Park Place Healthcare and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 63.9 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 37% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 88% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 08/13/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure supervision was provided to a resident who smoked and used oxygen that resulted in Resident #20 igniting themselves and received second degree burns to their face.On 08/13/25 at 5:09 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On 08/13/25 at 5:23 p.m., the administrator and the DON were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided.On 08/14/25 at 11:40 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Incident: Resident was smoking while wearing oxygen and accidentally ignited [themself], resulting in burn injuries and immediate life-threatening risk.1. Immediate Action Taken- Oxygen was removed from the resident's vicinity and turned off to eliminate fuel source. Staff responded immediately, extinguishing the fire, and activated emergency medical response, first aid was provided at the facility prior to transport.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 05/28/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse and failure to implement interventions to protect residents from physical abuse. An admission resident assessment, dated 12/18/24, showed Resident #3's cognition was intact (BIMS 15). A quarterly resident assessment, dated 01/15/25, showed Resident #5's cognition was intact (BIMS 15). A quarterly resident assessment, dated 01/25/25, showed Resident #4's cognition was intact (BIMS 13). A facility reported incident, dated 02/28/25, showed an allegation of abuse/mistreatment involving Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5. The reported incident showed at approximately 6:00 p.m., the residents were outside smoking when an alleged altercation involving threats of physical harm occurred between residents. The reported incident showed Resident #3 made verbal threats of physical harm to Resident #5. Resident #4 became upset and allegedly made threats of physical harm to Resident #3. Residents #3 and #4 were immediately separated and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. care plan interventions were implemented to prevent skin breakdown, andb. a resident with wounds received appropriate treatment for 1 (#26) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and skin conditions.The wound care nurse identified 12 residents had wounds in the facility. Findings:On 02/12/26 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #26 was observed with three open areas to their coccyx and buttocks during an incontinent care observation.On 02/12/26 at 10:48 a.m., CNA #1 was observed to apply vitamin A&D ointment to Resident #26's wounds.On 02/13/26 at 11:11 a.m., Resident #26 was observed lying on their back on a regular mattress.On 02/17/26 at 9:39 a.m., Resident #26 was observed lying in bed. They had a navy-blue pressure relieving mattress on their bed.An undated facility SKIN MANAGEMENT POLICY, read in part, Any resident with pressure sores will receive the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new sores from developing based upon the resident's clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered as prescribed for 1 (#48) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pain management.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Medication Administration, dated 04/2019, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. A policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, dated 03/2020, read in part, The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choice related to pain management. A care plan for Resident #48, dated 10/10/25, showed the resident had generalized pain. The care plan showed an intervention for pain management was to administer analgesic medications as ordered by the physician. A physician's order for Resident #48, dated 10/10/25, showed the resident was prescribed oxycodone 5 mg (an opioid analgesic) one every six hours as needed for pain. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (#8) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Findings:On 08/11/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident #8 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The resident had a knot and bruising on the right side of their forehead. On 08/11/25 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #4 was observed lying in their bed with their eyes closed. On 08/11/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #4 was observed in the dining room with a one-on-one sitter. On 08/12/25 at 9:13 a.m., Resident #4 was observed lying in their bed with their eyes closed. An annual assessment, dated 05/30/25, showed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia with agitation, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder. The assessment showed Resident #4 had a BIMS of 15, which indicated Resident #4 was cognitively intact. An annual, dated 06/03/25, showed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-18 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the direct care staffing hours on the Quality of Care report was accurately reported to CMS during the months of 12/2025 through 01/2026. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility.Findings: The Quality of Care report for the month of December 2025 showed the following was reported to CMS for direct care staffing hours for the 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift:a. 12/20/26, a census of 62 and 52.32 direct care staffing hours,b. 12/24/26, a census of 63 and 37.40 direct care staffing hours,c. 12/27/26, a census of 63 and 61.18 direct care staffing hours, andd. 12/28/26, a census of 61 and 61.00 direct care staffing hours. The facility payroll detail report for the month of December 2025 showed the facility had the following for the 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift:a. 12/20/26, 91.51 direct care staffing hours,b. 12/24/26, 63.27 direct care staffing hours,c. 12/27/26, 86.99 direct care staffing hours and,d. 12/28/26, 98.69 direct care staffing hours. The Quality of Care report for the month of January 2026 showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident's blood sugar was above 350 for 1 (#2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for insulin.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Physician Notification for Resident Change in Condition, policy undated, read in part, The licensed nurse assigned to the resident is responsible for notification of and communication to the medical staff regarding significant changes.Changes in the condition of the resident are determined by assessments utilizing parameters defined by physician orders/instructions. Document in the medical record the date, time and name of each physician notified, actions taken and/or resident's response to treatment. A physician's order for Resident #2, dated 12/31/25, showed Humalog (an insulin medication) 100 unit per milliliter, inject as per sliding scale, for blood sugar level of 350 to 400, give 10 units and notify medical doctor, subcutaneously before meals related to type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident's physical condition and needs for 1 (#10) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 02/11/26 at 8:48 a.m., Resident #10's left hand was observed to be contracted and completely closed into a fist. There were no therapeutic devices in their left hand. Resident #10's left arm was observed to not raise above shoulder height. A policy titled Resident Assessments, dated 11/2019, showed appropriate resident assessments were to be completed.A Physician's Progress Note for Resident #10, dated 11/14/25, showed the resident had left sided weakness. An admission Assessment for Resident #10, dated 11/23/25, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included renal failure and heart failure. The assessment showed Resident #10 had no impairment to their upper extremities. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan:a. included interventions for limited range of motion for 1 (#10) of 3 sampled resident reviewed for limited range of motion,b. was implemented for offering a meal replacement supplement for 1 (#48) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, andc. included the use of a mechanical lift for transfer for 1 (#3) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for accidents.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility and the DON identified six residents used a mechanical lift for transfers. Findings: A policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 12/2016, read in part, A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.The comprehensive person-centered care plan will: describe the services that are furnished or attain or maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. dirty linen was not placed on the floor for 1 (#41),b. soiled wipes and a soiled brief were not placed on the bed for 1 (#16),c. gloves were changed appropriately during incontinent care for 3 (#16, 40 and #41) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living, andd. staff worn a gown during incontinent care for 1 (#40) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for EBP.The DON identified 40 residents required assistance with incontinent care and 14 residents had EBP precautions. Findings: 1. On 02/12/26 at 5:46 a.m., CNA #5 was observed to don gloves to perform incontinent care on Resident #41. On 02/12/26 at 5:47 a.m., CNA #5 was observed to open a brief, set it on Resident #41's bedside table, remove the front of the resident's brief and assist them to turn to their left side. Fecal matter was observed on the resident's brief. CNA #5 cleaned the resident with wipes and discarded the dirty brief in the trash bag. With the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion exercises and equipment for a contracture to maintain or improve mobility for 1 (#10) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for range of motion and mobility.The DON identified two residents had limited range of motion. Findings:On 02/11/26 at 8:48 a.m., Resident #10's left hand was observed to be contracted and completely closed into a fist. There were no therapeutic devices in their left hand. Resident #10's left arm was observed to not raise above shoulder height. A policy titled Restorative Nursing Services, dated 07/2017, read in part, Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence.A physician's progress note for Resident #10, dated 11/14/25, showed the resident had left sided weakness. An admission assessment for Resident #10, dated 11/23/25, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included renal failure and heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure weight loss was unavoidable by providing meal replacement supplements for 1 (#48) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 02/11/26 at 9:16 a.m., Resident #48 was observed lying in bed with their eyes closed. A breakfast tray was untouched sitting on their walker seat.A care plan for Resident #48, dated 10/10/25, showed the resident had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to protein calorie malnutrition. The intervention was for staff to offer Resident #48 a meal replacement supplement if 50% or less of their meal was consumed.An undated weight log for Resident #48 showed on 12/05/25, the resident weighed 170 pounds.An admission assessment for Resident #48, dated 12/20/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included pancytopenia (a serious blood disorder characterized by dangerously low red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets), renal insufficiency, and cirrhosis of the liver.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a weekly skin assessment for 1 (#26) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and skin conditions.The wound care nurse identified 12 residents had wounds in the facility. Findings:On 02/12/26 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #26 was observed with three open areas to their coccyx and buttocks during an incontinent care observation.A physician order for Resident #26, dated 01/23/26, showed weekly skin assessment every Thursday evening night shift.An admission assessment for Resident #26, dated 01/29/26, showed the resident had diagnoses which included unspecified fracture of sacrum and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. A Skin Assessment by Charge Nurse for Resident #26, dated 02/12/26 at 10:58 p.m., showed the resident had no open area and their coccyx was reddened.A skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with necessary behavioral health care and services for 1 (#10) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health care needs.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/11/26 at 8:47 a.m., Resident #10 was observed to be tearful in their room. A physician's order for Resident #10, dated 11/11/25, showed the resident was to receive a psychiatric consultation for mental health needs if criteria was met as needed. An admission assessment for Resident #10, dated 11/23/25, showed the resident had a diagnosis of depression. The assessment showed it was very important for them to participate in activities. The assessment showed no behaviors and their depression screening showed no concerns. The assessment showed Resident #10 had a BIMS of 14, which indicated they were cognitively intact. A physician's order for Resident 310, dated 12/20/25, showed the resident was prescribed fluoxetine 20 mg (an anti-depressant medication) once daily for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than five percent for 2 (#53 and #56) of 4 sampled residents observed during medication pass. The facility's medication error rate was 7.41%.The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings:1. On 02/12/26 at 8:03 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer one tablet of vitamin D3 25 mcg to Resident #56.An Administering Medications policy, dated 04/2019, read in part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribe.A physician's order for Resident #56, dated 07/19/23, showed vitamin D3 50 mcg, give one tablet by mouth in the morning for supplement.On 02/12/26 at 11:29 a.m., CMA #1 stated Resident #56 was supposed to receive vitamin D3 50 mcg. They stated they should have given the resident two tablets of the house stock vitamin D3 25 mcg to equal 50 mcg.On 02/12/26 at 11:31 a.m., CMA #1 stated they did not follow the physician's order.2. On 02/12/26 at 8:37 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer one tablet of senna (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$131,280 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $23,431 — penalty dated 2026-02-18
• $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-02-18
• $17,799 — penalty dated 2025-08-18
• $40,912 — penalty dated 2025-06-02
• $10,712 — penalty dated 2024-08-23
• $11,741 — penalty dated 2024-05-22
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-14 for 7 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-02 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $120K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK