Sienna Extended Care & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 223 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 82.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.11 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-01-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 01/06/23, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure policy was followed regarding allegations of misappropriation of pain medication signed out and not documented as given. On 01/03/23, LPN #1 signed out four narcotic pills for Resident #36, these were not documented as administered on the MAR. Upon interview, Resident #36 stated they did not receive any pain medications on 01/03/23. On 01/04/23, LPN #1 was observed signing out two doses of a narcotic pain medication when the count sheet for Resident #36 count was determined to be inaccurate during shift change. Resident #36 was not in the building at this time. LPN #1 returned to work on 01/04/23 despite the policy stating the employee would be suspended pending an investigation. LPN #1 signed out narcotics for Resident #54 fourteen times from 10/13/22 through 01/03/23 that were not documented as administered to the resident on the MAR. The potential for residents to go with untreated pain is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. Thorough skin assessment was conducted on readmission, b. Weekly skin monitoring and/or weekly wound assessments were conducted, c. The physician was notified timely of the new or worsening wound; and d. Adequate wound care/treatment was initiated timely for one (#11) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #11 who developed a pressure injury which worsened to an avoidable pressure injury with slough visible. The DON identified 71 residents who were at risk for skin breakdown. Findings: The facility's Wound Care policy, revised October 2010, read in parts, The purpose .is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing .Verify that there is a physician's order .Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .The type of wound care given .any changes in the resident's condition All assessment data .Report other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-21 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the most recent state survey results of the facility in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of the residents. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/17/25 at 9:17 a.m., a framed form that showed Copies of all [NAME] surveys and results are available to view on the table at the north end of our main entrance was observed on the wall directly outside of the dining room. On 04/17/25 at 9:21 a.m., the surveyor walked to the front entrance and did not observe the survey results on any table at the north end of the main entrance. A Survey Results policy, revised 04/2007, read in part, A copy of the most recent standard survey, including any subsequent extended surveys, follow-up revisits reports .along with the state approved plans of correction of noted deficiencies, is maintained in a 3-ring binder located in an area frequented by most residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the total amount of resident funds in the facility trust account did not exceed the amount covered under the facility surety bond. The DON identified 11 residents in the facility trust account resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility form titled, Personal Funds Authorization, read in part, The facility maintains one trust fund account for both private and Medicare resident/patients .The facility has purchased a surety bond, or otherwise provided assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, to assure the security of all personal deposited with the facility. The facility trust account showed the following balances: a. statement date 06/30/24 beginning balance $39,450.07 ending balance $40,587.06; b. statement date 08/31/24 beginning balance $32,086.12; c. statement date 02/28/25 ending balance $28,346.24; and d. statement date 03/31/25 beginning balance $28,346.24. The facility surety bond, current bond term 08/20/22 through 08/20/25, showed the bond amount was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility without fear of discrimination or reprisal and failed to promptly resolve grievances the residents had in the resident council group. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility form, Resident's/Patient's Rights, read in part, You have the right to voice problems that you are concerned about regarding your treatment .Anyone who denies any of these rights is punishable by fine and/or imprisonment .If you are denied your rights, you may also be allowed punitive damages .There can be no retaliation of any type by the facility staff because of a complaint presented to the staff. The resident council minutes, dated 01/27/25, showed old business: still out of dietary items and everything they ordered or requested was usually out. The resident council minutes showed to see the 01/29/25 meeting for how the issue was resolved. The minutes showed new business: dietary rush when asking for orders and are always out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were coded for 2 (#1 and #48) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of resident assessments. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A hospice services contract, dated 11/08/24, showed Resident #1 had started hospice services on that date. A significant change MDS assessment, dated 11/19/24, was completed due to Resident #1 beginning hospice services. The assessment showed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of heart disease and a BIMS score of 12, indicating they were moderately cognitively impaired. A care plan, dated 01/20/25, showed Resident #1 had a terminal diagnosis and was receiving hospice services. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/19/25, showed that Resident #1 was not on hospice services. On 04/17/25 at 11:05 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the quarterly assessment was coded incorrectly and should have shown that Resident #1 was receiving hospice services. On 04/17/25 at 11:08 a.m., the DON stated the MDS assessments are supposed to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. follow EBP during the provision of care for 1 (#14) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living; and b. transport dirty linen appropriately and sanitize their hands between meal set up for different residents on hall 200. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 18 residents were on EBP. Findings: 1. On 04/15/25 at 12:42 p.m., CNA #4 entered Resident #14's room to answer their call light. The resident's representative informed CNA #4 the resident was wet. On 04/15/25 at 12:43 p.m., CNA #4 donned gloves. There was an EBP sign on the resident's closet. Gowns were observed on top of the resident's closet. There was an EBP sign, gloves, and hand sanitizer by the resident's room entrance. Resident #14 ambulated to the bathroom with CNA #4's supervision. There was a yellow ring on the center of the resident's sheet. On 04/15/25 at 12:50 p.m., CNA #4 assisted the resident with toileting and changed their clothing. CNA #4 did not have a gown on. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation for 1 (#177) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation prevention program, revised 04/2021, read in part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation .Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. A new employee form showed CNA #2 had a hire date of 12/06/24. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/24/25, showed Resident #177 had severe cognitive impairment (BIMS 07). An email correspondence to the administrator, dated 03/17/25, showed the family of Resident #177 discovered six unauthorized charges to the resident's debit card during their stay at the facility. The email correspondence showed there were four withdrawals made and deposited to a cash app account on 01/01/25 for a total of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. an abuse allegation was reported to APS for 2 (#8 and #21); and b. an initial abuse allegation was reported to the state agency within two hours for 1 (#21) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised 09/2022, read in part, If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law .The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies .The stated licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility .Adult protective services .Immediately .within two hours of an allegation involving abuse. 1. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/13/25, showed Resident #21's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete skin assessments as ordered for 3 (#1, 12, and #24) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #1's order summary report, dated 04/2025, had diagnoses which included peripheral autonomic neuropathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #1's quarterly resident assessment, dated 02/19/25, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 12. A physician's order, dated 11/04/24, showed weekly skin assessments on Tuesdays from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. Skin only evaluation (in assessments) was to be filled out. Document all findings. Obtain treatment order if needed one time a day every Wednesday. The last skin assessment for Resident #1 was dated 08/07/24. On 04/21/25 at 9:18 a.m., LPN #1 stated the last skin only evaluation they see in Resident #1's medical records was dated 08/07/24. 2. On 04/16/25 at 8:28 a.m., Resident #12 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer a resident's oxygen as ordered for 1 (#12) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified seven residents received continuous oxygen in the facility. Findings: On 04/16/25 at 8:24 a.m., Resident #12's oxygen concentrator was observed to be at a flow rate of 2 liters per minute via a nasal cannula. On 04/17/25 at 11:16 a.m., LPN #2 made observation of the oxygen flow rate on resident #12's concentrator. A policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 2001, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration .Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #12's order summary report, dated 04/2025, showed the resident had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician's order, dated 02/05/24, showed oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 liters continuously. May titrate to keep saturation above 90%. On 04/17/25 at 11:20 a.m., LPN #2 stated the resident's concentrator was set to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were only accessible to qualified staff. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. The administrator identified the facility had three medication rooms. Findings: On 04/16/25 at 10:55 a.m., life safety was on tour with the maintenance supervisor. The maintenance supervisor used their key to open the medication storage room by the DONs office. No other staff were present at the time. The maintenance supervisor walked over to the medication room on hall 500 and opened the door using their key. No other staff were present at the time. On 04/16/25 at 12:17 p.m., LPN #1 opened the medication storage room by the DONs office. There were numerous containers of residents' medications observed in the room. On 04/16/25 at 12:35 p.m., ACMA #1 opened the medication storage room on hall 500. There were numerous containers of residents' medications observed in the room. On 04/16/25 at 2:45 p.m., the maintenance supervisor had the medication room door by the DONs office…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK