Summers Healthcare, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 20.9 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 01/18/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide Resident #1 with an environment that was free from accident hazards. A nurses' note, written 01/03/24 at 5:40pm, documented resident was found with left arm caught in bed rail and the bed rail had fallen on it. A nurses' note, written 01/04/24 at 3:28pm, documented the resident was transferred to the ER following xray of left arm. An ER report, dated 01/04/24, documented resident had a closed fracture of the left distal humerus. On 01/17/24 at 12:10pm, the resident was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. On 01/18/24 at 1:10pm, the DON acknowledged no physician's orders and no bed rail risk assessment had been completed. There was no documentation that the risk and benefits of using bed rails had been discussed with the resident's representative and no signed consent had been obtained before bed rails were put in use nor upon her return from the hospital. On 01/18/24 at 5:09 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0680 — widespread
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified activity director for 19 of 19 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: On 01/18/24 at 1:10 p.m., the DON was asked if the facility had a certified activity director. She stated not at this time, CMA #1 does activities when they are here and comes in on their days off, the rest of the staff pitches in too. The DON was asked if CMA #1 or any other staff were certified activity directors. They stated no. On 01/18/24 at 3:56 p.m., the Administrator reported the last day the facility had a certified activity person was on 07/31/23.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions for reducing or discontinuing the use of bed rails and provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation for three (#1, 3, and #4) of three sampled residents with bed rails in use. The administrator identified 19 residents resided in the facility. There were six residents with bed rails in use. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included gastrostomy, tracheostomy, and ventilator dependent. On 01/17/24 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. 2. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included gastrostomy, tracheostomy, and ventilator dependent. On 01/17/24 at 1:08 p.m., Resident #3 was observed in bed with four bed rails raised. 3. Resident #4 had diagnoses that included gastrostomy and tracheostomy. On 01/17/24 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #4 was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. There were no interventions documented on the care plan or implemented for resident #1, #3, nor #4, to reduce or discontinue the use of bed rails. There was no documentation in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to a. assess the resident for need and safety of bed rail use, b. discuss the risks and benefits of bed rails and obtain informed consent from the resident or the resident's representative, and c. obtain a physician's order for the use of bed rails for three (#1, 3, and #4) of three sampled residents reviewed for restraints. The administrator identified 19 residents resided in the facility. There were six residents with bed rails in use. Findings: A Restraints (Physical) policy, undated, read in parts, .Procedure .1. Assess resident's need for restraint use .Obtain informed consen .Obtain physician's order .Develop or review resident care plan . 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included gastrostomy, tracheostomy, and ventilator dependent. On 01/17/24 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed with two upper bed rails raised. 2. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included gastrostomy, tracheostomy, and ventilator dependent. On 01/17/24 at 1:08 p.m., Resident #3 was observed in bed with four bed rails raised. 3. Resident #4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were transmitted timely for three (#152, 104, and #154) of 11 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/23/23, documented 19 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A MDS 3.0 Validation Report, dated 08/23/23, documented the following comprehensive assessments were not transmitted within 14 days of completion: a. Resident #152's comprehensive assessment, dated 05/19/23, b. Resident #104's comprehensive assessment, dated 12/16/22, and c. Resident #154's comprehensive assessment, dated 01/27/23. On 08/24/23 at 3:00 p.m., the administrator was asked to provide MDS submission reports from April 2023 to August 22, 2023. She stated No, because there was not anyone in facility to do them.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was labeled/dated and outdated foods were properly disposed. This affected 16 residents who received nutritional services from the kitchen. Resident Census and Condition of Residents documented four residents received enteral feeding, and the facility Census was 20. Findings: On 09/19/22 at 10:21 a.m., during a brief initial observation in the kitchen the following food was observed as follows; 1. two packs of frozen turkey breasts (use/sell by date 07/29/22), 2. two packages of bologna (use/sell by date 02/19/22) and, 3. hamburger patties in a clear package, unlabeled and no expiration date. The DS was asked when the turkey breast was stored. The DS stated, That, I don't know I wasn't here when it went in. During observation of the refrigerator in the kitchen, there was six bags of, undated, fajita-blend vegetables. The dry storage room had a large undated bag of cereal. The DS acknowledged there was no date on the bag. On 09/19/22 at 10:47 a.m., in a second storage area an, undated, opened bag of French fries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to document the provision of information and education regarding the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of vaccinations to the resident or legal representative before administering: a. the pneumococcal vaccine for three (#1, #4, and #5) of five residents sampled for immunizations, and b. the influenza vaccine for one (#3) of five residents sampled for immunizations. Resident Census and Condition of Residents documented 20 residents lived at the facility. Findings: Vaccination of Residents policy, revised October 2019, read in part, .1. Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations .2. Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record . 1.Resident #1's immunization log documented they received Prevnar 13 vaccine on 07/31/2020. There was no documentation in resident #1's clinical record that information and education regarding the risks, benefits, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to document the provision of information and education regarding the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of vaccinations to the resident or legal representative when offering the COVID-19 vaccine for five (#1, #3, #4, #5, and #7) of five residents sampled for immunizations. Resident Census and Condition of Residents documented 20 residents lived at the faciity. Findings: Vaccination of Residents policy, revised October 2019, read in part, .1. Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations .2. Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record . 1. There was no documentation in resident #1's clinical record that information and education regarding the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccination had been provided to resident #1 or their legal representative. 2. Resident #3's Social Service progress note, dated 06/07/22, read in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

What families pay in OK