Forrest Manor Nursing Center
1410 North Choctaw, Dewey, OK 74029 · For profit - Individual · 116 certified beds · (918) 534-3355 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 32.1% | 13.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 3.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.5% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 37.5% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.2% | 25.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.4% | 17.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.8% | 17.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.31 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.48 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.0–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0640 — widespreadEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to transmit MDS assessment data to CMS in the required timeframe for six (#13, 17, 26, 29, 37, and #51) of 20 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator identified 61 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, dated 2001, read in part, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. A facility MDS 3.0 Assessment Summary Report, was provided to the survey team on 09/10/24. The report documented quarterly assessments for six residents had been submitted to CMS beyond the required timeframe. The late assessments were: 1. Resident #13's quarterly assessment, completion date 07/17/24, had a transmit by date of 07/31/24. The transmitted date was documented as 08/29/24; 2. Resident #17's quarterly assessment, completion date 07/15/24, had a transmit by date of 07/29/29. The transmitted date was documented as 08/22/24; 3. Resident #26's quarterly assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employee a full time DON. The administrator identified 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Nursing Services - Staffing , documented the facility would maintain a full time licensed RN or LPN as the director of nursing. On 09/08/24 at 8:51 a.m., the BOM stated the facility did not have a full time DON. They stated the DON had quit their position about three weeks prior to the survey. They stated the organization was actively advertising for a new DON. On 09/08/24 at 9:40 a.m., the administrator provide a letter that stated the former DON had resigned suddenly via text message on 08/26/24. They stated they were advertising for a new DON. They stated they had not assigned the DON's duties to another RN since the former DON had resigned.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide direct care staff information to CMS in the required time frame. The administrator identified 61 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A PBJ report for the third quarter of 2024 documented direct care staffing data had not been received by CMS. On 09/10/24 at 7:40 a.m., the BOM stated the facility administrator was responsible for sending the staffing data to employee #1 who worked at corporate headquarters. They stated employee #1 was the person who sent the data to CMS. On 09/10/24 at 10:55 a.m., the administrator stated employee #1 was responsible for sending the staffing data to CMS. On 09/10/24 at 11:05 a.m., Employee #1 stated they had sent the data to CMS, but did not have the documentation to prove it. On 09/10/24 at 11:17 a.m., the administrator stated they were aware of the time frame for turning in the staffing data to CMS and they believed they had done so timely. They stated the problem may be that their company used standard calendar based quarters while the government did not.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an opportunity for a resident to create an advance directive for two (#9 and #50) of three sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. A facility census list, dated 09/08/24, documented 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility face sheet, dated 06/13/19, documented Resident #9 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation the resident was given an opportunity to create an advance directive. On 09/10/24 at 1:51 p.m., the ADON stated they had reviewed Resident #9's records and had not found documentation they had been provided the opportunity to create an advance directive. On 09/10/14 at 1:55 p.m. Resident #9 stated they did not recall talking to anyone about an advance directive. On 09/10/24 at 2:17 p.m., the BOM stated they had searched the resident's records that had been thinned from the chart and did not find documentation regarding an advance directive. On 09/11/24 at 10:15 a.m. the ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dietary interventions as ordered by the physician and/or documented in the plan of care for two (#19 and #50) of two sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for nutrition. A facility census list, dated 09/08/24, documented 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #19 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The care plan, updated 05/09/24, documented the resident had the potential for alteration in nutrition status related to end stage renal disease. The facility interventions were to encourage the resident to follow the diet as planned and ordered by the physician, monitor weight, educate on diet, monitor appetite, diet consultant to monitor diet monthly, monitor labs and report results to physician, administer medications as ordered, and provide low sodium diet. It was documented the resident was on a regular renal diet with low sodium. The facility interventions were to serve the diet as ordered and offer substitutions if less than 75% was eaten,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a post dialysis assessment for one (#19) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for dialysis. The ADON identified one resident who required dialysis. Findings: Resident #19 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The August 2024 monthly physician's orders documented the resident was to attend dialysis three times a week. The pre/post dialysis communication reports, dated 08/02/24, 08/05/24, 08/07/24, 08/09/24, 08/19/24, 08/21/24, 08/23/24, 08/26/24, 08/28/24, 08/30/24, 09/02/24, 09/04/24, 09/06/24, and 09/09/24, documented the pre-dialysis assessment and the section for communication from the dialysis unit were completed, but there was no documentation of a post dialysis assessment on the form. On 09/11/24 at 11:19 a.m., RN #1 stated the post dialysis assessment included checking the resident's weight, vital signs, dialysis site, and bruit. They stated the dialysis pre/post assessments were kept in a dialysis log book which traveled with the resident to dialysis and back to aide with communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure GDR requests were attemped and/or addressed by the physician for two (#37, and #49) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A Consultant Pharmacist Activity Report dated 09/11/24 documented 48 residents were receiving psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Resident #37 had diagnoses which included PTSD and major depressive disorder. A physician's order, dated 03/16/23, documented Resident #37 was to receive 150 mg of venlafaxine xr (antidepressant medication) by mouth every day. A physician's order, dated 03/16/23, documented Resident #37 was to receive 30 mg of mirtazapine (antidepressant medication) by mouth at bedtime. A physician's order, dated 04/05/23, documented the resident was to receive 10 mg of buspirone (antianxiety medication) by mouth three times a day. A quarterly assessment, dated 6/14/24, documented Resident #37 had routinely received antidepressant medications and an antianxiety medication. A review of Resident #37's medical records did not document any GRD's had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received an antipsychotic medication had an appropriate diagnosis/indication for the use of the medication for one (#49) and failed to ensure a PRN psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days for one (#42) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A Consultant Pharmacist Activity Report dated 09/11/24 documented 48 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included anxiety. A Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician, dated 08/29/24, read in part, PRN Psychotropics: 14 day limitation on all PRN orders. The orders may be extended beyond 14 days if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner: 1.) Believes it is appropriate to extend the order 2.) Documents clinical rationale for the extension 3.) Provides a specific duration. The document provided a section for a practitioner to provide a rationale and signature. The form did not have a rationale or physician's signature. A September 2024 MAR documented an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician and/or documented in the plan of care for two (#19 and #50) of two sampled residents whose diets were reviewed. A facility census list, dated 09/08/24, documented 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #19 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The care plan, updated 05/09/24, documented the resident had the potential for alteration in nutrition status related to end stage renal disease. The facility interventions were to encourage the resident to follow the diet as planned and ordered by the physician, monitor weight, educate on diet, monitor appetite, diet consultant to monitor diet monthly, monitor labs and report results to physician, administer medications as ordered, and provide low sodium diet. It was documented the resident was on a regular renal diet with low sodium. The facility interventions were to serve the diet as ordered and offer substitutions if less than 75% was eaten, monitor/discuss food preferences,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. update the dietary menu, b. offer nutritionally equivalent alternatives to planned meals, and c. have a RD review the menus for nutritional adequacy. The DM identified 61 residents who ate meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 09/10/24 at 11:05 a.m., the extended menus were requested from the DM. The DM stated they were new to the position and did not know where to find the extended menu. They stated they received the week's menu from the BOM. On 09/10/24 at 12:35 p.m., the BOM and DM located the extended menu on a small flat bar above the steam table. The extended menu cover was dated November 2022. On 09/10/24 at 12:35 p.m., the BOM stated the residents complained they were continually receiving the same meals. The BOM stated they requested current menus from the company representatives, but never received the new menus. The BOM stated they started creating the weekly menus and/or substitutions the facility used based on the November 2022 menu and meals the residents requested. The BOM stated the old menus were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: a. follow standards of practice in meal service; b. serve meals in a sanitary manner; and c. utilize professional grade equipment in the kitchen. The BOM identified 61 residents who ate meals prepared and served in the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 09/08/24 at 8:20 a.m., observations were made in the kitchen. The hand washing sink was located in the corner of the kitchen and was blocked by a mop, bucket, and a covered trash can. Above the hand washing sink was a rack with cooking utensils hanging downward from the edge of a rack, blocking access to the hand washing sink. On 09/08/24 at 8:25 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to plate food for multiple residents with their gloved hands including grabbing and splitting biscuits before placing the biscuit on the plate, reaching into the steam table pans and grabbing bacon, fried eggs, toast, and pancakes with their gloved hands. The cook did not change gloves between food items or residents. The cook was observed to touch the pre-printed resident diet cards, the plates, trays, counter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure code status was clearly identified in residents' medical records for two (#9 and #18) of twenty four sampled residents whose medical records were reviewed. A facility census list, dated [DATE], documented 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease and chest pain. Resident #9's medical record was reviewed. A sticker attached to the outside of the hard chart read, DNR [do not resuscitate]. A second sticker attached to the outside of the hard chart read, Full Code [which means to provide life saving measures]. An Oklahoma Do-Not -Rescucitate (DNR) Consent Form, dated [DATE], was found inside the resident's medical record and documented they wanted to a DNR code status. On [DATE] at 8:10 a.m., the ADON stated the sticker which identified the resident as a full code should have been removed once the DNR form had been signed. They stated they did have a policy and procedure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to consistently monitor for trends related to infectious disease. The ADON identified the census was 61. Findings: A policy titled Forrest Manor Nursing Facility Infection Control Policy and Procedure, updated 05/23/22, read in part, .Facility has established an infection control program under which it .Investigates, controls and prevents infections in the facility . A review of the facilities infection surveillance documentation for 2024 did not document the facility had been tracking infectious disease or looking for trends related to infectious diseases for 01/24, 02/24 or 03/24. On 09/11/24 at 12:34 p.m., the ADON stated there were was no documentation infection surveillance could be located for 01/24, 02/24, or 03/24.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safe to self-administer medication for one (#204) of one sampled resident reviewed for self-administering medications. The ADON identified one resident that self-administered medications. Findings: An undated policy titled Right to Self-Administer Medications read in part, .Each resident has the right to self-administration of drugs unless the interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be a danger to the resident or others .The attached form will be completed and kept in the resident's medical record .the interdisciplinary team must assess the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out the responsibility . Physician orders, dated 08/09/24, documented Resident #204 was to receive albuterol 3 mg/ipratropium 0.5 mg (bronchodilator medication) via nebulizer four times a day and it could be kept at bedside; and tiotropium bromide (anticholinergic medication) 2.5 mcg two inhalations once a day and it could be kept at bedside. On 09/11/24 at 12:34 p.m., the ADON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a CMS-10123 form to a resident who discharged from part Medicare Part A services for one (#50) of three sampled residents reviewed for required paperwork related to discharging from Medicare Part A services. The BOM stated six resident had discharged from Medicare Part A services in the previous six months to the survey. Findings: An undated CMS-10123 form, documented Resident #50's coverage for Medicare Part A services would end on 06/14/24. The form was not signed. On 09/09/24 at 1:31 p.m., the BOM stated they had forgot to provide Resident #50 a CMS-10123 form for Medicare Part A services which Resident #50 discharged from on 06/14/24.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for one (#203) of five sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The ADON identifed 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #203 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and hypertension. There was no documentation a baseline care plan had been completed. On 09/12/24 at 10:21 a.m., RN #1 stated they did not complete Resident #203's admission. They stated they did not know if a baseline care plan was completed. On 09/11/24 at 12:34 pm, the ADON stated a baseline care plan for resident #203 was not located.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (#203) of five sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The ADON identified 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #203 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and hypertension. There was no documentation a comprehensive care plan was completed for the resident. On 09/11/24 at 12:34 p.m., the ADON stated a care plan for resident #203 was not completed.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to care plan the use of bedrails for one (#42) of three sampled resident reviewed for accidents. The ADON identified 10 residents had some form of bed rail attached to their beds. Findings: A care plan, dated 05/23/24, did not include a problem, goal, or intervention regarding the safe use of bedrails. On 09/11/24 at 12:38 p.m., Resident #42's assigned bed was observed to have a full side rail attached to each side. On 09/11/24 at 12:46 p.m., CNA #2 stated Resident #42 had used a bed with bedrails for about six months. On 09/11/24 at 1:39 p.m., the ADON stated they had reviewed Resident #42's current care plan. They stated the resident's use of bedrails was not care planned. They stated the bedrails should have been care planned.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for one (#50) of two sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for ADL care for dependent residents. A facility census list, dated 09/08/24, documented 61 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/08/24 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #50 was observed in bed. The resident's hair was long and appeared tangled and greasy. On 09/08/24 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #50 stated they were scheduled for two showers per week, but only received one a week. The resident stated they usually did not receive their shower scheduled for the weekend. The resident's clinical record was reviewed and documented they were scheduled to receive showers on Wednesdays and Saturdays. There was no documentation the resident was offered/received showers on 08/10/24, 08/17/24, 08/24/24, or 08/31/24 (all Saturdays). On 09/11/24 at 9:00 a.m., the ADON stated there should be a shower sheet filled out even if the resident refused. The ADON stated they needed to educate the weekend staff on ADL care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a care plan intervention for contracted hands of one (#6) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for the presence of contractures. The ADON identified five residents had contractures. Findings: A care plan problem for bilateral contracted hands, updated 06/04/24, documented the resident was to have contracture cushions or rolled rags in their hand if possible. On 09/08/24 at 12:32 p.m., Resident #6 was observed sitting in the dining room. Both of their hands appeared to be contracted. Neither hand had a device or material to protect and support their contracted hands. On 09/10/24 at 7:33 a.m., Resident #6 was observed in their room watching television. Both hands of the resident appeared contracted. There was nothing in either hand to protect or support the hands. On 09/10/24 at 1:56 p.m., RN #1 stated Resident #6 did have two contracted hands. On 09/11/24 at 11:12 a.m., CNA #1 stated the staff sometimes put rags in Resident #6's hands. They stated the resident did not have anything in their hand at that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to attempt alternatives to the use of bed rails and obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails prior to their use for one (#42) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The ADON identified 10 residents at the facility had some form of bed rail attached to their beds. Findings: A facility Bed Safety policy, dated 12/2007, read in part, If side rails are used, there shall be an interdisciplinary assessment of the resident, consultation of the Attending Physician, and input from the resident and/or legal representative. The policy further reads, The staff shall obtain consent for the use of side rails from the resident or the resident's legal representative prior to their use. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and atherosclerosis. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/16/24, documented Resident #42's cognition was severely impaired. On 09/11/24 at 12:38 p.m., Resident #42 was observed to have bedrails attached to both sides of their bed. At 12:46 p.m., CNA #2 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to culture a urine sample prior to prescribing and administering an antibiotic for one (#9) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for the use of antibiotics. The ADON identified 17 residents who had been prescribed antibiotics in the past 90 days. Findings: A laboratory report documentated a sample of Resident #9's urine was collected on 07/10/24. The report documented an abnormal finding including high nitrate and white blood cell levels. The report also documented a note that stated a culture of the urine was indicated, but had not been ordered. On the bottom of the first page of the laboratory report was a hand written note which documented, Macrobid [antibiotic medication] 100 mg BID X 7 days. The hand written entry was noted by RN #1 on 07/16/24. A July 2024 MAR documented the resident had been administered Macrobid 100 mg orally for seven days starting on 07/16/24. On 09/09/24 at 7:36 a.m., Resident #9 stated they were taking an antibiotic medication. On 09/10/24 at 8:27 a.m., the ADON stated the resident was no longer being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to inspect the bed and bedrails of a resident prior to the use of bedrails for one (#42) of three sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. The ADON identified 10 residents at the facility had some form of bed rail attached to their beds. Findings: A facility Bed Safety policy, dated 12/2007, read in part, To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories) the facility shall promote the following : a. Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. On 09/11/24 at 12:38 p.m., Resident #42's assigned bed was observed to have a full side rail attached to each side. On 09/11/24 at 12:41 p.m., CNA #2 stated Resident #42 did have full bedrails on their bed. They stated the resident was moved to their currently assigned room about six months prior to the survey. They stated the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were offered, with education provided, to three (#22, 24, and #38) of four residents sampled for advance directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/28/23, identified 66 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #22 was admitted with diagnoses which included diabetes type two. Review of the clinical record for Resident #22, revealed an advance directive acknowledgement form was not in the clinical record. On 06/29/23 at 10:03 a.m., the DON and the BOM were asked where the advance directive acknowledgement was for Resident #22. They stated Resident #22 did not have one if it was not in the clinical record. The BOM stated the acknowledgement was in the admission packet and was offered and explained to the resident and resident representative on admission, however, the representative did not sign the acknowledgement. 2. Resident #24 was admitted with diagnoses which included dementia. Review of the clinical record for Resident #24, revealed an advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide advance notice of discharge from Medicare skilled services for three (#23, 27, and #38) of three residents who were reviewed for beneficiary notification. The BOM identified five residents who receive Medicare Part A services. Findings: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 01/08/23. Resident #23 was discharged from skilled services on 05/24/23. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, revealed the facility/provider had initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. The form documented a SNF ABN was not completed and provided to Resident #23. The form documented the facility was not using the SNF ABN form. The form documented Resident #23 received a NOMNC. Resident #23 remained at the facility and received long term care. 2. Resident #27 was admitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 12/8/22. Resident #27 was discharged from skilled services on 01/11/23. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidification bottles were changed for one (#30) of one resident sampled for oxygen services. The DON identified 14 residents who received oxygen services resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #30 was admitted with diagnoses which included emphysema. On 06/27/23 at 4:00 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in the east dining room. Resident #30 was observed to be using oxygen at one liter per minute via a nasal cannula. The tubing and humidification bottle were observed to be undated. On 06/29/23 at 08:45 a.m., Resident #30 was observed to have an oxygen concentrator in their room. The humidification bottle was observed to have one third of a cup of water and was undated. The oxygen tubing was observed to be undated. On 06/29/23 at 1:51 p.m., LPN #1 was asked what the policy and procedure was for oxygen and humidification bottles. They stated it was the responsibility of the night nurse to change and date them every other week. LPN #1 was asked where the task of changing the tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was not prescribed on an as needed basis for greater than 14 days without a physician's documented rationale, for one (#38) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The, Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented 70 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: Resident #38 had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, unspecified. A Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician form, dated 04/18/23, documented the physician should document a rationale for the PRN use of Valium 5 mg if it was to be used beyond 14 days. The form documented the physician's response as, 90 days. A Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician form, dated 05/17/23, documented the resident's current PRN Valium order must have a rationale and duration for continued use beyond 14 days. The physician's documented response on the form was, 90 days. There was no documentation of a rationale for the extended PRN use of the Valium. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure unpasturized eggs were not served in a manner to prevent foodborne illness and to maintain a clean and sanitary ice machine. The DON identified 65 residents who received medications and meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 06/27/23 at 11:45a.m., observation of refrigerator #3 revealed a box of unpasturized eggs. The dietary manager was asked if they prepare eggs with runny yolks for residents. They stated, yes when a resident request it. The manager was asked if the eggs used for the residents were pasturized. They looked at the box of eggs and stated No. On 06/29/23 at 3:30p.m., the ice machine was observed with the maintenance supervisor. When the plastic deflector sheild was wiped with a white paper towel it revealed a a black and brown substance. The maintenance superviors was asked what the substance was. They stated it was dirt and mold. When asked how often the ice machine was cleaned they stated, it was cleaned by maintenance staff monthly and a service company quarterly. Review of the cleaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit data to the PBJ staffing information for the third quarter of 2022. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/28/23, identified 66 residents resided at the facility. Findings: The PBJ Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705D FY Quarter 3 2022 (April 1 - June 30) document, run dated 06/26/23, documented the facility had not submitted PBJ staffing data for that quarter. On 06/30/23 at 9:22 a.m., the CBOM #1 was asked if it was their responsibility to submit PBJ data. They stated it was. CBOM #1 was asked if the data had been submitted for the second quarter of 2022. CP #1 stated they were unsure but would go into the system and check. CBOM #1 then stated they were unable to access the system with their current password and they were working with someone to gain access.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was conducted: a. when passing meal trays during the noon meal, and b. when administering medications to two (#25 and #51) of three residents observed during medication administration. The DON identified 65 residents who received medications and meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 06/28/23 at 12:25 p.m., the meal cart was taken to hall 100. CNA #1 was not observed to wash/sanitize their hands. CNA #1 was observed to obtain a meal tray from the cart and enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #1 was observed to assist the resident to a sitting position on the side of the bed, unwrap the silverware from the napkin, and cut food on the plate. On 06/28/23 at 12:27 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to obtain another meal tray and enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #1 was not observed to wash/sanitize their hands. On 06/28/23 at 12:28 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to obtain another meal tray and enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #1 was not observed to wash/sanitize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-12-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed to ensure the resident's bed/chair alarms were not a restraint and/or did not cause agitation for two (#9 and #52 ) of two residents reviewed for bed/chair alarms. The director of nursing documented there were four residents in the facility with bed/chair alarms. Findings: 1. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. A telephone order, dated 08/15/19, documented an order for a clip alarm due to the increased risk for falls. An admission assessment, dated 08/23/19, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making, required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living, had no falls, and used a bed/chair alarm daily. A care plan, dated 09/02/19, documented: Problem The resident was at risk for falls/injury related to weakness, cognitive impairment, behaviors, and anxiety. Goal The resident's dignity would be maintained and no un-addressed falls/injury would occur over the next 90…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was fully developed for one (#52) of 16 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified there were 58 residents in the facility. Findings: Resident #52 was admitted with diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia and history of falling. An annual assessment, dated 10/31/19, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required the extensive assistance of one staff for most activities of daily living, used a wheelchair for mobility, had one fall with a major injury, had two falls with no injury, and had a bed and chair alarm. A care plan, dated 11/27/19, was reviewed and there was no care plan in place for bed and chair alarms. On 12/09/19 at 8:20 a.m., the resident was observed in her wheelchair being wheeled by a staff member to the dining room. On 12/12/19 at 1:28 p.m., the director of nursing was asked if the pressure alarms had been care planned. She stated she did not know.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure cross contamination did not occur during incontinent care for one (#109) of one sampled resident reviewed for incontinent care. The director of nursing identified four residents in the facility who were incontinent of both bowel and bladder. Findings: Resident #109 had diagnoses which included dementia. A quarterly assessment, dated 10/23/19, documented the resident was severely impaired cognitively, required total assistance with activities of daily living, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 12/09/19 at 2:19 p.m., the resident was observed in bed with her eyes closed. On 12/12/19 at 9:55 a.m., certified nurse assistant #3 was observed providing peri-care for the resident. The certified nurse assistant washed her hands and put gloves on and then cleaned the resident's buttocks, which contained feces. The certified nurse assistant cleaned the area and did not remove her gloves or wash her hands. She used her soiled gloves to open a small individual container of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCCASKILL, DONALD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 100% | since 05/12/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $567K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375501. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.