Haskell Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 35.0 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to help prevent falls for two (#1 and #5) of three residents reviewed for falls. Res #1 had four falls in two months, they suffered a hematoma to back of head and abrasion to elbow with one fall and had a fracture to their orbital facial bones on the last fall. The facility failed to: a) Implement interventions and/or appropriate interventions to prevent falls for the residents after each fall occurrence. b) Monitor and/or update the residents' plan of care for appropriate fall interventions. c) Ensure staff were aware of additional care needs for the residents. The administrator identified 16 residents had fallen in the last six months. Findings: A Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy documented .staff, with the input of the Attending Physician, will identify appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls .If falling recurs despite initial interventions staff will implement additional or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure posted staffing information contained projected and actual staffing hours worked. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/22/24 at 11:05 a.m., a white board at the nursing station was observed to contain the facility name, date, census, staff and their position, but did not contain projected and actual staffing hours worked. On 09/25/24 at 3:54 p.m., a white board at the nursing station was observed to contain the facility name, date, census, staff and their position, but did not contain projected and actual staffing hours worked. On 09/27/24 at 3:52 p.m., the corporate nurse stated they were not aware of the requirements to post projected and actual hours worked.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one (#10) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified seven allegations of abuse within the last six months. Findings: A policy titled ABUSE POLICY read in part, .REPORT ALL ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND ALL SUBSTANTIATED INCIDENTS TO THE STATE AGENCY AND TO ALL OTHER AGENCIES AS REQUIRED AND TAKE ALL NECESSARY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS DEPENDING ON THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION . Res #10 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia, depressive episodes, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, and pain. A care plan, dated 05/24/24, documented the resident had an ADL self care deficit related to a diagnosis of quadriplegia. The care plan documented the resident was at risk of altered psychosocial well being related to no family support and history of ineffective coping mechanisms. The quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/24, documented the resident was not impaired cognitively and was dependent with activities of daily living. On 09/23/24 at 1:22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge and entry resident assessments were completed for one (#7) of six sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #7 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction. A progress note, dated 06/24/24 at 2:56 p.m., documented Res #7 left the facility via the facility van to visit their family member at the hospital and stay with another family member. A progress note, dated 06/25/24 at 4:02 p.m., documented Res #7 returned to the facility via the facility van. A progress note, dated 07/09/24 at 9:59 a.m., documented Res #7 left the facility to stay with a family member who was hospitalized . A progress note, dated 07/12/24 at 1:56 p.m., documented Res #7 returned to the facility. There was no discharge return anticipated or re-entry resident assessments completed. On 09/27/24 at 3:27 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated they were not aware discharge and entry tracking resident assessments had to be done when someone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessment was accurate for one (#7) of six sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #7 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and suicidal ideations. Res #7 had a level II PASARR which was completed on 09/22/21. An annual resident assessment, dated 08/29/24, documented Res #7 did not have a level II PASARR. On 09/27/24 at 3:22 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated they miscoded the resident assessment for Res #7. They stated knew the resident had a level II PASARR, but just failed to code it on the resident assessment.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure a level II PASARR was care planned for one (#7); and b. make a referral to the OHCA after a new serious mental illness diagnosis for one (#9) of two sampled residents whose PASARRs were reviewed. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #7 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and suicidal ideations. Res #7 had a level II PASARR completed on 09/22/21 and it documented the resident needed a psychiatric consult and counseling services. The care plan for Res #7 did not contain documentation regarding a psychiatric consult or counseling services. On 09/27/24 at 3:22 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated they failed to add interventions as recommended on the PASARR for psych visits/counseling. They stated they usually care planned things like that ,but just failed to do it. 2. Res #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 06/29/20 the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was competent to self administer medication and report medication errors to the physician for one (#7) of six sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #7 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and suicidal ideations. Res #7's Level II PASARR, dated 09/22/21, documented Res #7 required professional nursing supervision with medication and required medication management. A physician's order, dated 07/05/23, documented an order for folic acid (a supplement) 1 mg daily. A physician's order, dated 07/05/23, documented an order for tamsulosin (a medication for enlarged prostate) 0.4 mg at bedtime. A physician's order, dated 07/05/23, documented an order for Sodium Bicarbonate (a medication for heartburn) 650 mg three times a day. A physician's order, dated 07/05/23, documented an order for calcitriol (a medication for low calcium) 0.25 mcg every other day. A physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were changed and labeled monthly for one (#5) of two sampled residents whose oxygen tubing/humidifier bottles were observed. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility Findings: Res #5 had diagnoses which included COPD, chronic respiratory failure, dyspnea, abnormalities of breathing, and congestive heart failure. A physician's order, dated 07/20/23, documented Res #5's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were to be changed and labeled monthly on the 20th of each month. A care plan focus, dated 08/30/23, documented the resident's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle were to be changed and labeled monthly. A TAR for September 2024, documented Res #5's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was changed on 09/20/24. On 09/22/24 at 11:10 a.m., the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle labels were dated 08/21/24. On 09/23/24 at 2:38 p.m., the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle labels were dated 08/21/24. On 09/25/24 at 9:41 a.m., the oxygen tubing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for one (#10) of twelve sampled residents reviewed for abuse and one (CNA#1) of five sampled employees whose background checks were reviewed. The administrator identified 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled ABUSE POLICY read in part, .THIS FACILITY HAS PROCEDURES TO IDENTIFY EVENTS, SUCH AS SUSPICIOUS BRUISING OF RESIDENT, OCCURRENCES, PATTERNS AND TRENDS THAT MAY CONSTITUTE ABUSE .THIS FACILITY HAS PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE DIFFERENT TYPES OF INCIDENTS AND IDENTIFY THE STAFF MEMBER/MEMBERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INITIAL REPORTING .PROTECT RESIDENTS FROM HARM DURING AN INVESTIGATION .REPORT ALL ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND ALL SUBSTANTIATED INCIDENTS TO THE STATE AGENCY AND TO ALL OTHER AGENCIES AS REQUIRED . An undated Abuse Policy, read in part, This facility has procedures to screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating residents. The screening will include .checking with the the appropriate licensing boards and registries. A Background…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one (#10) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified seven allegations of abuse within the last six months. Findings: A policy titled ABUSE POLICY read in part, .THIS FACILITY HAS PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE DIFFERENT TYPES OF INCIDENTS AND IDENTIFY THE STAFF MEMBER/MEMBERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INITIAL REPORTING, LEADING TO THE INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND REPORTING OF RESULTS TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES . Res #10 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia, depressive episodes, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, and pain. A care plan, dated 05/24/24, documented the resident had an ADL self care deficit related to a diagnosis of quadriplegia. The care plan documented the resident was at risk of altered psychosocial well being related to no family support and history of ineffective coping mechanisms. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/24, documented the resident was not impaired cognitively and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a wound care plan for one (#24) resident of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings: The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/07/23, documented three residents had pressure ulcers. Res #24 was admitted with diagnoses which included diabetes and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the left side. Skin assessments dated 07/07/23, 07/14/23, and 07/21/23 documented Res #24 had a pressure ulcer on the right heel. On 08/07/23 at 9:50 a.m., Res #24 was observed lying on their left side. On 08/09/23 at 10:46 a.m., LPN #1 was observed applying Betadine (a topical antiseptic) to a pressure ulcer on Res #24's right heel. On 08/09/23 at 10:47 a.m.,LPN #1 reported Res #24 was noncompliant with wearing a heel protector on their right foot and keeping their right foot off of the surface of the bed. On 08/09/23 at 11:06 a.m., the MDS coordinator reported the wound care for Res #24 should have been on the care plan. On 08/09/23 11:07 at 11:07 a.m., LPN #1 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$3,422 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $3,422 — penalty dated 2023-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK