No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Wolfe Living Center At Summit Ridge

18501 Northeast 63rd Street, Harrah, OK 73045 · Non profit - Church related · 48 certified beds · (405) 454-1400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (405) 454-1400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
18961 NE 23rd Street · (405) 772-4650 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19671 NE 23rd St · (405) 454-6261 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18499 NE 50th St · (405) 464-7774 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2000 N Peebly Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
18509 NE 63rd St · (405) 454-6211

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.3%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.8%3.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%13.7%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.8%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.5%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.7%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%17.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.5%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%74.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission40.5%27.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.4%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.712.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.152.961.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.8%CMS range 36.9–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.6–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.2–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
1.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
54.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 36.6 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-01)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment was accurately coded for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of resident assessments. The administrator identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion, dated 10/01/24, read in part, Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. A Quarterly MDS, ARD of 04/18/25, showed Resident #1 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's, dementia, and severely impaired cognition. The assessment showed section E0900 (Section of the MDS for wandering) was coded as 0 for wandering in the seven day look-back period. A Progress note, dated 04/18/25 at 6:00 a.m., showed Resident #1 had wandered/paced three times that shift. An Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 04/18/25 at 2:49 p.m., showed Resident #1 was at risk for elopement. The assessment showed the resident wandered aimlessly or was non-goal-directed. On 04/20/25 at 3:03 p.m., ADON #1 reviewed Resident #1's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to review and revise the care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed for elopement. The administrator identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 03/24/25, read in part, Resident specific interventions that reflect the residents' needs.The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. An incident report for elopement for Resident #1, dated 04/15/25, read in part, Call received from maintenance staff the resident was in the back of the building ambulating across the parking lot. Maintenance staff stayed with resident until nursing staff reached [them] and assisted [them] back into the facility without incident. A head to toe assessment was performed with no noted injuries or distress. Video was reviewed, resident was shown leaving through the ambulance door on East Wing without door alarm sounding.INTERVENTIONS: 15 minute visual checks on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's POA was included in their clinical record for 1 (#13) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #13 had diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit and atrial fibrillation. Resident #13's Advance Directives Acknowledgement form, dated 08/21/23, read in part, I do have an Advance Directive/ Living Will/ Durable Power of Attorney for medical or health care decisions. Resident #13's clinical record did not contain a copy of their POA. A Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives policy, dated 03/24/25, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advance directives .Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney .On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advance beneficiary notices were provided for 2 (#140 and #141) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for beneficiary notices. The Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged within the Last Six Months form, showed 12 residents who were discharged to home with skilled days remaining in the last six months. Findings: A facility policy titled Wolfe Living Center-Advanced Beneficiary Notices, dated 02/17/22, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage .If services are being terminated and the beneficiary wants to continue receiving care that is no longer considered medically reasonable and necessary, the facility shall issue an ABN prior to furnishing non-covered care. 1. The Beneficiary Notice - Resident Discharge Within the Last Six Months form, showed Resident # 140 was discharged from skilled services, had skilled days remaining, and discharged home. Resident #140's EHR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not: a. conducting a complete and thorough investigation; b. establishing coordination with the QAPI program; c. reporting to the OSDH within 2 hours of the allegation of abuse; and d. assess the residents for any sign of injury for 2 (#1 and #23) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 01/01/22, read in part, The facility will develop an implement written policies and procedures that: a. Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of resident and misappropriation of resident property; b. Established policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations; and c. Include training for new existing staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, reporting procedures, and dementia management and resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to the state agency, but no later than two hours after the allegation was made for 1 (#1) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 01/01/22, read in part, 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies within Specified timeframe: a. Immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #1's annual assessment, dated 12/08/24, showed Resident #1's BIMS score was 03 and they were dependent on staff for showers and baths.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 (#1) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 01/01/22, read in part, The facility will develop an implement written policies and procedures that: . 4. Identifying and interviewing, all involve persons, including the alleged victim, alleged, perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation . 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #1's annual assessment, dated 12/08/24, showed, Resident #1's BIMS score was 03 and they were dependent for showers and baths. An OSDH form 283, combined initial and final report, dated 08/26/24, showed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received their baths/showers as scheduled for 1 (#25) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for activities of daily living. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/25/25 at 10:44 a.m., Resident #25 was observed with a medium length beard, hair combed, dressed in a long sleeve shirt, with long pants, and no odors present. A Bathing a Resident policy, dated 01/2022, read in part, It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene and help prevent skin issues. Resident #25 had diagnoses which included stage 4 chronic kidney disease and bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee. An admission resident assessment, dated 03/12/25, showed Resident #25's cognition was intact (BIMS 15), and they required supervision or touching assistance for the task of shower/bathe self. The assessment showed it was very important to Resident #25 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. An undated shower schedule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided as ordered for 1 (#4) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for non pressure wounds. ADON #1 identified six residents with non pressure wounds resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/26/25 at 1:30 p.m., Resident #4 was observed in the horse shoe activity. The resident was observed to have ace wrap dressings to their bilateral lower legs and shoes and socks to their bilateral feet. A clean dressing change policy, dated 01/2022, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection .Physician's orders will specify type of dressing and frequency of changes. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included a full thickness venous ulcer. Resident #4's current wound care order, dated 03/05/25 with a start date of 03/12/25, showed a wound care order for the left posterior lower leg venous wound: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry with gauze, apply collagen powder, super absorbent pad, wrap with four layer wrap once weekly and prn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect of monitoring was in place for a resident who was prescribed anticoagulant therapy for 1 (#22) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medication. The ADON identified three residents were prescribed anticoagulant medication. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Medication Monitoring, read in part, This facility takes a collaborative, systematic approach to medication management, including the monitoring of medication's for efficacy and adverse consequences .'Adverse Consequence' refers to unwanted, unintended, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such as impairment or decline in an individual mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective bi-polar type and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #22's annual assessment, dated 01/17/24, showed their BIMS score was 15 and they were prescribed an anticoagulant medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize a gait belt when assisting a resident in a geriatric chair for one (#2) of one sampled resident observed being positioned during the lunch meal service. The Administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Use of Gait Belt policy, dated 01/2022, read in part, .It is the policy of this facility to use gait belts with residents that cannot independently ambulate or transfer for the purpose of safety .Each nursing department employee will be given a gait belt during orientation .All employees will receive education on the proper use of gait belt during orientation and annually . A Turning and Repositioning policy, dated 01/22, read in part, .Repositioning techniques in bed .To minimize friction and shear, use sheets or lift equipment to avoid pulling or dragging . Resident #2 had diagnoses which included dementia and cognitive communication deficit. A quarterly assessment, dated 10/27/23, documented Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment, and they required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the removal of expired medications and supplies from the medication storage room and medication cart. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/12/22 at 9:45 a.m., the medication room was observed. Expired medications and supplies were found in the facility's medication room refrigerator and medication storage room for the following. 1. 9- Bisacodyl suppositories with an expiration date of 09/2022. 2. 7- Hepatitis B vaccines with an expiration date of 03/01/22. 3. 1- Box [NAME] 20cc syringes with an expiration date of 11/01/21. 4. 14- BD Safety-Lok 3ml syringes with an expiration date of 06/29/21. 5. 10- [NAME] Prevent Syringes with Safety Hypodermic Needle 3cc/23gauge with an expiration date of 03/31/22. 6. 2- Entra-Flo Gastrostomy Feeding Tubes with an expiration date of 08/06/22. 7. 2- Boxes adhesive remover wipes with an expiration date of 02/16/21. 8. 1- Box Inter-dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WOLFE LIVING CENTER ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2007
BEEM, MYRTAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2020
CAREY, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2023
DOVER, DERRELLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
JOHNSON, ERNESTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2001
LAWLESS, DAWNITAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
SHIRES, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2017
ST. PIERRE, JOCELYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
VANVLIET, CHARLENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2007
VOGEL, STEVEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
DAVIDSON, ROWENAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2021
NORMAN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2002
PORTANOVA, CARLOSIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2019
ELEVATE SENIOR LIVING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2021
WATERS, DANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 7%Other / private 22%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$259per resident / day
operating cost
$7,872per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$247per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375472. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next