North County Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 53.3 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-17 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 03/12/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were discharged with proper notice. On 03/06/25 Resident #1 returned to the facility after an overnight stay with family. Resident #1 was informed they were no longer a resident of the facility and were not allowed to return to the facility. On 03/12/25 at 5:57 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation related to a resident who was not allowed to return to the facility after an overnight stay with family. On 3/12/25 at 6:05 p.m., the DON and the corporate regional administrator were notified of the IJ situation and were asked to provide a plan of removal. On 03/13/25 at 2:35 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, North County Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal for Failure to Ensure Residents Are Not discharged Without Proper Notice An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to initiate fall interventions, to reduce the risk of a fall with major injury, for one (#23) of five residents sampled for falls. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, form documented 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Fall Prevention Program policy, dated 2022, documented in parts, .Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls .The nurse will indicate on the (specify location) the resident's fall risk and initiate interventions on the resident's baseline care plan, in accordance with the resident's level of risk .Each resident's risk factors and environmental hazards will be evaluated when developing the resident's comprehensive plan of care .interventions will be monitored for effectiveness . The plan of care will be revised as needed .When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will .document all assessments and actions . Resident #23 had diagnoses which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices between residents while administering medications for 3 (#9, 17, and #23) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON identified 43 residents were administered medications by facility staff.Findings:On 08/05/25 at 3:53 p.m. CMA #1 was observed going to their medication cart and preparing medications for Res #23. CMA #1 did not sanitize or wash their hands prior to preparing the medications. CMA #1 was then observed taking the plastic cup that contained Res #23's medication, hydrocodone/acetaminophen (pain medication) 7.5 mg / 325 mg tablet and handing it to Res. #23. Res #23 was observed placing the cup to their mouth and taking the medication. The resident was then observed returning the empty medication cup to CMA #1. On 08/05/25 at 3:57 p.m. CMA #1 was observed going to their medication cart and preparing medications for Res #17 directly after returning from administering medications to Res #23. CMA #1 did not sanitize or wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antipsychotic medication was not prescribed for the diagnosis of dementia for 1 (#25) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified five residents were prescribed antipsychotic medications.Findings:A facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated April 2007, read in part, Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective.A medication administration record for Res #25, dated 08/01/25 through 08/31/25, showed the resident had been prescribed Seroquel (an antipsychotic) 25mg tablets once in the morning and once at bedtime for unspecified dementia with unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances and anxiety. The record showed the resident had been administered the medication twice each day on 08/01/25, 08/02/25, 08/03/25, 08/04/25, and one dose on 08/05/25.On 08/05/25 at 11:49 a.m., CMA #3 was asked if they knew the reason Res #25 was being administered Seroquel. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an MDS discharge assessment record was transmitted in the required timeframe for 1 (#1) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments.The DON identified 44 residents required MDS assessments to be completed at the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS, dated [DATE], read in part, All MDS assessments (eg. [for example], admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc. [et cetera]) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded into our facility's MDS information system and transmitted to CMS' QIES [Quality Improvement and Evaluation System] Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations governing the transmission of MDS data.An undated Transfer/Discharge Report, for Res #1 showed the resident had been discharged from the facility on 03/01/25.On 08/05/25 at 10:33 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were not misappropriated for three (#4, 7, and #8) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for misappropriation. The DON identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Controlled Substances policy, dated April 2019, read in part, .Controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift . The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, dated April 2021, read in part, .Residents have the right to be free from .misappropriation of resident property . 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included abnormal posture and weakness. Form 283, incident date 06/10/24, read in parts, .DON was notified that LTC resident has a missing narcotic of Hydrocodone 5-325 mg tab qty of 60 are unaccounted for. Medication was delivered on 6/5/24 by pharmacy; the total quantity delivered was 112 tabs. #1 card of 52 tabs is in facility in the med cart. On 6/9/24 the nurse on duty contacted the MD for an order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for three (#31, 45, and #246) of 12 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 41 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #31 had diagnoses which included osteomyelitis, stage four pressure ulcer to the left heel, a stage three pressure ulcer to the right heel, diabetes, hypertension, and anxiety. Res #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The care plan, dated 01/04/24, documented a baseline care plan had been completed six days after admission. On 04/03/24 at 9:19 a.m., the care plan coordinator reviewed the resident's care plan and stated the baseline care plan was completed late. The coordinator stated they completed the baseline care plan upon returning to work. 2. Res #45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, hypertension, and dementia. The resident's EHR documented a baseline care plan which had been initiated on 02/13/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include the use of bed rails for four (#16, 23, 146, and #246) of four sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON stated 17 residents at the facility used bed rails. Findings: A policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 03/2022, read in part The comprehensive, person-centered care plan .described the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .and reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 1. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included primary osteoarthritis. A physician's order, dated 11/21/23, documented the resident was allowed to use therapeutic devices as needed to assist with positioning changes. On 04/03/24 at 12:40 p.m., Resident #16 was observed to have an assist bar attached to the left side of their bed. A review of the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to attempt alternative interventions prior to the use of bed side rails for three (#16, 23, and #146) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards and failed to assess resident's risk of entrapment prior to use of bed side rails for two (#16 and #146) of three sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. The DON stated 17 residents at the facility used bed rails. Findings: A policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated 08/2022, read in part, Prior to the installation or use of a side or bed rail, alternatives to the use of side of bed rails are attempted. The policy also documented that after alternatives were concluded to be ineffective the resident would be assessed for their risk associated with the use of bed side rails. 1. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included chronic pain and primary osteoarthritis. An MDS quarterly assessment, dated 02/27/24, documented the resident's cognition was severly impaired. A review of the resident's chart did not find documentation of the attempt to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete required nurse aide yearly performance reviews for two (CNA #2 and CNA #4 ) whose employee files were reviewed for competencies. The DON identified 13 nurse aides currently employed by the facility. Findings: The employee file for CNA #2 documented the last skills performance was completed on 09/22/22. The employee file for CNA #4 documented the last skills performance was completed on 09/22/22. On 04/04/24 at 11:34 a.m., the DON reviewed the skills performance checklists provided for two CNAs currently working for the facility. The DON stated to their knowledge no skills performance checks had been completed for the year 2023 for current CNAs. The DON stated they were not aware of the requirement.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of infections: a) for resident #10 during catheter care, b) for resident #21 during incontinent care, and c) implement a water treatment program for the prevention of Legionella. The administrator identifed five residents with a catheter/receive incontinent care. Findings: A handwashing/hand hygiene policy documented .2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 3. Hand hygiene products and supplies (sinks, soap, towels, alcohol-based had rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies . A policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary documented .Steps in the Procedure .2. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly .5. Put on gloves .11. With non-dominant hand .retract the foreskin of the uncircumcised male resident. Maintain the position of this hand throughout the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advanced directives for two (#4 and #7) of two sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The DON identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #4 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease - stage 3, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The resident's clinical records did not document the resident and/or their representative was offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive. 2. Res #7 had diagnoses which included embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein, edema, hypokalemia, and cerebral fluid drainage. The resident's clinical records did not document resident and/or their representative were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive. On 04/01/24 at 10:46 a.m., the social service director stated the facility would starting scanning all advanced directives offered to the resident and/or representative whether they were accepted or refused to show they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,641 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $17,641 — penalty dated 2025-03-17
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-27 for 50 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK