The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 33.1 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.546 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 02/01/24 an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents who had fallen had interventions in place to prevent the recurrence of falls. The facility failed to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and modify the care plan with each fall. The facility failed to conduct a root cause analysis and/or evaluate the cause for each fall. The facility did not have a fall prevention program, nor have the staff received education regarding falls and fall prevention in the last 12 months. Res #36 had 26 falls from 05/17/23 to 01/27/24. Res #36 had 19 falls prior to sustaining a left hip fracture on 11/19/23 and six falls after sustaining the fracture. 13 of the 26 falls did not have updated interventions to help prevent future falls. On 02/01/24 at 4:52 p.m., the OSDH verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 02/01/24 at 5:00 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 02/01/24 at 8:04 p.m., the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the advanced and planned menu was available for review for 32 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. A revised facility policy titled Menus dated October 2017, read in part, 2. Menus for regular and therapeutic diets are written at least two (2) weeks in advance, and are dated and posted in the kitchen at least one (1) week in advance.11. Copies of menus are posted in at least two (2) resident areas, in positions and in print large enough for residents to read them. On 06/17/25 at 11:39 a.m., it was observed no weekly menus were posted for resident to review. On 06/18/25 at 9:08 a.m., the dietary manager stated according to company policy the menu's were supposed to be posted in places throughout the building for residents to review. On 06/17/25 at 11:27 a.m., the dietary manger stated they did not have to post rotating schedules with the dates. On 06/18/25 at 9:04 a.m., Resident #1 stated, I have never seen menus posted.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer the 2024 influenza vaccine and the pneumococcal vaccine for 1 (#27) of 5 residents whose records were reviewed for immunizations. The facility's policy Influenza Vaccine, dated March 2022, and the facility's policy Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated October 2023, showed the date of the vaccine, lot number, expiration date, person administering, and the site of vaccination were documented in the resident's medical record. Resident #27's immunization record was missing their 2024 influenza and their pneumoccocal immunization. On 06/19/25 at 12:25 p.m., the infection preventionist stated there was no documentation of Resident #27 receiving their 2024 influenza or their pneumococcal immunization.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and ensure background checks were completed for new hires. The administrator identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse Prohibition/Unusual Occurrence Policy and Procedure policy, undated, read in part, .Screening All potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents as defined by the applicable requirements .Nursing Home will obtain OSBI checks, attempt to obtain information from prior employers, current employers and licensing boards and registries . The Employee Seniority Report, dated 01/30/24, documented the following: a. CNA #1 was hired on 02/11/23. b. DA #1 was hired on 10/27/23. On 02/01/24 at 1530, the Director of Staff Services reported they could not find a criminal background check for CNA #1 or DA #1 and reported neither employee should be working without a criminal background check.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have an effective administration to use it's resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of each resident. The facility failed to ensure: a. to follow their abuse policy and ensure background checks were completed for new hires; b. MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status; c. care plans were updated and revised; d. physician orders were followed; e. supervision was provided to help prevent accidents, falls were thoroughly investigated to determine root causes, fall interventions were modified/revised, and to monitor effectiveness of interventions to prevent falls; f. staff demonstrated competency in skills to care for residents; g. a registered nurse served as the DON; h. required daily staffing information was posted; i. the physician responded to and dated the MRRs; j. significant medication errors did not occur; k. certifications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their Legionnaires prevention policy. The administrator identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Legionella Water Management Program dated September 2022, read in parts, .Our facility is committed to prevent, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella .As part of the infection prevention and control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team .The water management team consists of at least the following personnel: a. The infection preventionist; b. The administrator; c. The medical director (or designee); d. The director of maintenance; and e. The director of environmental services .The purposes of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of Legionnaire's disease . On 02/06/24 at 2:20 p.m., a Legionnaires water management program policy was provided by LPN #1. On 02/06/24 at 2:22 p.m., the plant operations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for three (#1, 6, and #14) of 15 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease, old myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction. A physician order, dated 12/20/23, documented Brilinta (an antiplatelet medication) administer 90 mg BID for MI/CVA prevention. An admission assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident was severly impaired with cognition and required extensive assistance with ADLs. The assessment did not document the resident was receiving an antiplatelet medication. On 02/01/24 at 1:31 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated they missed coding the antiplatelet on the resident's admission MDS. 2. Res #14 had diagnoses which included depression, anxiety disorder, insomnia, and bipolar disorder. A physician order, dated 07/18/23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for two (#10 and #27) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #10 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. A physician order, dated 09/22/23, documented to administer metoprolol tartrate 50 mg BID related to hypertension. The order documented if the systolic was above 160 or the diastolic was above 90 to administer PRN clonidine. A physician order, dated 12/04/23, documented clonidine 0.1 mg to administer three times a day for HTN. A current order was not found for PRN clonidine in the EHR. The January 2024 MAR was reviewed and the following blood pressures were documented: 01/07/24 in the a.m., BP was 167/102, 01/08/24 in the evening, BP was 164/79, 01/09/24 in the evening, BP was 165/93, 01/13/24 in the a.m., BP was 155/92, in the evening BP was 162/89, 01/14/24 in the a.m., BP was 159/97, 01/16/24 in the a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were able to demonstrate competency in skills necessary to care for residents' needs for one (CMA #1) of six staff reviewed for competency skills. The administrator identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The employee file for CMA #1 was reviewed and the certification for CMA #1 expired on [DATE]. The payroll records were reviewed and CMA #1 worked as a CMA 18 days without certification, from [DATE] through [DATE]. A Drug Incident Report dated, [DATE], documented Res #27 received their roommate's 18 morning medications in error which included, Carafate (antacid) 1 gm, Neurontin (anti-convulsant) 600mg, Robaxin (muscle relaxer) 750mg, Norco (opioid) 10mg, dicyclomine (anti-spasmotic for the gastrointestinal system) 20mg, allopurinol (uric acid reducer) 300mg, digoxin (anti-arrhythmic) 125 mcg, ferrous sulfate (iron) 325mg, multivitamin, Paxil (anti-depressant) 20mg, potassium 20mEq, prednisone (steroid) 5mg,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a registered nurse serving as the DON on a full time basis. The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/30/24 at 9:40 a.m., during entrance conference, the administrator stated their DON was an LPN. The administrator stated they had emails where they had contacted the state and was informed an LPN could serve as the DON. The administrator stated they did not have a current waiver for the LPN to serve as the DON. The administrator stated the facility had RN coverage eight hours a day seven days a week. On 02/06/24 at 2:19 p.m., LPN #1 stated they had been employed as the DON of the facility since their start date of 01/16/20.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors did not occur for four (#1, 14, 24, and #27) of six sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The administrator identified 42 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy Diabetes-Clinical Protocol, dated November 2020, read in part, .The Physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. a. The staff will incorporate such parameters into the Medication Administration Record and care plan . 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and bradycardia. A physician order, dated 12/20/23, documented Basaglar KwikPen (insulin glargine) administer 20 units subcutaneously two times a day for diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 12/20/23, documented Lisinopril 20 mg administer one tablet by mouth in the evening for HTN. An admission assessment, dated 12/27/23 documented the resident was severly impaired with cognition and was dependent with ADLs. The assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$15,249 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,249 — penalty dated 2024-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK