Baptist Village of Oklahoma City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 578 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 248 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 95.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.49 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 07/15/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to ensure the shower room door on the memory care unit closed and locked behind them to ensure residents were not able to enter the room. On 7/15/24, during initial tour, the shower room floor was wet and slippery, there was a hair dryer placed in the grab bar area and it was plugged it to the electrical outlet. There were greater than 10 bottles of shampoos, conditioners, alcohol based surface cleaner, and shaving cream covering over half of the shower bench. The cabinet in the shower room was unlocked, razors within reach. Staff stated the shower room door was supposed to close behind them automatically. On 07/15/24 at 4:47 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation related to the shower room door being unsecured on the memory care unit. On 07/15/24 at 4:55 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 07/16/24 at 7:19 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect 1 (#106) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #106 was physically abused by Certified Nurse Aide # 8 causing two red marks on their right leg that was tender to touch. This caused Resident #106 to be afraid of the CNA. The administrator identified 95 residents resided in the facility Findings: On 09/28/25 at 5:15 p.m., Resident #106 was observed being propelled in a wheelchair to the dining room located on the memory care unit for the evening meal. An abuse policy, dated February 20, 2024, read in part, Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. An undated face sheet for Resident #106 showed they had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's, hypertension, and depression, A quarterly MDS, with an assessment reference date of 09/08/25 for Resident #106, showed they had a BIMS score of 05…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-07-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a decrease in range of motion for one (#40) of one sampled resident reviewed for limited range of motion. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #40 had diagnoses which included parkinsonism and pain. A nursing note, dated 02/18/24, documented Resident #40 had a fall and complained of pain to their right hand. An x-ray report, dated 02/19/24, documented acute fracture in the right proximal phalanx of the fourth finger with mild soft tissue swelling. A physician's order, dated 03/17/24, documented buddy tape 3-4 fingers for three weeks. A Provider office visit note, dated 04/03/24, documented a boutonniere deformity of the right ring finger and difficulty with extension. It documented Resident #40 was placed in a finger splint and consult placed for surgical evaluation. On 07/15/24 at 9:19 a.m., Resident #40 stated they fell in 02/24 and broke their ring finger. They stated they did not get therapy for the finger and did not see an ortho surgeon for two months. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review medications for a gradual dose reduction for four (#14, 33, 40, and #41) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 14 residents were on psychotropics medications in the facility. Findings: The Baptist Village Communities Psychotropic Medication Policy and Procedure, dated 02/20/24, read in part, Residents who receive psychotropic medications will receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated with the intention to decrease or discontinue the use of the psychotropic medication whenever safe and possible. 1. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included dementia and depression. A physician's order, dated 03/09/22, documented escitalopram 10 mg, give one tablet by mouth daily for depression. A physician's order, dated 03/12/23, documented trazodone 50 mg tablet, may give two 25 mg to equal 50 mg one time daily for depression. A review from 07/23 of Resident #40's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide safe resident transfers for 1 (#65) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The administrator identified 95 resided in the facility.Findings: On 09/30/25 at 9:02 a.m., Resident #65 was observed to be transferred from the bed to the wheelchair. CNA #4, CNA #5, and CNA #6 were in the resident's room for the transfer. The bed was elevated, resident the repositioned from side to side with two-person max assist for personal care, peri-care and brief change. The head of bed was elevated to assist with transfer and positioning of resident. A gait belt was applied around resident, under resident chest area and upper body, it was loose fitting. During the transfer, Resident #65 was lifted under their arms for most of weight by CNA #5 and CNA #6, and the gait belt was used for positioning by CNA #4 into wheelchair. The pressure under the resident arms could cause undue stress to resident arms, under arm area and shoulders and was unsafe, as the resident center of gravity was below the staff lifting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for two of two (#1 and #3) residents observed with indwelling devices. A Resident/Guest Suite List, dated 10/15/24, documented 96 residents were residing at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus with peripheral angiopathy with gangrene. The initial MDS assessment, dated 09/17/24, documented Resident #1 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living. They had a central line and were receiving antibiotics through it. 2. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included cystitis and bacteremia. The quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/27/24, documented Resident #3 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living. They had an indwelling catheter. On 10/15/24 at 1:51 p.m., these resident rooms were observed to not have signage indicating enhanced barrier protections were required and there were no PPE carts observed nearby. On 10/15/24 at 1:59 p.m., LPN #1 stated they did not know what enhanced barrier precautions were, but they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a CNA from physically restraining one resident (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A Resident/Guest Suite List, dated 10/15/24, documented 96 residents were residing at the facility and 30 of the residents were in memory care. Findings: An ABUSE, NEGLECT, MISTREATMENT AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF RESIDENT PROPERTY policy, dated February 20, 2024, read in part, Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, anxiety, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/07/24, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and had wandered throughout their environment 4-6 of the last 7 days. An Incident Report Form, dated 09/23/24, documented that after receiving an allegation of abuse, camera playback was viewed, and CNA #1 was seen grabbing Resident #4 several times by the right arm and shirt to pull them down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure breakfast menu was posted. Findings: The DON reported 101 residents, resided in the facility. The facility's policy Menu Posting and Menu Substitution dated 1/24, read in part Menus are to be posted at least one week in advance or more if state regulation requires. Menus are to be posted at a height and in font (minimum 14 Font) that can be easily read by all residents. Menus should include all daily available for each meal. On 07/12/24 at 8:31 a.m., no breakfast menu was posted. On 07/16/24 at 2:08p.m. the Registered Dietician reported they were not sure if the menu was posted.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify residents they were allowed to have resident council without staff present. The facility's deficient practice interfered with the resident's right to hold group meetings privately. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Rights: Resident and Family Groups policy, dated 02/20/24, stated team members, visitors and other guests may only attend the meeting upon invitation. On 07/17/24 at 10:55 a.m., the nine residents in attendance stated they were unaware they were allowed to have a resident council meeting without staff present. The social service staff member stated the were unaware but would review the policy.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman's contact information was posted in view of residents. The facility's deficient practice interfered with the resident's rights to communicate and access the state's ombudsman office. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights provided by the Administrator revealed .resident's right to . communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility .exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States .exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion .from the facility communicate with outside agencies .state long-term care ombudsman . On 07/17/24 at 11:36 a.m., an interview with the nine resident council members in attendance revealed they were unaware of who the ombudsman was, what their purpose was, or where to find that information. On 07/17/24 at 11:43 a.m., an eight by ten document with the Ombudsman name was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview, the facility failed to provide mail delivery to residents on Saturdays. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/17/24 at 11:22 a.m., nine members of resident council stated the mail did not get distributed on the weekends. On 07/17/24 at 11:24 a.m., the social services staff stated mail gets delivered Saturdays but does not get passed out until Monday.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure survey results were readily accessible/available to residents and visitors. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/17/24 at 11:28 a.m., the nine resident council members stated they did not know where the state inspection book was. On 07/17/24 at 11:43 a.m., a sign was observed posted on the information board on the long-term care halls. The sign documented that survey results could be found at the front desk. There was no sign or mention of the survey results by the skilled halls.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and resident representatives were able to file a grievance form anonymously and post information regarding the name of the grievance official. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Grievance Policy and Procedure, dated 02/2024, read in part the health center will provide a mechanism for filing a grievance/complaint without fear of retaliation .will provide residents, resident representatives and others information about the mechanisms and procedure to file a grievance; provide a designated individual to oversee the grievance process . On 07/17/24 at 11:10 a.m., the resident council members stated they did not know how to file a grievance, but that staff usually take care of their issues. On 07/17/24 at 11:22 a.m., the social services staff stated they were not positive who the grievance official was.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a timely manner to a resident with a fractured finger for one (#40) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #40 had diagnoses which included parkinsonism and pain. A nursing note, dated 02/18/24, documented Resident #40 had a fall and complained of pain to their right hand. An x-ray report, dated 02/19/24, documented acute fracture in the right proximal phalanx of the fourth finger with mild soft tissue swelling. A physician's order, dated 02/19/24, documented ice pack, four times daily for 14 days. Apply ice pack to right hand for 20 minutes max. A physician's order, dated 02/20/24, documented appointment ortho hand specialty referral, send x-ray result. Resident #40 was not seen by any provider until 03/17/24. A physician's order, dated 03/17/24, documented buddy tape 3-4 fingers for three weeks. Resident #40 was first seen for the ortho consult on 04/03/24. On 07/15/24 at 9:19 a.m., Resident #40 stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,695 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-10-01
• $18,337 — penalty dated 2024-07-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 87 rows in the source record cover these 39 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK