Heritage Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 48.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 03/19/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision for Resident #1 who wandered and experienced exit seeking behaviors. An undated elopement policy, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe and comfortable environment to prevent resident elopements. Resident #1's Wandering Risk Assessment, dated 02/13/25, showed the resident was a high risk for wandering and was a known wanderer/history of wandering. A nurse note, dated 02/15/25 at 1:03 p.m., showed Resident #1 remains confused trying to exit pushing on north hall door. The note showed Resident #1 was wandering on other halls and went in other rooms. An admission resident assessment, dated 02/19/25, showed Resident #1's BIMS score was 00 (severe cognitive impairment) and the resident was independent for the task of sit to stand and walking 10 feet, 50 feet with two turns, and 150 feet. A nurse note, dated 02/19/25 at 8:35 p.m., read in part, At about [8:35…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. falls were evaluated for cause and interventions implemented to prevent falls with injuries for one (#48) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards and falls. Resident #48 had a fall with a major injury in December 2023 which resulted in staples to the head. The facility did not assess the fall and implement changes in interventions to aide in the prevention of falls. Resident #48 had two additional falls one in March 2024 and one in April 2024 that also resulted in injuries without any implemented changes to interventions to aide in the prevention of falls. b. care plan interventions were implemented for one (#32) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards and falls. The facility Centers for Medicaid and Medicare from 802 , documented 6 residents had falls with injuries and two had falls with major injuries. Findings: 1. Resident #48 had diagnosis that included Schizophrenia, dementia, unspecified psychosis, abnormal coagulation, and acute kidney failure. Residents #48…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was supervised and locked for 1 (medication cart #1) of 2 medication carts observed. The ADON identified 48 residents resided in the facility and there were two medication carts. Findings:On 05/19/26 at 4:43 p.m., medication cart #1 on the south hall by the nurse's station was observed to be unlocked and unattended. There was no staff in sight of the medication cart.On 05/19/26 at 4:44 p.m., the ADON was observed walking to the unlocked medication cart #1 on the south hall by the nurse's station and then left without locking the medication cart. On 05/19/26 at 4:45 p.m., CMA #1 was observed walking out of a resident's room on the north hall to medication cart #1 on the south hall. Medication cart #1 was unlocked and unattended. Medication cart #1 remained unlocked, out of sight and supervision, while CMA #1 was away from the medication cart. A facility policy titled Security of Medication Cart, revised April 2007, read in part, 4. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0847 — widespread
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representatives:Understood what an arbitration agreement was;Understood their right not to sign the agreement as a condition of admission, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility; andWere explicitly granted the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing the document for 8 (#1, 2, 27, 38, 39, 42, 45, and #51) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration agreements.The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.The social services director stated all 51 residents had entered into a binding arbitration agreement.Findings:On 09/30/25 at 12:15 p.m., the social services director was observed using Docusign to click through the sections of the admission agreement. Hitting the enter button would sign each section and move to the next, thereby agreeing to everything inside of the admission packet. The arbitration agreement was part of the admission packet and was agreed to upon admission for everyone admitted to the facility.An undated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0848 — widespread
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement provided:the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties; andfor the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties.The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.The social services director stated all 51 residents had entered into a binding arbitration agreement.Findings:An undated Dispute Resolution Plan, contained within the Admissions Agreement: Manor, read in part, The parties agree and acknowledge that the business relationship involves interstate commerce and that any such mediation or arbitration shall be governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and conducted in accordance with the Rules of Mediation and Arbitration as then in effect and administered by Dispute Solutions, Inc.On 10/01/25 at 12:15 p.m., the social services director stated they went through each area of the admission packet separately, and they have not had a problem with people agreeing to sign the arbitration agreement.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the advance directive acknowledgement for 3 (#1, 2, and #42) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for advance directive acknowledgements.The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An Advance Directive policy, revised 2016, read in part, Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee will inquire of the resident, his/her representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. If the resident indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives.An Advance Directive Acknowledgement form, read in part, Please check ONE of the following statements: I HAVE executed and Advance Directive. I HAVE NOT executed an Advance Directive.Resident #1's Advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and maintain food and ice in a safe manner for one ice machine and 2 of 3 freezers maintained in the dining room. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 09/29/25 at 11:30 a.m., an observation of the kitchen and dining room was completed. In the corner of the dining area were three freezers and an ice machine. Two of the three freezers and the ice machine were not locked. Residents were walking around in the dining area waiting for the noon meal. There was no signage for staff use only. A facility policy titled Ice Machines and Ice Storge Chests read in part, To help prevent contamination of ice machines, ice storage chests/containers or ice, staff shall follow these precautions .Limit access to ice machines or ice storage chests/containers to employees only.A facility policy titled PURCHASING, RECEIVING AND STORAGE, read in part, Food will be properly stored to preserve flavor, nutritive value, appearance, and safety. Only authorized personnel will have access to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 (#59) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 10 allegations of abuse in the last six months.Findings: An undated electronic clinical record for Resident #59, under the tab medical diagnosis, showed diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, aphasia, and diabetes.A facility policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised July 2017, read in part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source ( abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management.The individual conducting the investigation, as a minimum.interview the person(s) reporting the incident,.interview the resident (as medically appropriate),.interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure two opened multidose vials of PPD solution were labeled with the date of the first usage for 1 of 1 refrigerators observed. Findings: A policy titled Dating and Discarding of Multidose Parenteral Vials, dated 06/21/17, read in part, If a multi-dose has been opened or accessed (e.g., needle-punctured) the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days for the opened vial.On 09/30/25 at 9:53 a.m. an observation of the medication storage room was performed with LPN #3. Two multidose vials of Tuberculin PPD were opened and not dated. On 09/30/25 at 9:53 a.m., LPN #3 was asked what their policy on opened vials of medication was. LPN #3 stated the vials should have a date on them when they were opened.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a privacy curtain was utilized during personal care for one (#9) of three sampled residents observed receiving incontinent care. The AIT identified 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated PERI CARE policy, read in part, Provide privacy, ensure door is closed, privacy curtain is pulled to provide full visual privacy and window blinds are closed. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness and cerebral infarction. Resident #9's annual resident assessment, dated 09/17/24, documented they had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #9's care plan for ADL deficit, revised 10/10/24, documented they required total assist with toileting. On 10/22/24 at 2:59 p.m., CNA #1 entered Resident #9's room to provide incontinent care. CNA #1 closed the door. The resident's roommate was in the room in their wheelchair. On 10/22/24 at 3:00 p.m., CNA #1 told the resident they would be providing care. CNA #1 provided incontinent care to the resident. The privacy curtain was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure thorough incontinent care was provided for one (#9) of three sampled residents observed receiving incontinent care. The AIT identified 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #9 had diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness and cerebral infarction. Resident #9's annual resident assessment, dated 09/17/24, documented they had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #9's care plan for ADL deficit, revised 10/10/24, documented they required total assist with toileting. On 10/22/24 at 2:59 p.m., CNA #1 entered Resident #9's room to provide incontinent care. They closed the door. On 10/22/24 at 3:00 p.m., CNA #1 told Resident #9 they would be providing care. CNA #1 had on gloves. They partly removed the resident's soiled brief, turned the resident on their side, and cleansed their buttocks. Fecal matter was observed during cleaning. CNA #1 removed the soiled brief and put it in a trash bag. They put the soiled pad on the floor mat. CNA #1 put a new brief on the resident and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control during the provision of incontinent care for one (#9) of three sampled residents observed receiving incontinent care. The AIT identified 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #9 had diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness and cerebral infarction. Resident #9's annual resident assessment, dated 09/17/24, documented they had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #9's care plan for ADL deficit, revised 10/10/24, documented they required total assist with toileting. On 10/22/24 at 2:59 p.m., CNA #1 entered Resident #9's room to provide incontinent care. They closed the door. On 10/22/24 at 3:00 p.m., CNA #1 told Resident #9 they would be providing care. CNA #1 had on gloves. They partly removed the resident's soiled brief, turned the resident on their side, and cleansed their buttocks. Fecal matter was observed during cleaning. CNA #1 removed the soiled brief and put it in a trash bag. They put the soiled pad on the floor mat. They put a new brief on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,133 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,323 — penalty dated 2025-03-24
• $21,810 — penalty dated 2024-05-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $202K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK