Baptist Village Of Enid

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 72.0 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.31 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly fall risk evaluations for 1 (#3) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for falls.The ADON identified 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A Fall Prevention Policy and Procedure policy, revised 02/2014, read in part, A fall risk evaluation will be completed quarterly, annually, on re-admission and with significant change in condition.A FALL RISK EVALUATION for Resident #3, dated 08/22/24, showed the resident had a fall risk score of 11, indicating a high risk for falls.There was no documentation a fall risk evaluation was completed for Resident #3 between September 2024 through February 2025. A quarterly resident assessment for Resident #3, dated 02/11/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included heart failure and hypertension. It showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired, with a BIMS of 06.A care plan for Resident #3, revised 02/12/25, showed the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, knee buckling, and hypertension.A Fall Investigation Form for Resident #3, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain lab as ordered for 1 (#5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for falls.The ADON identified 70 residents resided in the facility.Findings:Resident #5's physician's order, dated 09/01/25, showeda. Dilantin 100 mg (an anticonvulsant medication) one capsule one time daily in the morning for seizure prevention.b. Dilantin 100 mg two capsules one time daily in the evening for seizure prevention.Resident #5's nursing note, dated 11/24/25, read in part, Dilantin level 44.4. Notified PCP new order to hold Dilantin and redraw labs on Wednesday.Resident #5's laboratory results were reviewed for November 2025, there was no documentation the lab was obtained.On 03/04/26 at 10:39 a.m., LPN #1 stated the lab should have been obtained on 11/26/25. They stated there was no record the lab was obtained.On 03/04/26 at 10:50 a.m., the DON stated the lab should have been obtained on 11/26/25.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#53) of five sampled residents who was reviewed for unnecessary medications. Corporate Nurse #1 stated 53 residents received blood pressure medications. Findings: A Preparation for Medication Administration policy, dated 06/2021, documented medications were administered as prescribed. Resident #53 had diagnoses which included hypertension. A medication order form, dated 06/14/24, documented Resident #53 was to receive metoprolol succinate ER (beta blocker) 50 mg every day and 100 mg every night. It documented to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was less than 100 and diastolic blood pressure was less than 50. A medication order form, dated 08/12/24, documented Resident #53 was to receive lisinopril (blood pressure medication)10 mg every day. A September 2024 Medications form, documented on 09/27/24 Resident #53's morning diastolic blood pressure was 49. It documented the resident received metoprolol succinate ER 50 mg and Lisinopril 10 mg. A November…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was labeled for one of two medication carts observed. The DON identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Ordering and Receiving from Provider Pharmacy policy, dated 06/2021, read in part, Medication containers having soiled, damaged, incomplete, illegible or makeshift labels are returned to the issuing pharmacy for relabeling or destroyed in accordance with the medication destruction policy. On 12/02/24 at 1:10 p.m., a box of ipratropium bromide (broncodilator) 0.5 mg and albuterol sulfate 3 mg Inhalation solution was observed to be in a medication cart. There was a common nickname handwritten on the top of the medication box. The medication did not have a label with a resident name, medication name, strength, directions for use, fill date, quantity dispensed, prescriber name or expiration. LPN #1 stated, That's for [resident name deleted]. LPN #1 was asked how staff knew who the medication was for since it did not have a label. They stated, It says [name…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in facility. Findings: A Legionella policy, dated August 20 2024, read in part, is committed to the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella. The policy did not identify a system to prevent or detect water borne contaminants. On 12/04/24 at 10:30 a.m., the administrator was asked what system does the facility have in place to prevent and detect the water borne pathogens such as Legionella in the facility water system. They stated there was a policy, but not a system for testing.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed: a. to notify the physician for one (#5) of three sampled residents reviewed for physician notification, and b. notify the resident representative for one (#2) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included renal insufficiency, and diabetes mellitus. Resident #5 had a physician order for Eliquis 5 mg tablet two times per day. A nurse's Change in Condition note, dated 04/21/24 at 5:19 a.m., read in part Res was noted with milky thick urine with foul oder [sic]. Encouraged res to drink more water . There was no documentation the physician had been notified. A nursing progress note, dated 05/05/24 at 11:13 p.m., read in part staff reported to this nurse res had bright red blood in brief and toilet x2 this shift res explained past experience r/t bladder and blood transfusion res has no s/s of weakness noted states also f/u in am r/t condition call light et fluids within reach A Change in Condition nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents and resident representatives were able to file a grievance form anonymously, and post information regarding the name of the grievance official. The Administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Grievance Procedure, revised 03/2018, read in part Whenever the Guest has a need or request that is not being met, the Guest or his/her Representative should .Report it to the person in charge .Additional notices of health care center grievance process will be displayed in prominent locations throughout the health center .Grievance may be given to any friends' team member who will forward the grievance to the Grievance Office or they may file the grievances anonymously in the designated box located . Ombudsman contact name, resident rights, and OSDH complaint poster was observed in a box with a glass cover on the wall near the front entrance. There was no signage to indicate the person to contact to file a grievance or a box to place grievance forms. On 07/15/24 at 2:28…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the faciity failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property to the OSDH for one (#5) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The Administrator identified 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Grievance Procedure, revised 03/2018, read in part .If there is an allegation of .or misappropriation of Guest property, an incident report outlining corrective and preventative measures will be sent to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and the Department of Human Services .The investigation will consist at least the following .Interviews with any witnesses to the incident or concern .a search of the resident room .An interview with team members having contact with the resident during the relevant periods or shifts of the alleged incident .interviews with the resident's roommate, family members, and visitors .A root cause analysis of all circumstanced surrounding the incident . A Abuse, Neglect, mistreatment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to assess, and monitor for one (#5) of seven sampled residents reviewed for change in condition. The administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included renal insufficiency, and diabetes mellitus. A nurse's Change in Condition note, dated 04/21/24 at 5:19 a.m., read in part Res was noted with milky thick urine with foul oder [sic]. Encouraged res to drink more water . There was no documentation the resident had been monitored for worsening of symptoms. On 07/17/24 at 8:31 a.m., the DON was asked if the Resident should have been monitored for worsening of symptoms. They stated, Yes.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ABN and NOMNC letters were provided to two of three sampled residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. The Entrance Conference Worksheet, Beneficiary Notice documented 16 residents had received skilled nursing services and discharged with benefit days remaining at the time of discharge. On 10/17/23 at 12:30 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility census was 64. Findings: 1. Resident #147 was admitted to Skilled Nursing Part A services on 07/13/23, and the last day of service was 08/11/23. The facility completed the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form which documented the facility initiated the discharge from Part A services with benefit days remaining. The form documented the resident or representative did not receive ABN or NOMNC letters as required. 2. Resident #136 was admitted to Skilled Nursing Part A services on 08/01/23 and last day of service was 09/25/23. The facility completed the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form which documented the facility initiated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 89 rows in the source record cover these 41 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK