Pleasant Valley Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 78.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 08/16/24 at 9:35 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health identified the presence of an immediate jeopardy related to the facility failed to evaluate Residents #51 and #18 for the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Resident #18 had known sexually inappropriate behaviors and there was no evidence the facility identified these events as sexual abuse or evaluated the resident's capacity to consent. A Progress Note, dated 06/21/24 at 7:16 p.m., documented Resident #51 was observed with their legs opened and Resident #18 was sitting in front of Resident #51, rubbing on Resident #51's vagina. The nurse told the residents they could not do that. The nurse observed them kissing, went to speak with Resident #51, who was leaned forward while trying to pull their pants down, and Resident #18 had partial of their penis out. The nurse told them they could not do that in the hallway. On 08/16/24, there had been no documentation of evaluation of capacity to consent, care plans or assessments for Residents #51 and #18 regarding sexual activity. On 08/16/24 at 11:10 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a fall intervention to toilet a resident every hour was implemented for 1 (Resident #85) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls.Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #85 on 04/16/2026. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of heart failure. Resident #85's Baseline Care Plan, with an admission date of 04/16/2026, indicated the resident required one person physical assistance for toilet use, was always incontinent of urinary continence, frequently incontinent of bowel continence, and had a history of falls. Resident #85's incident report dated 04/16/2026, indicated the resident was on the floor in front of their wheelchair in front of the nurses' station due to an attempt to stand. Per the incident report, the resident slipped, fell, and landed on their buttocks in front of their wheelchair. The incident report indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed practical nurse (LPN) knew how to prime an insulin pen for 1 (Resident #7) of 6 residents observed for medication administration.Findings included: An undated facility document titled, Job description for Charge Nurse, specified Job Knowledge: 1. Knowledge of procedures and techniques necessary to administer medications and treatment as prescribed by the physician. An undated facility document titled, Staff education Policy signed by the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated It is the policy of this facility to perform Staff education or in-services based on the required annual in-services by the state and any additional training that is needed by the staff on an as need basis. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #76 on 11/16/2020. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and the manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5 percent (%) or less. The facility had 3 medication errors out of 34 opportunities, which yielded a medication error rate of 8.82% for 2 (Resident #76 and Resident #7) of 6 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 06/03/2025, revealed, Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. The policy specified, 8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. 1. The manufacturer's guidelines for the Lantus pen, with a copyright date of 2022, indicated, Step 3. Perform a safety test * Dial a test dose of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's supplemental oxygen tubing was stored in a plastic bag when not in use for 1 (Resident #41) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised 06/03/2025, indicated, Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. The policy specified, e. Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #41 on 10/02/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/03/2026, revealed Resident #41 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #41's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facilty failed to ensure staff members assisted residents with eating in a dignified manner for two (#12 and #75) of nine sampled residents observed during meal service in the assisted dining room. The DON identified 15 residents who required feeding assistance resided in the the facility. Findings: A Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes policy, revised 07/04/24, read in part, It is the practice of this facility to treat each resident with respect and dignity .All staff members involved in providing feeding assistance to residents promote and maintain resident dignity during mealtimes .All staff will be seated, if possible, while feeding a resident . 1. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia and obsessive-compulsive behavior. An Annual Resident Assessment, dated 06/09/24, documented Resident #12 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for the task of eating. On 08/13/24 at 12:14 p.m., CMA #3 was observed standing over Resident #12 and giving them a bite of their lunch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure information to file a formal complaint to the state agency and ombudsman were readily available to 10 of 10 residents that attended the resident group interview. The Administrator reported the census was 83. Findings: On 08/14/24 at 3:15 p.m., ten residents were asked if they knew their Ombudsman. several of the residents questioned what was an Ombudsman. The residents were introduced, then asked if they were familiar with where information was posted to call the ombudsman if they had a concern or complaint. They stated they did not know but the information may be on the bulletin board on C Hall. The residents were asked if they knew how to report a complaint to the state survey office. They stated they did not know, the information may have been posted on the bulletin board on C Hall. On 08/14/24 at 3:46 p.m., the bulletin board on C Hall was observed to have the information to report a complaint to the state office and posting of the Ombudsman. The forms were near the top of the bulletin board, with the bottom of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure past survey results were readily available to residents to review for 10 of 10 residents that attended the resident group interview. The Administrator reported the census was 83. Findings: On 08/14/24 at 3:15 p.m., ten residents were asked if they knew where the previous survey results were posted and if the reports were readily available to them, without having to request the information The residents stated they did not know they could look at the reports and did not know where to locate the previous reports. On 08/14/24 at 3:46 p.m., the bulletin board on C Hall was observed to have a binder labeled, Survey Results, in a file bin mounted to the wall. The lower part of the bin was approximately five feet above the floor. The binder was attached to a chain that limited the binder to be lowered approximately three feet above the floor. On 08/14/24 at 3:50 p.m., the Administrator was asked if the previous survey results were readily available to the residents to review, without the assistance of staff. They stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of abuse investigations were submitted to the State within 24 hours for three (#15, 44, and #51) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator identified 83 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #15 had diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit and chronic kidney disease, stage 3. Resident #15's admission assessment, dated 05/22/24, documented Resident #15's cognition was intact. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, faxed on 07/08/24 at 4:37 p.m., documented CNA# 5 reported to administration Resident #15 had reported to them that on 07/03/24 CNA #4 had called Resident #15 an expletive word in the shower room. A Final State Reportable Incident form, faxed on 07/11/24 at 12:57 p.m., documented CNA #4 was immediately put on a three day suspension for verbal abuse allegation during this investigation. All staff were immediately in-serviced over abuse on 07/08/24. On 08/14/24 at 1:17 p.m., RN #1 stated the facility policy for reporting abuse was to report verbal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. Resident #44 had diagnoses to include mild intellectual disabilities, vascular dementia, hearing loss, visual loss, behavioral and emotional disorder with childhood onset, schizophrenia, and bipolar. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 07/19/24 documented Resident #44 had moderate cognitive impairment, displayed verbal behavioral symptoms toward others and required some substantial to maximum assistance with ADLs. An Incident Report Form, dated 06/26/24 documented a hospice nurse reported Resident #44 stated a staff member was too rough with Resident #44. The resident had reported they had urinated on themselves in the dining room at lunch and the aide had to take the resident out of the dining room to provide care. Resident #44 stated They just jerked me around . The investigative file, contained documented of two Nurse Aides, a visitor, the resident's room mate, and a hospice nurse were interviewed. There was no documentation other staff or residents in the facility had been interviewed to ensure the safety of all residents. On 08/15/24 11:35 a.m., in the presence of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for two (#18 and #51) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The Administrator identified 83 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change policy, revised 07/02/24, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change .The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change .The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions . Resident #18 had diagnosis which included unspecified dementia. Resident #18's quarterly assessment dated , 04/20/24, documented Resident #18's cognition was severely impaired. A Behavior Note, dated 09/20/19 at 5:24 p.m., documented, Another resident informed this nurse that resident was in hallway touching penis. List Interventions Attempted: Educated [Resident #18] that resident will need to go inside room in private to do so. A Behavior Note,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,049 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $20,049 — penalty dated 2024-08-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK