Greenbrier Village Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-02-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to ensure Resident #100 received CPR; the facility failed to ensure a systemic approach was used to determine what a resident's code status was for four (#60, 75, 89 and #95) of four sampled residents. Resident #100 had a physician's order for CPR/full code on [DATE], no DNR was in place. On [DATE] at 9:48 p.m. Resident #100 presented with a cough. 22 minutes later at 10:10 p.m. per a late entry nurses note at 11:45p.m. Resident #100 was found with pupils fixed and dilated. The physician was notified at 10:15 p.m. and there was no documentation that CPR had been initiated. A physician's death note, dated [DATE] documented LPN #3 had seen Resident #100 approximately 30 minutes prior to 10:10 p.m. On [DATE] at 6:40 a.m., LPN #3 who found the resident at 10:10 p.m., stated CPR had not been provided. LPN #3 stated if CPR had been started it would have been documented. She stated there have been times when they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a family member of a resident's fall for 1 (#107) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for notification of falls. The DON identified 99 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 12/2025, read in part, A nurse will notify the resident's representative when the resident is involved in any accident or incident that results in an injury. A comprehensive admission assessment for Resident #7, dated 02/03/26, showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] for therapy services. A facility incident report, dated 02/12/26, showed Resident #107 fell on [DATE] at 4:27 p.m., obtained a large bruise, and a laceration which measured 1.75 cm over their right eye. There was no documentation Resident #107's family was informed until 02/13/26. On 06/24/26 at 10:23 a.m., a family member of Resident #107 stated they came to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 1:00 p.m., to visit Resident #107 when they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure 2 staff members were utilized to transfer a resident with a mechanical lift placing the resident at risk for falls for 1 (#65) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for falls. The DON identified 27 residents required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers.Findings: On 06/23/26 at 7:35 p.m., Resident #65 was observed sitting in a geriatric chair in the common area between the [NAME] and [NAME] halls. On 06/23/26 at 7:51 p.m., CNA #2 was observed to walk out of Resident #65's room with the mechanical lift. CNA #2 was observed to have been in the room alone and had transferred Resident #65 to the bed from their geriatric chair. A Using a Mechanical Lifting Machine policy, dated 07/01/17, read in part, At least two nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. A care plan intervention for Resident #65, dated 02/15/26, read in part, Per physical therapy for safety, the resident is only to be transferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week.The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report, dated 01/01/25 through 03/31/25, showed no RN hours on 03/30/25. A Timecard Report, dated 03/30/25, did not show RN coverage for eight consecutive hours.A Timecard Report, dated 06/01/25 through 06/30/25, did not show RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 06/07/25.On 07/03/25 at 9:49 a.m., the administrator stated they had an RN scheduled for the dates above, but they called in. The administrator stated they replaced the RN with a license practical nurse.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. ongoing side effects and behavior monitoring were completed for residents on psychotropic medications for 4 (#2, 9, 26, and #28); andb. a PRN order for psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days for 2 (#9 and #28) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review.The administrator identified 62 residents received psychotropic medications resided in the facility.Findings:An undated facility policy Behavior and Psychotropic Drug Use, read in part, Anytime PRN antianxiety medication is given, Nurses Note must be placed in [system name withheld] under behavior Note. Medication follow up. All behaviors will be documented in a behavior note .Behaviors will be monitored by charge nurse and documented in [system name withheld] by exception under behavior notes .Physician evaluation to be completed every 14 days for any PRN psychotropic medications .Ongoing monitoring is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of the medication,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all components of the daily staffing information was posted and was readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 of 1 observation. The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/02/25 at 10:30 a.m., a staff roster with unit name, staff names, a date of 07/02/25, and shift schedule was on a clip board at the nurse's station on the skilled unit. There was no posted staffing with all required components on the skilled unit. On 07/02/25 at 10:49 a.m., there was a white board with the name [NAME] and [NAME] (halls) and it showed names of staff, and a date of 07/02/25. The whiteboard did not have all the required components of the posted staffing. On 07/02/25 at 10:54 a.m., the [NAME] hall had a whiteboard with staff names and titles. The whiteboard did not have all the required components of the posted staffing. On 07/02/25 at 11:16 a.m., the administrator and assistant administrator observed [NAME] hall,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. EBP was followed during wound care observation for 1 (#13) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers; b. dryer lint compartments were clean and free of excess lint for potential prevention of thorough drying and fire hazard observed during infection control observation of laundry room; andc. contact isolation procedure was followed during the provision of incontinent care for 1 (#32) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for incontinent care.The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility.Findings:1. On 07/01/25 at 10:44 a.m., the wound care nurse entered Resident #13's room to perform sacrum wound care treatment. They donned gloves. CNA #1 was in the resident's room. They had on gloves. On 07/01/25 at 10:55 a.m., the wound care nurse completed Resident #13's sacrum wound care and skin treatment with the assistance of CNA #1. The wound care nurse and CNA #1 did not have on gowns during the wound care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR level 1 was completed after a new mental health diagnosis for 1 (#9) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASARRs.The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A PASSAR Level 1, dated 06/15/21, showed Resident #9 had a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident due to thrombosis and a secondary diagnosis of dementia without behaviors. A Behavior Note, dated 08/31/21, read in part, CNA told this nurse that resident was not acting [their] usual self et attempting to get out of bed by [themselves]. This nurse went to resident to assess et speak with [them] on how [they] was feeling. Resident responding with verbal aggression, body language very tensed as if [they] was going to hit this nurse. Resident demanded to get up, explained the use of hoyer lift to [them] et asked if we could assist [them] with the hoyer lift. Resident agreed. Hoyer brought into room et when res saw sling [they] became very aggressive,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a diagnosis on a PASARR form for a mental health illness for 1 (#73) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for the need of a level II screening. The administrator identified 81 residents resided at the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled Policy for completion of PASRR's, read in part, Evaluate residents/patient prior to admission to facility. Attempt to get good history and physical, including mental health history as well as any intellectual disabilities.Contact OHCA (LOCEU) if person coming to your facility with known intellectual disabilities or evidence or diagnosis of severe mental illness. A review of Resident #73's PASARR, dated 06/06/25, showed question #2 marked No for diagnosis of a serious mental illness for schizophrenic, paranoid, panic, mood or other severe anxiety or depressive disorder, somatoform disorder, personality disorder, or other psychotic disorder, or other mental disorder that may lead to a chronic disability. A review of the diagnosis list per electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party when the resident had a fall for one (#1) of three sampled resident reviewed for falls. The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Doctor Calls form, undated, read in part, Assess residents for change in condition, disease processes, notify physicians and family. Resident #1 had diagnosis which included arterial fibrillation, acute respiratory infection, congestive heart failure. A progress note, dated 06/02/24 at 1:30 p.m., documented Resident #1 was on the floor in room, on their side with a skin tear to right elbow. The note did not document if the resident's representative was notified of the fall. On 10/08/24 at 10:33 a.m. The DON stated They stated they had reviewed Resident #1's progress note from 06/02/24 and did not find documentation anyone at the facility had notified the emergency contacts listed in Resdient #1's chart. On 10/08/24 at 11:21 a.m., LPN #1 was asked the policy for contacting family and/or resident representative for change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the family was notified for one (#68) of one sampled residents who was sent out of the facility for a procedure. The DON stated 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Physicians Appointments policy read in part .2. When a resident has a follow up or routine physician appointment always notify the family and arrange for transportation with the family, ie, personal car, Transfer, Senior Citizens . On 03/27/24 at 1:21 p.m., a nursing note, dated 01/26/24, read in part .resident #65 was sent out for a procedure. On 03/28/24 at 9:57 a.m., the DON reported that there is no documentation of family being notified when resident #65 was sent out for procedure. On 03/27/24 at 10:49 a.m., the LPN #1, stated the nursing notes do not show the family for resident #65 was notified.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,819 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK