Fairview Fellowship Home For Senior Citizens, Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 69.4 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.78 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/22/25 at 1:40 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation related to the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement from the facility. 1. Resident #1's admission record, dated 11/01/24, showed the resident was admitted with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur. A Wander risk assessment, dated 11/01/24, showed Resident #1 was a low risk for elopement with a score of 4. A care plan, last revised 05/08/25, showed the resident was exit seeking on the following dates; a. 03/19/25; b. 04/11/25; c. 04/15/25; d. 04/07/25; e. 04/08/25; and f. 05/03/25. The care plan, revised 05/08/25, showed Resident #1 was moved to the memory care unit on 05/08/25. There were no additional documented interventions to address the wandering and exit seeking other than redirection. Resident #1's progress notes showed exit seeking behaviors and attempts to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were used during wound and catheter care for 2 (#18 and #34) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions practices by staff. The administrator identified six residents required enhanced barrier precautions during the provision of care. Findings: A facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure, last updated on 07/28/25, read in part, Enhanced barrier precautions expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities.Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use include dressing, providing hygiene, changing briefs, device care, urinary catheter care, feeding tube, wound care with any skin opening requiring a treatment order. 1. On 12/04/25 at 8:36 a.m., LPN #1 was observed performing donning gloves to provide wound care on Resident #34's left lower leg. After wound care LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication orders for a psychotropic medication were correct to prevent unnecessary medication administered after a gradual dose reduction for 1 (#8) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 72 residents were administered medications from the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled PCU059-Medication Discrepancies and Adverse Reactions, dated 03/2025, read in part, Medication Discrepancy: An inappropriate or incorrect medication prescribed for, dispensed for, or given to a resident. It is also an omission of an ordered medication due to a prescribing, dispensing, or administering error.On 10/13/25 at 1:36 p.m., Resident #8 was observed ambulating independently in the common area on the memory care unit. Resident #8's admission record, dated 08/30/24, showed they were admitted with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and generalized anxiety disorder.Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/11/25, showed their cognition was severely impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication order for an anti-anxiety medication was entered accurately and an anti-anxiety medication was administered following physician orders for 1 (#8) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON identified 72 residents received medications from the facility. Findings:On 10/13/25 at 1:36 p.m., Resident #8 was observed ambulating independently in the common area on the memory care unit. Resident #8's admission record, dated 08/30/24, showed they were admitted with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and generalized anxiety disorder.Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/11/25, showed their cognition was severely impaired with BIMS score of 04. The assessment showed Resident #8 was prescribed anti-anxiety medication during the look back period. A facility policy titled PCU059-Medication Discrepancies and Adverse Reactions, dated 03/2025, read in part, Medication Discrepancy: An inappropriate or incorrect medication prescribed for, dispensed for, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional accepted standards of quality were met related to a physician's order being entered accurately for 1 (#8) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified 72 residents were administered medications from the facility. Findings:The facility's policy titled PCU059-Medication Discrepancies and Adverse Reactions, dated 03/2025, read in part, Medication Discrepancy: An inappropriate or incorrect medication prescribed for, dispensed for, or given to a resident. It is also an omission of an ordered medication due to a prescribing, dispensing, or administering error.On 10/13/25 at 1:36 p.m., Resident #8 was observed ambulating independently in the common area on the memory care unit. Resident #8's admission record, dated 08/30/24, showed they were admitted with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and generalized anxiety disorder.Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/11/25, showed their cognition was severely impaired with BIMS score of 04. The assessment showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure careplan's were reviewed or revised for 2 (#1 and #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plan revisions. The DON identified 75 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's policy titled Resident Safety- Wandering/Elopement, revised 10/2023, read in part, The director of nursing will evaluate each resident upon admission and every three months thereafter for need of the wonder dash guard system. The evaluation will utilize information input from the family or legal guardian of the resident, the resident physician, and when possible, the resident. Additionally, residents will be evaluated for the wonder guard system when they: Seem confused or disoriented Pack belongings Have a history of wondering Verbalize a desire to leave Attempt to leave the facility Residents who are mobile enough to wonder and exhibit one or more of the above behaviors will be recommended for wonder guard. The facility's policy titled MDS (minimum data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent for meal assistance were treated with dignity during the noon meal for five (#11, 12, 16, 36, 50, 57, and #58) of 13 dependent residents observed during meal assist The MDS coordinator stated 13 residents required assistance with meal intake Findings: 1. Resident #11 had a diagnosis of seizures. A Care Plan, dated 11/27/23, documented Resident #11 had a potential impaired nutritional status and required assistance with meals at times. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 02/29/24, documented Resident #11 was cognitively intact for decision making and independent with eating. 2. Resident #12 had a diagnosis of dementia. A Care Plan, dated 07/20/23, documented Resident #12 had a potential for impaired nutritional status and required assistance with meals at times. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 04/18/24, documented Resident #12 had severe cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance with eating. 3. Resident #36 had a diagnosis of dementia. A Care Plan, dated 11/30/20,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated with fall interventions after falls for two (#32 and #36) of four sampled residents reviewed for falls. The DON identified 50 residents had falls in the facility and 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The facilty's Incident Reporting, Information Routing and Follow-Up policy, revised 03/2023, read in part, All incidents are to be reported .so that proper care , interventions, treatment is identified and performed. The policy also read, The Care Plan Coordinator will review for appropriate interventions listed, update the care plan. A MDS and Care Plan Process document, revised 07/2023 read in part, Each care plan is to be accurate in identifying individualized approaches from each discipline to assist in providing care to each resident. The facility's Policy #13 policy, revised 07/2023, read in part, .If a resident is identified at risk for falls the MDS/ Care Plan coordinator will be notified and it will be addressed in the care plan . 1. Resident #32 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered hydration for one (#44) of two sampled residents reviewed for hydration. The MDS coordinator identified 13 residents who required assisted with eating/drinking. Findings: Resident #44 had diagnoses which included dementia, urinary incontinence, and UTI. A dietary note, dated 3/11/24, documented annual nutrition assessment was completed and Resident #44 had the estimated need of 1802 milliliters of fluid, monitor, and to continue the plan of care. A physician's progress note, dated 05/08/24, documented Resident #44 had an abnormal CT which indicated possible old stroke, Resident #44 had a UTI and to continue antibiotics for five days, culture pending, push fluids, and monitor. Resident #44's electronic record documented the resident had 600 ml of fluid on 05/09/24, 720 ml on 05/10/24, 360 ml on 05/11/24 and 05/12/24, 600 ml on 05/13/24 and 05/14/24, 1190 ml on 05/15/24, 360 ml on 05/16/24 and 05/17/24, 480 ml on 05/18/24, and 680 ml on 05/19/24. On 05/19/24 at 10:35 a.m., Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were assessed for risk of entrapment, reviewed the risks and benefits of the bed rails with the resident or resident representative, or obtained informed consent prior to installation of the bedrail for two (#43 and #168) of two sampled residents assessed for accident hazards. The DON identified 23 residents who utilized bed rails. Findings: 1. Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia, history of right femur, and protein calorie malnutrition. Resident #43's significant change assessment, dated 03/19/24, documented they had severe cognitive impairment and required partial to substantial assistance with ADL care. An ADL care plan, dated 01/04/24, documented Resident #43 required extensive assistance with ADLs and utilized half bed rails. On 05/19/24 at 12:49 p.m., Resident # 43 had a half bedrail in place on their bed in the upright position. 2. Resident #168 had diagnoses which included heart failure, altered mental status, and non-displaced chip fracture of the right talus. (A small…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Census: 65 The PBJ Staffing Data Report, for 10/01/23 thru 12/31/23, documented the facility did not identify RN hours for 10/1/23, 12/22/23, 12/25/23, and 12/30/23 On 05/21/24 at 9:15 a.m., requested HR to provide documentation an RN had worked eight consecutive hours, in the building on 10/1/23, 12/22/23, 12/25/23, and 12/30/23. On 05/21/24 at 1:40 p.m., HR reported the facility did not have RN coverage in the building on 10/01/23.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,415 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $18,415 — penalty dated 2025-05-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in OK