Fountain View Manor, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 81.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete criminal history background checks for 2 (LPN #1 and LPN #2) of 5 sampled employees reviewed for criminal history background checks. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy, read in part, Screening: The facility will screen employees for a history of abuse, neglect or mistreating residents by attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers, and checking with the appropriate licensing boards and registries.1.An undated and untitled employee list showed LPN #1 was hired on 10/08/24.A review of the employee file for LPN #1 showed no criminal history/background check results. 2. An undated and untitled employee list showed LPN #2 was hired on 06/25/25. A review of the employee file for LPN #2 showed no criminal history/background check results. On 01/14/26 at 12:34 p.m., the administrator stated they were told they did not have to do background checks on nurses.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare food in a manner to minimize the risk of infection/cross contamination for 1 (the noon meal) of 1 meal services observed. The DM identified 80 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 01/13/26 at 12:12 p.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. [NAME] #1was observed to prepare the puree dessert. DA #1 was observed to carry a bucket with sanitizing water to the sink in the cooking area, beside the prep table, used to prepare puree food. DA #1 was observed to dump the contents of the bucket in the sink, then they set the bucket on the prep table beside the food processor. On 01/13/26 at 12:39 p.m., DA #1 was observed to wipe down a prep table with a rag from the sanitizing bucket. DA #1 was then observed handling food trays without washing their hands. On 01/13/26 12:45 p.m., cook #1 was observed to take a large sheet pan of burritos out of the oven using a sanitizing rag as a potholder. They were observed to prepare trays without washing hands. On 01/20/26, at 1:40 p.m., the DM stated the staff should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were operational and available for 14 of 14 rooms occupied by residents on the memory care unit.The DON identified 22 residents resided in the memory care unit. Findings:On 01/13/26 at 9:00 a.m., a tour of the memory care unit was conducted. On 01/13/26 at 9:01 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:02 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:03 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:04 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:05 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:06 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:07 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:08 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have no call light.On 01/13/26 at 9:09 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or representatives were offered the opportunity to create an advance directive for 2 (#9 and #18) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives.The DON identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings:1.An undated admission record showed Resident #9 admitted to the facility on [DATE].A review of electronic health records for Resident #9 showed no advance directive acknowledgment form in the record.2. An undated admission record showed Resident #18 admitted to the facility on [DATE].A review of electronic health records for Resident #18 showed no advance directive acknowledgment form in the record.On 01/14/26 at 11:33 a.m., social services #1 stated there were no advance directive acknowledgement forms in the residents' charts. Social Services #1 stated the form must have been left out of the admission packet when they made more copies.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for antipsychotic medications for 1 (#18) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments.The DON identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A physician order, dated 11/12/25, showed Resident #18's Olanzapine (an antipsychotic) was discontinued.A quarterly assessment, dated 11/25/25, showed Resident #18 had a BIMS score of 10 which showed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included dementia and depression. The assessment showed Resident #18 had received an antipsychotic medication daily during the seven day look back period.On 01/20/26 at 10:39 a.m., the DON stated the assessment was inaccurate.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to date and change oxygen equipment as ordered by the physician for 1 (#55) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for oxygen use. The ADON identified five residents with orders for oxygen use. Findings: On 01/12/26 at 2:17 p.m., Resident #55 was observed lying in bed with their eyes closed. The resident had humidified oxygen in place per nasal cannula. Resident #55's nasal cannula was not dated. The humidifier bottle and storage bag taped to the oxygen machine showed was dated 11/26/25. On 01/13/26 at 10:25 a.m., Resident #55 was observed resting with their eyes closed. Resident #55 had a nasal cannula with humidified oxygen in place. The nasal cannula was not dated, and the humidifier bottle was dated 11/26/25. A storage bag was taped to the side of the oxygen machine and was dated 11/26/25. On 01/13/26 at 4:10 p.m., Resident #55 was observed lying in bed with oxygen per nasal cannula in place. The oxygen tubing was not dated and the humidifier bottle and a storage bag hanging from the oxygen machine was dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for 2 (#49 and #75) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wound care.The administrator identified three residents with open wounds and three residents with urinary catheters for the use of enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: 1. On 01/14/26 at 9:05 a.m., LPN #3 was observed to provide wound care for Resident #49. LPN #3 gathered the supplies and entered the room of Resident #49. LPN #3 was observed to don a pair of gloves, but was not observed to don a gown. An undated facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, read in part, PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities .Wound Care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. An annual assessment, dated 12/17/25, showed Resident #49 was severely impaired for daily decision making and had memory problems. The assessment showed the resident did not have pressure ulcers. The assessment showed Resident #49 had diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure posting staffing information contained the required components and was accessible to all residents. This had the potential to affect 73 of 73 residents. The administrator identified 73 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/22/24 at 8:55 a.m., posted staffing information was observed on a white board at the nursing station. The facility name and staffing hours were not documented. On 04/23/24 at 9:00 a.m., posted staffing information was observed on a white board at the nursing station. The facility name and staffing hours were not documented. On 04/24/24 at 1:30 p.m., there was no posted staffing information in the Alzheimer's unit. On 04/25/23 at 9:30 a.m., the DON reported there was no posted staffing information in the Alzheimer's unit and reported anyone wanting to know staffing information would have to go to the central nursing station outside of the unit. The DON reported they were not aware of the requirements for posted staffing information.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to follow their abuse prevention policy by not obtaining criminal background checks upon hire for 9 (CNA #1, 2 and #3, Dietary Aides #1 and #2, SS Assistant #1, Activity Assistant #1 and #2 and Housekeeper #1) of 65 employees hired between 2016 and 2024. The administrator identified 73 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy, undated, read in part, .Screening: It is the policy of this facility to screen employees and volunteers prior to working with residents. Screening components include .criminal background checks .A criminal background check will be conducted on all prospective employees . The Employees roster, undated, documented the following: a. CNA #1 was hired on 02/15/24 b. CNA #2 was hired on 03/27/19 c. CNA #3 was hired on 03/08/17 d. Dietary Aide #1 was hired on 01/23/24 e. Dietary Aide #2 was hired on 09/27/23 f. SS Assistant #1 was hired on 11/22/22 g. Activity Assistant #1 was hired on 02/02/23 h. Activity Assistant #2 was hired on 03/02/23 i. Housekeeper #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of MDS assessments: a. for diuretic use for one (#23) of 19 sampled residents; b. for falls for two (#10 and #23) of 19 sampled residents; c. for insulin use for one (#9) of 19 sampled residents; and d. for antipsychotic medication use for one (#17) of 19 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 73 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #23 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain, and anxiety. An admission MDS assessment, dated 04/04/24, documented Res #23 was cognitively intact, received a diuretic, and had two falls with no injury during the review period. No documentation of an order for a diuretic was observed in Res #23's medical record. The medical record documented one fall without injury during the review period. On 04/25/24 at 10:09 a.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated Res #23 had not received a diuretic. They stated the MDS assessment was coded in error. On 04/25/24 at 12:17 p.m., MDS coordinator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK