a pig, you smell like a pig, and you breathe like a pig'. I looked at LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0575 — patternPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were posted. This had the potential to affect 35 residents in the facility. LPN #1 identified the census was 35. Findings: On 03/11/24 at 6:05 p.m., and on 03/12/24 at 10:40 a.m., tours of the common areas that were accessible to residents was completed. The resident rights were not located. On 03/14/24 at 11:30 a.m., the Administrator was asked if the resident rights were posted in any of the common areas that were accessible to all residents. A tour of the halls and common areas were conducted with the Administrator. They stated, I guess they aren't posted.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. assess a resident's physical limitations to prevent psychological abuse, and b. follow their abuse policy to fully investigate and report allegations of neglect for one (#5) of three residents reviewed for abuse. LPN #1 identified the facility census was 35. Findings: An undated, Abuse Neglect Exploitation Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Prevention policy, read in parts, .Neglect is the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness .occurs when .staff fails .delivery of patient/resident care and service to assure care is provided as required .Mental abuse includes .humiliation, harassment, treats of punishment or deprivation .Residents .shall be protected .staff assigned have knowledge of the individual residents' care needs .identify .patterns, and trends .Investigate different types of incidents .Report all alleged violations .immediately .have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated . Resident #5 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed have a system in place to ensure medications were available for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication availability. LPN #1 stated the facility census was 35. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses to include ankylosing spondylitis, depressive episodes, and anxiety. Physician Orders, dated 05/26/23, documented Resident #1 was to be administered: a. Elderberry Immune Complex, two gummies one time a day, b. Turmeric 500 mg, two capsules one time a day, and c. Vitamin E, 1200 units one time a day. Physician Orders, dated 05/27/23 doucmented Resident #1 was to be administered: a. Vitamin C gummies 500 mg one time a day, and b. Vitamin D-3 extra strength, gummies 150 mcg one time a day; The MAR, dated 12/2023, documented the following medications were held and not administered: a. Elderberry Immune Complex from 12/29/23 to 01/01/24, b. Turmeric from 12/12/23 to 12/19/23, and c. Vitamin E from 12/12/23 to 12/19/23 and, from 12/29/23 to 01/01/24. The clinical record did not contain signed physician orders to hold the medication or an entry the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate care and services with mental health providers for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for mental health services. The facility census was 35. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses to include depression. A Physician Order, dated 05/26/23, documented staff were to complete behavior monitoring every shift for scratching, itching, biting, sexual inappropriate behavior, hitting, attention seeking, hand wrenching, cussing, elopement attempts, refusal of care or hallucinations. The behaviors were to be documented in the clinical record. A Care Plan, dated 06/26/23, documented Resident #1 had behavioral problems to make frequent, and false statements and allegations against others and threatens to call the state complaint department. A Physician Order, dated 07/23/23, documented mental health services were to evaluated and treat Resident #1 as indicated. A Progress Note, dated 07/23/23, documented Resident #1 was seen by mental health staff , on 07/21/23, and no changes in order or care plan were made at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving 1:1 supervision was free from confinement, restriction, or isolation for one (#1) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for involuntary seclusion. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Neglect Exploitation Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Prevention policy, undated, read in parts, .Involuntary Seclusion is defined as separation of a resident from other residents .or confinement to her/his room .against the resident's will . A Safety and Supervision of Residents policy, revised December 2023, read in parts, .Recommended timeframe below for safety monitoring .1:1 for 8 hours; 15 minute checks for 8 hours, 30 minute checks for 8 hours, Hourly checks for 8 hours and then return to regular routine monitoring if no further incidents .Monitoring the effectiveness of interventions shall include .Evaluating effectiveness of interventions .Modifying or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to be administered effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial being of each resident. The Administrator failed to ensure: a. resident assessments were completed and submitted in the required time frame, b. each resident had a completed comprehensive care plan to accurately reflect the needs and services of each resident, c. a safe and secure environment was provided to prevent cognitively impaired residents to wander or elope from the building, d. residents were free from abuse and neglect, allegations and known events were identified, victims were protected during investigation, thorough investigations were completed and reported the to required agencies within the required time frame, e. a system was in place for residents and representatives to report grievances, issues corrected, and a response to the parties involved, f. a facility risk assessment was completed and updated to determine the resources necessary to care for the residents on a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents completely both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings. On 08/15/23 at 2:30 p.m., the Administrator and Corporate Nurse were provided an Entrance Conference Worksheet, and provided verbal instructions to provide a Facility Risk Assessment. On 08/28/23 at 1:50 p.m., the Corporate Nurse was asked to provide the Facility Risk Assessment. The Corporate Nurse stated, I have been looking for it because I knew you would ask. I cannot find one.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided dignity for: a. two (#5 and #21) of three sampled residents that required assistance with toileting needs and; b. one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for dignity. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility and documented eight residents were dependent on staff for toileting, 18 residents required assistance for toileting, and 22 residents were in a chair all or most of the time. Findings: 1. Resident #3 had diagnosis to include below the knee amputation. An Admission/readmission Screener assessment, dated 07/26/23, documented Resident #3 utilized a wheelchair for mobility. A BIMS assessment, dated 07/26/23, documented Resident #3 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The clinical record did not contain a baseline care plan, a completed MDS assessment, or a comprehensive care plan. On 08/16/23 at 4:37 p.m., Resident #3 was observed to rest on top of their bed. A manual wheelchair was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and the interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure advanced directives were offered for one ( #13) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives, and b. ensure code status for DNR or CPR was accurately documented in the clinical health record for two (#4 and #13) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for code status. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated [DATE], documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #4 had diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, muscle wasting, and abnormal weight loss. A quarterly assessment, dated [DATE], documented, Resident# 4 was not cognitively impaired. A physicians order, dated [DATE], read in part, .I have a DNR in place . A Care Plan, dated [DATE], read in part, . Anytime I am transferred out of the facility a copy of my DNR and Face sheet will be sent . A progress note, dated [DATE], read in part, .Informed hospice nurse of resident's wish to rescind DNR status . On [DATE] at 2:56 p.m., Resident # 4 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a NOMNC and ABN was provided for a facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services with days remaining for three (#15, 24, and #58) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. The Entrance Conference Worksheet, undated, documented 12 residents were discharged from Medicare Part A services with days remaining in the last six months. Findings: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to Medicare Part A Skilled Services on 06/15/23. The last covered day of services was on 07/15/23. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form documented NOMNC and ABN were provided to the resident at the time of discharge from skilled services. 2. Resident #24 was admitted to Medicare Part A Skilled Services on 03/11/23. The last covered day of services was on 04/14/23. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form documented NOMNC and ABN were provided to the resident at the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe homelike environment to ensure: a. blue painters tape was not used to repair a broken toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, b. tiles in the common area were not missing, cracked, stained, and buckled from water damage in common areas accessed by residents, and c. electrical outlets were covered in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom next to the sink The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Safe Environment, policy, undated, read in parts, .The facility will maintain all essential, mechanical, electrical .in safe operating condition .The facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home like environment .The facility will provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior . On 08/16/23 at 4:02 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was observed to not have a electrical outlet cover on an outlet next to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive resident assessments within 14 days of admission to the facility for three (#14, 21, and #151) of three sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility, on 05/20/23, with diagnoses to include dementia, emphysema, respiratory failure, alcohol dependence, and bipolar disorder. The resident assessment logs, documented: a. an entry to the facility was initiated on 05/20/23; and b. an admission assessment was initiated on 05/20/23 and remained in progress. 2. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility, on 07/18/23, with diagnoses to include bacteremia, diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, and respiratory failure. The resident assessment logs, documented: a. an entry to the facility was initiated on 07/18/23 and remained in progress; and b. an admission assessment was initiated on 08/21/23 and remained in progress. 3. Resident #151 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessments were transmitted within 7 days of completion for three (#17, 13, and #9) of three sampled residents reviewed for the transmission of resident assessments. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. 1. The Resident Assessment and Transmission Logs for Resident #17, documented: a. On 03/28/23, a Medicare 5-day Assessment had been exported but not accepted, and b. On 04/03/23, an End of Medicare Part A Stay Assessment had been exported but had not been accepted. 2. The Resident Assessment and Transmission Logs for Resident #13, documented: a. On 03/24/23, a Medicare 5-day Assessment had been exported but not accepted, and b. On 04/20/23, an End of Medicare Part A Stay Assessment had been exported but not accepted. 3. The Resident Assessment and Transmission Logs for Resident #9, documented: a. On 04/20/23, an Annual Assessment had been exported but not accepted, and b. On 08/15/23, a Quarterly Assessment was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed for two (#14 and #21) of three sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. 1. Resident #14 had been admitted to the facility, on 05/20/23, with diagnosis to include dementia, cerebral vascular disease, bipolar disorder, alcohol dependence, emphysema and respiratory failure. The clinical record did not contain a baseline care plan. On 08/24/23 at 2:25 p.m., the Administrator was asked what interventions were placed for Resident #14 on the baseline care plan. They stated there is not a baseline care plan. 2. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility, on 07/16/23, with diagnoses to include bacteremia, diabetes mellitus-type 2, encephalopathy, and respiratory failure. The clinical record did not contain a baseline care plan. On 08/25/23 at 9:58 a.m., the ADON was asked what concerns were identified and interventions placed on the resident's baseline care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed for two (#14 and #21) of three sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #14 had been admitted to the facility, on 05/20/23, with diagnosis to include dementia, cerebral vascular disease, bipolar disorder, alcohol dependence, emphysema and respiratory failure. The clinical record contained a comprehensive care plan, dated 08/17/23, two days after Resident #14 had been discharged from the facility. On 08/24/23 at 3:30 p.m., in the presence of the Administrator, and DON was asked to review Resident #14's nursing care plan and identify the nurse that had completed the care plan. There was no response from the DON. The Administrator stated, That has my name, but I did not do it. They were asked if Resident #14 was admitted , on 05/20/23, why did the resident not have or need a care plan until two days after discharged to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure ADL care was provided for dependent residents for three (#5, 6, and #9) of five sampled residents reviewed for ADL's. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented the 37 residents resided in the facility. Six residents were dependent for bathing and 18 required assistance. Eight residents were dependent for assistance with toileting and eleven required assistance. Findings: An undated, Activitied of Daily Living (ADLs)/Maintain Abilities policy, The facility will provide care and [NAME] for the following activities of daily living .bathing, dressing, grooming,,,toileting .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain .grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy, paralytic gait, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following a stroke. A Quarterly Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to monitor for side effects related to the use of psychotropic and opioid medications for three (#53 7, and #21) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated on 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility, and 18 residents received psychoactive medications. Findings: 1. Resident #53 had diagnoses which included pain, quadriplegia, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and muscle spasms. A Physician Order, dated 02/02/22, documented to administer trazadone 50 mg one tablet by mouth at bedtime. A Physician Order, dated 02/04/22, documented to administer Sertraline 50 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day. A Physician Order, dated 02/24/22, documented to administer Depakote tablets 250 mg one tablet by mouth two times a day. A Physician Order, dated 05/09/22, documented to administer Lorazepam 0.5 mg one half tablet by mouth two times a day. A Physician Order, dated 09/13/22, documented to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was not prescribed on an as needed bases for greater than 14 days without a physician documented rationale for two (#3 and #21) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility, and 18 residents received psychoactive medications. Findings: 1. Resident #3 had diagnosis to include bipolar depression with psychotic features, major depressive disorder and anxiety. Physician Orders, dated 07/26/23, documented Resident #3 was to be administered: a. Lorazepam every 8 hours as needed for anxiety and restlessness, and b. Zyprexa [Olanzapine] 5 mg every 12 hours as needed for a psychotic disorder. The clinical record contained no documentation Resident #3 had been re-evaluated every 14 days, a physician had documented a rationale for the continued use of prn psychoactive medications, or a stop date to no longer administer the as needed psychotropic medications. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. vaccinations were not beyond the expiration date, and b. controlled medications that were to be destroyed were stored in a double lock. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Receiving Controlled Substances, dated January 2018, read in part, .Medications listed in Schedules II, III IV, and V are stored under double lock. On 08/23/23 at 2:10 p.m., medications were observed in the refrigerator in the mediation room. Twenty-nine fluzone influenza vaccines were dated with an expiration date of 06/30/23, and two pneumonia vaccinations were observed with an expiration date of 09/11/22. On 08/23/23 at 2:20 p.m., the DON was asked to observe the vaccination syringes and review the expiration dates. They were asked if the vaccinations should have been disposed of. They stated, Yes. They were asked if any resident had received a pneumonia vaccination since 09/11/22. They stated they would look. On 08/23/23 3:05 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were labeled with the date for one of three refrigerators observed. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. The Corporate Nurse #1 identified 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: A Infection Control-Food Handling policy, undated, read in part, .Food should be properly labeled . On 08/15/23 at 2:30 p.m., during a tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed in a refrigerator: a. a plastic bag containing cooked bacon with no date label, b. a plastic bag containing cooked scrambled eggs with no date label, c. a pan containing tuna salad covered in a plastic wrap with no date label, d. two plastic bags of shredded white cheese with no date label, and e. a pan of cream of wheat covered in plastic had no date label. On 08/15/23 at 2:38 p.m., [NAME] #1 was asked what the policy was on labeling left overs in the refrigerator. [NAME] #1 stated, We label them with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a QAPI program was in place to identify areas of concerns or deficient practice, implement plans of correction, or improve the identified concerns with resident care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. On 08/15/23 at 2:30 p.m., the Administrator and Corporate Nurse were provided an Entrance Conference Worksheet, and given verbal instruction to provide information regarding the QAA committee and the facility's QAPI plan. On 08/28/23 at 4:08 p.m., the Corporate Nurse, DON, and ADON were asked what members are included on the QAPI committee. The Corporate Nurse stated, the medical director, social services, Administrator, DON, DM, maintenance, and MDS coordinator. The Corporate Nurse was asked how often the QAPI committee meet. They stated the committee meets quarterly, but also have a monthly QAPI to review triggers for residents, and have a stand up meeting every morning with nursing, the administration and all department head. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin tests were administered according to policy for four (#55, 21, 3, and #7) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23 documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Policy for TB Infection Control Program policy, dated 12/30/05, read in parts, .It shall be the policy and procedure of [Name of Facility] that all new residents .will receive a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST). This testing will be completed within 30 days of admission to .this facility .The TST will be separated by at least 1-3 weeks. Results of the TST will be read within 48-72 hours from the time of administration . 1. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. A Clinical Immunizations documented Resident #55 was administered a TB test on 07/26/23, and documented results were pending. On 08/24/23 at 10:00 a.m., the Corporate Nurse was asked what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccination for four (#55, 21, 3, and #7) of five sampled residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility, and 10 residents had received the pneumococcal vaccination. Findings: A Influenza and Pneumococcal Disease Prevention policy, revised January 2018, read in part, .Residents should be offered a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the CDC recommended immunizations schedule . 1. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. The clinical health record did not document Resident #55 had been assessed and offered the pneumococcal immunization. 2. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included type two diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular disease. The clinical health record did not document Resident #21 had been assessed and offered the pneumococcal immunization. 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccination for five (#55, 56, 21, 3, and #7) of five sampled residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A COVID-19 Vaccine policy, dated 04/08/22, read in parts .COVID-19 Vaccinations and boosters will be offered to .all Residents .The Information to be Documented .Resident or Representative was provided education .Resident/Representative Consented to the Vaccine Which Vaccine was Administered .Which Dose was Administered .Date of Vaccination .If no, reason for Refusal .Contraindication .refusal . 1. Resident #55 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation. The clinical health record did not document Resident #55 had been offered the COVID-19 vaccination. 2. Resident #56 had diagnoses which included type one diabetes mellitus, systolic congestive heart failure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light system for two (#5 and #4) of sixteen sampled residents reviewed for a functioning call light system. The Resident Census and Condittion of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Safe Environment policy, read in part .The facility will be adequately equipped to allow resident to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from toilet and bathing facilities . 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included, muscle wasting and atrophy, paralytic gait, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 08/15/23, documented the resident had no cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. On 08/23/23 at 07:58 a.m., Resident #5 triggered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a staff education plan for six (CNA #1, CNA #4, CNA #5 ,CNA #7, the CDM, and the Administrator) of six sampled employees for staff education. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Staff Education Plan policy, undated, read in parts, .it is the policy of the facility to provide a staff education plan in accordance with state and federal regulations .The facility will develop, implement, and maintain a written staff education plan .The facility will ensure the staff education plan includes both pre-service and annual requirements .The staff education plan shall ensure that education is conducted annually for all facility employees, at a minimum, in the following areas; a. Prevention and control of infection, b. Fire prevention, emergency procedures - life, safety, and disaster preparedness, c. Abuse, neglect, and exploitation d. Accident prevention and safety awareness programs e. Resident rights to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor the resident's choice of bathing for one (#18) on one sampled resident reviewed for preference of bathing. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #18 had diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure, morbid/severe obesity, diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, and depression. An Annual Assessment, dated 11/18/22, documented Resident #18 was cognitively intact, participated in the assessment, and preference to choose clothing, care of personal belongings and to choose the type of bathing was very important. An ADL care plan, last revised on 11/30/21, read in parts, .ADL self care performance deficit .bathing/showering .able to bathe self with limited assist .provide sponge bath when a full bath or shower not tolerated .transfers .independently .requires limited assist from 1 staff member at times . Documentation was provided to support Resident #18 had been bathed. The documentation did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have information posted through out the facility on how to file a grievance, who the contact person was and have grievance forms readily available for residents or representatives to obtain. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility Findings: An undated, Grievance Program policy, read in parts, .Right to file Grievances: residents and visitors have the right to present grievances on behalf of himself or herself or others to the staff or administrator of the facility whether verbally or in writing .Grievance forms will be sporadically placed in easy to find locations in the facility such as nurses' station, Social Service office, to encourage independent usage unless assistance is requested . The Activities Director provided five grievances, dated 04/17/23, out of their grievance book that they had received from Residents. Resident #101 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, COPD, hypertension, GERD, and anxiety. On 08/29/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment, maintain comprehensive care plans to include personal interventions, and follow physician order for a psychology referral for one (#14) of two sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 37 residents resided in the facility, 18 residents had behavioral healthcare needs, and none of the 18 residents had an individualized care plan to support the resident. Findings: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility, on 05/20/23, with diagnoses to include dementia with psychotic disturbance, cerebral vascular disease, tobacco use, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, alcohol dependence, and bipolar disorder. Physician Orders, dated 05/20/23, documented Resident #14 was to be administered Chlorpromazine HCl [Thorazine] 50 mg two times a day, and 100 mg at bedtime for dementia with psychotic disturbance. A Progress Note, dated 05/20/23 at 4:30 p.m., read in parts, .Received a call from [local police…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$211,014 in federal fines across 11 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $14,508 — penalty dated 2025-04-18
- $66,436 — penalty dated 2024-09-17
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- $93,374 — penalty dated 2023-08-30
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-11 for 106 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KILGORE, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 01/26/2024 |
| 2316WM LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2017 |
| KILGORE FAMILY TRUST-2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2017 |
| KTFW-OK, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2017 |
| CHILDREE, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/02/2023 |
| COOPER, DREW | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $15K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375253. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.