No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Hills Living & Rehabilitation Center

411 North West Street, McAlester, OK 74502 · For profit - Individual · 81 certified beds · (918) 423-2920 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$73,288 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $73,288 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-31)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2206 N Main St · (918) 420-9340 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2009 N Main St · (918) 302-9996 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9 W Washington Ave · (918) 423-6872 · Call to confirm hours
Park
A Street and, W Springer Ave · (918) 421-4922 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.8%3.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.5%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.0%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.0%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.1%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.4%17.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.0%17.5%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.722.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days6.422.961.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
<0.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.4–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.44
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
54.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 56.9 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-31)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for two (#33 and #59) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 58 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An Investigation of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, undated, read in parts, .The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of residents. The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, or mental abuse .Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking .In the event there is an allegation or incidents involving resident to resident abuse, the individuals involved in the abuse should be immediately separated by staff .Once safety is established, the Administrator and Director of Nursing should be notified immediately. Put the resident on 1:1 when needed and document .An investigation into what triggered the abuse shall be conducted by the DON with referrals made accordingly .The facility shall prevent the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-09 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to convey funds to next of kin within 30 days of death for 3 (#8, 9, and #10) of 3 expired residents whose trust fund accounts were reviewed for conveyance of funds. The administrator identified 16 residents with funds in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Refunds, revised 04/2017, read in part, Within thirty (30) days of a resident's discharge or death, the facility will refund the resident's personal funds and provide a final accounting of those funds to the resident, the resident's representative or to the resident's estate, as applicable.Should a resident pay for services which then retroactively become Medicare/Medicaid eligible, the facility will promptly refund the amount charged to the resident for those services as soon as the facility receives the intermediary's payment. 1. A discharge assessment for Resident #8, dated [DATE], showed the resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. A handwritten ledger titled Ledger Sheet for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to securely store protected health information. The DON identified 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 10/22/25 at 11: 00 a.m., at the end of the East hall was an unsecured resident room with three 4-drawer tall file cabinets and one 5-drawer tall file cabinet. On top of one file cabinet were loose papers and files with residents' protected health information, including name, birthdate, social security numbers, insurance information, labs, and physician's progress notes. None of the file cabinet drawers were locked and two of the 4-drawer file cabinets held more resident clinical records. On 10/22/25 at 11:07 a.m., the DON observed the unsecured storage room and resident records. An undated and unnamed facility policy showed all resident records were to be behind locked doors at all times with keys kept in the administrator's office.On 10/22/25 at 11:07 a.m., the DON stated all resident records should be secured with a lock and with limited staff access.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an abuse free environment for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The facility DON identified 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 10/21/25 at 6:00 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula. The resident was covered with blankets from their chin down. The resident appeared tired with dark circles under their eyes and congested with a hoarseness to their voice. On 10/22/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula. The resident was covered with a blanket from their upper chest down. The resident spoke in a calm and animated voice without signs of fear or hesitation. Resident #1's incident statement, dated 10/02/25, read in part, [Resident #1] states was out smoking [and] did not realize [they] had BM on [their] way out to smoke. Nurse came out told [them] to come inside and clean up d/t [they] had soiled [themselves]. Resident states nurse grabbed chair, pushed forward, and [Resident #1]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure chemicals which had the potential to harm residents if the chemicals were touched, inhaled, or ingested. The DON identified 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/22/25 at 11: 00 a.m., there were no wandering residents observed on the East hall. At the end of the East hall was an unsecured resident room which was used for storage. There was no way to lock the storage room door and located behind the door was six 1-gallon sized bottles of unsecured chemicals. The chemicals included three 1-gallon bottles of ZEP Wet Look Floor Polish, two 1-gallon bottles of Floor Front Floor Finish, and a gallon bottle of Betco Advanced Alcohol Gel Sanitizer. Each of the 6 bottles of chemicals had a warning label which read to keep out of reach of children.On 10/22/25 at 11:07 a.m., the DON observed the unsecured chemicals in the storage room. An undated and unnamed facility policy showed all chemicals must be secured with locks and accessible to only housekeeping and maintenance.The MSDS for Floor Front…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure protected health information was secure for 1 (East/West Hall) of 1 medication cart observed.