McLoud Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 56.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The administrator identified 43 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A document titled, Nursing Department Schedule as Worked, dated 06/08/24, documented there was not an RN who had worked on the day, evening, or night shift. On 06/13/24 at 1:52 p.m., the administrator stated they did not have an RN scheduled to work on 06/08/24 and 06/09/24. They stated an RN had not worked on 06/08/24. The administrator stated they did not utilize staffing agencies.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper food service sanitation and storage requirements were followed. The DON identified 43 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: The facility's undated, Food Storage policy, read in part, It is the policy .to follow all state and federal guidelines on food storage. The policy also read, Plastic containers with tight fitting covers must be used for storing .flour .Scoops must be provided for .flour .Scoops are not to be stored in food. The policy also read, Perishable food such as meat .fruits, vegetables and frozen products must be refrigerated immediately to ensure nutritive value and quality. Refrigeration temperatures should be thermostatically controlled to maintain food temperatures at or below 40 degrees F. The policy also read, Leftover food is used within 24 hours or discarded. The policy also read, Temperatures for refrigerators should be between 35-39 degrees Fahrenheit. Thermometers should be checked at least three times a day .Frozen meat .should be defrosted in a refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a SNF ABN for two (#1 and #42) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The administrator reported 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The DON identified 17 residents who had been discharged from a Medicare Part A covered stay with benefit days remaining in the past six months. 1. Res #1 admitted to Part A skilled services on 03/26/24 and discharged from skilled services on 05/30/24. There was no documentation a SNF ABN was provided to Res #1 or their representative. 2. Res #42 admitted to Part A skilled services on 05/08/24 and discharged from skilled services on 06/06/24. There was no documentation a SNF ABN was provided to Res #42 or their representative. On 06/12/24 at 9:28 a.m. the social service director stated they were not aware the form SNF ABN needed to be completed for residents discharged from Part A services. The director stated the SNF ABN form had not been completed for resident #1 and #42.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new PASARR Level I screening was conducted when a new serious mental illness diagnosis was received for one (#13) and the PASARR level I included the mental health diagnoses for one (#14) of two sampled residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The administrator identified 43 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #13 had diagnoses, dated 06/02/23, which included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. On 06/11/24 at 1:46 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated they were unaware they needed to submit a PASARR level I for a new diagnosis of serious mental illness. 2. Res #14 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder single episode on 04/23/15 and psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition on 07/27/15. A PASARR Level I Screening, submitted on 08/17/15, documented Res #14 did not have a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. On 06/13/24 at 11:36 a.m., the DON stated Res #14 had diagnoses of depression and serious mental illness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated to include oxygen therapy and enhanced barrier precautions for one (#14) of eight residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified four residents who had catheters, two residents who had wounds, and seven residents who utilized oxygen. Findings: The facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, revised 12/2016, read in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The care plan also read, The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will .Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .Incorporate identified problem areas. Res #14 had diagnoses which included asthma, urinary retention, and stage four pressure ulcer. A physician's order, dated 04/07/23, documented to administer oxygen at 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a portable electric space heater was not utilized in resident rooms for one (#3) of one sampled resident observed with a portable electric space heater in their room. The DON identified 43 residents who resided in the facility and two residents who utilized electric space heater in their rooms. Findings: The facility's undated, Electrical Safety for Residents policy, read in part, The resident will be protected from injury associated with the use of electrical devices, including electrocution, burns and fire. The policy also read, Portable space heaters are not permitted in the facility. Res #3 had diagnoses which included psychotic disorder with hallucinations and dementia. On 06/10/24 at 9:15 a.m., Res #3 was asked why they were using a portable electric space heater. They stated because they were cold. Res #3 stated they covered the heat and air vent because it blew out cold air. On 06/10/24 at 11:03 a.m., a portable electric space heater was observed plugged in and turned on in Res #3's room. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the required staffing information. The DON identified 43 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 06/09/24 at 8:00 a.m., a white dry erase board was observed hanging on the wall at the nurses' station. The white dry erase board was not filled out. A schedule was observed in a book at the nurses' station. The schedule did not document the current census. On 06/10/24, 06/12/24, and 06/13/24 the white dry erase board was observed on the wall at the nurses' station. The dry erase board did not document the name of the facility, census or the hours worked for each staff member. On 06/13/24 at 3:04 p.m., the DON stated the required information was not documented on the dry erase board at the nurses' station.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was necessary to treat a specific condition indicated in the clinical record for one (#42) and failed to ensure a rationale was documented for declining a gradual dose reduction for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 30 residents who received psychotropic medication. Findings: The facility's Consultant Pharmacist Reports policy, dated 04/2018, read in part, Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber .Prescriber accepts and acts upon suggestions or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing. 1. Res #42 had diagnoses which included myocardial infarction, acute respiratory distress, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, acute on chronic systolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive communication deficit, age-related physical debility, essential hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. A physician order, dated 05/11/24, documented the resident received Lexapro (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to guarantee the person designated to serve as the DM met the State requirement for DM. The administrator identified all 43 residents received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: The dietary manager was transferred to the kitchen on 11/16/20. There was no documentation provided the dietary manager had obtained their certification for dietary manager. On 06/12/24 at 12:41 p.m., the DON stated the dietary manager had finished their training and was waiting to take the test. On 06/12/24 at 4:57 p.m., the dietary manager stated they were not certified. The dietary manager stated they needed to take the test.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. nebulizer masks were stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for two (#12 and #32) of two sampled residents observed for infection control with breathing treatments; b. staff wore appropriate PPE and performed hand hygiene during wound care for one (#14) of two sampled residents who were observed during wound care. c. staff wore appropriate PPE during provision of care for two , (#17, and #38) of three sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions; and d. IV tubing was changed per facility policy for intermittent use for one(#17) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for IV therapy. The DON identified seven residents who were placed on enhanced barrier precautions, five residents who received nebulizer treatments, and one resident who received IV medication. Findings: The facility's, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)-Prevention of Infection, revised 11/2011, documented to remove nebulizer container after completion of therapy, rinse the container with fresh tap water,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $121K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK