No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Okemah Care Center

112 North Woody Guthrie, Okemah, OK 74859 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 76 certified beds · (918) 623-1126 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (918) 623-1126 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
112 N 3rd St · (918) 623-3060 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
106 S Woody Guthrie St · (918) 623-2510 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1012 W Broadway St · (918) 623-2608 · Call to confirm hours
Park
S 3rd St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
122 E Atlanta St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.7%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%3.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.8%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.4%25.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.1%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.5%17.5%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.492.311.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.142.961.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
45.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 42.7 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) tubing was labeled and dated for two, (26, and #36) of four residents sampled for respiratory care.The DON identified four residents that received oxygen therapy.Findings : On 02/23/26 at 12:35 p.m., Resident #26 was observed using oxygen tubing with a label dated 02/13/26. On 02/24/26 at 2:16 p.m., Resident #36 was observed using oxygen tubing with no label and without a date. An undated, Oxygen Concentrator Maintenance, read in part, All tubing will be changed weekly and PRN as needed for soiling. Tubing will be dated and initialed when completed.On 02/23/26 at 1:20 p.m., LPN #1 confirmed Resident #26 did use the oxygen and the label on the tubing was dated 02/13/26. They stated they thought it was to be changed out weekly.On 02/25/26 at 11:06 a.m., LPN #1 confirmed Resident #36 did use oxygen and there was not a label on the oxygen tubing. They stated they did not know when it had been changed.On 02/25/26 at 1:30 p.m., the DON stated the oxygen tubing should be changed out weekly, and it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the temperature log was maintained for one of one medication refrigerators observed for proper temperature controls for medication storage. The administrator identified 42 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 02/24/26 at 1:50 p.m., a tour of the medication room was conducted with CMA #1. The temperature log sheet for the month of February 2026, located on the front of the medication refrigerator, showed no documentation for 02/20/26, 02/21/26, 02/22/26, and 02/23/26. The refrigerator was observed to be 42 degrees Fahrenheit.A Medication Storage in the Facility policy, dated 5/2025, read in part, Medications requiring refrigeration or temperatures between 36 degrees F and 46 degrees F are kept on a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow daily temperature monitoring. Medications requiring storage in a cool place are refrigerated unless otherwise directed on the label.On 02/25/2026 at 9:45 a.m., the DON stated the night shift is assigned to complete the temperature checks and documentation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to: a. Discard gloves and gown after exiting and returning to the resident room after catheter care. b. Ensure staff changed gloves and wore a gown during wound care for 2 (#2 and #35) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The administrator identified nine residents with enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: 1. On 02/25/26 at 11:50 a.m., LPN #1 obtained supplies to complete catheter care for Resident #2. LPN #1 donned a gown and a pair of gloves. Catheter care was completed. The LPN #1 exited the room with the soiled washcloths and emesis basin of soapy water still wearing the gown and gloves used when care was provided. LPN #1 discarded the soapy water, five rooms down the hall, in a resident common bathroom. LPN #1 continued further down the hall to place the dirty linen in the dirty linen hopper. As LPN #1 walked down the hall to return to the resident room, they removed their gown and gloves and placed them in the trash can in the room of Resident #2. An ENHANCED BARRIER…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan related to elopement for one (#2) of two residents sampled for elopement. The corporate nurse reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #2 had diagnoses which included bipolar, mood disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. An incident report, dated 10/30/24, documented the resident had eloped the day before and interventions were put in place. There was no documentation related to the new interventions on the care plan. On 12/27/24 at 8:30 a.m., the administrator reported the care plan should have been updated.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy curtains were used for two (#9 and #21) of three sampled residents reviewed for privacy. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Privacy Curtains policy, read in part . It is the policy of this facility that each resident will have a privacy curtain in room to maintain him/her privacy from someone entering the room . Resident #9 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and severe intellectual disabilities. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/16/24, documented Resident #9 was dependent on staff for all ADL's. On 06/03/24 at 10:04 a.m., Resident #9 was observed from the hallway. They were lying uncovered with a t-shirt on, and their legs folded up. There was no sheet on the resident's lower body. On 06/03/24 at 2:53 p.m., Resident #9 was observed in bed from the hallway. The privacy curtain was not pulled and the resident was not covered from the waist down. On 06/03/24 at 03:10 p.m., CNA #1 was asked to observe Resident #9. They stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Braden skin assessments, and weekly skin assessments were completed for two (#21 and #13) of two sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. The Resident Matrix documented three residents had pressure ulcers that were not present on admission. Findings: An undated, Skin Assessments policy, read in part .It is the policy of this facility that skin assessment will be completed on every resident every week . An undated, Braden Skin Evaluation policy, read in part .A Braden scale skin evaluation will be completed no less than quarterly. This will be most likely completed with the MDS that comes due whether a quarterly, annual, significant change or admission . 1. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included, pressure ulcer of right buttock Stage 4, dementia, and depressive disorder. A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk dated 12/29/2023, documented the resident was at high risk for pressure ulcers. The clinical health record did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects related to the use of antidepressants for four (#1, #3, #32 and #40) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. The Resident Matrix, dated 06/03/24 documented 31 residents received antidepressants. Findings: An undated Monitoring of Antidepressants policy, read in part .Resident receive antidepressant medication routinely only when medically necessary. Every effort is made to ensure that resident who use antidepressants receive the intended benefit if [sic] the medication and to minimize the unwanted effects of the antidepressant medications . 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included depressive disorder and depression. A physician order, dated 07/06/23, documented to administer Trazadone 100 mg one time at bedtime. A physician order dated 06/25/23 documented to administer Escitalopram Oxalate 20 milligrams by mouth one time a day. An undated Monitoring of Antidepressants policy, read in part . There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the person designated to serve as the dietary manager had met the state requirement for dietary management. The Director of Nursing stated 42 residents received food from the kitchen and 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: There was no documentation the DM was certified as a dietary manager. A Office of Professional and Workforce Development Receipt dated 11/03/22, documented a transaction basket number dated for 03/11/22 for enrollment in the course. A document titled Grades for {name withheld}, documented the grades for the modules. The introduction was dated for 12/20/22. There was no final test score. There was no documentation the dietary manager had taken the test to become a certified dietary manager. On 06/05/24 at 11:22 a.m., the administrator stated the dietary manager had not taken the certification exam. They stated the dietary manager started around 03/11/22.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained to promote food safety and sanitation. The Director of Nursing identified 42 residents who received services from the kitchen. Findings: A Sanitization policy dated 10/08, read in part, The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All .kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodent, roaches, flies and other insects. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Seals, hinges and fasteners will be kept in good repair. All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized using hot water and/or chemical sanitizing solutions. The policy also read, Dishwashing machines must operate using the following specifications:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a process in place to identify resident's code status for one (#33) of ten residents reviewed for code status. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Advanced Directivespolicy, revised April 2008, read in part, .Changes or revocations of a directive must be submitted in writing to the Administrator .The Care plan Team will be informed of such changes and/or revocations so that appropriate changes can be made in the resident assessment .and care plan . Resident #33 had diagnoses which included type two diabetes mellitus, anemia and malaise. An undated form titled Full Code was observed on the inside of a cabinet door at the nurse's station. The form documented Resident #33 was a full code. Resident #33 had a signed DNR, dated 05/13/22, in their hard chart. On 06/04/24 at 12:03 p.m., LPN #2 was asked what was the list of full code and DNR. They stated To let everyone know the DNR code status, if someone is down they will come up here and check it. They were asked how often the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment for: a. residents who ate their meals in the dining room and who watched TV in the television room, and b. prevent lingering urine odors for two (#9 and #33) of all residents who resided in the facility. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Housekeeping policy, read in part .It is the policy of this facility that housekeeping services will be provided every day. Housekeeping will be responsible to clean the residents area Housekeeping will also be responsible for cleaning the .halls .dining room . A. Dining Room On 06/03/24 at 11:54 a.m., Resident #3 was observed entering the television room and sitting near the coke machine. A puddle of water was observed on the floor near the resident and coke machine. On 06/03/24 at 12:05 p.m., the windows in the dining room were observed to have noted to have dust/dirt and dead flies lying on the window ledges. There was a dead fly in the southwest window, two dead flies and dirt and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for activities for one (#38) of one sampled residents reviewed for activities. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facilty. Findings: A Goals and Objectives, Care Plans policy, dated 8/2006, read in part, Care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence. The policy also read, Goals and objectives are entered on the resident's care plan so that all disciplines have access to such information and area able to report whether or not the desired outcomes are being achieved. Goals and objectives are reviewed and/or revised . at least quarterly. A Care Plans-Comprehensive policy, dated 10/2009, read in part, An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs is developed for each resident. The policy also read,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer tube feeding bolus according to physician order for one (#32) of one sampled resident reviewed for tube feeding. The administrator identified two residents received tube feeding resided in the facility. Findings: A Intake, Measuring and Recording policy, dated 9/2005, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to accurately determine the amount of liquid a resident consumes in a 24-hour period. The policy also read, Record the fluid intake as soon as possible after the resident has consumed the fluids. At the end of you shift total the amounts of all liquids the resident consumed . The policy also read, The following should be recorded in the resident's medical record per facility guidelines: .The amount (in mls) of liquid consumed .notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the procedure. Res #32 had diagnoses which included anorexia, cachexia. A physicians order dated 09/02/23 documented mighty shake one time a day for weight loss. A physicians order dated 10/19/23 documented regular diet mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was not greater than 5% for two (#6 and #12) of three sampled residents observed during medication observation The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, read in part .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician . 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included hypertension and mood disorder. A physician order, dated 02/06/24, documented to administer aspirin 81 milligram chewable tablet one time a day. On 06/05/24 7:58 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident #6's medications. CMA #1 did not instruct Resident #6 to chew the Aspirin tablet when administered. 2. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included Atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities. A physician order, dated 06/27/2, documented to administer aspirin 81 milligrams chewable tablet one time a day. On 06/05/24 at 8:17 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to prepare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff wore PPE during provision of care for one (#21) of one sampled residents reviewed for EBP and b. failed to ensure a syringe used for tube feeding administration was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#32) of one sampled resident reviewed for tube feeding. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. The Director of Nursing identified two residents received tube feeding. Findings: An Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedure, dated 04/01/24, read in part .EBP will be used for resident with indwelling medical devices, wounds, or those who are colonized by or infected with a multidrug - resistant organism .procedure to use EBP when .other high-contact resident care activities . 1. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included, pressure ulcer of right buttock Stage 4, dementia, and depressive disorder. On 06/05/24 at 10:57 a.m., upon entry to the room, the resident was lying in the bed with their shorts pulled down with their buttocks exposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered scheduled appointments were not canceled for one of (#1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for outside appointments. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of chronic pain, dry eye syndrome, and carcinoma of the face. Resident #1 had a consult appointment scheduled for 08/02/23 with a specialty physician for carcinoma of the face. Resident #1 had been rescheduled for the consult appointment to 08/27/23 without notifying Res #1 or their representative. A grievance form, dated 08/02/23 at 2:00 p.m., documented the administration had received a complaint from the resident's representative regarding the canceled appointment. The grievance form documented an in-service with the social service director on 08/02/23. The grievance form documented monitoring of the appointment schedule was conducted in the daily stand up meeting and was ongoing at the time of the survey. On 08/14/23 at 08:42 a.m., an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 38 residents resided at the facility. The form documented one resident with tube feeding. Findings: On 05/01/23 at 9:30 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen and food storage areas was conducted. In the refrigerator macaroni salad was observed, which had been opened and served out of and was dated 04/22/23. A bag of shredded lettuce in a re-sealable bag was observed and was not dated. A thick amber liquid, labeled caramel and out of the original container was dated 04/23/22. A container labeled chili was observed with a date 04/19/23. In the first chest freezer a large bag of bread sticks were observed to be open to air. In the small refrigerator a container of prune juice was observed to have been opened and not dated. The floor in the kitchen and storage areas were observed to not have been thoroughly cleaned around the edges and debris was observed on the floor. The lid to the sugar bin was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of dust and kept the vents and ceiling tiles in good repair. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 38 residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 05/02/23 at 9:30 a.m., an environmental tour of the facility was conducted to look at the vents in the resident rooms. The vents in room [ROOM NUMBER] were observed to have been full of dust, room [ROOM NUMBER] had one vent observed with dust, room [ROOM NUMBER] had one vent which was observed broken with paint chips and one vent with dust. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have ceiling tiles with brown areas on them, tiles which had been taped, and the tape was observed to be peeling. Another ceiling tile was observed to have been cracked across the width of the tile. The vent was observed to have dust and what appeared to have been rust. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s intake vent was observed to be very dusty and room [ROOM NUMBER]'s ceiling tile around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were encoded and transmitted to CMS in the required time frame for two (#28 and #36) of twenty residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident form documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #28 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure and diabetes. A quarterly assessment, dated [DATE], was completed and transmitted to CMS. A nurse note, dated [DATE], documented the resident had expired. A discharge, death in the facility, assessment was not located in the resident's records. On [DATE] at 11:07 a.m., the corporate nurse confirmed the discharge, death in the facility, assessment had not been completed in the required time frame. 2. Res #36 had diagnoses which included COPD, end stage renal disease, anxiety, and dementia. An admission assessment, dated [DATE], was completed and transmitted to CMS. The resident's clinical records documented a discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for five (#2, 5, 9, 10 and #30) of twenty residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to accurately code for: a. the presence of the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness for Res #2, 5, 10, and #30. b. the use of insulin for Res #5. c. falls for Res #9. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident form documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #2's PASRR level II evaluation, dated 06/04/19, documented the resident had a major mental illness as defined by CMS. The resident was admitted , on 06/05/19, and had diagnoses which included schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and other recurrent depressive disorders. An annual assessment, dated 03/02/23, revealed the facility documented the resident was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review,and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu and provide pureed foods listed on the menu for the puree diets from the kitchen. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 16 residents resided at the facility who had mechanically altered diets including pureed and all chopped food. Findings: The breakfast menu for week three documented the pureed meal should have been assorted juice, pureed hot or pureed cold cereal, pureed egg of choice, pureed breakfast meat, pureed breakfast bread, margarine/jelly, and milk/beverage. On 05/03/23 at 7:48 a.m., preparation of the puree meal was observed. [NAME] #1 did not provide any bread in the pureed meal. On 05/03/23 at 8:27 a.m., four pureed meals were observed being plated. [NAME] #1 plated eggs, sausage with gravy, and oatmeal. The cook did not serve toast or other bread with the pureed meals. On 05/03/23 at 12:02 p.m., the DM stated the pureed meals should have received what all the other residents received. She stated when toast was on the menu the pureed should contain toast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program and to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into the residents' assessment and care plan for three (#2, 10, and #30) of seven residents reviewed for PASRR. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented three residents with intellectual and/or developmental disability and 22 residents with documented psychiatric diagnosis who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #2's PASRR level II evaluation, dated 06/04/19, documented the resident had a major mental illness as defined by CMS. The resident was admitted , on 06/05/19, and had diagnoses which included schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and other recurrent depressive disorders. An annual assessment, dated 03/02/23, revealed the facility documented the resident was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. On 05/01/23 at 4:48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan which included the residents' needs for three (#10, 17, and #21) of 15 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to develop a care plan related to: a. hydration needs for Res #10. b. nutrition needs for Res #17. c. mobility and range of motion needs for Res #21. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #10 had diagnoses which included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disabilities, blindness, both eyes, contractures, calculus of kidney, calculus of ureter, and acute kidney failure. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/27/22, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills, and required total assistance with most ADLs. An admission assessment, dated 08/17/22, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills, and required total assistance with most ADLs. The care area assessment documented hydration and fluid maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated related to falls for two (#9 and #21) of 15 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 38 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Res #9's care plan, dated 07/13/22, documented the resident had a potential for falls and was to be up in a geri/chair daily. The care plan documented interventions which included a fall risk assessment was to be done quarterly and as needed and to notify physician with any changes. The care plan did not contain any updates. An incident report, dated 02/22/23, documented Res #9 had a fall and the intervention was to check on the resident more frequently. A quarterly assessment, date 04/05/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition; required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and was totally dependent with transferring; and had no falls. On 05/02/23 at 9:10 a.m., an observation was made of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited ROM received the appropriate treatment and services to increase or prevent further decrease in ROM for one (#21) of four residents sampled for ROM. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented seven residents who had contractures resided at the facility. Findings: Res #21's admission assessment, dated 03/22/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required limited to extensive assistance with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident was impaired on one side of the upper body and impaired on both sides of the lower body. A nurse note, dated 03/22/23, documented the resident had left side weakness, contracture in the left arm and hand, and had not attempted to ambulate while being at the hospital. The note documented the resident required feeding assistance had dysphagia and aphasia . A nurse note, dated 04/29/23, documented Res #21 was pleasant and squeezed with right hand on command. The note documented the resident's left hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised while smoking for tone (#21 and #41) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for accidents. The corporate nurse consultant identified 15 residents who smoked cigarettes. Findings: Res #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included critical illness myopathy, seizures, and disorder of the brain. A 48-hour care plan, dated 03/15/23, was initiated which documented resident was a supervised smoker. A smoking assessment, dated 03/17/23, documented the smoking policy and procedure was discussed with Res #41 and their family. Both resident and family agreed with the policy and procedure which documented Res #41 would be supervised related to previous injuries from smoking. An admission assessment, dated 03/22/23, documented the resident was cognitively intact; was independent with bed mobility, and minimum assistance with transferring and other ADLs; and used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to change an indwelling urinary catheter per physician order, keep the catheter bag off the floor, and positioned below the resident's bladder for one (#21) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, form documented four residents resided at the facility who had indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: Res #21 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region. An admission assessment, dated 03/22/23, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and was receiving hospice services. A physician order, dated 03/22/23, documented to change the urinary catheter every 30 days. A physician order, dated 04/01/23, documented to change urinary catheter every 30 days. A care plan, dated 04/04/23, documented the resident had a urinary catheter related to skin breakdown as evidenced by sacral wound. A physician order, dated 04/23/23, documented the urinary catheter was to be changed every 30 days. The resident's record did not document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for one (#10) of one resident reviewed for hydration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented two residents were dependent for eating. Findings: A facility policy, titled Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration dated December 2008, read in parts, .6. Nursing will assess for signs and symptoms of dehydration during daily care. 7. Nurses Aides will provide and encourage intake of bedside, snack and meal fluids, on a daily and routine basis as part of daily care. Intake will be documented in the medical records. Aides will report intake of less than 1200 ml/day to nursing staff . Res #10 had diagnoses which included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disabilities, blindness, both eyes, contractures, calculus of kidney, calculus of ureter, and acute kidney failure. A quarterly assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the need of bed rails and informed consent was obtained prior to the use of bed rails for one (#21) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 38 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Res #21's admission assessment, dated 03/22/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition, required limited to extensive assistance with ADLs, and was receiving hospice care. A restraint assessment, dated 03/22/23, documented side rails were not indicated at that time. A care plan, dated 03/31/23, documented the resident required extensive to total assist with most ADLs related to illness as evidenced by decreased physical activity. The care plan documented the resident required extensive assist with dressing, bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfers at times, and bathing. The care plan did not include bed rails for the resident. On 05/01/23 at 11:28 a.m., a fall mat was observed in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to acquire physician ordered medication for one (#18) of three residents observed during medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #18 had diagnoses which included chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of the lower bilateral extremities. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/13/23, documented the resident received an anticoagulant daily during the assessment period. A physician order, dated 04/20/23, documented to administer Apixaban (Eliquis) 5 mg one time daily. On 05/01/23 at 12:16 a.m., CMA #1 was observed during medication administration for Res # 18. During the administration, Eliquis 5 mg was not available to administer. The CMA was observed to order the medication during the medication pass. On 05/02/23 at 1:07 p.m., the corporate nurse consultant stated the facility received a three day supply that morning so the resident would be covered until the pharmacy sent the rest of the medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% for one (#18) of four residents observed during medication pass. A total of 29 opportunities were observed with three errors and the total error rate was 10.34%. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, titled Self-Administration of Drugs dated August 2006, read in part, .13. The staff and practitioner will periodically (for example, during quarterly MDS reviews) reevaluate a resident's ability to continue to self-administer medications. Res #18 had diagnoses which included chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of the lower bilateral extremities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and seasonal allergic rhinitis. A medication self administration assessment, dated 07/15/22, documented the resident was to be assisted by a CMA or nurse for inhaling with inhalers and no medications were to be left in the room. There were no other self administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff demonstrated proper infection control practices related to removing gloves after catheter care for one (#21) of two residents reviewed for catheters. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented four residents resided at the facility who had indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: A facility policy, titled Catheter Care, Urinary, revised December 2007, read in parts, . 19. Discard disposable items into designated containers. Remove gloves and discard into designated container. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly .23. Clean the bedside stand and/or overbed table. Return the overbed table to its proper position . Res #21 had diagnoses which included chronic atrial fibrillation, COPD, and pressure ulcer of sacral region. An admission assessment, dated 03/22/23, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. A physician order, dated 03/23/23, documented to perform catheter care with soap and water daily. On 05/02/23 at 1:17 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to place gloves on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a system to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, was in place. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 38 residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 05/01/23 at 11:28 a.m., a fall mat was observed in Res #21 room next to his bed and a quarter bed rail was observed attached to the bed and was in the up position. On 05/04/23 at 11:12 a.m., the maintenance person stated they did bed rail inspections once a month but did not document the inspections. He stated they did not install the bed rail for Res #21. He stated the beds in the facility were old and most the bed rails did not fit the beds properly.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-07 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OKEMAH CARE CENTER, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/11/2009
HUMPHREYS, DOUGLASIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/11/2009
BRANNON, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375420. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next