No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edmond Health Care Center

39 East 33Rd Street, Edmond, OK 73013 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 109 certified beds · (405) 942-3884 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations$71,283 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $71,283 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-24)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (84%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3224 S Broadway, Ste 112 · (405) 427-4945 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
185 E 33rd St · (405) 348-8328 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3209 S Broadway · (405) 657-2795 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2901 Broadway Ct · (405) 673-8522

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.8%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.3%3.4%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.8%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.6%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.7%17.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.7%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.1%74.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.3%27.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.1%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.752.311.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.002.961.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.0–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.2–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.511.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.15
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
83.8%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 76.5 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 44% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 84% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-05)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 07/31/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to:a. ensure Residents #1 and #2 were free from abuse;b. act on Resident #2's known behavioral patterns; andc. protect Resident #1 from serious harm.Resident #2 with known behavioral patterns was observed by staff to be impaired and suspected of being under the influence of drugs on the night or early morning hours of 07/24/25 with glossy eyes, dilated pupils, talking to themselves and with noted confusion. Resident #2 was documented as entering other resident rooms while suspected of being under the influence of drugs and with impaired decision making. The facility did not implement interventions. The following night the resident was observed to be speaking to themself using profane language in the hallway after returning from the community and subsequently sexually assaulted (raped) Resident #1 on the early hours of 07/25/25. These failures put all residents at risk of serious harm. An admission resident assessment, dated 06/04/25, showed Resident #2's cognition was intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 03/21/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, intervene, and evaluate a resident in accordance with physician's orders and professional standards of practice for Resident #2. On 03/21/25 at 10:21 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 03/21/25 at 1:45 p.m., the administrator, DON, and the director of clinical services were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On 3/24/25 at 1:55 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Edmond healthcare Center Plan of Removal Immediate Jeopardy 03/21/25. The facility's response to the IJ called for the facility to implement a plan of removal to ensure there is a system in place to assess, intervene and evaluate to receive appropriate care and treatment. The facility will be in compliance on 3/21/25 by 10:00 p.m. 1. All staff are educated on reviewing and following physician orders for a change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 03/18/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to supervise a resident with a known history of suicide attempt from access to a box cutter for Resident #4. On 03/18/25 at 5:23 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 03/18/25 at 5:28 p.m., the administrator and the chief nursing officer were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On 3/20/25 at 9:37 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Edmond healthcare Center Plan of Removal Immediate Jeopardy 03/18/25. The facility's response to the IJ called for the facility to implement a plan of removal to ensure there is a system in place to protect residents. 1. In-service will be completed with all staff by 10:00 p.m. on 3/18/25 over the following: a. Suicide Precautions Policy b. Supervision of residents exhibiting signs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-08-04 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a mental health disorder and observed a traumatic event at the facility [NAME]. a care plan developed that thoroughly described the distress from a person-centered perspective; andb. appropriate interventions in place to address the trauma the resident experienced for 1 (#4) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The BOM identified 78 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 07/30/25 at 9:13 a.m., Resident #4 was observed seated on the bed in their room with family member #1 present in the room. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 06/29/25, showed Resident #4's cognition was severely impaired (BIMS 04). The assessment showed the resident had diagnoses which included bipolar disorder. An initial facility reported incident, dated 07/25/25, showed the DON and administrator were notified Resident #2 was in Resident #1's room. The initial report showed the residents were immediately separated and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 (#21) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for changes in skin condition. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/02/26 at 10:55 a.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 were observed assisting Resident #21 into their bed via mechanical lift after providing shower assistance. Resident #21 was observed to have an open area and multiple scabbed areas of various sizes to their left buttocks. A physician's order for Resident #21, dated 06/17/24, showed weekly skin assessments were to be done every Monday on the day shift. A skin assessment report for Resident #21, dated 12/11/25, showed no skin problems. No other skin assessments were completed after 12/11/25. On 01/05/26 at 8:25 a.m., LPN #2 was asked if the physician had been notified of the areas on Resident #21's left buttocks and what kind of treatment was performed on the wounds. LPN #2 stated there was no documentation the physician had been notified of Resident #21's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. a discharge assessment was encoded and transmitted for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents whose discharge assessments were reviewed for encoding and transmission; andb. a quarterly assessment was completed, encoded, and transmitted for 1 (#66) of 18 sampled residents whose quarterly assessments were reviewed for completion, encoding, and transmission.The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Electronic Transmission of the MDS, dated [DATE], read in part, All MDS assessments .and discharge and reentry records are completed and electronically encoded and transmitted .in accordance with current OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations. A Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, read in part, For a Quarterly, Significant Correction to Prior Quarterly, Discharge, or PPS [prospective payment system] assessment, encoding must occur within 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. ensure weekly skin assessments were completed for 1 (#21), andb. complete wound treatment as ordered for 1 (#45) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wounds.The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 01/02/26 at 10:55 a.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 was observed assisting Resident #21 into bed via mechanical lift after providing shower assistance. CNA #1 donned a gown and gloves and continued to assist Resident #21 with catheter care and incontinent care. Resident #21 was observed to have an open area and multiple scabbed areas of various sizes to their left buttocks. A physician's order for Resident #21, dated 06/17/24, showed weekly skin assessments were to be done every Monday on the day shift. A care plan, updated on 05/08/25, showed to monitor wound dressing to left buttocks and change as needed if soiled. December 2025 monthly physician orders showed Resident #21 had diagnoses which included cerebrovascular infarction, traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia, chronic pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. ordered pain medication was available for administration; andb. a resident received pain medication as ordered for 1 (#66) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pain management.The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings: An Administering Medications policy, revised 04/2019, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.A physician's order for Resident #66, dated 04/04/25, showed Percocet (an opioid medication) oral tablet 10-325 mg. Give one tablet by mouth every six hours for pain. Discontinue Percocet 7.5-325 mg upon arrival of Percocet 10-325 mg.Resident #66's quarterly resident assessment, dated 11/02/25, showed the resident had diagnosis of pain in unspecified joint. The assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 15.A physician's order, dated 11/17/25, showed Percocet oral tablet 7.5-325 mg. Give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for breakthrough pain, hold for sedation.A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were completed in a timely manner for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for lab results.The DON identified 10 residents required hemoglobin A1c monitoring. Findings: An undated Lab Policy and Procedure, read in part, All laboratory tests will be done as ordered by the physician in a timely manner and the results reported to the physician. A Physician's Order, dated 07/09/25, read in part, Laboratory: Hemoglobin a1c every 3 months (Jan [January], April [April], July [July], Oct [October]). A Lab Results Report, dated 07/16/25, showed Resident #3's hemoglobin A1c (a blood test that shows an average blood sugar) was obtained on 07/14/25. A Hospital Care Timeline, dated 10/15/25, showed Resident #3 was discharged from the hospital on [DATE] and no hemoglobin A1c lab was obtained. A Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes mellitus. On 01/02/26 at 10:23 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. linens were stored in a manner to promote infection control,b. the laundry room floor was cleaned for 1 of 1 laundry visit, andc. infection control precautions were used during activities of daily living care for 1 (#21) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions.The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility and 17 residents required enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: 1. On 01/02/26 at 10:55 a.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 were observed assisting Resident #21 into bed via mechanical lift after providing shower assistance. No enhanced barrier precautions were observed to be practiced evidenced by both CNAs not wearing a gown. On 01/02/26 at 10:57 a.m., CNA #1 was observed to don a gown and gloves and continued to provide Resident #21 with catheter care and incontinent care. CNA #1 was observed to hold a tissue up to Resident #21's mouth so they could spit out a substance which they coughed, while wearing the same gloves used when providing catheter care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The BOM identified 78 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 07/30/25 at 9:13 a.m., Resident #4 was observed seated on the bed in their room with family member #1 present in the room. On 07/30/25 at 9:28 a.m., the room with Resident #2's name on it was observed. Resident #2's side of the room was free from any personal items from a resident and did not have a resident on that side of the room. On 07/30/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident #1's name was observed outside the fourth room down from the nurse's station on the right side of hall 300. Resident #1 was not observed inside the room. On 07/30/25 at 10:14 a.m., Resident #1 was observed seated in a standard wheelchair at the beginning of hall 300. Resident #1 was observed wearing a light green shirt with a flower on it, blue/grey pants, and tan skid proof socks on. Resident #1 was able to identify their first name, but was unable to provide any additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation after an allegation of abuse for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The BOM identified 78 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 07/30/25 at 9:13 a.m., Resident #4 was observed seated on the bed in their room with family member #1 present in the room. On 07/30/25 at 9:28 a.m., the room with Resident #2's name on it was observed. Resident #2's side of the room was free from any personal items from a resident and did not have a resident on that side of the room. On 07/30/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident #1's name was observed outside the fourth room down from the nurse's station on the right side of hall 300. Resident #1 was not observed inside the room. On 07/30/25 at 10:14 a.m., Resident #1 was observed seated in a standard wheelchair at the beginning of hall 300. Resident #1 was observed wearing a light green shirt with a flower on it, blue/grey pants, and tan skid proof socks on. Resident #1 was able to identify their first name, but was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an initial facility reported incident regarding an allegation of abuse was sent within two hours to the state agency for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The BOM identified 78 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation policy, revised 04/2021, read in part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management.If resident abuse .is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law.Immediately is defined as .within two hours of an allegation involving abuse. An admission resident assessment, dated 06/04/25, showed Resident #2's cognition was intact (BIMS 15). The assessment showed the resident exhibited verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit a final report of findings of an investigation after an allegation of verbal abuse for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Administrator #1 identified 80 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, revised 07/2017, read in part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source ('abuse').The administrator. or his/her designee, will provide the appropriate agencies or individuals.a written report of the findings of the investigation within five (5) working days of the occurrence of the incident. An undated care plan for Resident #3's showed the resident had diagnoses which included hypertension and diabetes mellitus type 2.An Initial Incident Report Form, dated 03/06/25, read in part, [Resident #3] was very upset because [they] could not find [their] remote control to [their] TV [television], [CNA #5] (employee) told [Resident #3] that [they] needed to calm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after an allegation of abuse/mistreatment for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Administrator #1 identified 80 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, revised 07/2017, read in part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source ('abuse') shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management.interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident.Witness reports will be obtained in writing. Either the witness will write his/her statement and sign and date it, or the investigator may obtain a statement, read it back to the member and have him/her sign and date it.An undated facesheet for Resident #2 showed diagnoses of dehiscence of wound of abdominal wall and acute kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to place a call light within reach of a resident for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident who was observed for call lights.Administrator #1 identified 80 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 07/23/25 at 2:35 p.m., Resident #1's call light was observed nearest the head of bed laying on top of a pillow. Resident #1 was observed in their Geri-chair approximately two feet away from the bed.An Answering the Call Light policy and procedure, revised 03/2021, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely response to the resident's request and needs.When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident.A quarterly resident assessment, dated 05/17/25, showed Resident #2 was cognitively intact.An undated care plan for Resident #1 showed the resident had diagnoses which included post traumatic disorder and quadriplegia.On 07/23/25 at 2:38 p.m., Resident #1 stated they could use the call light if it was clipped to their shirt and placed under their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who received dialysis had pre and post monitoring for 2 (#1 and #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis. The DON identified four residents who received dialysis services resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Dialysis Care/Arterial-Venous Fistula, read in part, All residents receiving dialysis will have monitoring before and after their dialysis treatment to ensure condition is stable after treatment. 1. Resident #1's physician's order, dated 03/31/25, showed scheduled visits to the dialysis center every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturdays with a chair time of 6:15 a.m. to 10:15 a.m., but to be present at the site at 6:00 a.m. to coordinate care accordingly. Resident #1's admission resident assessment, dated 04/03/25, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 11. A review of 04/2025 dialysis communication forms showed Resident #1 had one completed pre and post monitoring dialysis communication form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's legal representative was notified of a resident's refusal to use a c-pap for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety, and major depressive disorder. A court ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN, dated 04/07/21, showed the Resident #3 had a court appointed guardian. The court appointed guardian was listed on Resident #3's electronic health record as the guardian, power of attorney, and emergency contact. Resident #3's quarterly resident assessment, dated 11/21/24, showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 15. A care plan, initiated, 07/12/24, showed Resident #3 often will remove the c-pap once staff has left the room, staff has found it under their bed before where they had tossed/tried to hide it. Staff to encourage them to keep it in place and not remove it. A physician's order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the results of an abuse/mistreatment investigation were reported to the State Agency within 10 business days for 1 (#2); and b. an allegation of abuse/mistreatment was reported to the appropriate licensing board in a timely manner for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for timely care and treatment. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, revised 04/2021, read in part, Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included altered mental status and quadriplegia. An Initial INCIDENT REPORT FORM, dated 03/03/25, showed an allegation of abuse/mistreatment. The report showed Resident #2 told LPN #1 that they were sick. The report showed Resident #2 vomited on themselves, and LPN #1 refused to clean them up and left them covered in their vomit until the aide on the next shift came in to clean them up. The report showed the appropriate licensing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL care for a dependent resident for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. The DON identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Bath, Shower/Tub policy, revised 02/2018, read in part, Documentation 1. The date and time the shower/tub was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath. 3. All assessment data obtained during the bath. 4. How the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath. 5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s). The facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting policy, revised 03/2018, read in part, Appropriate care services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care.) Resident #3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to add an intervention to a residents care plan to prevent future accidents after a fall for one (#12) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Falls- Clinical Protocol policy, revised 03/2018, read in part, the staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and to address the risk of clinically significance consequences of falling. Resident #12 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery, type two diabetes, unspecified, lack of coordination, muscle, weakness, and contusion of right lower leg. Resident #12's annual assessment, dated 5/31/24, documented the resident's cognition was fully intact and required substantial to maximal assistance for chair to bed transfers. The facility's #1420 Witnessed Fall with Injury report, dated 12/29/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible for one (#5) of seven sampled residents reviewed for call lights. The DON identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Falling Leaves Fall Prevention Program, dated 08/25/23, read in part, 22. Call lights in reach and in good working order. Res #5 had diagnoses which included heart failure, emphysema, paraplegia and quadriplegia. A physician order, dated 05/07/24, documented falling leaves prevention program. On 09/12/24 at 1:54 p.m., Res #5's call light was not accessible while resting in bed. On 09/12/24 at 1:55 p.m., LPN #1 stated Res #5's call light was supposed to be within reach while resting in bed. On 09/17/24 at 4:12 p.m., Res #5's call light was not in accessible while resting in bed. On 09/17/24 at 4:13 p.m., RN #1 stated Res #5's call light was not within reach. They stated their call light was stuck behind their pillow in their bed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have an effective pest control for one (#9) of nine sampled residents reviewed for pest control. The DON identified 82 residents resided in the facility. On 09/17/24 at 2:50 p.m., Res #9 was observed with eight flies located on different areas of their body. On 09/17/24 at 2:52 p.m., housekeeping #1 stated there were lots of flies, but they sprayed. On 09/17/24 at 2:56 p.m., CMA #1 stated there had always been a lot of flies on hall 400.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse and Neglect policy, undated, read in part, .no resident shall be subject to abuse and/or neglect .All incidents to include suspected resident abuse will be reported to the Administrator and Director of Nursing immediately .Any staff member involved in any incident will report it immediately to his/her supervisor, and a written statement would be obtained through interview about the incident. The Administrator will be the person to notify appropriate agencies .the employee will be suspended pending the investigation . Resident #8 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 06/02/24, documented an allegation of abuse/mistreatment. It documented the family of Resident #8 observed video footage of CNA #3 cursing and arguing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of abuse investigations were submitted to the State within five business days for two ( #7 and #8) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse and Neglect policy, undated, read in part, .no resident shall be subject to abuse and/or neglect .All incidents to include suspected resident abuse will be reported to the Administrator and Director of Nursing immediately .Any staff member involved in any incident will report it immediately to his/her supervisor, and a written statement would be obtained through interview about the incident. The Administrator will be the person to notify appropriate agencies .the employee will be suspended pending the investigation . 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, and anxiety disorder. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, faxed 07/08/24 at 2:10 p.m., documented an allegation of abuse/mistreatment. It documented a family member of Resident #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize a safe transfer technique when transferring a resident who required two-person physical assistance for one (#10) of one sampled resident observed during a transfer. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, revised 07/17, read in part, In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents .Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible .Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer belts, lateral boards) and mechanical lifting devices . Resident #10 had diagnoses which included nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. Resident #10's Care Plan, initiated on 09/24/23, documented the resident required one to two person assistance with all ADLs due to left sided hemiplegia from a stroke. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor nutritional intake for two (#1 and #2) of three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Snacks policy, revised 09/10, read in part, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with adequate nutrition .Supplements to be offered if meal consumption is less than 50 [percent] .To document supplement - Y - for yes supplement given N .supplement not given .record the following information in the resident's medical record .date and time the snack was served .The amount of snack eaten by resident . 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, and Parkinson's disease. Resident #1's Care Plan, revised 03/29/24, documented provide regular diet, document how much is eaten after each meal. A Physician Order, dated 05/20/24, documented Resident #10 had a regular diet regular texture, regular thin consistency. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 06/09/24, documented Resident #1's cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was swallowed by the resident for one (#1) of one sampled resident observed with a medication on their shirt. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Administering Medications policy, revised 04/19, read in part, .Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, constipation, and Parkinson's disease. A Physician Order, dated 05/21/24, documented Colace 100mg give one capsule by mouth one time a day related to constipation. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 06/09/24, documented Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired. On 08/07/24 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #1 was observed to have a red circular pill on the top of their blue shirt. On 08/07/24 at 12:15 p.m., LPN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote resident dignity by during dining for two (#6 and #21) of four sampled residents reviewed for dignity. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. An admission assessment, dated 05/10/24, documented Res #6's cognition was intact. It was documented the resident had impairment of their upper extremities and required partial to moderate assistance with eating. 2. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/08/24, documented Res #21's cognition was severly impaired. It was documented the resident was understood, was able to understand, and had adequate vision. It was documented the resident required partial to moderate assistance with eating. On 07/08/24 at 8:43 a.m., CNA #1 was observed standing over Res #6 while assisting them with their breakfast meal. On 07/08/24 at 8:47 a.m., Res #21 was observed with their breakfast plate on the table in front of them. They were placed at the same table as Res #6. Res #21 was observed watching CNA #1 assist Res #6 with their breakfast. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly evident or possible serious mental illnesses to the OHCA for a level II PASARR evaluation for three (#22, 71 and #8) of four sampled residents reviewed for PASARR's. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A level I PASARR, dated 12/08/23, documented Res #71 did not have evidence or diagnosis of a serious mental illness. The resident's primary diagnosis was documented as CVA and their secondary diagnosis was documented as dementia. On 04/23/24, the resident had a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms. There was no documentation the resident had been referred to the OHCA for a level II PASARR evaluation. On 07/10/24 at 11:31 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was made aware the resident had a negative level I pre-screen and was later identified with newly evident of possible serious mental illness. They were asked if the resident was referred to the OHCA for a level II PASARR evaluation. They stated they did not contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL care to dependent residents for two (#26 and #85) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #26 had diagnoses which included aphasia, need for assistance with personal care, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left dominant side. An annual assessment, dated 05/30/24, documented the resident's speech was not clear, sometimes understood, and usually understands. It was documented the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. The June 2024 survey report for personal hygiene documented personal hygiene to include combing the resident's hair was not completed six out of 30 opportunities. On 07/08/24 at 7:49 a.m., the resident was observed with a bonnet on their head. On 07/08/24 at 9:31 a.m., the resident was observed without a bonnet on their head. Their hair was not combed. 07/11/23 at 8:56 a.m., the resident was observed without a bonnet on their head. The hair on the back of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and document blood pressures as ordered by physician for two (#60 and #189) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for following physician's orders. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #189 had diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage. A physician order, initiated on 03/21/24, documented the resident was to receive amlodipine 10 mg daily via peg tube. Hold if blood pressure is less than 110/65. March, April, May, June, and July 2024 MARs/TARs were reviewed for blood pressure monitoring. There was no documentation blood pressures had been monitored. On 07/12/24 at 9:45 a.m., the DON stated the medication order initiated 3/21/24 was to be held if BP was less than 110/65. There was no documentation blood pressure had been monitored from 03/21/24 through 04/25/24. There were 34 missing blood pressure entries to ensure blood pressure had been monitored. The DON stated the nurses would be unable to hold the medications appropriately if the blood pressures were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures during meals. The Administrator identified 79 residents received services from the kitchen. Three residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: 1. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/11/24, documented Res #1's cognition was intact. On 07/08/24 at 6:09 a.m., the resident was asked how was the food. They stated the food was not warm. 2. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/20/24, documented Res #52's cognition was intact. On 07/08/24 at 7:45 a.m., the resident was asked how was the food. They stated the food was cold. 3. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/15/24, documented the Res #28's cognition was moderately impaired. On 07/08/24 at 8:22 a.m., the resident was asked how was the food. They stated the food was not great. They stated they received a mechanical soft diet and the meat was like mush. 4. A annual assessment, dated 04/20/24, documented Res #55's cognition was intact. On 07/08/24 at 8:37 a.m., the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was kept clean and maintained in good repair. The Administrator identified 79 residents received services from the kitchen. Three residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: On 07/09/24 at 11:20 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. a. There was a hole in the wall below the two compartment sink, b. There was black and white residue on the floor and the wall below the dish washer area c. There was a gap between the floor and the wall below the dish washer area, d. Two of two door gaskets were torn on the True two door reach in cooler, e. One of two door gaskets were torn on the True three door reach in freezer, f. Base boards were missing near the microwave rack, g. Grout was missing between the counter tiles on the serve out window, h. Black and white residue was on the floor under the ice machine, i. One of two oven hood lights were burned out and/or not working, j. Plastic lids on bulk dry ingredient containers of oatmeal,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a) Place dirty linens in a plastic bag before removing from the res room for 1 (#22) of who were dependent on staff for ADL care, b) Provide environmental cleaning, disinfection, and reprocessing of reusable resident medical equipment for wrist blood pressure cuff (CNA #1) between residents, and proper hand hygiene breaks in infection control (CNA #2) wiping sanitized hands on front of their top and pant legs without re-cleaning hands, c) Replace O2 tubing after the NC touched the floor and was placed back into the res nose for 1 (#85) of 12 residents who were O2 dependent; and d) Maintain an infection control program for enhanced barrier precautions by donning gowns prior to wound care for 2 (#60 and #40) of who received wound care at the facility. The Administrator identified 82 residents residing at the facility. Findings: An Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 04/01/24, read in part, .an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms that employs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate PASARR screening was completed for one (#9) of four sampled residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A level 1 PASARR, dated 11/04/21, documented Res #9 had a diagnosis of a serious mental illness and a recent history of mental illness or was prescribed a psychotropic medication. There was no documentation in the resident's chart or on the form indicating a determination for level 2 PASARR was made. On 07/09/24 at 1:25 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated there should have been documentation on the form with the determination for a level 2. They stated the facility was likely told a level 2 was not necessary but did not document it on the form or in the resident's chart.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure CPR was administered in accordance with standards of practice and facility policy. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy documented a rate of 30 compressions to two rescue breaths during the administration of CPR. On [DATE] at 12:58 p.m., a staff member retrieved LPN #1 to assist with an unresponsive resident. On [DATE] at 1:04 p.m., CPR was initiated. On [DATE] at 1:09 p.m., the Ambu-bag was observed squeezed five times. On [DATE] at 1:11 p.m., the Ambu-bag was observed squeezed four times, 30 compressions were administered, and a single rescue breath was given and compressions were re-started during the administration of the second rescue breath. On [DATE] at 2:10 p.m., the DON stated they observed compressions and rescue breaths were alternated until EMS responded to the scene. They stated they had corrected the issue with the rescue breaths immediately.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to treat a contracture for one (#22) of one sampled residents reviewed for range of motion. The DON identified three residents with contractures. Findings: 1. Res #22 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. A physician order, dated 05/17/24, documented Res #22 was to have a hand roll to the left hand at all times except when showering. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #22 was severely cognitively impaired and had impairment to range of motion on one side. A care plan, revised 07/09/24, documented Res #22 had a contracture to their left hand due to a cerebral vascular accident. The care plan documented the resident was to have a hand roll in their left hand at all times except when showering. On 07/09/24 at 9:32 a.m., Res #22 was observed in their geri-chair being pushed by a staff member. No hand roll was observed in their left hand. The hand was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure O2 was administered as ordered by the physician for one ( #85) of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. The ADON identified 12 residents who received O2. Findings: Res #85 had diagnoses which included SOB and failure to thrive. A physician order, dated 06/27/24, documented O2 via NC 3 liters continuously. On 07/12/24 at 9:50 a.m., the resident was observed with their O2 tubing not in place. The tubing was on the floor. The O2 concentrator was set at 1.5 LPM. On 07/12/24 at 10:06 a.m., the resident was observed with O2 in place. The O2 concentrator was set at 1.5 LPM. On 07/12/24 at 10:16 a.m., LPN #3 was asked what was the resident's O2 supposed to be set at. They stated they thought they saw it set at 2 LPM, but did not know what the physician ordered. They reviewed the order in the EHR and stated it was supposed to be set at 3 LPM. LPN #3 was asked to verify what the resident's O2 concentrator was set at. They stated 1.5 and it should be 3. They stated that is the reason for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired supplies were disposed, narcotic medications were kept behind two locks, refrigerator temperatures were checked daily, and multi-use vials were dated when opened. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/10/24 at 10:29 a.m., the medication room was observed with LPN #2. On 07/10/24 at 10:35 a.m., the white refrigerator was observed containing an undated opened vial of TB skin test, an unopened vial of lorazepam concentrate, not in the clear locked narcotic box, and a bottle of vancomycin solution prepared for enteral administration that was frozen. The temperature log on the front of the refrigerator did not document the month, and had no temperatures documented for the sixth and seventh day. On 07/10/24 at 10:37 a.m., LPN #2 stated they were unable to determine when the TB skin test vial was opened. They stated the narcotic should have been behind two locks. They stated they were unsure how often the med aides were supposed to check the medication room for expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained per physician's orders for one (#67) of five sampled residents reviewed for laboratory testing. The Administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Lab Policy & Procedure, undated, documented all laboratory tests will be done as ordered by the physician in a timely manner and the results reported to the physician. Resident #67 had diagnoses which included bipolar, major depression, Diabetes Mellitus, and CHF. A physician's order, dated 06/11/24, documented to obtain a CBC and CMP weekly times two. A laboratory test, dated 06/12/24, documented a CBC and CMP had been collected. There was no documentation the second test had been collected. On 07/12/24 at 4:02 p.m., LPN #4 was asked where Resident #67's second CBC and CMP would be located. LPN #4 looked in Resident #67's EMR and stated they only saw the 06/12/24 lab. LPN #4 then looked in the facilities lab online and stated, I'm not pulling up anything. On 07/12/24 4:21 p.m., the ADON stated, We are missing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served as scheduled. The Administrator identified 79 residents received services from the kitchen. Three residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube. Findings: An undated schedule of meal times, documented breakfast was to be served at 7:30 a.m. On 07/08/24 at 8:31 a.m., food trays were observed being delivered to residents in the dining room. 1. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/20/24, documented Res #52's cognition was intact. On 07/08/24 at 7:45 a.m., the resident was asked about the food. They stated the meals were not always on time. 2. A annual assessment, dated 04/20/24, documented Res #55's cognition was intact. On 07/08/24 at 8:37 a.m., the resident was asked how was the food. They stated the meals were usually late. 3. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/21/24, documented Res #56's cognition was moderately impaired. On 07/08/24 at 8:41 a.m., the resident was asked how was the food. They stated the meals were served late. 4. A quarterly assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide medical record to a resident's representative upon request for one (#3) of one sampled resident reviewed for medical records. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Access to Personal and Medical Records policy, revised 05/17, read in part, .Access to the resident's personal and medical records will be provided to the resident within 1 week .of his or her request .The resident .may grant others the right to access the resident's records if such request is made in writing and identifies the information that is to be released and to whom the information is to be released . Resident #3 had diagnoses which included bipolar and schizophrenia. An AUTHORIZATION FOR ACCESS BY PATIENT OR DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION form, dated 02/20/24, documented Resident #3 signed the release of their medical records to their representative. On 03/06/24 at 12:58 p.m., the Administrator stated they were not aware Resident #3's family had requested medical records. They stated it takes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not involuntarily discharged for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for involuntary discharge. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Transfer or Discharge Documentation policy, revised 12/16, read in part, .Should the resident be transferred or discharged for any of the following reasons, the basis for the transfer or discharge will be documented in the resident's clinical record by a physician .The safety of individuals in the facility is endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident .The following information will be communicated to the receiving facility or provider .Resident representative information including contact information . A Transfer or Discharge, Emergency policy, revised 08/18, read in part, .Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures .Notify the representative (sponsor) or other family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored and labeled in the refrigerator; and kept at safe temperatures in the freezer. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented 81 residents resided in the facility, and three residents received tube feeding. Findings: An undated Receiving Food and Supplies policy, undated, read in part, Food items will be received and handle in accordance with good sanitary practice .All foodstuffs [sic] are to be dated . An undated Purchasing, Receiving and Storage policy, undated, read in part, .Food will be properly stored to preserve flavor, nutritive value, appearance, and safety .The food service director is responsible for inventory control . On 07/05/23 at 8:10 a.m., the initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the kitchen supervisor as the CDM was not available. Observations of the refrigerator were as follows: a. Beef patties with no label or date, b. Fried okra with no label or date, c. A plastic container of mashed potatoes with no label or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive for three (#23, 27, and #63) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #27 had an initial admission date of 07/13/18 and a current admission date of 03/30/23. There was no documentation Resident #27 had been given the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. 2. Resident #63 had an initial admission date of 02/01/23. There was no documentation Resident #63 had been given the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. 3. Resident #23 had an initial admission date of 06/12/13 and a current admission date of 08/19/22. There was no documentation Resident #23 had been given the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. On 07/06/23 at 1:42 p.m., the CNO stated they were unable to locate the Advance Directive acknowledgement form for Resident #27 and Resident #63. The CNO was asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered weekly skin assessments were completed on residents with pressure ulcers for three (#63, 65, and #182) of four sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented nine residents with pressure ulcers greater than a stage I. Findings: A Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown policy, revised 04/18, read in part, .the nurse shall describe and document/report the following .Full assessment of the pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue . 1. Resident #63 had diagnoses which included stage III pressure ulcer of the right lateral plantar foot and stage III pressure ulcer of the right calcaneous. A Physician Order, dated 04/19/23, documented weekly skin assessments on Wednesday on night shift. A Wound Assessment, dated 05/17/23, documented Resident #63 had a stage III pressure ulcer of the right lateral plantar foot which measured 1.5 length x 1.5 width x 0.2 cm depth. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. spare keys to medication and treatment carts were secured and not accessible; b. controlled medications were secured behind two locks; and c. medications were administered as ordered for two (#32 and #34) of five sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/03/23, documented 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Disposal and Returns policy, dated 05/16/23, read in part, .Full chain of custody should be documented to clearly indicate the removal of the medications from the cart and placed into a secure storage area for destruction . 1. On 07/11/23 at 10:09 a.m., the DON was asked what the policy was for dc'd controlled medications. They stated they were put in a narcotic cabinet and locked. They were asked where the narcotics cabinet was located. The DON stated it was in their office inside a locked closet. They stated the closet was locked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one (#51) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Homelike Environment policy, revised 02/21, read in parts, .Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible .clean, sanitary and orderly environment .clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition . On 07/05/23 at 9:46 a.m., Resident #51 was observed lying in bed with a pillow under their head. The pillow did not have a pillow case on it. The pillow was observed to have a large purple/black colored area measuring approximately 12 inches in length by approximately 2 1/2 inches in width on the bottom right side of the pillow (orientation facing the resident). The resident was unable to answer questions about the pillow. On 07/05/23 at 9:48 a.m., RN #1 was asked the reason…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a diagnostic test for one (#41) of one sampled resident reviewed for diagnostic tests. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/03/23, documented 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #41 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction and seizures. An After Visit hospital summary, dated 05/26/23, documented an appointment for a CT angiogram of the heart and an echo cardiogram to be conducted on 06/22/23 at the hospital. It documented the following medications to take prior to the CT angiogram: a. prednisone 50 mg, 13 hours, seven hours, and one hour prior to test; b. benadryl 50 mg, one hour prior; c. metoprolol 50 mg, 12 hours prior, and 50-100 mg one hour prior; d. valium 5-10 mg, one hour prior; and e. diltiazem if patient has COPD or asthma. On 07/10/23 1:37 p.m., the DON was asked about Resident #41's diagnostic tests. They stated the pharmacy didn't send all of the medication protocol, so the tests had to be rescheduled. On 07/10/23 at 2:11 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$71,283 in federal fines across 8 penalties.

  • $26,250 — penalty dated 2025-07-24
  • $8,475 — penalty dated 2025-03-24
  • $14,399 — penalty dated 2025-03-24
  • $4,196 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $7,409 — penalty dated 2023-10-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
YOUNGE AND CRANE INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2003
CRANE, JUDYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2019
HALL, SONJAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
UNDERWOOD, ADAMSONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2021
EDMOND HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
GEORGE H MACTOLFF TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2006
GMGP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2006
GREGORY E MACHTOLFF TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2006
MARTY A. MACTOLFF, III TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2006
R AND M NURSING HOMES, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KHAN, MUNEERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 6%Other / private 5%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$241per resident / day
operating cost
$7,328per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$236per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375483. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next