Midwest City Post Acute & Rehab
8200 National Avenue, Midwest City, OK 73110 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (405) 737-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $31,011 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.8% | 13.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 3.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 4.7% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.2% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.9% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.7% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.8% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.3% | 74.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.6% | 27.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.1% | 16.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.34 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 2.96 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.5%CMS range 33.7–67.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.2–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.2–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to prevent significant medication errors for Resident #2. Resident #2 was ordered Morphine 20mg/ml give 0.5ml every four hours as needed. The Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form, dated [DATE], documented LPN #1 administered Morphine 0.5ml at 6:00 a.m., 10:15 a.m., and 2:30 p.m. The Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form, dated [DATE], documented LPN #1 administered an additional dose of Morphine 0.5ml at 10:15 a.m., 2:30 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. per family request. The MAR, dated [DATE], documented LPN #1 administered Morphine 0.5ml at 5:58 a.m., 11:15 a.m., and 2:23 p.m. On [DATE], LPN #1 stated they had not contacted the physician for orders for the additional doses of Morphine administered to Resident #2. LPN #1 stated the entries on the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form, dated [DATE], were administered on [DATE] but they had documented the wrong date. Resident #2 expired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for 2 (#5 and #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for timely administration of medications. The DON identified 99 residents received medications in the facility. Findings:An Administering Medications policy, revised 04/2019, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time fame. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the MAR space provided for that drug and dose. 1. A significant change assessment for Resident #5, dated 04/28/26, showed the resident had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating their cognition was in intact. A June 2026 MAR for Resident #5 showed they were to be given 0.25 mg of alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) by mouth two times a day for anxiety. An Administration Note, dated 06/21/26 at 5:24 p.m., showed alprazolam was not given because the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for respect and dignity.The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 08/12/25 at 4:22 p.m., Resident #1 was observed sitting on hall 2 in a wheelchair with a t-shirt and a brief. An undated facility policy Resident Rights, read in part, The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and environment that promotes her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality.An undated diagnosis sheet, showed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of anoxic brain damage, required assistance with personal care, epilepsy, generalized anxiety disorder and depression.A care plan, dated 06/03/25, read in part, Assist Resident #1 with dressing.[Resident #1] has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes, impaired decision making, neurological symptoms.On 08/12/25 at 4:23 p.m., CMA #1 stated it was not okay for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when unsupervised for 1 of 3 medication carts used for dispensing medications.The DON of identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 08/12/25 at 2:53 p.m., the medication cart on hall 300 was observed to be unlocked and unattended blocking the doorway in front of room [ROOM NUMBER].On 08/12/25 at 2:54 p.m., upon entering room [ROOM NUMBER], LPN #1 was observed standing behind the closed curtain.An undated facility policy titled Medication Storage and Handling, read in part, 3. The Medication Cart will always be locked unless it is in direct view of the Unit Nurse. No medications should be left unattended: In resident's rooms, on medication carts, At the Nurse's stations.On 08/12/25 at 2:55 p.m., LPN #1 stated they could not see the medication cart because they were standing behind the curtain, blocking their view of the medication cart.On 08/12/25 at 2:56 p.m., LPN #1 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the SA: a. an allegation of abuse for one (#9); and b. an injury of unknown origin for one (#11) of four sampled residents reviewed for reportable incidents. The administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated 10/22/22, read in parts, It is the policy of this facility to prevent resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect or mistreatment they observe, hear about or suspect to the Administrator .The Administrator is the Abuse Coordinator .IF YOU SUSPECT ABUSE .Notify a Supervisor/Nurse Immediately .Notify the Administrator and Director of Nursing .The Administrator or designee utilizing the state specific Incident Reporting System will immediately notify the Department of Health by the Incident Reporting System .Investigation .All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to fully investigate: a. an allegation of abuse for one (#9); and b. an injury of unknown origin for one (#11) of four sampled residents reviewed for reportable incidents. The administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Program, policy, dated 10/22/22, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to prevent resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect or mistreatment they observe, hear about or suspect to the Administrator .The Administrator is the Abuse Coordinator .IF YOU SUSPECT ABUSE .Notify a Supervisor/Nurse Immediately .Notify the Administrator and Director of Nursing .The Administrator or designee utilizing the state specific Incident Reporting System will immediately notify the Department of Health by the Incident Reporting System .Investigation .All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessment were accurately coded for four (#10, 21, 43, and #54) 17 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Guidelines for Assessments policy, dated 05/29/24, read in part, It is the policy of the facility to ensure that assessments of the residents take place timely, at the appropriate time and are accurate. 1. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's. A Care Plan, dated 07/20/23, documented Resident #10 was at risk for elopement due to wandering and verbalizing wanting to leave the facility. A Wound Care Specialist Progress Note, dated 10/23/24, documented Resident #10 had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to left heel and a stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacrum. Resident #10's Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 11/13/24, documented not applicable for walking 50 feet or more. It also documented they had one stage 3 pressure ulcer, but no other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change resident assessment was completed when a resident was placed on hospice services for one (#43) of two sampled residents reviewed for hospice services. The DON identified three hospice residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Guidelines for Assessments policy, dated 05/29/24, read in part, It is the policy of the facility to ensure that assessments of the residents take place timely, at the appropriate time and are accurate. Resident #43 had diagnoses which included dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery. A Physician Order, dated 10/30/25, documented admit to hospice care services for diagnosis of senile degenerate. There was no significant change resident assessment completed when the resident began hospice services in Resident #43's clinical record. On 01/29/25 at 1:07 p.m., CNA #3 stated Resident #43 was receiving hospice services. On 01/29/25 at 1:13 p.m., LPN #2 stated Resident #43 was receiving hospice services and they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a decrease in range of motion for one (#51) of one sampled resident reviewed for decrease in range of motion. The administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #51 had diagnoses which included central cord syndrome of cervical spine paraplegia and muscle wasting. An admission Assessment, dated 10/24/24, documented Resident #51 was cognitively intact, but had functional limitation in range of motion in both upper extremities. A Physician's Order, dated 10/28/24, documented right hand wrist contracture splint. A Physician's Order, dated 11/07/24, read in part, request adaptive equipment for eating: rocker knife, plate guard, and thick handled bent/curved silverware for left hand. Bedside commode for toilet training and to decrease assistance from care givers. On 01/30/25 at 9:49 a.m., the PTA stated while Resident #51 was on skilled they were able to walk using a specialized platform walker, but they could not let Resident #51 keep using it because it belonged to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received a psychotropic medication had an acceptable diagnosis/indication for the use of the medication for one (#9) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Guidelines for Psychotropic Medication policy, dated 06/05/23, read in part, Based upon each individual resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that residents who have not previously been on a psychotropic drug are not given these meds unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition/diagnosis, that is documented in the medical record by the physician. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder. There were no other psychiatric or mood disorder diagnoses. A physician's order, dated 10/31/24, documented the resident was to receive olanzapine (an antipsychotic) 5 mg two times a day. An admission Assessment, dated 11/06/24, documented Resident #9 was cognitively intact with a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for one (#11) of four sampled residents reviewed for reportable incidents. The administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #11 had diagnoses which included stage three chronic kidney disease and dementia. A Nurse's Note, dated 12/27/24, documented Resident #11 was noted with purple discoloration under the left breast/ribs and left upper and forearm. It documented the ADON, administrator, and NP were notified. It documented orders were obtained for a stat x-ray: left rib series with posterior and anterior chest three view, left humerus two view, left forearm two view for a diagnosis of pain and discoloration. It documented the family was notified of the discoloration and new order. There was no origin of the bruising identified in the nurse note. The note was signed by LPN #1. An Incident Report, dated 12/27/24, documented Resident #11 was noted with purple discoloration under their left breast/ribs and left upper and forearm. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call cord was within reach for one (#23) of 13 sampled residents whose call cord availability was observed. The administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Call Lights policy, read in part, Always be sure the resident has a functioning call light that is the easiest type for them to use. Always place the call light in an accessible location to where the resident is located in their room. Resident #23 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction and hemiplegia of dominant side. Resident #23's quarterly assessment, dated 11/07/24, documented the resident had functional range of motion limitations to all four extremities and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. On 01/27/25 at 12:51 p.m., a touch pad call light was observed attached to the curtain against the wall while Resident #23 was in a specialized mobile chair in front of their bed. The touch pad was not within their reach. On 01/27/25 at 12:53 p.m., LPN #1 stated Resident #23's touch pad call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy was provided to a resident with limited ROM for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for therapy services. The DON identified 11 residents who received restorative therapy resided in the facility. Findings: A Restorative Nursing policy, revised 05/16/19, read in part, .the facility will provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable .Restorative Services .actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning .A resident may be started on a restorative nursing program when he or she is admitted to the facility with restorative needs, but is not a candidate for formalized rehabilitation therapy . Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. An admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was used during a two-person physical assist transfer for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Bed Mobility and Transfers policy, undated, read in part, .Sit to Stand Transfer Procedure .With hands securely on the safety/gait belt, instruct the resident to stand .Bed to/From Wheelchair .Secure a gait belt around the resident's waist .Make sure your hands are securely on the safety/gait belt . Resident #7 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease and tremor. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 07/09/24, documented Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate assistance for the sit to stand task and the transfer to and from a bed to a wheelchair task. On 10/16/24 at 9:48 a.m., CNA #5 and CNA #6 were observed placing one arm under each of Resident #7's arms, held the backside of Resident #7's pants, and hoisted the resident up from their wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment by maintaining comfortable water temperatures for two (300 hall and 400 hall) of two shower rooms observed for comfortable water temperatures. The maintenance supervisor identified two shower rooms in the facility. Findings: The Water Temperatures, Safety of policy, dated December 2009, read in parts, .Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than ____ [degrees] F ., or the minimum allowable temperature per state regulation .Maintenance staff is responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls and record the water temperatures in a safety log . On 02/13/24 at 11:09 a.m., Resident #6 stated the water in the shower rooms were hard to adjust. They stated the water was either too hot or too cold. On 02/13/24 at 11:16 a.m., the 300 hall shower room was observed. The shower on the left side was observed to register 84 degrees F with only the hot water running. At 11:18 a.m., the shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses received competency/skills checks for two (LPN #1 and LPN #3) of five employee files reviewed for competency/skills checks. The DON identified 16 nurses who currently worked at the facility. Findings: 1. LPN #1 was hired on [DATE]. The ODH Form 283, read in parts, .Incident date: 01-28-2024 .Part B .On [DATE] [LPN #1] was the nurse for [Resident #2]. Resident was on hospice and had a physician order for morphone [sic] 0.5ml q4 hours PRN. [LPN #1] stated that [they] administered this medication outside of physician order and time regulations. [LPN #1] stated [they] filled a 10ml syringe with 3ml of morphine and used this to administer several doses to the resident within [their] shift. Resident expired on [DATE]. [LPN #1] was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation .Part C .[LPN #1] was suspended. [LPN #1] will have another nurse sign off on any narcotics given since [they are] not allowed to be terminated. Education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure records were accurate for one (#2) of five sampled residents whose records were reviewed. The DON identified 64 residents resided in the facilty. Findings: Resident #2 had diagnoses which included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. A physician order, dated [DATE], documented Resident #2 was ordered lorazepam 2mg/ml give one milliliter every four hours as needed for anxiety. An Order Note, dated [DATE] at 4:26 p.m., documented a new order from hospice had been received for morphine 20ml/mg every four hours as needed for pain/shortness of breath. The Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form, documented on [DATE], LPN #1 administered morphine 0.5ml at 6:00 a.m., 10:15 a.m., and 2:30 p.m. The Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form, dated [DATE], documented LPN #1 administered an additional dose of morphine 0.5ml at 10:15 a.m., 2:30 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. per family request. The MAR, dated [DATE], did not contain documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were reconciled when they were delivered from the pharmacy for one (#2) of three sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The DON identified 50 residents had orders for controlled medications. Findings: The Accepting Delivery of Medications policy, dated April 2007, read in parts, .Before signing to accept the delivery, the Nurse must reconcile the medications in the package with the delivery ticket/order receipt .A nurse shall sign the delivery ticket, indicating review and acceptance of the delivery . Resident #2 had diagnoses which included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. A physician order, dated 01/24/24, documented an order for morphine 20ml/mg every four hours as needed for pain/shortness of breath. A Packing Slip dated 01/24/24, documented the pharmacy had filled 20mls of morphine 20mg/ml for Resident #2. A Prescription History, dated 01/24/24, documented the pharmacy had delivered the morphine to the facility and it had been signed for by LPN #2. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to order and administer medication as ordered for one [#1] of four sampled residents reviewed for medication. The Administrator identified 73 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 05/2017, read in part, .PRN medication, reason for administration, and effectiveness in the Nursing Notes or on the back of the MAR .Dispense Medication as ordered . Resident #1 has a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, dementia along with mood, behavior and agitation deficits. Physician's order: dated 02/26/23, documented Xanax(alaprazolam) 0.25 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. On 12/07/23 at 3:43 p.m., DON stated, according to Resident #1 charts, they missed the 17:45 dose. They stated they put in a order for the medication to be refilled 08/31/23 at 21:43, because they ran out. On 12/06/23 at 3:41 p.m., DON stated Resident #1 nursing notes says they requested a prn dose of Xanax at 1500. On 12/06/23 at 3:23 p.m., DON stated, medications are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were allowed the opportunity to formulate or decline an advanced directive for two (#12 and #50) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for advance directive. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/17/23, documented 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Advance Directives Policy and Procedure policy, undated, read in parts, .The facility provides to all residents the right to accept or refuse .formulate an advance directive . 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation Residents #12 and #50 were provided the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive or declined. On 10/18/23 at 9:33 a.m., Medical Records stated there was no advanced directive for Resident #12 or Resident #50. On 10/18/23 at 1:20 p.m., The Administrator stated residents were offered the option of formulating or declining an advance directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the intervention of a fall mat was in place for one (#41) of two sampled residents reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/17/23, documented 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #42 had diagnoses which included left femur fracture. A Resident Assessment, dated 08/03/23, documented Resident #41 required extensive assistance for transfers. A Care Plan, last revised 08/16/23, documented Resident #41 has had an actual fall and is at risk for further falls. It documented an intervention of a fall mat had been implemented on 02/11/23. A Physical Therapy evaluation, dated 08/28/23, documented Resident #41 required two person assistance and was at risk for falls. On 10/17/23 at 10:24 a.m., Resident #41 was observed in bed. They were observed to have bruising to their forehead, both eyes, and left chin. Resident #41 stated they had fallen trying to get up. No fall mat was observed in the resident's room. On 10/19/23 at 2:07 p.m., Resident #41 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were ordered with an appropriate diagnoses for one (#39) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/17/23, documented 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Psychotropic Drugs Usage policy, undated, read in part, .The following specific conditions are acceptable to warrant the use of anitpsychotic medications. The following diagnoses must be documented by the physician or consultant psychiatrist in the clinical record of the resident receiving an antipsychotic medication . Alzheimer's was not included as an appropriate diagnoses for an antipsychotic. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. A Physician's Order, dated 11/17/22, documented to administer Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 25 mg daily at bedtime related to Alzheimer's disease. On 10/19/23 at 1:13 p.m., the DON was asked how they ensured appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment in a resident's room for one (#71) of three sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 10/17/23, documented 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #71 had was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/17/23 10:42 a.m., Resident #71 was observed in their room, in bed. The wall behind the headboard was observed to be in disrepair. There were multiple areas paint was missing, wall board was peeled of and other areas were it was starting to peel. Resident #71 was asked how long the wall had been in that condition. They stated it had been that way when they moved in. On 10/20/23 at 10:24 a.m., the maintenance supervisor was asked how they ensured a comfortable, home like environment. They stated by making sure everything was up to code and working. The maintenance supervisor if they where aware of the wall behind Resident #71's wall behind…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mattress was in good repair for one (#25) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #25 had diagnoses which included anoxic brain injury and pain. On 11/17/22 at 2:29 p.m., Resident #25 was observed in bed. The mattress was observed to be peeling from the residents shoulders to the top of their head and from their knees to the end of their legs. jasmine crying out, staff On 11/18/22 at 8:51 a.m., LPN #1 was asked how they ensured a resident's mattress was in good repair. They stated if we have somebody that needs a new bed, we let the supply person know. They stated they discussed concerns in morning meeting and via a group text. LPN#1 was shown Resident #25's mattress. They stated, It's peeling. They were asked if the mattress was in good repair. They stated, No, we need a new one.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to implement a care plan for falls for one (#25) of two sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Baseline Care Plan Assessment/Comprehensive Care Plans policy, undated, read in parts .Policy: The facility interdisciplinary team .will discuss and develop quantifiable objectives along with appropriate interventions in a effort to achieve the highest level of functioning and the greatest degree of comfort/safety and overall well-being attainable for the resident . Resident #25 had diagnoses which included unspecified convulsions, anoxic brain damage, and diffuse traumatic brain injury. A fall Care Plan, target date 10/28/22, read in part, .9/24/22- Fall matt (sic) next to bed Date Initiated: 11/16/2022 . On 11/16/22 at 8:45 a.m., Resident #25 was observed lying in bed. No fall mat was observed on the resident's floor. On 11/17/22 at 1:26 p.m., Resident #25 was observed lying in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident care plan was updated for one (#25) and a resident was asked to participate in a care plan meeting for one (#18) of 13 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Baseline Care Plan Assessment/Comprehensive Care Plans policy, undated, read in parts .Policy: The facility interdisciplinary team .will discuss and develop quantifiable objectives along with appropriate interventions in a effort to achieve the highest level of functioning and the greatest degree of comfort/safety and overall well-being attainable for the resident .The facility Social Service Director or designee will notify the resident of their scheduled care plan conference and will invite and encourage the resident to attend. This notification will continue for any subsequent care plan conferences. These notifications will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure toenail care was provided to dependent residents for two (#111 and #25) of two sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Skin and Foot Care, policy, revised March 2015 read in part, .Toenails should only be trimmed by personnel qualified to do so (this can be regular staff, and does not have to be a podiatrist), according to facility policy . 1. Resident #111 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Atherosclerotic heart disease. A Resident Assessment, dated 10/02/22, documented the resident required oversight for personal hygiene. On 11/17/22 at 8:51a.m., Resident #11 was observed in bed. Their feet were observed to be uncovered. Their toenails were observed to be extremely long and curling under into their skin. They were asked how frequently staff trimmed their toenails.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis resident had been assessed upon return from dialysis for one (#13) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents' report, dated 11/15/22, documented two residents received dialysis services. Findings: A Community Hemodialysis policy, undated, documented the facility would monitor the resident after dialysis for any signs and symptoms of disequilibrium syndrome, nausea, vomiting or bleeding from the dialysis access site. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease. A Dialysis Communication form, documented upon a residents' return from dialysis, staff were to assess a residents' vital signs, status of access site, medications administered upon return, and the residents' condition. Nursing Progress notes, dated 09/04, 09/17, 09/29, 10/11, 10/13, 10/20, 10/25, and 10/27/22, documented Resident #13 had returned from dialysis. There was no documentation the resident had been assessed for vital signs, the status of the access site,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the minimum requirements for four of thirty days reviewed for sufficient staffing. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented, 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Quality of Care Monthly Report for September 2022, documented, the facility did not meet the required 2.90% staffing for the following days: On September 11, the facility had 2.23%, on September 17, the facility had 2.37%, on September 18, the facility had 1.77%, and on September 25, the facility had 2.32%. On 11/18/22 at 12:38 p.m., the DON stated the staffing numbers for these days did not meet the requirement for sufficient staffing.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Registered Nurse Coverage policy, read in part, .it is the policy of the facility to provide the services of an RN for at least 8 consecutive hours per 24 hour day, 7 days weekly . Review of Punch Detail report documents there was no RN coverage for 5/5, 5/6, 5/17, 5/28, and 5/29/2022. On 11/18/22 at 9:40 a.m., the DON was ask for the RN coverage. On 11/18/22 at 11:22 a.m. the DON stated we did not have RN coverage on 5/5. 5/6, 5/17, 5/28, and 5/29/2022. On 11/18/22 at 12:32 p.m. the Administrator stated, we follow regulation for RN coverage. On 11/18/22 at 12:38 p.m. the DON stated there should be 8 hours RN coverage 7 days a week.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for three (#10, 25 and #33) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Administration Guidelines policy, undated, documented staff were to verify each medication against the MAR. It documented staff were to sign the MAR immediately after administering medications, document necessary medication administration information, and document withheld medications per facility policy. 1. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included HTN, major depressive disorder, other rheumatic valve disease, COPD, Alzheimer's disease and unspecified osteoarthritis. Resident #10 had the following physician's orders: a. Apixaban tablet 2.5 mg give one tablet PO BID, start date of 03/01/22, b. Depakote tablet delayed release 250 MG give one tab PO BID, start date 03/01/22, c. Ferrous Sulfate tablet 325 MG give one tab PO BID, start date 03/01/22, d.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was in reach for one (#111) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for call lights. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #111 had diagnosis which included anoxic brain injury. On 11/7/22 at 8:51 a.m., Resident #111 was observed laying in bed. The resident's call light was observed to be off the bed and was on top of a small shelf at the end of the bed. On 11/17/22 at 9:04 a.m., Resident #111 was asked how they called for staff assistance. They stated with the call light if they can find it. On 11/17/22 at 9:11 a.m., CNA #2 was asked what the policy was for call lights. They stated we go in each room and double check and make sure they had them. They were asked if Resident #111 was able to use the call light. They stated yes. CNA #2 was asked to locate the resident's call light. They stated it was on the shelf at the end of the bed. On 11/17/22 at 10:33 a.m., the ADON was informed of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for one (#20) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Program policy, updated 05/02/17, read in part, .Any incident or allegation involving abuse or mistreatment will result in an abuse investigation .The facility will take steps to prevent mistreatment while the investigation is underway .Staff members who are suspected of abuse or misconduct shall immediately (regardless of the time left on shift) be barred from any further contact with residents of the facility and be suspended from duty, pending the outcome of the investigation .When an alleged or suspected case of abuse or neglect is reported to the Administrator, the Administrator, or person in charge of the facility, will notify the following persons or agencies of such incident immediately per state and federal regulations .Department of Health, Ombudsman, APS, local police department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse had been reported to OSDH within two hours for one (#20) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Program policy, updated 05/02/17, read in part, .When an alleged or suspected case of abuse or neglect is reported to the Administrator, the Administrator, or person in charge of the facility, will notify the following persons or agencies of such incident immediately per state and federal regulations .Department of Health . Resident #20 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Resident Assessment, dated 10/11/22, documented Resident #20's cognition was intact. An undated, hand written statement from CNA #4, documented they heard an altercation between Resident #20, their family member, and CMA #3. They stated CMA #3 threw the medication cart keys in the air and stated 'All this for no [expletive] reason' as they were walking away. CMA #3's time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse had been thoroughly investigated and residents had been protected from further potential abuse for one (#20) of one sampled resident reviewed for an allegation of abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Program policy, updated 05/02/17, read in part, .Any incident or allegation involving abuse or mistreatment will result in an abuse investigation .The facility will take steps to prevent mistreatment while the investigation is underway .Staff members who are suspected of abuse or misconduct shall immediately (regardless of the time left on shift) be barred from any further contact with residents of the facility and be suspended from duty, pending the outcome of the investigation .When an alleged or suspected case of abuse or neglect is reported to the Administrator, the Administrator, or person in charge of the facility, will notify the following persons or agencies of such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate resident assessments for one (#13) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents' report, dated 11/15/22, documented two residents received dialysis services. Findings: A Community Hemodialysis policy, undated, documented the facility would monitor the resident after dialysis for any signs and symptoms of disequilibrium syndrome, nausea, vomiting or bleeding from the dialysis access site. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease. A Resident Assessment, dated 09/03/22, did not document dialysis services. Dialysis services was checked No. A Physician's order, dated 11/08/22, documented dialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. On 11/15/22 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #13 was asked if they received dialysis services. They stated they did. They stated they had been receiving dialysis services for about three years. On 11/18/22 at 8:31 a.m., the ADON was asked if Resident #13 received dialysis services. They stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident room was free from potential accident hazards for one (#26) of 24 sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. Resident #26 had diagnoses which included Dementia. A Resident Assessment, dated 09/09/22, documented the resident had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with transfers. An ADL careplan, dated 11/26/22, read in parts, . has risk for falls .needs a safe environment with: even floors free .clutter . On 11/15/22 at 1:41 p.m., Resident #26's room was observed to have a sheet stuck to the floor in front of the resident's recliner. The sheet was approximately three to four feet wide and was on top of a black sticky substance. On 11/17/22 at 7:55 a.m., the sheet was again observed to be stuck to the floor in front of the resident's recliner. On 11/17/222 at 7:55 a.m., RN #1 was asked how long the sheet stuck to the black sticky substance had been on floor. She stated she was not sure, but thought it was about three weeks ago. On 11/17/22 CNA #1 was asked how long the sheet stuck to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to a GDR for one (#33) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented nine residents received antipsychotic medications. Findings: A Psychotropic Monitoring policy, dated 06/21/17, read in part, .For any individual who is receiving a psychotropic medication, the GDR may be considered clinically contraindicated if .The physician has documented the clinical rationale for why any additional attempted dose reduction at that time would be likely to impair the resident's function or increase distressed behavior . Resident #33 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances and psychosis. A physician's order, dated 09/10/21, documented, seroquel tab 50 MG give one tab PO at bedtime for psychosis. A Physician Recommendation from pharmacy, dated 06/14/22, read in part, .This resident currently takes Seroquel 50 mg HS. Please assess and if appropriate, consider a dose reduction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered labs for one (#25) of six sampled residents whose records were reviewed for laboratory services. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Lab Scheduling/Tracking policy, undated, read in part, .It is the policy of the facility to ensure that laboratory tests ordered by the physician are systematically scheduled and tracked so that ordered lab work is obtained and results are received and reported timely .The Charge Nurse will monitor the scheduled labs daily to check to ensure that any collected lab results are received timely as well as to confirm that received results are reported to the physician . Resident #25 had diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage, unspecified convulsions, and diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness. A physician's order, dated 12/22/20, documented keppra level every three months in the months of January, April, July, and October. The resident's record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and sanitary. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/15/22, documented 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Nutritional Services policy, dated 09/12/14, read in part, .The Facility will maintain the ice machine .storage container in a sanitary manner to minimize the risk of food hazards. The ice machine will be cleaned once quarterly or more often as needed . On 11/15/22, at 12:13 p.m. the ice machine on hall 400 was wiped with a white paper towel underneath the dispenser flap. A large amount of black substance on paper towel and on the bottom of the entire length of the dispenser edge. On 11/15/22, at 12:45 p.m. the administrator was shown the black substance on the white paper towel, and on the dispenser edge that had the black substance. The administrator was asked when the machine was last maintenanced. They stated they just had a company come out. The administrator was asked how often the ice machine was cleaned and sanitized. They…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing wasn't stored on the floor for one (#111) of one sampled resident reviewed for oxygen. The facility Matrix report, dated 11/15/22, documented two residents received oxygen services. Findings: Resident #111 had diagnoses which included anoxic brain injury. On 11/17/22 at 8:51 a.m., Resident #111's oxygen tubing was observed to be laying on the floor. On 11/17/22 at 9:11 a.m., CNA #2 was asked what the policy was for storing oxygen tubing. They stated if it was not in use, it was placed in a bag and dated. They were shown the oxygen tubing on the floor. CNA #2 was observed to pick up the oxygen tubing, placed it in a plastic bag and tied it to the oxygen concentrator. On 11/17/22 at 10:33 a.m., the ADON was made aware of the oxygen tubing laying on the floor. She was informed CNA #2 picked the tubing up off the floor, bagged it, and fastened it to the oxygen concentrator.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$31,011 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,118 — penalty dated 2024-04-11
- $13,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAMILY TK5 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| PRATT, KYLENE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 44% | since 02/01/2025 |
| PRATT, TODD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| RAJU, SENTHIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| KOPION HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375252. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.