No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maple Healthcare And Rehab

12 East Conner, Fairland, OK 74343 · For profit - Corporation · 29 certified beds · (918) 676-3685 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (918) 676-3685 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
209 W Conner Ave · (918) 848-5028 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
11 W Central Ave · (918) 542-4444 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
21853 S Highway 69 · (918) 257-6887 · Call to confirm hours
Park
205-299 S Main St · (918) 676-3636 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.5%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.1%3.4%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.1%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.4%13.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.9%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.8%94.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.4%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.7%17.5%17.1%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.75
RN hoursweekends
68.8%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 29 beds and averages 21.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-02)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated and offered the opportunity to create advance directive for two (#21 and #23) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. A Detail Census Report, dated 12/30/24, documented 24 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #21's electronic health records found no advance directive. 2. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #23's electronic health records found no advance directive. On 12/30/24 at 12:00 p.m., Resident #23's representative stated they did not recall talking to the facility staff about advance directives. On 12/31/24 at 8:17 a.m., Resident #21 stated they were unaware of speaking to a staff member about advance directives. On 01/02/25 at 10:21 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated they had not been documenting they offered and educated residents regarding advance directives. They stated there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one (#26) of 17 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON reported the census was 24. Findings: Resident #26 had diagnoses which included parkinsonism and hypertension. A verbal order form, dated 09/11/24, documented resident #26 was admitted hospice on 09/11/24. Resident #26's care plan was reviewed and the care plan did not incorporate hospice services into the plan of care. On 12/31/24 at 10:11 a.m., the corporate nurse stated hospice services should have been included on the care plan.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The DON reported 24 residents receive meals from the kitchen. Findings: An undated facility policy titled food Safety Requirements, read in parts, Dry food storage- keep foods/beverages in a clean dry area off the floor .Holding- staff shall monitor food temperature while holding for delivery to ensure proper hot and cold holding temperatures are maintained .All equipment used in the handling of food shall be cleaned and sanitized, and handled in a manner to prevent contamination. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 12/30/24 at 8:13 a.m. The following observations were made: a. the paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink was out of paper towels, b. the Low Temperature Dish Machine Temperature Form had no documented temperatures or chemical concentrations since 10/21/24, c. there was an open gallon container of milk without documentation of the date it was opened, d. there was an open container of sliced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement an enhanced barrier precaution policy to prevent the spread of MRDO's in the facility. The DON reported the census in the facility was 24. Findings: On 12/30/24 at 8:45 a.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. No signage was noted indicating enhanced barrier precautions were in place to protect at risk residents. On 01/02/25 at 10:26 a.m., CNA #1 stated the facility did not use EBP. On 01/02/25 at 10:28 a.m., CNA #2 stated they were not familiar with EBP. On 01/02/25 at 10:31 a.m., LPN #1 stated to their knowledge the facility was not using EBP. On 01/02/25 at 10:35 a.m., the DON stated they are currently not using EBP. ' ' ' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed after a resident was admitted to hospice for one (#26) of one sampled resident reviewed for hospice. The DON reported the census was 24. Findings: Resident #24 had diagnoses which included parkinsonism and hypertension. A verbal order form, dated 09/11/24, documented Resident #24 was admitted to hospice on 09/11/24. The resident's medical record was reviewed and did not document a significant change assessment had been completed. On 12/31/24 at 10:11 a.m., the corporate nurse stated a significant change assessment should have been completed within 14 days of the resident being admitted to hospice.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention regarding falls for one (#21) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. A Detail Census Report, dated 12/30/24, documented 24 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titles Fall Prevention Program, read in part, High Risk Protocol: a. The resident will be place on the facility's Fall Prevention Program. i. Indicate fall risk on the care plan. ii. Place Fall Prevention indicator (such as star, color coded sticker) on the name plate to the resident's room. A fall risk focus in Resident #21's care plan, dated 10/20/24, read in part, Follow facility fall protocol. A fall risk assessment, dated 11/16/24, documented Resident #21 was scored as a high risk for falls. On 12/31/24 at 1:11 p.m., Resident #21's room door was inspected for an indication they were on the fall protocol. No indicator on the resident's door or walker was observed. On 01/02/25 at 9:38 a.m., LPN #1 stated there was no indicator on the door or in the room of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction was addressed by the physician and residents did not receive psychotropic medications on an as needed basis for more than 14 days for one (#16) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON reported 21 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: Resident #16 had diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. A physician's order, dated 09/11/23, documented the resident was to receive alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg as needed every 8 hours. The order did not have an end date. A GDR, dated 04/02/24, read in parts, This resident is currently on PRN alprazolam 0.5mg q8h with the following diagnosis: anxiety .Please evaluate current diagnosis, behaviors and usage patterns and evaluate continued need. PRN psychotropic orders cannot exceed 14 days with the exception that the prescriber documents their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order . The GDR was not signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three (#5, 10, and #16) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered policy, dated December 2016, read in part, .The comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed within seven .days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment . 1. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. An admission assessment, dated 01/28/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making. The Care Plan documented it was initiated on 08/29/23. The electronic clinical record did not contain any other comprehensive care plans for Resident #10. 2. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder. An admission assessment, dated 01/05/23, documented the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for PRN antianxiety medication use past 14 days for one (#10) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified five residents who were ordered PRN psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. A physician order, dated 01/15/23, documented the resident was ordered Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. The Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber report from the Consultant Pharmacist, dated 02/04/23, read in part, .This resident is currently on PRN Lorazepam 0.5mg q12h with the following diagnoses: anxiety. Please .evaluate continued need . The pharmacy recommendation was not addressed by the physician. Review of the February 2023 MAR revealed the resident was ordered Lorazepam 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. Review of the March 2023 MAR revealed the resident was ordered Lorazepam 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. The Consultant Pharmacist's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation for one (#10) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #10 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. A physician order, dated 01/15/23, documented the resident was ordered Lorazepam 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. A physician order, dated 08/15/23, documented the resident's Lorazepam order was changed to 0.5mg every six hours as needed for anxiety. Review of the August 2023 MAR revealed the resident had received an as needed dose of Lorazepam 0.5mg 18 times, including a one time order, from 08/10/23 through 08/30/23 The Controlled Drug Record, dated 08/10/23 through 08/30/23, documented Lorazepam 0.5mg tablet had been signed out 34 times. On 08/31/23 at 9:54 a.m., CMA #2 was asked what the facility protocol was for documentation of narcotic medications. They stated they signed the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure code status was accurate for one (#8) of 16 sampled residents who were reviewed for advance directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Advance Directives policy, dated December 2016, read in part, .Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record . Resident #8 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. The admission Record form documented the resident had a DNR. A physician order, dated 08/05/22, documented the resident was a full code. Review of the electronic clinical record revealed an undated, signed DNR had been uploaded on 08/09/22. On 08/30/23 at 10:11 a.m., LPN #1 was asked what the code status was for Resident #8. They reviewed the electronic clinical record and stated the resident was a full code. They were asked what the signed DNR was dated. They reviewed the DNR and stated the form was not dated. On 08/30/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident representative of changes in condition and treatment for one (#15) of two residents reviewed for notification of change. The Residents Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A Change in Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised date 2017, read in part .Our facility will promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g. changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.) . A medication order, dated 07/30/23, documented resident #15 was to be administered Tylenol #3 [acetaminophen with codeine] 300-30 mg every six hours as needed for pain. A progress noted, dated 07/30/23, documented a new order for Tylenol #3 had triggered a drug interaction alert. The alert stated the medication Tylenol #3 could interact with the resident's prescribed medication Mirtazapine [an oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to provide an Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage to one (#14) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications. The Entrance Conference Worksheet Beneficiary Notice - Resident discharged Within the Last Six Months form, documented three residents, who had discharged in the previous six months prior to the survey, had remained in the facility after a discharge from a Medicare Part A stay. Findings: Resident #14 had diagnosis which included bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. A progress note written by the SSD, dated 07/26/23, documented the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on that date. A progress note written by LPN #3, dated 08/03/23, documented resident #14 was readmitted to the facility on that date. On 08/31/21 the Administrator returned a completed SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form which documented resident #14 was not given a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an incident of physical assault on a resident was reported to the facility administration and state agency for one (#24) of 16 residents assessed for abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #24 had diagnosis which included cognitive communication disorder and pneumonia. An abuse investigation and reporting policy, revised date July 2017, read in part, . All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported . A nursing note, dated 05/31/23 at 7:08 p.m., documented a resident's family member had attempted to force the resident from their bed. The note read in part, .[they] yanked the blankets off, pulled [their] heel protectors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to one (#24) of one resident reviewed for hospitalizations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #24 had diagnosis which included cognitive communication disorder and pneumonia. A nursing noted, dated 05/31/23 at 9:08 p.m., documented the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital related to low blood pressure. On 08/31/23 at 12:08 p.m., the administrator was asked if resident #24 was given a written notice of transfer and the bed hold policy prior to being sent to a hospital on [DATE] as indicated by a nurse note of the same date. They stated they would need to check in the resident's records. At 12:38 p.m., the administrator was asked about the written notice of transfers prior to hospitalization for resident #24. They stated they were aware of the regulation but had not found a copy or documentation that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a PASRR level one assessment form had been completed for one (#1) of one residents reviewed for preadmission screening. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia and major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms. An admission record, print date 08/29/23, documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 08/29/23, resident #1's medical records were reviewed for the presence of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form. None was located in the electronic medical record or paper chart. At 12:10 p.m., resident #1 was observed in their room and an attempt to question them was made. The resident was not interviewable. On 08/30/23 an Oklahoma Healthcare Authority Nursing Facility Level of Care Assessment form, dated 08/30/23, was observed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings for one (#15) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised date December 2016, read in part . A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident . Resident #15 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia. On 08/30/23 at 8:02 a.m., a resident representative reported they had not been invited to or attended an interdisciplinary treatment team meeting since resident #15 had resided at the facility. On 08/31/23 at 1:25 p.m., the DON was asked to describe the process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ADL care was provided for dependent residents for two (#7 and #16) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for ADL care. The DON identified 20 residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care. Findings: The Care of Fingernails/Toenails policy, dated April 2007, read in parts, The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed .Nail care includes daily cleaning . The Shaving the Resident policy, dated December 2007, read in parts, .The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness and to provide skin care .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .The date and time the procedure was performed . 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder. The Care Plan, revised 04/02/23, documented the resident had an ADL self care performance deficit. The quarterly assessment, dated 06/15/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making and required limited one person physical assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide pre and post dialysis assessments for one (#12) of one resident reviewed for dialysis care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented one resident at the facility attended off-site dialysis treatments. Findings: A hemodialysis policy, undated, read in part, .The nurse will ensure that the dialysis access site (e.g. AV shunt or graft) is checked before and after dialysis treatments and every shift for patency by auscultating for a bruit [an abnormal vascular sound] and palpitating for a thrill [an abnormal vibration] . Resident #12 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. A care plan focus for hemodialysis, revised date 05/04/22, documented the resident required dialysis three times weekly. A review of the interventions related to the focus did not include pre and post dialysis checks of the access site nor presence of bruit and thrill. On 08/29/23 at 12:44 p.m., resident #12 was observed in their room. They were asked if the nurses had been checking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician for of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, identified 23 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Regimen Reviews policy, dated April 2007, read in parts, .The Consultant Pharmacist will provide a written report to physicians for each resident with an identified irregularity .Copies of drug/medication drug regimen review reports, including physician responses, will be maintained as part of the permanent medical record . 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder. The Recommendation Summary for DON and Medical Director report from the Consultant Pharmacist, dated 11/03/22, read in part, .This resident has been taking the antipsychotic Aripiprazole 5mg qam since [DATE]. Please evaluate the current dose and consider a dose reduction . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in the proper consistency for one (the noon meal) of one meal observed. The DON identified two residents who were ordered a puree diet. Findings: On 08/29/23 at 1:08 p.m., the dietary manager was observed to puree kielbasa and fried potatoes. On 08/29/23 at 1:17 p.m., the dietary manager stated they had pureed the food to the consistency in which they would serve it and provided the surveyor a sample of the kielbasa and fried potatoes. The kielbasa was observed to not be smooth, had pieces of meat still visible, and required chewing upon tasting. The fried potatoes were observed to not be smooth, had pieces of potato with the skin on which required chewing upon tasting. On 08/29/23 at 1:27 p.m., the dietary manager plated the pureed foods and handed the tray to the administrator to serve the resident. The administrator was asked to return the tray to the kitchen before it was served to the resident. The dietary manager was asked how they ensured pureed foods were the correct consistency.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure opened foods were dated, food with signs of freezer burn was discarded, and scoops were not stored in bulk food bins, b. ensure equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner, c. ensure hair restraints were utilized by staff while in the kitchen for two (the dietary manager and [NAME] #1) of two staff observed during meal preparation and service, and d. maintain proper hand hygiene during meal service for one of one meal services observed. The DON identified 22 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. Findings: The Sanitization policy, dated October 2008, read in part, .Kitchen .surfaces not in contact with food shall be cleaned on a regular schedule and frequently enough to prevent accumulation of grime . The Refrigerators and Freezers policy, dated December 2014, read in part, .Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with a sanitizing solution on a scheduled basis and more often as necessary . The Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was updated annually. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Facility Assessment policy, dated July 2017, read in parts, .A facility assessment is conducted annually .Once a year, and as needed, a designated team conducts a facility-wide assessment to ensure that the resources are available to meet the specific needs of our residents . The Facility Assessment document, provided by the facility, read in part, .Resident Population Profile - [DATE] - [DATE] . On 08/31/23 at 12:08 p.m., the administrator was asked how often the facility assessment was updated. They stated they were to update it at least annually. They were asked why it had not been updated after 03/14/23. They stated they did not know. They stated the information obtained from 03/15/22 through 03/14/23 was the last time the facility assessment had been updated.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to assess the need for education and influenza, pneumonia, or COVID-19 vaccinations for one (#19) of three residents reviewed for immunizations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #19 had diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease. A review of resident #19's medical records found no documentation of the resident or their representative having been assessed for the need of influenza, pneumonia, and COVID-19 immunizations. There was no documentation of the resident or their representative having been educated or offered the opportunity to receive immunizations for the three diseases. On 08/31/23 at 4:33 p.m., the Administrator and DON reported they had been unable to find any documentation the resident or their representative have been question regarding the resident's immunization status or that they had been given the opportunity for education and immunization while at the facility.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure training was provided regarding activities that constitute abuse/neglect, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse/neglect, and dementia management/resident abuse prevention. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure, dated 02/26/19, read in parts, .Training .All facility personnel will be trained at Orientation and annually thereafter on; The facility policy and procedures relative to abuse and neglect .Appropriate interventions to deal with aggressive reactions of residents . On 08/31/23 at 8:00 a.m., the inservices/training related to abuse/neglect, procedures for reporting abuse/neglect, and dementia management/resident abuse prevention were requested from the administrator. The administrator stated they were unable to locate the inservice book to show evidence of training. They stated they had the book in the DONs office on 08/28/23 but was afraid someone had thrown the binder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide 12 hours of nurse aide inservice training for 12 of 12 months of inservice training records requested. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/29/23, documented 23 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Staff Development Program policy, dated December 2009, read in part, .All personnel must participate in .regularly scheduled in-service training classes . On 08/31/23 at 8:00 a.m., the facility's nurse aide inservice training documentation was requested from the administrator. The administrator stated they were unable to locate the inservice documentation for the past 12 months. They stated they had the book in the DONs office on 08/28/23 but was afraid someone had thrown the binder away. On 08/31/23 at 1:26 p.m., CNA #2 was asked how often they received inservice training. They stated they had not received any inservices/training since January 2023. They stated at times there was a paper for the staff to review and sign. On 08/31/23 at 1:29 p.m., CNA #1 was asked how often they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to: ~ Ensure the dish machine reached the proper temperature/chemical sanitation level for one of one dish machines observed; ~ Ensure opened food products were labeled/dated and properly stored for two of two refrigerators and one of three freezers observed; and ~ Ensure food temperatures were obtained before serving to ensure proper holding temperature for one (noon meal) of one meals observed. The facility identified eight residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 07/06/21 at 10:39 a.m., dietary aide #1 was asked if she would test the sanitation on the dish machine. She stated they had some test strips but did not know where they were located. The specifications on the dish machine documented the minimum wash/rinse temperature was 120 degrees Fahrenheit and the sanitization was 50 ppm. At 1:56 p.m., the dietary manager tested the dish machine. The sanitation strip was observed to test at 10 ppm, the wash temperature was 100 degrees Fahrenheit, and the rinse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-14 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure survey results were accessible to residents/visitors. This had the potential to affect all eight residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/08/21 at 10:08 a.m., a resident group meeting was conducted. The one resident in attendance was asked if he knew where survey results were located for their viewing if desired. He stated he did not know where the survey results were located. On 07/08/21 at 10:18 a.m., went to the nurse's station with resident #62. The survey book was not observed. CNA #1 stated the survey book was usually right here and pointed to the chart rack on the right hand side and stated it was usually right here. The DON came up and stated here it is. She stated it should be up on the desk so the residents do not have to ask for it. There were no other survey results after 02/2019 annual survey. The facility had a COVID survey that had been conducted on 06/29/20. On 07/08/21 at 10:55 a.m., showed the administrator the survey report book and told her that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide iability and appeals notices as required for two (#64 and #65) of two sampled residents for liability and appeals notices. The BOM identified two residents who had skilled days remaining had been discharged from skilled services in the last six months. Findings: On 07/07/21 at 11:25 a.m., asked the BOM to complete the SNF beneficiary protection notification review form for the two sampled residents. The BOM was asked to provide the surveyor with the liability and appeals notices if provided for two residents. At 12:39 p.m., the administrator reported the forms were not completed for resident #65 and resident #64 had the signed original and they could not find their copy.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-14 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete baseline care plans for four (#62, #63, #112, and #113) of four sampled residents whose baseline care plan were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included spastic quadriplegic, cerebral palsy, and functional quadriplegic. The resident's clinical record did not include a baseline care plan. 2. Resident #63 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, epileptic seizures, and gastrostomy status. The resident's clinical record did not include a baseline care plan. 3. Resident #112 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included paraplegia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the clinical record did not reveal a baseline care plan had been developed. 4. Resident #113 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included COPD and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with a gastrostomy tube received the appropriate treatment and services for one (#63) of one sampled resident reviewed with a gastrostomy tube. The facility identified one resident who resided at the facility who had a gastrostomy tube. Findings: Resident #63 had a re-admission date of 02/22/21. The resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, epileptic seizures, and gastrostomy status. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/22/21, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired related to cognitive skills for daily decision making, required total care of ADLs, and had enteral tube for nutrition. The resident's clinical record did not include a comprehensive care plan. A physician's order, dated 06/12/21, documented to administer 165 ml/hr of Water Oral Liquid (Infant Foods) via peg tube two times a day related to gastrostomy status. A physician's order, dated 06/27/21, documented to administer 30 cc of Water Oral Liquid (Infant Foods) per peg tube four times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' monthly drug regimen reviews were acted upon by the DON and physician for two (#62 and #63) of three sampled residents whose pharmacy DRRs were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who received medications who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #63 had a re-admission date of 02/22/21. The resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, epileptic seizures, and gastrostomy status. A physician's order, dated 03/31/21, documented to administer Guiatuss Syrup 100 mg/5 ml to give 30 cc via peg tube as needed for cough. A pharmacy DRR/MRR, dated 05/13/21, documented to clarify the Guiatuss order as the order did not include how often the medication could be given. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/22/21, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired related to cognitive skills for daily decision making, required total care of ADLs, and had enteral tube for nutrition. On 07/13/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were not on prn antianxiety medications for greater than 14 days without physician rationale to extend the use of the prn medication for one (#112) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified one resident who was ordered prn antianxiety medications. Findings: Resident #112 had diagnoses which included paraplegia and diabetes mellitus. A telephone order, dated 05/26/21, documented the resident was ordered Clonazepam 0.5 mg as needed twice daily for anxiety Review of the order summary report, dated 07/12/21, revealed the prn Clonazepam was an active physician's order with a start date of 05/26/21. Review of the clinical record did not reveal documentation of a rationale to extend the duration of the prn antianxiety medication past 14 days. On 07/13/21 at 3:11 p.m., the DON was asked who monitored to ensure residents were not ordered prn psychotropic medication for greater than 14 days without physician rationale to extend the use. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete a facility assessment. The facility identified eight residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/07/21 at 10:50 a.m., the administrator was asked for the facility assessment. She stated she did not have access to the facility assessment. She stated the previous administrator had the access.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete, accurate, and well organized for four (#3, #7, #8, and #63) of eleven sampled residents whose records were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 07/13/21 at 3:27 p.m., it was revealed to the MDS #1 nurse the resident #63's last comprehensive assessment was completed on 06/20/19. She was asked why an annual assessment was not completed in 06/2020. She stated she had started doing the MDS assessment the end of 03/2021 or the beginning of 04/2021. She stated she could not see anything before 02/16/21 in the computer system. She stated when the new company took over the facility the new company took everyone out of the computer system. 2. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was discharged from the facility on 03/16/21. A nurse's note, dated 03/16/21 at 11:00 a.m., documented the resident discharged to his family. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to identify deficient practices and develop and implement plans of actions to correct identified concerns for seven (#3, #5, #8, #62, #63, #112, and #113) of eleven sampled residents who were reviewed during the survey. The facility identified eight residents who resided in the facility. Findings: See F636, F637, F641, F655, F656, F661, F756, F825, F842, and F883. On 07/13/21 at 04:28 p.m., the DON was asked if the facility had addressed any concerns in the QAA. She stated she did not know. She stated she had not since she had started working at the facility on 06/21/21. She stated there was nothing in the QA book since 10/16/20. The DON was asked prior to the survey did the facility staff identify and develop a QA plan r/t the RAI process. She stated no. She stated it was her understanding the medical director was going to come to facility in 07/2021 and would have a QA meeting. The DON was asked prior to the survey did the facility staff identify and develop a QA plan r/t the clinical records not being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-14 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the QAA meeting was held quarterly for two (1st and 2nd quarters of 2021) of three quarters that were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: On 07/06/21 at 1:44 p.m., during the entrance conference with the administrator she was given a copy of the entrance conference worksheet. The worksheet asks for the frequency of the QAA meetings. On 07/06/21 at 02:54 p.m., the DON reported the last QAA meeting at the facility 10/16/20.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control policy and procedures were implemented to prevent possible infections as evidenced by: -a resident with a gastrostomy tube received the appropriate treatment and services for one (#63) of one sampled resident reviewed who had a gastrostomy tube, ~hand washing was performed during a medication pass observation for one (#5) of five sampled residents observed during medication pass, ~a Influenza vaccination was offered to a resident for one (#7) of five sampled residents for influenza vaccination review, ~received education r/t COVID-19 vaccinations, were offered the COVID-19 vaccinations, and/or if the vaccinations were declined had the required documentation for two (#62 and #112) of five sampled residents and five (CNA #2 and #3, LPN #2 and #3, and RN #1) of five staff members employee files that were reviewed for the COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility identified one resident who resided at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure influenza immunization were offered to residents for one (#7) of five sampled residents reviewed for influenza immunizations. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #7 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation in the resident's clinical record that the influenza immunization had been offered or was given. On 07/13/12 at 1:30 p.m., the DON was asked if there was any documentation for the resident's influenza immunization. She stated she could not find any documentation of the vaccinations, consents, or refusals in any of the charts she had available. She stated there was much of the residents' prior history that was not able to be accessed at that time.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and family staff members received education r/t COVID-19 vaccinations, were offered the COVID-19 vaccinations, and/or if the vaccinations were declined had the required documentation for: two (#62 and #112) of five sampled residents and, five (CNA #2 and #3, LPN #2 and #3, and RN #1) of five staff members employee files that were reviewed for the COVID-19 vaccinations. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included spastic quadriplegic, cerebral palsy, and functional quadriplegic. No immunization history, consents, or denials were located in the resident's clinical record for the COVID-19 vaccination. 2. Resident #112 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included paraplegia and diabetes mellitus. No immunization history, consents, or denials were located in the resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure for screening of employees before hire for four (RN #1, LPN #2 and #3, and CNA #3) of five employee files that were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: The facility's abuse prevention policy and procedure, dated revised on 02/26/19, documented, .Criminal Background Check . In states where Criminal Background Checks are required; all employment candidates are required to authorize the facility to conduct a background check for conviction of crimes . Background screens are submitted after a conditional offer is extended and must be received within the appropriate timeframes per state requirements . Prior Employment Reference(s)- Reference check(s) of the candidate's prior employment must be conducted by the department director, or designee,prior to hiring the candidate . 1. LPN #2 had a hire date of 06/30/21. A time clock adjustment form for LPN #2, dated 07/01/21, documented the punch date was 06/30/21 and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments for two (#8 and #63) of eight sampled residents whose comprehensive assessments were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #63 had a re-admission date of 02/22/21. The resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, epileptic seizures, and gastrostomy status. The resident's clinical record documented the resident's last full comprehensive assessment (annual) was dated 06/20/19. The resident's clinical record documented quarterly assessments were completed on 09/20/19, 12/21/19, 03/22/20, 09/20/20, and 05/22/21. There was no comprehensive annual assessment completed in 06/2020 and no comprehensive admission assessment completed after the resident's re-admission on [DATE]. On 07/13/21 at 3:27 p.m., it was revealed to the MDS #1 nurse the resident's last comprehensive assessment was completed on 06/20/19. She was asked why an annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed when a resident elected hospice services for one (#5) of one residents who was reviewed for hospice services. The facility identified one resident who received hospice services. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included COPD and pain. A hospice order, dated 06/11/21, documented, .I CERTIFY THAT THE PATIENT HAS A TERMINAL DIAGNOSIS OF COPD AND PROGNOSIS IS SIX MONTHS OR LESS IF THE DISEASE RUNS ITS NORMAL COURSE .PT admitted TO HOSPICE FOR COPD, END STAGE . Review of the assessments did not reveal a significant change assessment had been completed when the resident elected hospice services. On 07/13/21 at 4:03 p.m., the MDS coordinator was asked why a significant change assessment had not been completed when the resident elected hospice services on 06/11/21. She stated the resident should have had a significant change assessment completed. She stated she did not know the resident had been placed on hospice services.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an admission assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one (#112) of nine residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility identified two residents who had been admitted in the past 30 days. Findings: Resident #112 had diagnoses which included paraplegia and diabetes mellitus. A skilled nurse note, dated 05/13/21, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and a colostomy. An admission assessment, dated 05/26/21, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and an ostomy. The assessment documented the resident was always continent of bowel and bladder. The assessment documented the resident received an antianxiety medication one day during the seven day look back period and had not received an antibiotic during the seven day look back period. Review of the May 2020 MARs revealed the resident had received an antianxiety medication and an antibiotic for seven of seven days of the look back period. On 07/13/21 at 3:28 p.m., the MDS coordinator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed for one (#63) of eight sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility identified eight residents who resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #63 had a re-admission date of 02/22/21. The resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, epileptic seizures, and gastrostomy status. The resident's clinical record did not include a comprehensive care plan. On 07/13/21 at 11:30 a.m., the DON was asked for the resident's care plan. The DON stated the MDS #1 nurse had three more care plans to complete.