El Reno Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 43.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy covers for indwelling catheters for two (#8 and #15) of two sampled residents reviewed for dignity. The DON identified three residents with indwelling catheters resided in the facility. Findings: The Catheter Care policy, revised 09/21/23, read in part, Residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. The policy also read, .Catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use. 1. Resident #8 had a diagnosis of retention of urine. A physician's order, dated 02/16/24, documented to change catheter once monthly. On 05/19/24 at 8:35 a.m., Resident #15 was observed on the hallway in a wheelchair. There was no privacy cover on the catheter drainage bag. On 05/19/24 at 11:56 a.m., Resident #15 was sitting in the dining room waiting for lunch. There was no privacy cover on the catheter drainage bag. On 05/20/24 at 11:26 a.m., Resident #15 was sitting by the nurse's station. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of an abnormal blood sugar level as ordered for one (#36) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Physician, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner or Clinical Nurse Specialist Lab Notification policy, revised 11/24/21, read in part, The facility must promptly notify the attending physician .of lab results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures .or per ordering physician's orders. Resident #36 had a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus. A physician's order, dated 09/01/23, documented novolog injection solution 100 units per milliliter subcutaneously four times a day related to type two diabetes mellitus. Inject as per sliding scale, if FSBS is greater than 451 notify physician. Resident #36's May 2024 TAR documented FSBS of 476 and the number four on 05/18/24. On 05/23/24 at 9:03 a.m., the DON stated Resident #36's blood sugar was 476…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for two (#42 and #43) of 12 sampled residents MDS were reviewed. The Administrator identified 40 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #43 discharged to an assisted living facility. The discharge assessment, dated [DATE], documented discharge return anticipated, planned discharge, and that there was no discharge planning occurring. On [DATE] at 9:33 a.m., the Administrator stated planning for the discharge started months ago and they had been working with a third party agency. On [DATE] at 2:26 p.m., the Administrator stated they had worked on the discharge and did not anticipate Resident #43 to return to the facility. On [DATE] at 2:45 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated they anticipated the resident to return to the facility and stated they did not document information that stated the resident was anticipated to return. MDS Coordinator #1 further stated there was active discharge planning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised: a. quarterly and as needed to include wound care for one (#9); and b. to include the use of side rails for one (#12) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change policy, dated 05/23, documented the comprehensive care plan will be revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. 1. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included unsteadiness on feet and mild cognitive impairment. A bed rail assessment, dated 08/14/23, documented left and right side bed rail use. A bed rail informed consent, dated 08/14/23, documented the resident was bed bound. Resident #12's care plan, revised 05/19/24 did not document the use of side rails. On 05/19/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in bed with two round shaped rails on each side of the upper part of the bed. The Resident stated staff put them up so they can use them to assist with positioning.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were properly labeled and had identified use by dates during the initial kitchen tour. The Administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility and the DON verified all 40 residents received food from the kitchen. A Date Marking for Food Safety policy, revised 04/24, read in part, The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, tie/temperature control for safety food. The policy also read, The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for date marking the food at the time of the food is opened or prepared. The marking system shall consist of a color-coded label, the day/date of opening, and the day/date the item must be consumed or discarded. On 05/19/24 at 8:13 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, the refrigerator was observed to have a white plastic bin which contained 10 cups with clear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff had the competencies to carry out the food services for four (#3, 8, 9, and #10) of four residents reviewed for dietary services. The Midnight Census Report form, dated 11/02/23, documented the census was 42. A Diet Type Report, dated 11/02/23 documented Residents #3, 9, and #10 were to be served pureed diets, and Resident #8 was to be provided a renal diet. A menu, approved by the RD/LD, documented on 11/02/23, the menu to be served was as follows: a. the puree/level 4 diets were to be served a #8 scoop of pureed oven fried chicken, #8 scoop of pureed Au Gratin potatoes, #8 scoop of pureed spinach/sauteed onions, #12 scoop of pureed cornbread with margarine, and a #12 scoop of pureed yellow cake with caramel icing. A note at the bottom of the menu, documented pureed and mechanical soft diets were to be served gravy or sauce if needed. b. Regular diets were to be served: 3 ounces of oven fried chicken, a #8 scoop of Au Gratin potation, #8 scoop of spinach with sauteed onions, one each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed menus were followed and an extended menu was available and prepared for a renal diet for four (#3, 8, 9, and #10) of four residents reviewed for dietary services. The Midnight Census Report form, dated 11/02/23, documented the census was 42. A Diet Type Report, dated 11/02/23 documented Residents #3, 9, and #10 were to be served pureed diets, and Resident #8 was to be provided a renal diet. A menu, approved by the RD/LD, documented on 11/02/23, the menu to be served was as follows: a. the puree/level 4 diets were to be served a #8 scoop of pureed oven fried chicken, #8 scoop of pureed Au Gratin potatoes, #8 scoop of pureed spinach/sauteed onions, #12 scoop of pureed cornbread with margarine, and a #12 scoop of pureed yellow cake with caramel icing. A note at the bottom of the menu, documented pureed and mechanical soft diets were to be served gravy or sauce if needed. b. Regular diets were to be served: 3 ounces of oven fried chicken, a #8 scoop of Au Gratin potation, #8 scoop of spinach with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an extended menu was available to ensure dietary needs were met for an ordered renal diet for one (#8,) of one sampled resident reviewed for a renal diet. The Midnight Census Report form, dated 11/02/23, documented the census was 42. A Diet Type Report, dated 11/02/23 documented Resident #8 was to be provided a renal diet. A menu, approved by the RD/LD, documented on 11/02/23, the menu to be served for regular diet orders was as follows: a. three ounces of oven fried chicken, b. a #8 scoop of Au Gratin potatoes, c. a #8 scoop of spinach with sauteed onions, d. one each of cornbread with margarine, and e. one square of yellow cake with caramel icing. The menu did not contain instructions for a renal diet. On 11/02/23, at 11:25 a.m., the DM referred to the extended menu for reference to the portion sizes to be served. On 11/02/23 at 11:45 a.m., the steam table contained oven fried chicken, Au Gratin potatoes, and spinach. A large tray of corn bread remained on top of the oven and single servings of cake…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure heart rate monitoring was completed as ordered prior to the administration of Carvedilol for one (#2) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 03/29/23, documented 42 resident resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Administration policy, dated 02/21/23, read in parts, .Medications are administered .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards .Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters . Resident #2 had diagnoses which included essential hypertension. A Physician Order, start date 04/11/22, documented Carvedilol tablet 12.5 mg give 12.5 mg by mouth twice a day, hold medication if systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or heart rate was below 60. The February 2023 MAR did not document Resident #2's heart rate was checked prior to the administration of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered labs were obtained for two (#2 and #4) of five sampled residents reviewed for laboratory services. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 03/29/23, documented 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Laboratory Services and Reporting policy, dated 11/24/21, read in parts, .The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician .in accordance with state law .The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents .The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the services .All laboratory reports will be dated .and will be filed in the resident's clinical record . 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses of mixed hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, and malignant neoplasm of the large intestine. A Physicians' Order, dated 04/21/21, documented to obtain serum LFT's, valproic acid, and CBC with differential every six months. On 03/29/23, at 4:42 p.m., the DON was asked for the results for the labs ordered every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK