No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bellevue Health & Rehabilitation Center

6500 North Portland Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73116 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 142 certified beds · (405) 767-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (405) 767-6500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Dec 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6424 N Portland Ave · (405) 840-9441 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
ASP Cares0.5 mi
3405 Northwest Expy · (405) 607-3995 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3501 NW Expressway · (405) 946-6342 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6600 N Independence Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.1%13.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.1%3.4%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%4.7%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.8%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.6%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.2%74.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%27.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.9%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.202.311.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.002.961.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 589 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 393 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.8%CMS range 59.5–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 8.2–11.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 5.4–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
50.3%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 125.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.73 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 18 dietary contract employees received abuse training.The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, revised 08/2006, read in part, Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents. Our abuse prevention program provides policies and procedures that govern at a minimum: .b. Mandated staff training/orientation programs that includes topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, dealing with violent behaviors or catastrophic reactions, etc.The facility's contract with the dietary contractor titled Management Service Agreement, dated 10/06/25, read in part, The [name of dietary contractor agency withheld] Mangers will train and manage the Service Employees and oversee the provision of the management services.On 12/17/25 at 4:23 p.m., human resources stated the dietary contractor was responsible for ensuring all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. walls and paint were in good repair for 2 (#3 and #6), and b. a resident's bed was in good repair for 1 (#3) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for a safe home like environment. The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility. Findings:1.On 12/15/25 at 4:25 p.m., Resident #6's room was observed to have chipped and peeled paint in several areas on the wall behind the bed. The sheetrock had deep scratches and was white in color. Sheetrock was observed on the floor from the damaged wall. A facility policy titled Maintenance Service, revised 12/2009, read in part, Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment.Function of maintenance personnel include but are not limited to: a. Maintaining the building in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines.Resident #6's comprehensive assessment, dated 09/08/25, showed they were admitted with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not ensuring all staff working in the facility were trained on identifying and reporting abuse for 18 of 18 dietary contractor staff members. The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, revised 08/2006, read in part, Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents. Our abuse prevention program provides policies and procedures that govern at a minimum: .b. Mandated staff training/orientation programs that includes topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, dealing with violent behaviors or catastrophic reactionsThe facility's contract with the dietary contractor titled Management Service Agreement, dated 10/06/25, read in part, The [name of dietary contractor agency withheld] Mangers will train and manage the Service Employees and oversee the provision of the management services.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure there were enough trained staff at set meal times for 4 of 4 dining observations.The DON identified 138 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.Findings:On 12/15/25 at 8:48 a.m., kitchen staff were observed preparing trays for a hall cart for delivery to residents. Posted mealtimes for breakfast showed 8:00 a.m.On 12/15/25 at 12:51 p.m., lunch hall trays were delivered to hall 300. Dining room residents had not been served lunch yet. Posted mealtimes for lunch showed 12:00 p.m.On 12/16/25 at 9:00 a.m., breakfast trays were delivered to hall 400. Dining room residents had not been served breakfast yet. Posted mealtimes for breakfast showed 8:00 a.m.On 12/18/25 at 12:50 p.m., dining room residents were observed receiving trays for lunch. Posted mealtimes for lunch showed 12:00 p.m.An undated facility document titled [NAME] Meal Times, read in part, breakfast 8:00 a.m., lunch 12:00 p.m., and dinner 5:00 p.m.On 12/15/25 at 10:57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure:a. prepared food items were labelled with the preparation and use-by dates,b. food items were discarded after the expiration date,c. fresh food items with visible mold, discoloration, or soft to touch were discarded,d. opened food items were stored in airtight packaging,e. monitoring of temperatures for refrigerators and freezers containing food, andf. food was prepared in a sanitary environment for 2 of 2 kitchen observations.The DON identified 138 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.Findings:On 12/15/25 at 9:00 a.m., the following temperature log observations were made:a. a freezer temperature log for the reach in freezer, with opening and closing temperature documentation areas, was not completed for 12/15/25, andb. a refrigerator temperature log for the walk-in refrigerator, with opening and closing temperature documentation areas, was not completed for 12/15/25.On 12/15/25 at 9:05 a.m., four clear plastic covered pitchers were observed on a four wheeled cart near the food preparation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathrooms accessible to residents had call lights for 2 of 2 bathrooms observed accessible to residents.The DON identified 141 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/16/25 at 1:13 p.m., a bathroom located outside of the therapy hall accessible to residents was observed unlocked, the door open, and a sign on the door that read, restroom for patients only. The restroom did not have a call light to alert for assistance. On 12/16/25 at 1:15 p.m., the bathroom on hall 500 was observed to be accessible to residents and did not have a call light to alert in the event of an accident. A facility policy titled Quality of Life- Accommodation of Needs, revised 08/2009, read in part, The resident's individual needs and preferences shall be accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. On 12/16/25 at 1:11 p.m., medical records was asked about the bathroom outside the therapy room on the main hall. Medical Records stated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to handle and process linens to prevent the spread of infection for residents on contact isolation in the laundry room. The infection preventionist identified five residents on contact precautions. Findings: On 12/18/25 at 3:00 p.m., an observation of the laundry area was completed. There were no gowns available. A facility policy titled Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, dated September 2022, read in part, Hand hygiene products, as well as appropriate PPE [personal protective equipment] (i.e., gloves and gowns) are available and used while sorting and handling contaminated linen. On 12/18/25 at 3:04 p.m., the housekeeping/laundry manager stated the staff wore gloves to transport the red biohazard to the laundry area. The housekeeping/laundry manager stated the staff would open the bags and place the soiled linen in the washing machine. The housekeeping/laundry manager stated gowns were not worn to place the soiled linen in the washing machine. On 12/18/25 at 3:12 p.m., the infection preventionist stated laundry staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan intervention for transfers for 2 (#12 and #13) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The DON identified 152 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1.On 09/09/25 at 11:27 a.m., Resident #12 was observed transferring from their bed to a wheelchair with the assistance of CNA #3 and CNA #5 using a slider board and a gait belt.A facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 03/2022, read in part, The care plan interventions are derived through analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment.The comprehensive, person-centered care plan:a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes.b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.An admission record for Resident #12, dated 06/12/25, showed they were admitted with a diagnosis of acquired absence of the right leg below the knee. An annual assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer O2 according to physician orders and/or label O2 tubing for two (#13 and #54) of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified 29 residents received O2. Findings: 1. Res #13 had diagnoses which included SOB. A physician order, dated 01/01/24, documented oxygen 2 LPM via nasal cannula as needed to maintain O2 saturations. On 06/02/24 at 8:24 a.m., there was an O2 concentrator observed the resident's room. The O2 tubing was not labeled. On 06/02/24 at 8:50 a.m., LPN #1 was asked to verify when the resident's O2 tubing was last changed. They stated O2 tubing should be changed weekly and labeled. They stated the O2 tubing was not labeled. 2. Res #54 had diagnoses which included SOB. A physician orders, dated 05/21/24, documented administer O2 at 2 LPM via nasal cannula every shift; and change O2 tubing weekly on Wednesdays and date with tape. On 06/02/24 at 8:37 a.m., the resident was observed with O2 being administered via nasal cannula. The O2 concentrator was set at 1.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete ongoing assessments of a resident pre and post dialysis for one (#67) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. Findings: The Facility's Dialysis Care/Arterial-Venous Fistula policy, approved 01/20/23, read in parts, All residents receiving dialysis will have monitoring before and after their dialysis treatment to ensure condition is stable after treatment. The policy also read, The Charge Nurse prior to and upon return from dialysis shall evaluate the resident's condition, including but not limited to vital signs and the graft/fistula site. Resident #67 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dependence on renal dialysis and end stage renal disease. A physician's order, dated 01/11/23, documented to monitor each shift for complications of dialysis. A physician's order, dated 01/11/23, documented, to dialysis Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; notify dialysis center, attending physician and responsible party if refused. Complete Pre…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff used personal protective equipment and sanitized a blood pressure cuff for a resident with contact precautions for one (#93) of two sampled residents reviewed for transmission based precautions; b. staff used personal protective equipment for a resident with enhanced barrier precautions for one (#56) of one enhanced barrier precaution observation; and c. staff maintain infection control practices during incontinent care for one (#52) of seven incontinent care observation. The infection preventionist identified eight residents who were on transmission based precautions and 31 residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions resided in the facility. The DON identified 45 residents required assistance with incontinent care. Findings: The Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions policy, revised 09/22, read in part, Staff and visitors wear gloves .when entering the room. The policy also read, Staff and visitors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide double portions as ordered for one (#52) of three residents observed for meal service. The DON identified 143 residents received meal service from the kitchen. Findings: Resident #52 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included DM II, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A physician's order, dated 10/13/23, documented, LCS diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency, double portions for heart healthy. On 06/02/24 at 12:07 p.m., Resident #52 was observed to receive their meal tray. Resident observed to receive a tray with single portions. On 06/02/24 at 12:12 p.m., CNA #4 verified there were no double portions on Resident #52's tray. They stated they had not noticed double portions on the meal ticket.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an enteral tube feeding bottle was properly labeled for one (#54) of two sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding management. The DON identified three residents received enteral tube feeding via continuous pump. Findings: A Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump policy, dated November 2018, read in part, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide a guideline for the use of a pump for enteral feedings .On the formula .document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered . Res #54 had diagnoses which included dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase gastrostomy status. A physician order, dated 05/21/24, documented Vital AF 1.2 Cal. Give 55 ml/hr via PEG-tube every shift. A physician order, dated 05/25/24, documented enteral H2O. Auto flush PEG-tube every shift with 23 cc of H2O every hour. 06/02/24 at 8:37 a.m., the resident was observed receiving 55 ml/hr of Vital AF 1.5 Cal via PEG-tube. There were no staff initials, date, or time on the formula bottle or H2O bag. On 06/02/24 at 8:44 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one (#24) of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified 148 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #24 had diagnoses which included congestion an allergic rhinitis. A physician order, dated 10/04/23, documented loratadine (an antihistamine) 10 mg tablet. Give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed. A significant change assessment, dated 03/12/24, documented the resident's cognition was intact. A physician order, dated 05/26/24, documented guaifenesin ER (an expectorant) tablet 600 mg. Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for seven days. An order administration note, dated 05/26/24 at 7:56 p.m., documented guaifenesin was on order. The May and June 2024 MARs documented guaifenesin was administered 12 out of 14 opportunities. On 06/02/24 at 10:45 a.m., the Resident #24 stated the had a respirator infection over the holiday weekend and was not able to take their prescribed medication. A health status note,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. physician orders were in place for wound care and dressing changes, b. a surgical wound was assessed and monitored, and c. a resident was monitored as ordered for side effects related to a medication error for one (#269) of three sampled residents reviewed for wound care and medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility. The ADON identified four residents with surgical wounds. Findings: A Dressing, Dry/Clean policy, revised September 2013, read in parts, .Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure .Check the treatment record .Assess the wound and surrounding skin for edema, redness drainage, tissue, healing progress and wound .The following should be recorded in the resident's medical record .wound appearance .the type of dressing used and wound care given .All assessment data . An admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for three (#62, 70 and #269) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors policy, revised 04/2014, read in parts, .A 'medication error' is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders .or accepted professional standards . 1. Resident #269 had diagnoses which included, a fracture of the right femur, and atrial fibrillation. An incident report, dated 04/06/23, read in part, .During medication pass medication was administered to patient that belonged to someone else . On 04/26/23 at 11:06 a.m., ACMA #4 was asked to explain what happened when Resident #269 had been administered another resident's medications. They stated, I was training on the cart, I popped the medications and asked CMA #5 to give the medications to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: A. ensure hands were washed/sanitized during resident medication pass for two (#13 and #53) of two sampled resident observed during medication pass, and B. provide wound care in a manner which prevented cross contamination for one (#222) of one sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/24/23, reported 143 residents resided in facility and 16 of those residents had pressure ulcers. Findings A Dressings policy, revised 09/13, read in parts, .Cleanse the wound with ordered cleanser. If using gauze, use clean gauze for each cleansing stroke. Clean from the least contaminated area to the most contaminated area . 1. On 04/25/23 at 3:28 p.m., CMA #1 was observed administering oral medications to resident #13. CMA #1 did not sanitize their hands prior to or after administering the medications, then punched two oral medications added chocolate pudding, and with a spoon, fed the pudding and medication to resident #53. CMA #1 did not sanitize their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advance directives and a code status had been determined for one (#15) of 32 sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives and code status. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Advance Directives policy, revised December 2016, read in parts, .Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to .formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so .Written information will include a description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives .Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record .If the resident indicated that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility will offer assistance in establishing advance directives . Resident #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure (CMA #5) had completed a clinical skills check prior to passing medications for one (#269) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 04/25/23, documented 143 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors policy, revised 04/2014, read in parts, .A 'medication error' is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders .or accepted professional standards . Resident #269 had diagnoses which included, a fracture of the right femur, and atrial fibrillation. An Incident report, dated 04/06/23, read in part, .During medication pass medication was administered to patient that belonged to someone else .notified new order received and noted for blood pressure and heart rate monitoring initiated . CMA #5's Medication Pass Observation checklist, was completed 04/07/23. On 04/26/23 at 11:06 a.m., ACMA #4 was asked to explain what happened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BELLEVUE NORTHWEST NURSING CENTER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/14/2023
BELLEVUE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
ROBERT A. THOMPSON 2000 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
BURGESS, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
FUECHSEL, KELLEYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
HARDEMAN, NANCYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
STUART, HOLLIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
STUART, MATTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
THOMPSON, NORMANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
THOMPSON, STEPHENIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
THOMPSON, TARAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
THOMPSON, TURNERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/14/2023
BOTELLO, HALEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/02/2021
GFELLER, HEALTHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/24/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2008
BOTELLO, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
DEAVER, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
MEADOWS, TAMARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/14/2023
RANGEL, OSCARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
SHIREY, BRIANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
WAXMAN, KATHLEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
BELLEVUE RE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2023
HIRECALLOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2022
FINCH, COREYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$765K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 38%Medicare 24%Other / private 38%

This home reported $765K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,462per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375349. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next