No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ignite Medical Resort Edmond, LLC

1400 East Memorial Road, Oklahoma City, OK 73131 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 173 certified beds · (405) 875-0040 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1810 E Memorial Rd · (405) 607-4333 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
14101 N Eastern Ave · (405) 562-1800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
521 E Memorial Rd · (405) 849-5203 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2108 Smiling Hill Blvd · (405) 359-4759 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.3%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.4%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.8%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%3.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%4.7%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.8%13.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.3%25.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.8%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.1%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.7%74.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%27.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.4%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.582.311.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.952.961.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 658 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 240 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 52.9–58.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 9.0–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 6.0–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
68.4%
Total nursing turnover
63.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 69.4 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 104 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 03/16/23, an IJ situation was determined to exist due to the facility failing to ensure: a. Resident #153, who admitted with a blister to their left heel was thoroughly assessed on admission and weekly, monitored for changes, physician notified, and interventions implemented. This resulted in sepsis, osteomyelitis, and left BKA, and b. Resident #157 was thoroughly assessed on admission and an unstageable pressure ulcer was identified four days after admission. On 03/16/23 at 2:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 03/16/23 at 2:48 p.m., the Administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation. On 03/16/23 at 11:19 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was provided. The plan of removal documented: .1. Immediate action(s) taken for the resident(s) found to have been affected include: R-153 no longer resides at the facility. R-157 was assessed on 3/15/23 for wound on left great toe. M.D. notified, order obtained, treatment provided, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide baseline care plans to the resident and representative for 2 (#76 and #15) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans.The DON identified 68 residents resided in the facility.Findings:1. An undated Baseline Care Plan policy, read in part, The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care .The baseline care plan will: Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission .The supervising nurse, or supervising nurse shall verify within 48 hours that a baseline care plan has been developed. A written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and representative in a language that the resident/representative can understand .The supervising nurse or MDS nurse/designee is responsible for providing the written summary of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan focus was developed to address a resident's respiratory needs and a resident's oral care needs for 2 (#3 and #5) of 23 sampled residents reviewed comprehensive care plans. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled 'Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy),' read in part, The facility will obtain an order for the use of CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, or Trilogy device and settings from the practitioner.A personal CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, or Trilogy device may/may not be brought into the facility for the resident use. If brought in, the nurse/respiratory therapist will verify the settings on the machine prior to use. 1.On 10/02/25 at 9:31 a.m., Resident #3 was observed lying in bed alert and oriented. A white BIPAP machine was observed on the bedside dresser. There were a mask and hose observed attached to the BIPAP with visible moisture in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for 2 (#12 and #61) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for care plan revisions.The DON identified 68 residents resided in the facility.Findings:1. An annual assessment, dated 08/17/25, showed Resident #12 had a BIMS of 14 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed a diagnosis of depression. Section N of the assessment showed no antipsychotic or antianxiety medications were administered during the look back period. Section N showed an antidepressant medication was administered during the look back period. A physician's order for Resident #12, dated 09/23/25, showed to administer sertraline HCL (an antidepressant) 50 mg tablet daily related to depression. A care plan, revised 08/17/24, showed a focus for trazodone for insomnia, antiplatelet therapy, refusing medications and pain. The care plan did not show a focus or concern related to antidepressant or psychotropic medications for Resident #12. On 10/01/25 at 3:19 p.m., MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure;a. breathing treatments were monitored during administration for 1 (#18) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for breathing treatments, andb. oxygen tubing, nasal canula, BIPAP mask were labeled with the date they were administered and placed in a bag when not in use for 2 (#3 and #10) sampled residents reviewed for oxygen and BIPAP treatments. The DON identified four residents received breathing treatments, 51 residents required supplemental oxygen, and four residents had BIPAP treatments. Findings:An undated facility's policy titled Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy), read in part, The facility will obtain an order for the use of CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, or Trilogy device and settings from the practitioner.A personal CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, or Trilogy device may/may not be brought into the facility for the resident use. If brought in, the nurse/respiratory therapist will verify the settings on the machine prior to use. 1.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete pre and post assessments of dialysis monitoring for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis.The DON identified one resident who received dialysis at the facility.Findings:An undated, Hemodialysis policy, read in part, The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice .The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments .Ongoing assessment and oversight of the resident before during and after dialysis treatments .Ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services.Review of the assessments tab, showed Dialysis Resident Monitoring assessments were completed up until 07/16/25 when the assessment was discontinued, and the facility began using paper.A quarterly assessment, dated 07/20/25, showed Resident #7 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. maintain a clean ice machine; b. wash/sanitize hands before handling/storing dishes removed from the clean side of the dish machine; and,c. meet the minimum hot water temperatures for the wash and rinse cycles for the sanitizing of dishes cleaned in the dish machine. The DON identified 72 residents ate meals prepared in the kitchen.Findings:On 09/29/25 at 9:55 a.m., the ice machine in the main kitchen was observed with the dietary manager. The plastic cover was removed to expose the evaporator. The interior of the plastic cover had a black substance along the edges of the molded plastic cover. There was a black substance on the plastic framing the evaporator. The water reservoir tray which sat below the evaporator had a black substance along the sides and edges of the tray. There was a black substance around the pump and other components resting above the reservoir. On 09/29/25 at 10:05 a.m., the dietary manager was observed to load the dish machine with dirty dishes and run it. The dish machine wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention control measures were in place for a. oxygen tubing labeled with the date and stored in a bag when not in use for 1 (#10) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care;b. BIPAP mask labeled with the date and stored in a bag when not in use for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care;c. sanitary laundry delivery during 1 of 1 observation;d. legionella surveillance in the water system; ande. the use of enhanced barrier precautions when performing supra-pubic catheter care for 1 (#3) of 1 resident observed for urinary catheter care.The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility, 4 residents had BIPAPS, and 51 residents had orders for supplemental oxygen.The DON identified four residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Findings:An undated facility policy titled Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BIPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy), read in part, The facility will obtain an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of a bariatric bed for 1 (#3) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accommodation of needs.The DON identified 73 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 09/29/25 at 2:33 p.m., Resident #3 was observed on an air mattress. Resident #3 was tall and big built/obese with shoulders that near each side of the bed. Resident #3 was observed to be paraplegic and required assistance to turn hips but did not have room to turn. An admission assessment, dated 09/19/25, showed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 13 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, paraplegia, depression and pressure ulcers. Section K of the assessment showed Resident #3 had a weight of 295 pounds and a height of 75 inches on admission. A care plan, revised 09/22/25, showed no concern for a bariatric sized bed. A review of physician orders for Resident #3, dated October 2025, showed no order for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to limit a physician's order for a prn anti-anxiety medication to 14 days for 1 (#4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified seven residents received anti-anxiety medication. Findings: The medication administration record, dated July 2025, showed Resident #4 received PRN Lorazepam 11 times.The medication administration record, dated August 2025, showed Resident #4 did not receive a PRN dose of lorazepam. The medication administration record, dated September 2025, showed Resident #4 received one PRN dose of lorazepam. The order summary report, dated 09/30/25, showed Resident #4 had diagnoses which included chronic pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and shortness of breath.The order summary report, dated 09/30/25, showed an active order for lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet given orally every six hours PRN for restlessness or agitation was written on 07/13/25.The order summary report, dated 09/30/25, showed an active order for lorazepam 0.5 mg liquid given sublingual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician discharge order was obtained for 1 (#78) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for a planned discharge.The DON identified 162 residents discharged in the past 6 months.Findings: An undated policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, read in part, Facility will obtain a physician's order for transfer or discharge and instructions or precautions for ongoing care. A care plan, dated 08/18/25 showed, Resident #78 was admitted to the facility for a short-term stay and would need assistance with discharge planning. An admission assessment, dated 08/21/25, showed Resident #78 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, had a diagnosis of dementia, their overall goal was to discharge to the community, and active discharge planning was already occurring. A progress note, dated 08/18/25, showed Resident #78 was discharging to an assisted living facility. A progress note, dated 08/21/25, showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy and discharge notice to resident representative for 2 (#76 and #9) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for bed hold policies.The DON identified 162 residents had been discharged from the facility in the last six months.Findings:1. An undated Bed Hold Notice policy, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave .In the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policies to the resident and/or the resident representative within 24 hours. An admission MDS assessment, dated 09/07/25, showed Resident #76 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included dementia, restless leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurately coded to reflect the resident's status for 2 (#3 and #5) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments.The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1.On 10/02/25 at 9:31 a.m., Resident #3 was observed lying in bed alert and oriented. A white bi-pap machine was observed on the bedside dresser. There were a mask and hose observed attached to the BIPAP with visible moisture in the mask laying in the open top drawer of the bed side dresser. An undated facility's policy titled Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment, read in part, The appropriate, qualified health professional will correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identifies resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status. An undated facility's policy titled 'Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BIPAP,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided for dependent residents for 1 (#15) of 2 sampled residents who were reviewed for activities of daily living.The DON identified 10 residents who were dependent on staff for showers/bathing.Findings: On 10/01/25 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #15 was observed in bed watching television. The resident was observed to be well-groomed and free from odors. An undated policy, titled Resident Showers, read in part, Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety. An admission assessment, dated 09/16/25, showed Resident #15 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, had a diagnosis of depression, and was dependent on staff for showering/bathing. A care plan, dated 09/16/25, showed Resident #15 required staff assistance with showering/bathing. Review of the electronic clinical record and shower sheets, dated 09/09/25 - 09/30/25, showed Resident #15 had received a shower/bath six out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking assessment was completed to prevent accidents and hazards for 1 (#10) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for safe smoking assessments to prevent accidents and hazards.The administrator identified no residents who smoke, and the facility was a non-smoking facility.Findings: On 10/02/25 at 10:49 a.m., Resident #10 was observed ambulating with a walker. Resident #10 was observed putting in the door code on the east exit and went outside. Resident #10 sat in a chair outside the door, less than 15 feet from the door. Resident #10 was observed with a lighter and cigarette in their possession. Resident #10 lit a cigarette and sat and smoked less than 15 feet from the entrance unsupervised. Resident #10's admission assessment, dated 09/03/25, showed Resident #10's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 9. The assessment showed Resident #10 was a tobacco user.Resident #10's care plan, revised 09/09/25, read in part, I have behaviors of smoking outside and refusing my lactulose,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheters were secured for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters.The DON identified four residents had indwelling urinary catheters.Findings: On 10/01/25 at 10:23 a.m., CNA #1 and CNA #3 were observed to provide catheter care for Resident #1. The catheter was not observed to be secured before or after the care had been provided. A care plan, updated 07/23/25, showed Resident #1 had an indwelling urinary catheter for urinary retention. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/23/25, showed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of four, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 10/02/25 at 11:50 a.m., CNA #3 stated they typically utilized a device to secure indwelling urinary catheters. CNA #3 observed Resident #1's catheter and stated they did not know why Resident #1's urinary catheter was not secured. CNA #3 stated they did not know why it had not been secured after catheter care on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clinical rationale had been documented for a declined gradual dose reduction for 2 (#11 and #5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified seven residents who received psychotropic medications.Findings: 1.A physician order, dated 08/24/25, showed Resident #11 had been ordered fluoxetine (an antidepressant medication) 40mg daily. A Pharmaceutical Consultant Report Psychoactive Gradual Dose Reduction, dated 03/22/25, showed a gradual dose reduction was recommended for fluoxetine 40mg daily. The physician check marked a box which indicated the minimal effective dose. The Pharmaceutical Consultant Report Psychoactive Gradual Dose Reduction, read in part, Continue current use of above stated medication. My Clinical Rationale for continuance is as follows. The section for the clinical rationale from the physician was left blank. An annual assessment, dated 08/24/25, showed Resident #11 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for anticoagulants for 1 (#11) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified 22 residents received an anticoagulant medication.Findings: An undated policy titled, Medication Monitoring, read in part, Interventions shall be identified on the resident's comprehensive plan of care for the systematic monitoring of high risk medications to facilitate early identification of adverse consequences. A physician order, dated 08/23/24, showed Resident #11 was ordered Xarelto (an anticoagulant medication) 10mg daily for quadriplegia. An annual assessment, dated 08/24/25, showed Resident #11 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, had a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, and had received an anticoagulant medication during the look back period.A care plan, dated 08/24/25, showed the resident received Xarelto and staff were to monitor, document, and report to the physician signs or symptoms of anticoagulant complications.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment carts were secured for 1 (400 hall) of 4 treatment carts observed.The DON identified four treatment carts in the facility. Findings:On 10/01/25 at 1:55 p.m., the 400-hall treatment cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended by room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cart was observed to contain insulin, heparin, medicated ointments, and wound cleanser/wound care supplies.On 10/01/25 at 1:57 p.m., RN #1 was observed to lock the 400-hall treatment cart.An undated policy titled Medication Storage, read in part, During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart.On 10/01/25 at 1:57 p.m., RN #1 stated the treatment cart was to be locked when unattended.On 10/01/25 at 2:06 p.m., the DON stated treatment carts were to be kept locked when unattended to ensure medications were secured.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure radiology services were provided for 1 (#2) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for radiology services.The DON identified 68 residents resided in the facility.Findings: An undated policy titled Diagnostic Testing Services, read in part, The facility will provide the appropriate diagnostic services (laboratory and radiology) required to maintain the overall health of its residents and in accordance with State and Federal guidelines. A care plan, updated 01/13/25, showed Resident #2 had pain related to osteoarthritis and chronic pain, and to administer pain medication per physician orders. A physician visit note, dated 06/05/25, read in part, Assessments 1. Pain in left upper arm.Treatment 1. Pain in left upper arm. Notes: order x-ray of the left humerus and elbow then escalate to MRI evaluation. A physician visit note, dated 06/30/25, read in part, Assessments 1. Pain in left upper arm.Treatment 1. Pain in left upper arm. Notes: order x-ray of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State agency within two hours for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The DON identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings:The facility abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy, dated 2025, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property .Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies .within specified timeframes .Immediately, but no more than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury.A quarterly resident assessment, dated 06/04/25, showed Resident #1's cognition was intact (brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for two (#2 and #5) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. LPN #1 identified 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy also read, The facility has written policies and procedures that define how staff will communicate and coordinate situations of abuse. 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and depression. A MDS assessment, dated 01/05/24, documented the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. It documented the resident was always incontinent of bladder and required substantial/maximal assist of staff for toileting hygiene. An initial OSDH Incident Report, received at OSDH on 08/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. food items in the refrigerator were properly labeled and had identified use by dates, b. food items were discarded on or before the manufacturer expiration dates, c. leftovers in the refrigerator were dated and used within at least 3 days, d. food items were stored at the appropriate temperatures, e. only clean utensils were used when accessing bulk foods, f. staff in the kitchen with beards wore beard restraints, g. clean dishware was not exposed to splash and covered or inverted, and h. dishwasher rinse cycles were routinely tested for proper chemical sanitization. The Administrator identified 58 residents resided at the facility. Fifty-six residents received meals prepared by dietary services. Findings: A 'Dishwashing Machine Use' policy, revised August 2010, read in parts, A supervisor will check the dishwashing machine for proper concentrations of sanitizer solution .once a week . A 'Food Safety Requirements' policy, undated, read in parts, Dietary staff must wear hair restraints (e.g.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a nurse aide performance review once every 12 months for two (CNA #1 and CNA #2) of two CNA records reviewed for annual competencies. The staff roster, dated 04/24/24, documented 31 CNAs are employed by the facility. Findings: A Competency Evaluation policy, dated 2023, read in part, subsequent and/or annual competency is evaluated at a frequency determined by the facility assessment, evaluation of the training program, and/or job performance evaluations .employee competency forms are maintained in the Staff Development Coordinator's office for current training year, then forwarded to the Human Resources Director for placing into the employee's personnel file. CNA #1 had a hire date of 11/23/21. There was no CNA annual competency review located in the employee's file. CNA #2 had a hire date of 07/20/22. There was no CNA annual competency review located in the employee's file. On 04/25/24 at 1:38 p.m., the DON and Executive Director stated CNA competency reviews were completed upon hire and annually. The DON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advanced directives for two (#31 and #163) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The Administrator identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included status post displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of humerus right arm. The resident's clinical records did not document the resident and/or their representative was offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive. 2. Resident #163 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included aftercare following joint replacement surgery left knee. The resident's clinical records did not document resident and/or their representative were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive. On 04/23/24 at 10:51 a.m., the Admissions Coordinator was asked if Resident #31 or Resident #163 had been offered the choice to formulate advanced directives. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a discharge order for one (#61) of three discharged residents reviewed. The Executive Director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #61 had diagnoses which included conversion disorder with seizures. A Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) policy, revised 2023, read in part, Obtain physicians' orders for transfer or discharge . A progress note, dated 01/25/24, read in part, Date/Time of Discharge/Death: 1/25/24 @1300 . On 04/23/24 at 1:38 p.m., the DON stated there was not a physician's order for discharge.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours for one (#28) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Executive Director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Baseline Care Plan policy, dated 2023, read in part, The baseline care plan will . be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Resident #28 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. There was no baseline care plan located in the resident's clinical record. On 04/24/24 at 11:05 a.m., MDS Coordinator #2 stated the baseline care plan was not developed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for two (#9 and #28) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The Executive Director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Comprehensive Care Plans policy, dated 2023, read in part, The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment .The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum .the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . 1. Resident #9's comprehensive care plan, initiated on 02/13/24, documented the ability to walk in the room and hallway with staff assistance and the use of a walker. An admission assessment, dated 02/18/24, documented resident #9 required substantial assistance with bed mobility and did not attempt to transfer or walk due to medical or safety concerns. On 04/24/24 at 1:08 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was complete for one (#61) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharge. The Executive Director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #61 had diagnoses which included conversion disorder with seizures. A Discharge Summary policy, dated 2023, read in part, The discharge summary should include .reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post discharge medication to include prescription and over the counter medications . A Discharge Summary, dated 01/25/24, documented the resident received skilled nursing services and therapy services. The discharge summary documented the resident was stable and the resident and representative were educated to see the PCP for follow up after discharge. A Clinical Discharge Instruction Form, dated 01/25/24, had a section for medications sent home. That section was observed to be incomplete. On 04/23/24 at 1:38 p.m., the DON stated medication reconciliation was not documented.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one (#264) of five sampled residents observed for medication administration. The Executive Director identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Administration policy, dated 2024, read in part, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician . Resident #264 had a diagnosis of hypertension. A physician's order, dated 04/24/24, documented losartan potassium-HCTZ 100-25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth daily for hypertension. Hold if systolic BP is less than 105 or diastolic is less than 65 and notify physician. On 04/24/24 at 7:55 a.m., RN #2 was observed documenting that she was holding the losartan due to a low pulse. RN #2 did not administer the medication. On 04/24/24 at 10:24 a.m., RN #2 stated the order was to hold the medication if the BP was low and to notify the physician. RN #2 stated they would clarify the order with the physician.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a proper indication for the use of ordered medications for two (#4 and #262) of six sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications The Executive Director indicated 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Unnecessary Drugs-Without Adequate Indication for Use policy, undated, read in parts, indication for use is the identifed, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication .will be determined by assessing the resident's underlying condition . 1. Resident #4 had diagnosis which included dementia and pain. A Active Order summary, dated 04/25/24, read in part, Lorazepam [antianxiety medication] 0.5mg give one tab by mouth two times a day for pain . On 04/25/24 at 3:21 p.m., the DON was asked if pain was a proper indication for the Lorazepam use. They stated No, it is not 2. Resident #262 had physicain orders for: a. torsemide 20mg 3 tablets daily for diuretics, and b. apixaban 5mg every 12 hours for anticoagulant therapy. On 04/25/24 at 11:31 a.m., the DON stated that neither medications had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to disinfection a glucometer before or after its use on a resident. RN #2 identified three residents required the use of this glucometer for blood glucose monitoring. Findings: A Glucometer Disinfection policy, dated 2023, read in part, The facility will ensure blood glucometers will be cleaned and disinfected after each use and according to manufacturer's instructions for multi-resident use . On 04/23/24 at 11:30 a.m., RN #2 was observed completing glucose monitoring with a glucometer. RN #2 did not disinfect the glucometer before or after the use. On 04/23/24 at 11:33 a.m., RN #2 stated the glucometer gets cleaned by the night shift. They provided a Glucometer Control Log that documented that the glucometer was in range, but did not document any cleanings.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to ensure a bath/shower was provided to a resident who required assistance from staff for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The facility census, dated 12/04/23, documented 67 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Activities of Daily Living Policy, dated 2023, read in part, .Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living .bathing . Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, sepsis, and stage four chronic kidney disease. An admission Resident Assessment, dated 11/21/23, documented Resident #1's cognition was intact, and they needed partial assistance from another person for bathing. Resident #1 had a shower review sheet completed on 11/22/23 and 12/02/23. There was no other documentation Resident #1 had received any other bath/shower in the facility. On 12/05/23 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #1 stated they did not receive a bath or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as ordered for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/26/23, documented 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included heart failure, essential (primary) hypertension, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and heart failure, unspecified. A Physician's Order, dated 03/02/23, documented amlodipine Besylate oral tablet 5mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension. A Physician's Order, dated 03/02/23, documented hydralazine HCI oral tablet 100mg, give one tablet by mouth with meals related to essential (primary) hypertension. A March 2023 MAR documented the following: a. Amlodipine Besylate 5mg had not been administered three out of 29 opportunities. Nurse notes documented three of the 29 opportunities the medications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified timely when: A. an unstageable wound had been identified by staff for one (#157), B. a resident had a stage two pressure ulcer to obtain a treatment and when signs and symptoms of infection had been identified for one (#153), and C. a medication was unavailable and could not be administered as ordered for one (#19) of three sampled residents reviewed for notification. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 03/13/23, documented 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Notification of Changes policy, dated 01/03/23, read in part, .The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly .consults the resident's physician .when there is a change requiring notification Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment .New treatment . 1. Resident #153 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pressure ulcers. A Nursing Admission assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered timely for one (#19) of six sampled residents reviewed for medication. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 03/13/23, documented 59 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Ordering policy, dated January 2023, read in part, .Medications and related products are received from the provider pharmacy on a timely basis . Resident #19 had diagnoses which included rash and other nonspecific skin eruption. A Resident Assessment, dated 02/22/23, documented Resident #19's cognition was moderately impaired. A Skin/Wound Note, dated 03/12/23 at 9:22 p.m., documented the resident had a rash to their chest and was scratching at it. A new order was received for Bactroban cream to be applied twice a day for five days. An eMAR note, dated 03/13/23 at 10:21 a.m., documented waiting on pharmacy for the Bactroban cream. An eMAR note, dated 03/14/23 at 12:47 a.m., documented the Bactroban had been ordered and would not be available until possibly Wednesday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIAKONOS GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/24/2025
PILGRIM, SCOTTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2018
BUSH, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/20/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 66%Other / private 34%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$665per resident / day
operating cost
$20,219per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$552per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375583. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next