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 07/29/25 at 1:17 p.m., a computer on top of an unattended medication cart at the corner of East/West Hall was observed to be open and showed protective health information.On 07/29/25 at 1:35 p.m., a computer on top of an unattended medication cart at the corner of East/West Hall was observed to be open and showed protective health information.On 07/30/25 at 1:32 p.m., a computer on top of an unattended medication cart on East Hall was observed to be open and showed protective health information.On 07/30/25 at 2:28 p.m., a computer on top of an unattended medication cart at the corner of East/West Hall was observed to be open and showed protective health information.On 07/30/25 at 2:55 p.m., the administrator and DON reported the computer should have been closed and not showing protected health information.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from flies.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 07/29/25 at 11:42 a.m., flies too numerous to count were observed in the lobby. An unknown female resident was observed resting in a recliner. There were four cups of liquid on the table beside the recliner. Flies were observed in and around the cups of liquid, and a dead fly was observed floating in the liquid of one cup.On 07/29/25 at 1:30 p.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], flies too numerous to count were observed all over the room, bed, and bedside table.An invoice for air curtains, dated 07/03/25 was reviewed.On 07/30/25 at 12:02 p.m., the administrator stated the facility had ordered blowers for the doors to help with the fly problem, but they were still waiting on them to come in.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed to address the use of illegal substances for 2 (#3 and #4) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility.Findings: 1.An undated face sheet showed Res #3 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, opioid dependence, and psychotic disorder. A nurse note, dated 06/12/25, showed the resident was found smoking an illegal substance using a soda can with holes punctured in the side. Education was provided to resident and to continue medication hold for 24 hours per physician.Res #3's care plan did not address the resident's use of an illegal substance.2. An undated face sheet showed Res #4 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, hypoxemia, and alcoholic hepatitis.Res #4's care plan did not address the resident's use of an illegal substance.A nurse note, dated 06/07/25, showed Res #4 was found smoking an illegal substance from a Pepsi can with holes punched in the side. Education was provided to resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with substance abuse were provided services for 2 (#3 and #4) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for substance abuse.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility.Findings: A facility policy titled Marijuana Policy for Residents, dated 07/03/20, read in part, We do not allow marijuana on the ground due to we accept federal monies. If you see residents smoking marijuana you must tell them to put it out then take it. Report on the State Health Department under suspected Criminal Act form 283 fill out form completely. Call police department give the Marijuana to them. Start your investigation .you must get at least 3 statements from other residents.1.An undated face sheet showed Res #3 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder, and impulsiveness.A nurse note, dated 06/12/25, showed the resident was found smoking an illegal substance using a soda can with hole puncture in the side. Education was provided regarding the risks of recreational drug use and the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (#1) of 9 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/29/25 at 12:43 p.m., Res #1 was observed up in the lobby in a wheelchair.An undated medical diagnosis list showed Res #1 admitted with diagnoses of left sided hemiparesis/hemiplegia and bilateral hard of hearing.An undated facility policy Investigation of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, read in part, The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of residents. The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, or mental abuse.An Oklahoma State Department of Health incident form 283, dated 04/15/25, showed CNA #1 used unnecessary force when assisting Res #1 while in their wheelchair in the lobby. The report showed CNA #2 was asked why they did that, CNA #1 stated She was getting on my last nerve. The report showed CNA #1 was suspended immediately pending an investigation. The report showed an investigation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain and clean, safe, and sanitary homelike environment during two of two observations. The administrator identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/19/24 at 11:03 a.m., the following observations were made, a. a broken tile was observed with black tape over a loose and cracked tile in the main hallway, b. a tile in the main hall was cracked and pieces missing creating a trip hazard, c. there was a cracked and broken tile observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], d. room [ROOM NUMBER] had cracked tiles in the entry way, e. the double doors leading down the main hallway from the front commons had the lower panel separated from the door and had sharp edges, f. the walls in the main center hallway were scuffed with black marks and damaged in the commons area and the North main hallway, g. the tiled floors on the East hall were chipped, stained, and damaged where the center hall met. There was brown stained residue on the tile and the base…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physical environment of the kitchen and ensure employees with facial hair wore a beard guard in the kitchen. The administrator identified 58 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/28/24 at 8:30 a.m., the kitchen was observed to have: a. a broken paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink, b. missing trim on the exterior door, c. a broken cover on a fluorescent light fixture, d. build up of brown sticky substance on the walls around the grill area, and e. rusted air vents on the ceiling. On 10/28/24 at 12:15 p.m., a male employee with a partial beard was observed in the kitchen not wearing a beard guard. On 10/29/24 at 12:00 p.m., a male employee with a partial beard was observed in the kitchen not wearing a beard guard. On 10/30/24 at 8:41 a.m., the CDM stated they had made maintenance aware of the physical environment. They stated they would ensure staff wore beard guards when needed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. The administrator identified 58 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: CMS memo 17-30, revised date 06/09/17, documented CMS expects long term care facilities to have water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and the spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility water system. No documentation of water management policies and procedures were found from record review. On 10/29/24 at 1:00 p.m., the maintenance supervisor was asked to provide documentation of water management policies and procedures. The maintenance supervisor stated they had never heard of a water management program to reduce the risk and growth of Legionella. They stated the facility did not need a water management program because they never had any standing water. On 10/29/24 at 1:22 p.m., the IP stated the facility did not have policies and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for two (#30 and #41) of 15 sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed for accuracy. The administrator identified 58 residents who resided in the facility. 1. Res #30 had diagnoses which included depression, anxiety, mood disorder, and intermittent explosive disorder. An annual resident assessment, dated 08/31/24, documented a diagnosis of psychotic disorder. 2. Res #41 had diagnoses which included impulse disorder. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 11/24/21, documented a diagnosis of psychotic disorder. On 10/29/24 at 1:05 p.m., the IP reported no resident had a diagnosis of psychotic disorder in the facility. They were unsure as to why resident assessments would document the diagnosis of psychotic disorder. On 10/31/24 at 11:41 a.m., the MDS coordinator reported they started their position in December, and documented the diagnosis, psychotic disorder, on Res #30 and #41 because the diagnosis was documented on their previous resident assessments.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to change and label oxygen tubing according to physician orders for four (#17, 28, 31, and #50) of four sampled residents reviewed for respiratory treatments. The DON identified 13 residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings: A Respiratory Care/Oxygen Therapy policy, dated 09/07/22, read in part, .Change tubing weekly. Label tubing with date and initials . 1. Res #17 had diagnoses which included COPD and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. An admission assessment, dated 01/17/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and received oxygen therapy. A physician order, dated 09/27/22, documented to change oxygen tubing weekly on Thursdays. The order documented to date and initial the tubing. On 10/28/24 at 9:56 a.m., Res #17 was observed lying in bed. The resident was observed wearing oxygen delivered by nasal cannula at three liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was observed with a tape label dated 10/17/24. Res #17 stated the staff changed the tubing, but was not sure how often. 2. Res #28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an incident of abuse for two (#33 and #59) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 58 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An Investigation of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, undated, read in parts, .The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of residents. The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, or mental abuse .Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking .In the event there is an allegation or incidents involving resident to resident abuse, the individuals involved in the abuse should be immediately separated by staff .Once safety is established, the Administrator and Director of Nursing should be notified immediately. Put the resident on 1:1 when needed and document .An investigation into what triggered the abuse shall be conducted by the DON with referrals made accordingly .The facility shall prevent the occurrence of abuse by reviewing past specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the OHCA of a new possible serious mental disorder diagnosis for two (#37 and #20) of six sampled residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The administrator identified 58 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A Level I PASARR, dated 07/19/21, documented Res #37 did not have a serious mental illness. On 10/06/21, Res #37 received a new diagnoses of specified persistent mood disorder. There was no documentation the OHCA had been contacted to see if a Level II PASARR was required. On 10/30/24 at 12:10 p.m., the administrator stated OHCA must not have been contacted because the notification information was not documented at the bottom of the Level I PASSAR that was reviewed. 2. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. A Level I PASARR screen, dated 11/29/22, documented no serious mental illness. On 01/06/23, the resident was diagnosed with delusional disorder. On 10/31/24 at 11:41 am, the administrator stated the OHCA should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. vaping of tobacco did not occur inside the facility, and smoking assessments were completed quarterly for one (#35) of two sampled residents reviewed for smoking; and b. oxygen tanks were stored properly for one (#12) of five sampled residents reviewed for oxygen. The DON identified 23 residents who smoked/vaped tobacco products and 13 residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings: A smoking policy, dated 01/09/22, documented smoking/vaping is only allowed in designated areas. The policy documented the courtyard is the only designated area for residents to smoke. 1. Res #35 had a diagnosis of nicotine dependence. A care plan, dated 09/10/20, documented the resident was an unsupervised smoker. The care plan documented the resident would follow facility policy related to smoking areas. An annual assessment, dated 08/12/23, documented the resident was cognitively intact. A quarterly smoking assessment, dated 11/07/23, documented the resident had a minimal problem of smoking in unauthorized areas and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/10/23 at 1:00 p.m., an environmental tour of the facility was completed. On the west hall there were two locations with tape placed across the tiles. The tiles were observed to have been loose. A document provided by the maintenance supervisor documented 18 of 26 broken tiles had been replaced. On 10/11/23 at 9:22 a.m., the maintenance supervisor stated they were available 24 hours a day seven days a week. The supervisor stated they had replaced some tiles on the resident halls but the residents had rolled over them with their wheelchairs before the tile cement had dried and broke them.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. the ice machine was locked to prevent possible cross contamination. b. dietary staff washed hands after handling dirty items and before touching clean items. c. hand washing was completed during wound care treatment. The administrator identified 59 residents who resided in the facility and two residents who received wound care treatments. Findings: 1. On 10/11/23 at 8:50 a.m., a resident was observed in the dining room raising the unlocked lid on the ice machine and scooped a cup of ice with their bare hands and placed the ice in a disposable cup. The scoop for the ice machine was was observed lying uncovered on top of the ice machine. On 10/11/23 at 8:56 a.m., the assistant dietary manager stated the ice machine should have been locked and the ice scoop should have been covered. On 10/11/23 at 11:35 a.m., a meal service was observed. An unidentified resident was observed to approach the kitchen door with a glass of ice tea and requested the glass to be emptied. Dietary aide #1 who was wearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/03/23 at 6:56 p.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. DA #1 was observed to enter the kitchen and was not observed to wash their hands. On 08/03/23 at 7:00 a.m., DA #1 was observed to take the silverware to the dining room and started passing the silverware to the residents in the dining room. The DA was then observed to return to the kitchen and retrieved coffee cups without washing their hands and returned to the dining room. The DA was then observed to return to the kitchen and was observed to touch the top of a trash can and was not observe to wash their hands. The DA was then observed to return to the dining room taking a coffee pot with them to pour coffee for the residents. On 08/03/23 at 7:10 a.m., the lid to the sugar bin was observed to have been broken. At that time the DM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to privacy by providing a means of attaining full visual privacy during personal care and/or treatments for three (#1, 4, and #47) of 26 resident's whose rooms were observed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, anxiety disorder, and carcinoma. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/13/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, had delusions, and was independent to requiring limited assistance with most ADLs. On 08/03/23 at 10:22 a.m., the resident was observed in their room sitting on a recliner. The resident was not able to be interviewed. The resident was observed to have a roommate who was out of the room at the time. The resident's room was observed to not have privacy curtains or tracts on the ceiling for privacy curtains. On 08/08/23 at 3:46 p.m., the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 08/03/23 at 7:23 a.m., the coffee bar area was observed to have saw dust on the counter, the floor, and ice machine. The ice machine dispenser tray was observed to be full of water and had visible brown substance between the two plastic layers of the ice dispenser. The ice drop was wiped with a clean white towel and had brown substance was observed on the towel after wiping the ice drop. The wall and floor by the ice machine was observed to have visible spillage of a dark substance on them. On 08/03/23 at 7:25 a.m., the administrator stated housekeeping was responsible for cleaning the ice dispenser at the coffee bar. On 08/03/23 at 7:31 a.m., the housekeeping supervisor stated they were to clean the area of the coffee bar and ice machine daily but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Res #20 had diagnoses which included multiple fractures due to a MVA. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/22/23, a significant change assessment, dated 02/20/23, and a quarterly assessment dated [DATE], had the following diagnoses listed as active diagnoses: left humerus fracture, left skull/facial bones fracture, laceration of lip, left radial styloid process fracture, and left clavicle fracture. On 08/08/23 at 1:02 p.m., the MDS coordinator reported they needed to remove the multiple fractures and laceration of lip diagnoses and stated the diagnoses were old and were no longer active diagnoses for Res #20. 3. Res #40 was admitted with diagnoses which included anxiety, schizophrenia, and PTSD. A physician order, dated 09/25/21, read in part, Invega Sustenna 156mg/ml 1 vial IM on the 25th of each month. On 02/16/23, the consultant pharmacist recommended a GDR for Ivega. Res #40's physician refused to attempt a GDR and documented the rationale as schizophrenia. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 04/08/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new possible serious mental disorder was referred to OHCA for two (#26 and #56) of seven sampled residents whose PASRR screenings were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Res #26 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included impulse disorders, dementia with behavioral disturbance, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and insomnia The resident's PASRR I, dated 12/01/23, documented the resident had a history of mental retardation or a related condition. There was no documentation the resident was referred to the OHCA. The resident's EHR documented a new diagnosis of delusional disorder on 01/06/23. On 08/07/23 at 7:54 a.m., the administrator stated the PASRR form was filled out incorrectly. The administrator stated the resident did not have a MR diagnosis. They were asked if the facility notified the state of the new possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to meet the residents' needs for five (#3, 26, 40, 46, and #59) of 26 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to: a. update the care plan related to falls for Res #40, 26, and #59. b. update the care plan to include diuretic medications and updates for psychotropic medication use for Res #3. c. update the care plan to include new diabetes interventions for #46. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy entitled, Policy: Falls - Prevention and Risk Reduction Policy:, read in part, 1. The MDS Coordinator will: .d. Update interventions on the falls care plan with any new occurrence of falls . 1. Res #59 had diagnoses which included pain, clostridium difficile, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and pancytopenia. An admission assessment, dated 06/04/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, required limited to extensive assistance with most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a foul odor of a surgical wound in a timely manner for one (#21) of five residents sampled for non-pressure skin issues and failed to notify a physician of out of parameters FSBS readings for one (#46) of five residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Res #21 had diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage, disruption of wound, and subsequent encounter of mechanical complication of internal right hip prosthesis. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/03/23, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with ADL, had a surgical wound, and surgical wound care. The care plan, last revised 06/07/23, documented an abscess to right hip area approximately 6.0 x 4.0 cm. The care plan documented the physician was notified and a new order for Bactrim BID for 5 days and wound care with with Betadine/NS and apply Silvadene was obtained.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers were assessed routinely for two (#4 and #19) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented two residents had pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. Res #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD, emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, peripheral vascular disease, An admission assessment, dated 06/20/23, documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired, required extensive assistance with ADLs, and had no pressure ulcers. A nurse note, dated 07/20/23, documented an 1.0 cm in diameter open area to the resident's right outer ankle with erythema present to surrounding tissue. The note documented the physician was notified and order received for heel protectors while in bed and to cleanse BID with NS, Betadine, apply thin layer of TAO, and cover. This was the only assessment documentation found for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the supervision and assistance to prevent falls for three (#26, 40, and #59) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls and for two (#30 and #39) of two sampled residents reviewed for smoking hazards. The DON identified 27 resident who had falls in 2023 and the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy entitled, Policy: Falls - Prevention and Risk Reduction Policy:, read in part, 1. The MDS Coordinator will: .d. Update interventions on the falls care plan with any new occurrence of falls . A Smoking Policy, dated of 06/23/16, read in part .4. The MDS coordinator will: a. Write and maintain a smoking care plan for the resident that includes interventions to maintain residents safety and hygiene. b. Complete a smoking screen with every scheduled resident assessment and any significant change of condition. 1. Res #59 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure to adequately monitor residents for behaviors and adverse side effects for four (#1, 3, 26, and #28) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents who lived in the facility received psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, impulse disorder, bi-polar disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. A physician order, dated 04/08/20, documented the facility was to administer 15 mg of buspirone (a medication used to treat anxiety) twice daily. A physician order, dated 11/24/20, documented the facility was to administer 100 mg of sertraline (a medication used to treat depression) daily. A care plan, dated 10/26/22, documented to monitor for adverse reactions to medications, increased sedation, changes in level of consciousness, fatigue, restlessness, increased anxiety, over-sedation, headache, nausea. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#3) of five residents sampled for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #3 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. A physician order, dated 02/22/23, documented the facility was to administer Novolog U-100 insulin twice daily for a FSBS greater than 200. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/14/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition, required limited to extensive assistance with most ADLs, and received insulin for seven days of the seven day assessment period. The resident's MAR for July was reviewed and documented the facility administered insulin 10 times when the resident's FSBS results were less than 200. On 08/07/23 at 12:52 p.m., LPN #1 reviewed the resident's MAR and stated from the documentation it appeared the resident's dose of Novolog was given when the resident's FSBS reading was not over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in advance of the risks and benefits of treatment for two (#3 and #26) of five residents whose medications were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #26 had diagnoses which included delusional disorders, impulse disorders, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. A care plan, dated 11/30/22, documented the resident had a diagnosis of dementia with behaviors and was at risk for complications. An admission assessment, dated 12/10/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition and was independent to requiring supervision with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications daily during the assessment period. A physician order, dated 02/20/23, documented the facility was to administer 1 mg of risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) twice daily for a diagnosis of delusional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor a resident's choice of leaving the facility without staff for one (#9) of one sampled residents reviewed for choices. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's, Therapeutic Leave Policy, dated 05/01/22, read in part, All residents have the right to take leave with family, friends, with consent or agreement of POA/Guardian, unless the resident is self-determined .Resident(s) may attend church services of choice, with transportation of by church van or POV Res #9 admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included psychoactive substance abuse with other psychoactive substance-induced disorder, PTSD, and personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/27/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and was independent with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident had no behaviors. A care plan, dated 05/05/22, documented the resident's plan was to return home when their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for one (#40) of 18 sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for resident assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented a census of 60 residents. Findings: Res #40's last quarterly assessment was completed on 04/08/23. A quarterly assessment was due on 07/08/23 but was not completed. On 08/08/23 at 1:00 p.m., the MDS Coordinator reported Res #40 should have had a quarterly assessment completed on 07/08/23 and did not.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0642 — isolated
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN coordinated and signed the resident assessment for one (#46) of 18 sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An annual assessment for Res #46, dated 03/30/23, was not signed by the RN in one of the two required sections and had been signed by the MDS coordinator LPN in a section which required an RN to review and sign. On 08/08/23 at 2:11 p.m., the MDS Coordinator reported the RN was supposed to sign in two required sections but had only signed one section. The MDS Coordinator reported they signed in the RN section in error.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure OHCA was contacted when a resident with a PASRR level I assessment with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness for three (#3, 26, and #56) of six sampled residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 44 residents had documented psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: 1. Res #3 admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, delusional disorder, and major depressive disorder. A PASRR I, dated 03/16/21, documented the resident had a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/14/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required limited assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident had not had behaviors during the look back period. The assessment documented the resident had received an antipsychotic and an antidepressant seven days in the seven day assessment period. On 08/07/23 at 2:58 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated the resident did not have a PASRR II. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to edema and diuretic use for one (#11) of one resident sampled for edema. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Res #1 had diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease, edema, and history of non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of left lower leg limited to breakdown of skin. An annual assessment, dated 02/09/23, documented the resident received diuretic medication. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/12/23, documented the resident was cognitively intact and received diuretic medication. A physician order, dated 07/08/23, documented an increase of furosemide (a diuretic medication) to 20 mg twice daily. On 08/03/23 at 12:11 p.m., the resident was observed with edema in their feet and legs. Both legs were observed with patches of pink skin. The resident stated they had had sores on her legs from the edema but was better now because of the treatment the physician ordered. On 08/07/23 at 11:53…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary documented the required components for one (#61) of two sampled residents whose discharge summaries were reviewed. The DON identified eight residents who were discharged in 2023. Findings: Res #61 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to family on 06/27/23. The Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documented frequent therapeutic passes with daughter for the recapitulation of Res #61's stay. On 08/08/23 at 10:30 a.m., the DON reported the discharge summary did not adequately reflect a recapitulation of Res #61's nine year stay in the facility.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy for medications regimen reviews for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 48 residents who resided in the facility received psychotropic medications. Findings: A facility policy titled Consultant Pharmacist Reports, dated 2006 and revised in January 2018, read in part: .D. In performing medication regimen reviews, the consultant pharmacist incorporates federally mandated standards of care, in addition to other applicable professional standards, .G. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber . Res #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, impulse disorder, major recurrent depressive disorder which was severe with psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. A physician order, dated 04/08/20, documented the facility was to administer 15 mg of buspirone (a medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving medications were adequately monitored for side effects for two (#3 and #26) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #26 had diagnosis which included atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with intermittent claudication, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities with gangrene of the left leg, atherosclerosis of native arteries of left leg with ulceration of other part of foot, chronic total occlusion of artery of the extremities, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. An admission assessment, dated 12/10/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition, was independent to requiring supervision with most ADLs, and received an anticoagulant medication daily during the assessment period. A physician order, dated 05/12/23, documented the facility was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure controlled medications in the medication room refrigerator were stored in a permanently affixed compartment. The DON identified one resident who received controlled medications from the refrigerator. Findings: On 08/08/23 at 10:43 a.m., during observations of the medication room, a small black refrigerator, with a lock on the door, contained a metal lock box that was not permanently affixed to the inside of the refrigerator. There was one unopened bottle of Lorazepam (a medication for anxiety) 2mg/ml inside the metal lock box. On 08/08/23 at 10:45 a.m., CMA #1 reported being aware the metal lock box containing controlled medication should have been permanently affixed to the inside of the refrigerator. On 08/09/23 at 2:00 p.m., the DON reported being unaware the lock box for controlled medications was not permanently affixed and reported it should have been affixed to the inside of the refrigerator.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure standard precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections during wound care for one (#30) three residents review for wound care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented two residents had pressure ulcers. Findings: Res #30 had diagnoses which included open wound of unspecified buttock. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/24/23, documented the resident was intact in cognition and was independent to requiring supervision with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident did not have skin issues. A care plan, dated 07/11/23, documented the resident had an open area to the left intergluteal cleft measuring 6 cm x 2 cm. The care plan documented slough was present to the wound bed and the surrounding tissue felt spongy. The care plan documented the wound had moderate amount of purulent drainage observed. The care plan documented the wound care physician was to assess and provide wound treatment. The care plan documented the staff were to check the site and change the dressings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Res #4 had diagnoses which included unspecified open wound of unspecified buttock, anorexia, and chronic pain. A base line care plan, dated 04/21/23, documented staff were to turn and reposition the resident every two hours, to provide incontinent care every two hours, and to assist the resident with transfers utilizing a mechanical lift. An admission assessment, dated 05/10/23, documented the resident was intact in cognition, required extensive to total assistance with ADLs, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 08/03/23 at 7:30 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in a recliner. The resident was observed to have been covered with a blanket and had a cap on. The resident's shoulders were observed to have been bare and a transfer sling was observed under the resident. At that time, the resident stated when the staff did incontinent care the last time they placed them in the recliner. The resident stated this was several hours ago and they told them at the time they wanted to go back to bed. The resident stated trying to sleep on the recliner was like trying to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an advance directive acknowledgment for 10 (#12, 13, 14, 30, 33, 38, 54, 55, 56, and #160) of 10 residents sampled for advance directives. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: An Advance Directives policy, dated 12/07, documented in parts, .Prior to admission of a resident to our facility, the social services director or designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care . and the right to formulate advance directives .Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. On 08/30/22, health records for residents #12, 13, 14, 30, 33, 38, 54, 55, 56, and #160 were reviewed and an advance directive acknowledgement was not documented. On 08/30/22 at 3:30 p.m., the administrator was asked if the residents had an advance directive acknowledgement. The administrator stated the residents should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights were honored by failing to provide a nicotine free environment. The administrator reported there were 33 non-smoking residents. Findings: A smoking policy, dated 01/29/22, did not address vaping. On 08/31/22 at 10:27 a.m., several residents were observed vaping in the dining room around non-smoking residents. On 08/31/22 at 12:00 p.m., two residents were observed vaping in the dining room around non-smoking residents. On 08/31/22 at 2:32 p.m., one resident was observed vaping in the lobby around non-smoking residents. On 08/31/22 at 4:00 p.m., one resident was observed vaping in the dining room around non-smoking residents. On 08/31/22 at 3:35 p.m., The DON stated Our smoking policy does not address vaping, so vaping is allowed in the building. On 09/01/22 at 11:35 a.m., an unnamed resident reported they did not smoke and stated I do not want to be around that stuff. I would prefer they didn't 'vape' in here. On 09/01/22 at 11:45 a.m., an unnamed resident reported they had health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for four (#14, 33, 56 and #58) of four residents sampled for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: The Care Plans-Comprehensive policy, dated 08/01, documented in parts .each resident's comprehensive care plan has been designed to .reflect treatment goals and objectives in measurable outcomes. 1. Res #14 was admitted with diagnoses which included pulmonary heart disease, morbid obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Res #14 physician's order, dated 01/11/21, documented oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal canula. There was no care plan for oxygen for Res #14. On 08/31/22 at 9:28 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the oxygen should have been care planned with interventions. On 08/31/22 at 9:28 a.m., the administrator stated the oxygen had not been care planned but should have been. 2. Res #33 was admitted with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide restorative care as ordered by the physician for two (#54 and #111) of three residents sampled for restorative care. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented 14 residents required restorative care. Findings: 1. Res #54 was admitted with diagnoses which included hemiplegia, mood disorder, and footdrop (left foot). Res #54 physician's order, dated 05/27/22, documented in part, .ROM/stretching LUE & LLE 6 x week or as tolerated . A document titled Point of Care Restorative Nursing Category Report, documented No Restorative Nursing Data Recorded for res #54 from 07/28/22 to 08/04/22 and from 08/16/22 to 08/26/22. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/17/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living. On 08/30/22 at 3:15 p.m., Res #54 was observed in their room and stated they received restorative care occasionally, it's off and on. On 08/31/22 at 1:32 p.m., the DON reviewed the Point of Care Restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow a safe smoking policy for. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: The smoking policy updated on 01/29/22 read in parts, Smoking is only ALLOWED [sic] in designated areas only. The exit doors and the front portico is non-smoking there is non-smoking posted [sic]. The courtyard is the only designated area for residents to smoke . On 08/30/22 at 9:00 a.m., one resident was observed smoking at the front door less than 15 feet from the entrance. On 08/30/22 at 1:00 p.m., four residents were observed smoking at the front door less than 15 feet from the entrance. On 08/31/22 at 2:35 p.m., the DON stated They know they are not allowed to smoke on the front porch.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow their Covid 19 policy for visitors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: The Core Principles of Covid 19 Infection Prevention policy, dated 04/05/21, read in parts, Screening of all who enter the facility for S/Sx of COVID-19 (e.g. temperature checks, questionnaire regarding signs/symptoms, travel .) & DENIAL OF ENTRY OF THOSE WHO SIGNS/SYMPTOMS OR THOSE WHO HAVE HAD CLOSE CONTACT WITH SOMEONE WITH COVID-19 INFECTION IN THE PRIOR 14 DAYS (regardless of the visitors vaccination status) .Hand hygiene (use of alcohol-based hand rub is preferred .Face covering/mask (COVERING MOUTH & NOSE) . On 08/30/22 at 1:30 p.m., a delivery driver was let into the facility by a staff member and walked into the dining room, stopping at the kitchen door to deliver pizza to the staff. The delivery driver was not screened, did not perform hand hygiene or put on a mask. The delivery driver left at 1:38 p.m. On 08/30/22 at 2:30 p.m., the IP stated, The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and sanitary environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: On 08/30/22 at 10:00 a.m., a strong odor of urine was noted on the [NAME] Hall. The floors in multiple resident rooms on the [NAME] Hall were not clean. On 08/30/22 at 10:20 a.m., multiple tiles throughout the hallways had pieces missing, were broken and/or held together with black tape. Stained and dirty areas were noted on the hallway floors. On 08/31/22 at 11:30 a.m., a strong odor of urine was noted on the East Hall. Stained and dirty areas were noted on the hallway floors. On 09/01/22 at 1:25 p.m., a strong odor of urine was noted on the [NAME] Hall. On 08/31/22 at 3:18 p.m., the DON reported that it was a challenge to keep the facility clean. On 09/01/22 at 11:30 a.m., the administrator reported the tiles in the hallways should have been fixed and the tape removed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure handrails were secure for one of four halls in the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: On 08/31/22 at 9:00 a.m., the hand rails on each side of the storage closet on the [NAME] Hall were observed to be loose. The handrail on the left side of the linen closet on the [NAME] Hall was loose. On 09/01/22 at 2:00 p.m., the administrator reported the hand rails should have been attached and secured.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: On 08/30/22 at 10:00 a.m., a large number of flies were noted in the hallway and in resident's rooms on the [NAME] Hall. On 08/31/22 at 11:30 a.m., a large number of flies were noted in the hallway and in resident's rooms on the [NAME] Hall. On 09/01/22 at 1:25 p.m., a large number of flies were noted in the hallway and in resident's rooms on the [NAME] Hall. On 08/31/22 at 9:00 a.m., CMA #1 reported there was a problem with flies on the [NAME] Hall. On 08/31/22 at 3:53 p.m., the DON reported there was a problem with flies in the building. On 09/01/22 at 2:42 p.m., the administrator reported flies were a problem in the building.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise a care plan for one (#58) of five residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/30/22, documented a census of 61 residents. Findings: Res #58 was admitted with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. A physician's order dated, 11/27/20, read in part, Upon return from dialysis check if dressing is intact, is there any edema or new orders . A physician's order dated, 01/21/20, read in part, Keep dressing to port clean and dry. Special instructions: Port site and dressing to stay dry at all times The Resident Progress Notes dated, 01/01/22 through 09/01/22 documented Res #58 refused dialysis 26 times. The dialysis care plan for Resident #58 was not revised to include their non-compliance with going to dialysis and their specific physician's orders related to dialysis care. On 09/01/22 at 12:00 p.m., the DON stated the care plan should have been revised to reflect Res #58's physician's orders and noncompliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$73,288 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $73,288 — penalty dated 2024-10-31
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-23 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
1996 REVOCABLE TRUST OF CHARLES F HARDY IIIOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/24/2024
1996 REVOCABLE TRUST OF PATRICIA HARDYOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/24/2024
HARDY, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1993
HARDY, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1993
ANDERSON, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
NYSTROM, ASHLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/22/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
HERITAGE HILLS NURSING PROPERTIESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/24/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$300K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 2%Other / private 4%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $300K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$211per resident / day
operating cost
$6,428per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$219per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375317. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next