Lawton Post Acute & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 82.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions on care plans to prevent falls for 1 (#47) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #47 had 7 falls with 2 which resulted in fractures. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.On 04/27/26, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to identify and implement interventions to prevent falls resulting in fractures for a resident who sustained seven falls in five months.On 04/27/26 at 10:44 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation.On 04/27/26 at 12:48 p.m., the administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template.On 04/27/26 at 4:52 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Plan of Removal - F656 (Comprehensive Care Plans) Immediate actions .Resident #47's comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. ensure adequate supervision was provided and exit doors and perimeter fences were secure to prevent an elopement for 1 (#92) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement risk.The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified six residents in the facility at risk for elopement.An elopement evaluation for Resident #92, dated 02/28/26, showed the resident was at risk for elopement and wandering. The evaluation showed the resident wandered around the facility into rooms. The evaluation showed Resident #92 was a new admit.A baseline care plan for Resident #92, dated 02/28/26, showed no interventions for wandering or a risk for elopement.Resident #92 was last seen in the facility on 03/07/26 at 11:10 a.m. The resident was not observed in their room at 11:20 a.m. The resident was found approximately three blocks away, Southwest of the facility, half block away from a busy four-lane road, and was returned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician and family were notified when a resident had a significant change of condition for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a change of condition which resulted in death. Resident #96 was on the toilet and bleeding. ACMA #2 stated they contacted LPN #1 about the residents' condition, and they had left the blood in the toilet for LPN #1 to observe. LPN #1 came to observe the resident; however, LPN #1 told them to continue to monitor the resident since they had refused to go to the ER. The physician or family was not notified of the serious change in condition of Resident #96.The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.On [DATE], an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to notify the physician and family of a change in condition for Resident #96 who was reported to have active bleeding which resulted in death. On [DATE] at 5:24 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly assess, identify, and intervene when a resident experienced an acute new onset of profuse bleeding from an unknown source for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a change in condition when facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of a critical hemoglobin lab value of 6.3 with a normal reference range was 13.7 to 17.5, and identify the new onset of profuse bleeding from an unknown source on a resident with a recent repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm resulting in an attempted transfer to the acute care hospital and subsequent death in the ambulance while in the facility parking lot.Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Identify, monitor, intervene, and provide continuing assessments for Resident #96 who was admitted with a recent history of an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. b. Notify the medical provider of, or intervene, for Resident #96's critically abnormal lab value of a hemoglobin of 6.3, and c. Notify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient/competent staff to assess, monitor, and intervene for a resident with profuse bleeding for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a change in condition when facility staff failed to assess, monitor, intervene for significant change in condition when a resident experienced an acute onset of profuse bleeding and failed to notify the medical provider of a critical hemoglobin lab value of 6.3 with a normal reference range of 13.7 to 17.5, and the onset of profuse bleeding on a resident with a known history of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system and the presences of an aortocoronary bypass graft resulting in the subsequent death of Resident #96.Specifically, the facility failed to:a. Identify, monitor, intervene, and provide continued assessments for Resident #96 who was admitted with known history of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system and the presences…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls with serious injury for one (#56) of one sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The lack of intervention development and implementation resulted in Res #56 suffering a broken hip. The administrator reported 69 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #56 admitted to the facility 06/01/23 with diagnoses which included dementia. A baseline care plan was not developed within 48 hours of admission. An incident report, dated 06/06/23 at 8:25 p.m., documented Res #56 had an unwitnessed fall. The incident report did not document an intervention. A progress note, dated 06/06/23 at 10:53 p.m., documented Res #56 had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom. The progress note documented the resident was reminded to use their walker. The care plan was not developed after the fall. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #56 was moderately cognitively impaired. A care plan, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, in that;The facility failed to:a. Ensure wandering residents did not elope and ensure residents at risk for wandering and elopement had not eloped for 1 (#92) of 6 residents at risk for wandering and elopement. Resident #92 was at risk for wandering and elopement. A baseline care plan, dated [DATE], showed no risk for elopement. Resident #92's care plan did not have interventions for wandering or elopement until [DATE]. ADON #1 stated they were not aware Resident #92 was found to be an elopement risk due to not communicating with the nurse that completed the assessment. ADON #1 stated there were no interventions implemented. An incident report, dated [DATE], showed Resident #92 was reported missing from their room and was found a couple of blocks away 10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was completed annually to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently, during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends), and emergencies.The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A document titled [NAME] Post Acute & Rehab Facility Assessment, showed the date of the assessment as 02/20/24. On 03/19/26 at 2:48 p.m., the interim administrator stated the facility assessment was completed annually. The interim administrator stated the assessment determined the resident needs based on resident needs at the time along with the quarterly QAPI. On 03/19/2026 at 3:30 p.m., DON #2 provided a facility assessment, dated 02/04/25, signed by the current interim administrator. DON #2 stated they completed the facility assessments for the year prior. DON #2 stated they did not have one for the current year. By the end of the survey, the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed and monitored by a licensed nurse for a significant change of condition and profuse bleeding for 1 (#96) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for neglect. LPN #1 was notified on [DATE] at 1:15 a.m. of Resident #96 with bleeding from an unknown source and failed to complete an assessment. EMS was notified at 3:12 a.m., left the building with Resident #96 at 3:35 a.m. and the resident ultimately expired in the ambulance at 3:40 a.m.The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A policy titled Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol, dated 03/2018, read in part, The physician will help identify individuals with a significant risk for having acute changes of condition during their stay. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following baseline information:a. Vital signs,b. Neurological status,c. Current level of pain and any recent changes in pain level,d. Level of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a resident assessment for hospice for 1 (#80) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accurate assessments.The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.Findings: A quarterly assessment for Resident #80, dated 02/11/26, showed the resident was receiving hospice care and their cognition was severely impaired with a BIMS score of 4.Resident #80's electronic health record did not show the resident had received any orders for hospice care. On 03/12/26 at 11:42 a.m., Resident #80's POA stated the resident did not receive hospice care. On 03/12/26 at 1:27 p.m., ADON #2 stated Resident #80 did not receive hospice care per Resident #80 POA's request.On 03/12/26 at 1:52 p.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated Resident #80 was not receiving hospice care and the assessment error was a mistake. MDS Coordinator #1 stated Resident #80's quarterly MDS assessment was not accurate.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure loose medications were not kept in the bottom of the medication cart drawers for 1 (North hall) of 1 medication cart observed. The administrator identified two medication carts in the facility.Findings: On [DATE] at 1:33 p.m., the medication cart for the North hall was observed with ACMA #1. There were six tablets and one capsule observed laying across the bottom of the drawer. An undated Medication Storage and Handling policy showed the medications would be monitored by the unit nurse, charge nurse, and the consultant pharmacist to assure they were not expired, contaminated, or unusable. On [DATE] at 1:40 p.m., ACMA #1 stated they checked for loose pills two times a week, but it had been a couple of days ago since they last checked. ACMA #1 stated when they found loose pills during their cleaning of the medication cart, they were to report to the charge nurse so the medications could be destroyed. On [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and distribute food and ice in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/10/26 at 9:46 a.m., the initial tour of the kitchen with the dietary manager was conducted with the following observations made:a. one white paper bowl with orange ice cream wrapped in plastic wrap unlabeled and undated;b. one bag of opened hamburger buns unlabeled and undated; andc. ice machine with pink substance on the white plastic chute directly above the ice, that when wiped with a clean paper towel, resulted in pink and brown speckled substance. On 03/10/26 at 10:00 a.m., the dietary manager stated the food should be labeled. They stated they saw dirt on the towel used to wipe the ice machine chute. They stated the ice machine was wiped down last week and serviced recently. On 03/11/26 at 11:21 a.m., cook #1 was observed to have one hand gloved and one hand ungloved. [NAME] #1 used the gloved hand to place…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for 1 (#96) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for death. The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled Nursing Documentation, read in part, Chart as soon as possible after giving care. Enter the date and time you are actually charting, and at the beginning of the entry - late entry for (date and time charting about).An admission assessment for Resident #96, dated [DATE], showed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 12. The assessment showed Resident #96 required partial to moderate staff assistance with most activities of daily living.An EMS report for Resident #96, dated [DATE], showed the resident expired in the ambulance on [DATE] at 3:40 a.m.A task log for Resident #96, dated [DATE] and [DATE], showed the resident received assistance with activities of daily living on [DATE] at 10:08 a.m. The log showed the resident received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were initiated and maintained during the provision of care to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (#42) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for catheter care.The administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 21 residents were on EBP.Findings: On 03/10/26 at 11:44 a.m., Resident #42 was observed to have an indwelling urinary catheter. CNA #3 and CNA #5 entered the room with a mechanical lift to get resident up. They were observed to put on gloves. They did not put on a gown. There was no signage or PPE located inside of the room or near the room. An undated policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, read in part, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are required for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devises during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multi drug-resistant organism (MRDO) status. Indwelling medical device examples include . urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper PPE (personal protective equipment) was used for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The director of nursing reported that 19 residents required enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 07/14/25 at 1:20 p.m., Res #3 was observed in bed with CNA #1 and CNA #2 present at the bedside providing care to the resident and changing the resident's linens. The two CNAs were observed wearing gloves but no gown. PPE supplies for enhanced barrier precautions were observed hanging on the resident's door. On 07/14/25 at 1:25 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to enter Res #3's room to perform feeding tube site care. The LPN performed hand hygiene and applied gloves. The LPN was observed to clean the feeding tube site and apply a clean gauze pad to the site. The LPN was observed not wearing a gown for enhanced barrier precautions. A policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised date 05/01/25, showed enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of a gown and gloves for use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set was coded accurately for Legionella for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled discharged resident from the hospital with Legionella. The administrator reported one resident tested positive for Legionella at the hospital and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Findings: Resident #1 diagnoses included COPD with acute exacerbation, pneumonia (unspecified organism), and chronic kidney disease stage 4. A hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed assessment: severe sepsis with acute organ dysfunction due to Legionella pneumonia/acute COPD exacerbation and urinary tract infection was improving. A Medicare-5 day assessment, dated 02/02/25, did not show a diagnosis for Legionella. On 03/12/25 at 12:19 p.m., the MDS/QS coordinator stated the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned from the hospital on [DATE] and the Medicare-5 day care assessment was completed on 02/02/25 for skilled services. They stated the resident wanted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$124,185 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $124,185 — penalty dated 2026-04-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK