No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fairfax Behavioral Health & Memory Care Community

282 County Road 6300, Fairfax, OK 74637 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (918) 642-3234 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$46,436 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $46,436 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-05)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
110 E Beck Dr · (918) 521-9349 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
400 N Main St · (918) 642-1200 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
201 N Main St · (918) 642-1390 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8900 Lake Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.1%13.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.5%3.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.6%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.0%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.5%3.4%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.7%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.4%13.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.5%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.4%94.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.9%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table67.6%17.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.292.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.202.961.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 49.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-21)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff transferred a resident in a safe manner to prevent injury for 1 (#6) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for safe transfers.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 02/03/26 at 1:14 p.m., Resident #6 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room with their left arm wrapped in an ace wrap and secured in an immobilized arm sling.A facility policy titled Policy and Procedure Resident Transfer and Safe Patient Handling, dated 11/01/23, read in part, It is the policy to ensure all resident transfers are performed using proper body mechanics, approved transfer techniques, and appropriate equipment in order to prevent injury to residents and staff and to promote resident dignity and mobility.A care plan for Resident #6, dated 10/02/25, showed the resident required moderate to maximum assistance of two staff members for toileting and incontinent care.An incident note for Resident #6, dated 11/30/25, showed the resident had a fall and was lowered to the bathroom floor by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse for 2 (#33 and #45) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse, which resulted in Resident #45 being hospitalized . The administrator reported four incidents of resident-to-resident abuse in the past 90 days. Findings: An undated policy titled Abuse By A Resident To Other Residents, read in part, In the case of abuse from one resident to another resident, any employee observing the abuse, shall immediately intervene in an effort to protect the resident. If there is an actual physical altercation, the employee shall immediately gain the assistance of another employee to assist in separating the residents involved by moving one resident away from the other. The residents will be geographically separated and supervised until both are calm and not a risk to harm themselves or others, or until it can be determined that the incident is isolated, and no threat or harm exists. 1. On 07/17/25 at 11:57 a.m., Resident #33 was observed in the dining room with their family member who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to access, monitor, and intervene for a change in condition for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care.The administrator identified 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings:A quarterly assessment, dated 11/17/25, showed Resident #1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke, congestive heart failure, hemiplegia and diabetes mellitus type II. The assessment showed Resident #1 was severely impaired in cognition and had unclear speech. The assessment showed Resident #1 required substantial assistance with all activities of daily living. There were no nurse progress notes documented for Resident #1 between 02/03/26 and 02/09/26.A treatment administration record for Resident #1, dated 02/09/26 at 7:44 a.m., showed the resident's finger stick blood sugar was 209.A blood pressure and pulse summary for Resident #1, dated 02/09/26 at 10:37 a.m., showed the resident's blood pressure was 130/84 and heart rate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update care plan interventions after falls for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plan interventions.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 02/03/26 at 1:33 p.m., Resident #2 was observed walking up and down halls with CNA #5. The resident was unsteady on their feet and required hands on assistance to walk. CNA #5 attempted to redirect the resident several times to sit in their specialized wheelchair without success. On 02/03/26 at 2:47 p.m., Resident #2 was observed sitting in their chair while CNA #5 was talking to them.On 02/03/26 at 3:01 p.m., a sign posted in Resident #2's room, read in part, Use call light when needed.On 02/04/26 at 9:48 a.m., Resident #2 was observed walking up and down halls with CNA #5.A document titled Policy: Resident Falls and Prevention, dated 08/01/25, read in part, Interventions will be reflected in the resident's care plan and reviewed regularly .Update the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (#2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for elopements.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 02/03/26 at 1:33 p.m., Resident #2 was observed walking up and down halls with CNA #5. They were unsteady on their feet and required hands on assistance to walk. CNA #5 attempted to redirect resident several times to sit in their broda chair without success. On 02/03/26 at 2:47 p.m., Resident #2 was observed sitting in their chair while CNA #5 was talking to them.On 02/04/26 at 9:48 a.m., Resident #2 was observed walking up and down halls with CNA #5.On 02/04/26 at 11:10 a.m., the park where Resident #2 was found during their elopement was observed to be approximately 50 yards from the facility's back door and on the other side of a small hill.A Policy and Procedure: Resident Elopement Prevention and Response, dated 11/01/23, read in part, It is the policy to protect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 (#4) of 13 sampled residents whose orders were reviewed.The administrator identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An admission assessment, dated 05/08/25, showed Resident #4 had diagnoses which include diabetes mellitus type 2 and acquired absence of right leg below the knee. The assessment showed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated a moderate impairment of cognitive ability. A physician's order, dated 07/05/25, showed to cleanse the left great toe with normal saline, pat dry, apply Betadine (antiseptic) every shift and leave open to air two times a day for wound care.The TAR for July 2025 did not show any wound care completed for the left great toe as of 07/17/25. On 07/17/2025 at 1:34 p.m., Resident #4 stated no treatment was being done on their toe. On 07/17/2025 at 1:42 p.m. ADON #1 stated the order had been put in incorrectly and was triggering a task on the TAR. ADON #1 stated the wound care treatment was not being completed as ordered. On 07/17/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for 2 of 2 meal services observed.The administrator reported 48 residents received meals from the kitchen.Findings:On 07/16/25 at 11:28 a.m., cook #1 was observed to plate one portion of meatloaf, one scoop of mixed vegetables, one scoop of au gratin potatoes, and one brownie.On 07/16/25 at 11:45 a.m., cook #1 was observed to plate a pureed diet plate with one scoop of pureed meatloaf, one portion of pureed corn, one portion of pureed bowtie pasta, and one portion of banana pudding.No bread was served with either meal.A spring/summer menu, dated 07/16/25, showed the menu for the day was meatloaf, au gratin potatoes, vegetable blend of the day, bread of choice, and dessert of the day.On 07/16/25 at 11:50 a.m., cook #2 stated they use frozen pureed food, and they tried to keep the pureed menu similar to the regular menu.On 07/17/25 at 1:51 p.m., the DM stated they had forgotten to prepare bread for the lunch service on 07/16/25. They stated the pureed meal served on 07/16/25 did not follow the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food served from the kitchen was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature.The administrator reported 48 residents received meals from the kitchen.Findings:On 07/16/25 at 12:47 p.m., a test tray was delivered. The food was observed to not be hot, the meatloaf was dry and bland, the mixed vegetables were soggy, the potatoes were not well seasoned, and the brownie was undercooked. No bread was served with the meal.A quarterly assessment, dated 06/18/25, showed Res #7 had a BIMS score (a test of cognitive function) of 15, indicative of intact cognition.A quarterly assessment, dated 07/09/25, showed Res #55 had a BIMS score (a test of cognitive function) of 15, indicative of intact cognition.On 07/15/25 at 10:09 a.m., Res #7 stated the food was not hot when served in the room and it sometimes did not taste appealing.On 07/15/25 at 10:50 a.m., Res #55 stated the food was not good.On 07/15/25 at 3:30 p.m., during a resident council meeting, some residents in attendance voiced concerns regarding temperature and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure lids to bulk containers were not broken and beard guards were worn in the kitchen.The administrator reported 48 residents received meals from the kitchen.Findings:On 07/15/25 at 10:35 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. Dietary Aide #1 was observed washing dishes without wearing a beard guard. A bulk sugar container with a broken lid was also observed.On 07/17/25 at 1:51 p.m., the DM stated staff should wear hair restraints while in the kitchen, and the broken lid for the bulk sugar container should have been replaced.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring was completed for a resident receiving psychotropic medications for 1 (#40) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The administrator reported the facility census was 48.Findings:A facility policy titled Management of Routine Antipsychotic Medications in Long-Term Care, dated 11/01/23, read in part, 3. Monitoring and Documentation -Nursing staff must document: -the resident's response to the medication. -Any side effects, including extrapyramidal symptoms or sedation.An admission record, dated 03/28/25, showed Res #40 had diagnoses which included delusional disorders and unspecified anxiety disorder.A care plan, revised 04/03/25, showed the resident received psychotropic medications and that Res #40 was to be monitored every shift for side effects of the medication.An admission assessment, dated 04/10/25, showed Res # 40 had a BIMS score (a test of cognition) of 15 which was indicative of intact cognition. The assessment also showed Res #40 was receiving an antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit MDS assessment data within 14 days after completion of the resident assessment for 4 (#2, 19, 21, and #48) of 4 residents sampled for transmitting resident assessments. The administrator reported 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An MDS Assessments policy, dated 11/01/23, read in part, The facility will complete MDS assessments for all residents in accordance with CMS requirements .All assessments must be accurate, reflect the resident's status during the designated observation period, and be submitted electronically to the Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) within mandated timelines .Completed MDS assessments will be locked and submitted to the QIES ASAP system with 14 days. On 07/16/25 at 1:00 p.m., a review of MDS assessments for sampled residents was conducted. MDS assessments were not transmitted within 14 days as required for Resident #2, 19, 21, and #48. On 07/17/25 at 1:46 p.m., the DON provided batch transmittal forms dated 05/24/25 and 06/25/25. The forms showed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (#40) of 13 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.The administrator reported two residents had an indwelling urinary catheter.Findings:A facility policy titled Care Plans, dated 11/01/23, read in part, Each resident will have an individualized care plan that is developed and maintained by the interdisciplinary team (IDT). The plan will address the resident's identified needs, strengths, goals and risks, and it will guide consistent, coordinated care delivery by all staff.An admission record, dated 03/28/25, showed Res #40 had diagnoses which included unspecified retention of urine and dementia.An admission assessment, dated 04/10/25, showed Res #40 had a BIMS (a test of cognition) of 15, which was indicative of intact cognition. A physician's order, dated 06/27/25, showed Res #40 had a size 16 French indwelling urinary catheter for a diagnosis of unspecified retention of urine.A review of Res #40's care plan did not show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure EBP were in place during wound care for 1 (#55) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for wound care.The Administrator reported one resident received routine wound care.Findings:On 07/17/25 at 9:30 a.m., ADON #1 was observed providing wound care to Res #55. ADON #1 was not observed to be wearing a gown. No signage was observed indicating Res #55 was on EBP.A facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy and Procedure, dated 11/01/23, read in part, [NAME] Behavioral Health & Memory Care Community shall implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for all residents known to be colonized or infected with MDROs [Multidrug-Resistant Organisms] and in accordance with CDC [Centers for Disease Control] guidance. This includes the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for certain resident care activities even when residents are not in isolation or on contact precautions.An admission record, dated 04/08/25, showed Res #55 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment. The DON identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Observations of rooms on the 100 hall revealed the sinks did not have hot running water. On 10/16/24 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #4 stated they have not had hot water in their room for over a month. The resident stated they have arthritis in their hands and washing them in cold water causes pain. On 10/16/24 at 2:15 p.m., the maintenance supervisor stated the 100 hall has been without hot water due to a broken hot water tank. 10/16/24 at 2:44 p.m., the maintenance supervisor stated they had spoke with the administrator who told them they are to receive a government grant in March and that is when the hot water tank will be replaced. On 10/17/24 at 9:05 a.m., Resident #5 stated they have not had hot water in their room since they arrived on 09/05/24. On 10/17/24 at 9:06 a.m., Resident #6 stated they have not had hot water in their room for over a month. They stated it would be nice to have hot water for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident were free from abuse for one (#1) of three residents sampled for abuse. The DON reported 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Abuse By a Resident To Other Residents, read in parts .abuse as used in this policy shall refer to all forms of abuse including, but not limited to physical, verbal, sexual and psychological . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia with a BIMS of 5 Resident #2 had diagnoses which included dementia with a BIMS of 11. On 10/08/24 at 3:00 p.m., Resident #2 was observed by staff sitting beside Resident #1's bed with their left hand on Resident #1's pubic area. A nurse's note dated, 10/08/24 at 5:29 p.m., documented Residents #1 and #2 were immediately separated. A head to toe assessment was performed on Resident #1 with no signs or symptoms of trauma or injury. The physician, family and [NAME] Police Department were notified. On 10/15/24 at 2:30 p.m., the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#8) of four residents sampled for abuse. The director of nurses reported the census was 53. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Abuse by a Resident to Other Residents, read in parts .Abuse as used in this policy shall refer to all forms of abuse including, but not limited to physical, verbal, sexual, and psychological . Resident #3 had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Resident #8 had diagnoses including schizophrenia and convulsions. On 08/06/24 at 8:05 am, Res #3 was observed in the dining room propelling their wheelchair towards Res #8, who was seated in a wheelchair and stationary. Res #3 was shouting obscenities and threatening Res #8 with bodily harm. Res #3 was observed to bump their wheelchair into the leg of Res #8. The residents separated and Res #8 went out of the dining room to the nurse's desk. As Res #3 passed by Res #8 they were heard to yell more obscenities and threaten Res #8 again. A nurse note, dated 08/06/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who require assistance with dressing were not left unclothed in their rooms and resident catheter bags were covered while in public spaces for one (#12) of two residents reviewed for dignity. A midnight census report, dated 06/02/24, documented 48 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated that was the accurate census at the time the survey began. Findings: The facility's Policy and Procedure for Exercising of Rights policy, undated, read in part, The resident has a right to a dignified existence and the facility will protect and promote the rights of each resident. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of the left leg above the knee. On 06/03/24 at 2:19 p.m., upon entrance to Resident #12's room they were observed lying sideways on their bed nude from the waist down. They stated they could not reposition themselves or reach the call light to ask for assistance. They stated they they had returned from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents the opportunity to develop or refuse the creation of an advance directive or three (#15, 21 and #36) of five residents reviewed for advance directives. A midnight census report, dated 06/02/24, documented 48 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated that was the accurate census at the time the survey began. Findings: The facility Policy and Procedure for Residents Rights Regardign (sic) Advance Directives for Health Care & Mental Health Treatment, undated, read in part, Every competent person has a right to determine whether he/she will receive life sustaining treatment , who will make the decisions concerning their health care if they cannot and provide their wishes concerning organ donation. 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 3. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 06/04/24 at 12:57 p.m., LPN #1 stated the advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure required interdisciplinary team members participated in the planning process of resident care plans for six (#5, 12, 16, 21, 26, and #36) of twelve residents reviewed for care plans. A midnight census report, dated 06/02/24, documented 48 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated that was the accurate census at the time the survey began. Findings: The facility Policy and Procedure Regarding Resident Care Plan, undated, read in part, The comprehensive care plan will be developed by the IDT which will include the attending physician, registered nurse with the responsibility for the resident, nurse aide with responsibility for the resident, dietary staff representative, the resident and/or resident representative if possible, and any other healthcare professional as identified by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident. 1. Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE]. 2. Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. 3. Resident #16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a resident was educated on the risks and benefits of using bedrails and obtained informed consent; b. bed frames and bed rails were inspected prior to the application of rails to the frame and use of bed rails by a resident; and c. alternatives to the use of bed rails were attempted prior to the use of bed rails for two (#12 and #36) of two sampled resident reviewed for bed rails. The DON reported eight residents had bed rails in use at the facility. Findings: When asked for the facility policy on the use of bed rails the DON offered the Policy and Procedure for the use of Alternative Measures to Restraints which was undated. The policy read in part, Positioning bars may be used by residents who request them as an aid to reposition in bed. Also, residents who are confused or disoriented to the point that they do not recognize the edge of the bed, but who would not attempt to climb over them, may use them to prevent falling from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain registered nurses on duty eight hours each day seven days every week. Findings: A Policy Regarding Facility Staffing, undated, read in part, It shall be the policy of this facility to employ sufficient, adequately trained staff, to be on duty 24 hours a day, to meet the needs of the residents residing in the facility, as determined by the Administrator and/or Director of Nursing. A Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report for the first quarter of 2024 (October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023) documented registered nurse hours were not submitted for 11/04/23, 11/05/23, 11/18/23, 11/23/23, 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/16/23, and 12/17/23. A facility staffing schedule for November 2023, did not document registered nurses as having worked on 11/04/23, 11/05/23, and 11/18/23. A facility staffing schedule for December 2023, did not document registered nurses as having worked on 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/16/23, and 12/17/23. A Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report for the second quarter of 2024 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within the ordered time frame. A midnight census report, dated 06/02/24, documented 48 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated that was the accurate census at the time the survey began. Findings: A facility Time of Administration policy, undated, read in part, The following schedule will be implemented for administration of medications, unless physician orders indicated otherwise .TID First dose within 2 hours of rising, second dose no sooner than 5 hours, third dose no sooner than 5 hours. A Medication Admin Audit Report, dated 06/04/24, documented 23 of 48 residents who had medications ordered to be administered at 7:00 a.m., were administered those medications after 12:00 p.m. A Medication Admin Audit Report, dated 06/05/24, documented 13 of 49 residents who had medications ordered to be administered at 7:00 a.m., were administered those medications after 12:00 p.m. On 06/05/24 at 1:17 p.m., CMA #2 stated they had not finished passing morning medications as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of discharge was provided to a resident and the ombudsman office was notified when a resident was discharged from the facility to a hospital for one (#12) of two resident reviewed for discharges and hospitalizations. The director of nurses stated six residents had discharged in the previous six months. Findings: The Policy and Procedure for Transfer and Discharge, undated, read in part, The facility will notify the resident, resident's representative if authorized, the person responsible for payment of the resident's care, or legal representative of the resident, of the tranfers or discharge. The reason for the transfer or discharge will be documented in the resident's medical record. Notice will be made as soon as possible before transfer or discharge when an emergency exists. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #12's MDS section of their electronic medical records found the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and code a pressure wound in Section M of a MDS quarterly assessment for one (#12) of one resident reviewed for pressure wounds. A midnight census report, dated 06/02/24, documented 48 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated that was the accurate census at the time the survey began. Findings: The Policy & Procedure for Assessment Review, undated, read in part, This facility will ensure that each resident's condition will be examined by the nursing facility at least once every three months, and if necessary, will change the resident's assessment to assure the continued accuracy of each resident's assessment. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of the left leg above the knee. A progress note, dated 05/13/24 at 7:56 p.m., documented Resident #12 had a new wound on the coccyx about 1 cm in length. A progress note, date 05/23/24 at 8:03 a.m., documented Resident #12's sacral wound was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was performed following the development of a new pressure ulcer and partial amputation of a resident's leg for one (#12) of twelve resident reviewed for Minimum Data Set assessments. A midnight census report, dated 06/02/24, documented 48 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated that was the accurate census at the time the survey began. Findings: The Policy & Procedure for MDS Frequency & Completion, undated, read in part, If a significant change in the resident's condition does occur, an assessment must be done within 14 days of when the change in condition was identified. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of the left leg above the knee. A progress note, dated 05/13/24 at 7:56 p.m., documented Resident #12 had a wound on their coccyx. A hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have policy and procedures for obtaining and using feedback from staff, residents, and resident representatives. Findings: A review of the facility QAPI and QAA records did not find documentation of a program to obtain feedback from facility staff, residents, and resident representatives. On 06/07/24 at 12:05 p.m., the Administrator stated although the facility did have a grievance process for residents it did not have a feedback program or policy and procedures for a feedback program.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light system for one (#47) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for a functioning call light system. The Administrator identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Resident Call System policy, undated, read in part, .In the event of a call light malfunction, the facility will provide alternative methods of alerting staff of needs, ie: bell, buzzer, light. Facility staff will then immediately notify maintenance via verbal communication of call light malfunction for further intervention . Resident #47 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, atherosclerotic heat disease, bipolar disorder. Resident #47's care plan, revised 04/21/24, documented to keep call light within reach and mark call light with bright tape. On 06/03/24 at 1:01 p.m., Resident #47's call light was out of reach of the resident. The call light was attached to privacy curtain. Resident #47 was sitting in her wheelchair. Resident #47 was unable to state if the call light was working properly. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. foods were labeled and dated, and disposed of according to policy, and b. kitchen equipment, sinks and refrigerators were cleaned and free from food debris and grime. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: An undated, Food Storage, Preparation and Distribution policy, read in parts, .Leftovers food items will be labeled, dated and stored under refrigeration .non-potentially hazardous leftovers will be used or disposed of within 48 hours .Leftover foods will be stored in covered containers or wrapped securely. Each item will be clearly labeled and dated before being stored . An undated, Sanitation and Infection Control policy, read in parts, .The following is a suggested cleaning schedule for kitchen and dining areas .All Appliances After each use .Sinks After each meal . On 05/09/23 at 8:30 a.m., the following was observed in the kitchen: a. the hand-washing sink was observed to have brown stains and grime in the sink, b. a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place to monitor for Legionella and other waterborne diseases. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: An undated Water Management Program policy, read in part, .The facility can control the growth and spread of water-borne pathogens through a water management program . On 05/11/23 at 8:30 a.m., the medication storage room was observed. The double sink was observed to be used, the water was observed to back up from the other side of the drain. LPN #1 was asked how long had the sink not been draining. They stated, since the maintenance man had quit. They were asked how long was that. They stated about one to two weeks ago. On 05/11/23 at 10:35 a.m., the Administrator was asked if there was a system in place to monitor for Legionella or other waterborne diseases. They stated, No. They were asked if they were working on a system. They stated, we are hiring a new maintenance man, and they are familiar with all the requirements.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was performed as ordered by the physician for one (#59) of three sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six and three residents had wounds. Findings: Resident #59 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness, bilateral below the knee amputations, depression, and type two diabetes mellitus. A Nurses Progress Note, dated 05/07/23 at 2:57 a.m., read in parts, Resident put thumb through the side of [their] cup of noodles and the liquids caused an area on the outside of [their] right thigh approximately 1.5 cm x 3.9 cm. Obtained an order from PCP for Silvadene. Clean area with NS pat dry apply and cover with non-stick Telfa pad BID . A Treatment Administration Record, dated 05/07/23 through 05/08/23, documented the treatments had been completed. On 05/09/23 the resident refused the treatment. On 05/09/23 at 3:10 p.m., LPN #1 was asked what date was documented on Resident #58's dressing. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week for October 2022, November 2022, December 2022, January 2023, February, 2023, March 2023, and May 2023. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: The Schedule Sheet, dated October 2022, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for 10/8, 10/15, 10/16, 10/21, 10/22, 10/25, 10/26, or 10/30/22. The Schedule Sheet, dated November 2022, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for 11/13, 11/18, or 11/20/22. The Schedule Sheet, dated December 2022, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for 12/1 or 12/21/22. The Schedule Sheet, dated January 2023, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for 01/21, 01/27, 01/28, or 01/29/23. The Schedule Sheet, dated February 2023, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for 02/12, 02/19, or 02/24/23. The Schedule Sheet, dated March 2023, did not contain documentation of RN coverage for 03/16, 03/24, or 03/25/23. The Schedule Sheet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring was completed for: 1. anti-anxiety medication for one (#1); 2. anti-depressant medications for three (#1, 3, and #4); and 3. anti-psychotic medication for one (#1) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six, six residents received psychoactive medications, one resident received an antipsychotic medication, two residents received an anti-anxiety medication, and six residents received an anti-depressant medication. Findings: An undated, PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING MEDICATION EFFICACY AND POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS policy, read in parts, .Individual monitoring of a specific drug regimen will be based on the physician's therapeutic goals .desired effect .Monitoring for potential side effects will be accomplished through data collection such as AIMS evaluation, non-movement side effects documentation, behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than 5% for two (#4 and #59) of three sampled residents observed during medication administration. The medication error rate was 6.45%. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: An undated Policy & Procedure On Medication Errors, read in part, .It shall be the policy of this facility to insure that medications error rates are not greater than 5% and residents will be free of any significant medication errors . An undated Medication Card Identification and Administration System, read in parts .Remove the appropriate medication dosage, placing it in the souffle cup . 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure and depression. A Physician Order, dated 04/25/23, documented to administer Duloxetine 30 mg one capsule by mouth one time a day for depression. On 05/10/23 at 8:35 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to remove a card of Duloxetine from the medication cart, then return it to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Tuberculin solution multi dose vials, were labeled when the seal was punctured and disposed of after 30 days. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: On 05/11/23 at 8:30 a.m., the medication storage room was observed. There were two vials of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative solution that were in the medication refrigerator. One of the vials had been used and had no date on the box or the vial. The other vial had a date (03/28/23) written on the box. LPN #1 was asked how long TB solution was good for after the seal was punctured. They stated they were unsure, but everything should be dated when opened. They were asked who the TB solution was used for. They stated the tests are used on the residents and the staff. On 05/11/23 at 8:45 a.m., the DON was asked how long the TB medication is good for once the seal is broken. They stated they were unsure and would have to ask. On 5/11/23 at 12:01 p.m., the DON stated, We don't have an actual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0851 — pattern
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit accurate data regarding direct care staffing information to CMS on October 2022, November 2022, and April 2023. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: The PBJ Staffing Data Report, for Quarter 1, 2023 (October 1 - December 31), documented the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours a day for 10/01, 10/02, 10/08, 10/09, 10/13, 10/16, 11/23, and 11/24/22. The Data Report of Nursing Home Information, dated April 2023, documented the following: 1. On 04/29/23, the census was three. The direct staff for day shift was 15.50 hours, evening shift hours was 15.75 hours, and night shift was 15.75 hours. 2. On 04/30/23, the census was three. The day shift was 15.50 hours. The facility should have had 16 hours each shift for direct care staffing. On 05/11/23 at 11:05 a.m., the DON was asked if the facility had issues with licensed coverage for 24 hours/day. The DON stated they had been there for a year and in charge of the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written information for the bed hold policy for one (#5) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented the census was six. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and hallucinations. A Discharge Assessment, dated 04/07/23, documented the resident had an unplanned discharge to an acute hospital. On 05/10/23 at 3:52 p.m., the MDS coordinator was asked if they provide the resident or resident representative with a copy of the bed hold policy when the resident was discharged to the hospital. They stated, No. There was no documentation Resident #5 had been provided a bed hold policy at the time of discharge.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$46,436 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $4,186 — penalty dated 2026-02-05
  • $42,250 — penalty dated 2025-07-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FAIRFAX BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND MEMORY CARE COMMUNITY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
RICHMOND, JENNIFERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
TODD, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2026
RICHMOND45 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
FINCH, COREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2026
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$844K
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-100.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 14%Other / private 13%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$472per resident / day
operating cost
$14,342per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375467. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next