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure discharge summaries were completed for two (#3 and #8) of three sampled discharged residents who were reviewed for discharge summaries. The facility identified two residents who discharged from the facility in the last month. Findings: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was discharged from the facility on 03/16/21. A nurse's note, dated 03/16/21 at 11:00 a.m., documented the resident discharged to his family. The resident's discharge summary was not in the resident's clinical record. On 07/13/21 at 11:50 a.m., the administrator was asked for the resident's discharge summary. The administrator stated the previous owners used 'Matrix' (a different electronic health record computer system). She stated they did not have access to 'Matrix' (where the resident's previous electronic record was located).2. Resident #3 had diagnosis which included schizoaffective disorder. On 07/12/21 at 11:09 a.m., the discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure coordination of care for hospice for one (#5) of one sampled residents who was reviewed for hospice. The facility identified one resident who received hospice services. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included COPD and pain. A hospice order, dated 06/11/21, documented, .I CERTIFY THAT THE PATIENT HAS A TERMINAL DIAGNOSIS OF COPD AND PROGNOSIS IS SIX MONTHS OR LESS IF THE DISEASE RUNS ITS NORMAL COURSE .PT admitted TO HOSPICE FOR COPD, END STAGE . Review of the resident's care plan did not reveal a care plan had been developed for hospice services. On 07/13/21 at 3:13 p.m., the DON was asked how care was coordinated with hospice. She stated she communicated with the hospice nurses about showers provided and what medications the hospice would supply. She was asked who was responsible to develop a plan of care when a resident elected hospice services to ensure staff knew how care was coordinated between the hospice company and the facility. She stated the MDS coordinator had recently been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a yearly NA competency review was completed yearly for one (CNA #4) of one CNAs who had worked at the facility for over one year. The facility identified eight residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 07/06/21 at 1:44 p.m., during entrance conference with the administrator the administrator was asked for a list of CNAs who have worked at the facility for over one year. Later a list was provided which documented CNA #4 was the only CNA who had worked at the facility for over one year. CNA #4 had a hire date of 10/15/18. On 07/13/21 at 11:10 a.m., the BOM was asked for the yearly NA competency review for CNA #4. The BOM stated CNA #4 had been hired as the SSD. She was asked if the SSD still worked as a CNA. She stated yes.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician of resident lab results for one (#112) of three sampled residents whose labs were reviewed. The facility identified three residents who had routine lab orders. Findings: Resident #112 had diagnoses which included paraplegia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the clinical record revealed the following lab reports dated 06/24/21: ~ CBC; ~ CMP; ~ Lipid panel; ~ PreAlbumin; ~ TSH; ~ Hemoglobin A1C; and ~ A ferritin level. Review of the clinical record did not reveal the physician had been notified of the lab results. On 07/12/21 at 3:30 p.m., the DON was asked what the facility protocol was for notification of lab results to the physician. She stated the lab results were faxed to the physician for review. The physician signed the results and sent them back to the facility. She stated if the lab was critical they called the physician. She was asked if the physician had been notified of the lab results dated 06/24/21. She stated the notification should be documented in the nurse notes and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated for physical therapy services as ordered by the physician for one (#112) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for therapy services. The facility identified five residents who had limited range of motion. Findings: Resident #112 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included paraplegia and diabetes mellitus. A admission assessment, dated 05/26/21, documented the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, had limited range of motion on one side of the upper and lower extremities, utilized a wheelchair, required extensive assistance with most ADLs, and the resident's overall goal was to be discharged to the community. A care plan, dated 05/28/21, documented the resident had limited physical mobility related to paraplegia and staff were to provide gentle range of motion as tolerated with daily care. A physician order, dated 06/14/21, documented physical therapy was to evaluate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SELECTIS HEALTH INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 12/31/2020
BALLER, LANCEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2020
DAY, SARAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/26/2021
DESMOND, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
ECKHART, KRYSTALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
SELECTIS MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2020
BRYANT, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2022
CARROW, JERIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2024
HAHNER, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2023
HAWK, SHEILAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/2025
SMALL, NOVETTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2024
SPILLARS, RODGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
TROST, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2022
WILSON, DEANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/03/2025
FURSTENBERG, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/2025
NEUMAN, CLIFFORDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$240K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 6%Other / private 7%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$276per resident / day
operating cost
$8,403per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$226per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375515. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next