No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Woodlands Skilled Nursing And Therapy

1701 East 6th Street, Okmulgee, OK 74447 · For profit - Partnership · 114 certified beds · (918) 756-1967 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (918) 756-1967 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jun 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1101 S Belmont Ave · (918) 756-8371 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1160 S Belmont Ave · (918) 756-1223 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
420 E 8th St · (918) 777-3977 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1126 E 6th St · (918) 652-4846 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%3.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%4.7%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.8%13.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.1%25.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.0%17.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.6%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%74.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%27.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.502.311.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.232.961.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.8%CMS range 55.1–75.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.1–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.7–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
24.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 51.1 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the opportunity to vote and provide activities for 3 (#2, 6, and #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility document titled RESIDENT'S RIGHTS AND CONFIDEMTIALITY, revised 08/01/17, read in part, At the facility, we recognize the importance of protecting and promoting the rights of all its residents. The right to civil and religious liberties. The right to participate in social, religious and group activities of choice. An activities calendar posted in a resident common area showed activities for 05/2026. A facility form titled Grievances, dated 06/2026, showed on 06/09/26 a specific concern regarding voting. 1. An undated admission record showed Resident #2 had diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. A quarterly assessment for Resident #2, dated 02/25/26, showed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 and was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of neglect for 1 (#4) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for neglect. The administrator identified one allegation of neglect in the last six months. Findings: A facility policy titled Administrative Policies and Procedures Resident Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, revised 11/01/22, read in part, A member of the administrative staff will then conduct a thorough investigation of the incident/allegation to obtain information about the incident and complete ODH [Oklahoma State Department of Health]-283.Thorough investigations may include interviewing relevant staff, residents, families and/or other witnesses, reviewing chart information and contacting the physician. An undated admission record showed Resident #4 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and a pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 2. An admission assessment for Resident #4, dated 03/30/26, showed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 and was not cognitively impaired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner during ADL care for 1 (#35) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dignity. The administrator identified 45 resident resided in the facility. Findings: An undated transfer/discharge report showed Resident #35 had diagnoses which included mononeuropathy, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. An annual assessment, dated 04/23/25, showed Resident #35 was cognitively intact and had a brief interview for mental status score of 15. The assessment showed the resident was independent with ADLs including showers. The care plan, revised 04/24/25, showed Resident #35 had an ADL self care performance deficit related to musculoskeletal impairment. The care plan showed the resident was able to bathe self, feed self independently, ambulate independently, and toilet self. The resident council minutes for the meeting held 05/19/25 was reviewed. The minutes showed on a resident response form a concern from resident council regarding the nursing department. The form showed the aides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for 1 (#32) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator reported 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #32's undated medical diagnoses list showed diagnosis of Parkinsonism. A facility incident report, dated 05/08/25, showed Resident #32 had a fall on 05/08/25. A fall risk assessment, dated 05/08/25, showed Resident #32 was high risk for falls. There was no documentation in Resident #32's care plan to reflect the fall on 05/08/25. On 05/22/25 at 11:46 a.m., registered nurse #1 stated the fall on 05/08/25 should have been care planned with an intervention put in place.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for two (#3 and #4) of three sampled residents reviewed for home like environment. The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/07/24 at 3:10 p.m., two children were observed running through the dining area and common area. On 05/07/24 at 3:12 p.m., food wrappers and chewed gum was observed on the floor of the activity room. On 05/07/24 at 3:15 p.m., two children were observed running down the 200 hall. On 05/08/24 at 10:12 a.m., Resident #4 stated the staff bring their children to work with them and it keeps them from getting their rest because they run up and down the hallways and are loud. On 05/08/24 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #3 stated having children running up and down the hallway bothers them. They have caught children in their room and observed them coming out of other residents' rooms. It upsets them because the children tear up the yard ornaments in the courtyard, especially the bird feeders. They have reported this to the DON but the children…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The administrator identified 55 resident residing in the facility. Findings: 1. On 02/12/24 at 9:02 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. The large round trash can by the deep fryer was not covered. The stand up freezer which held the house shakes was observed to have ice build up. On 02/12/24 at 9:04 a.m., the refrigerator was observed to have a large mixing bowl with what looked like chocolate pudding in the bowl the plastic wrap was not covering the bowel and was in the pudding. There were 13 individual cups of pudding not labeled in the refrigerator. A bowl of what looked like tomato soup was cover with plastic wrap but not labeled or dated. A donut on a plate cover with plastic wrap not labeled or dated. A plate with cake and a dessert cup on the plate covered with plastic wrap that was coming unsecured from the plate was observed in the refrigerator not labeled or dated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented during resident council meetings or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be met. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The resident council reports dated 08/24/23 documented several concerns related to laundry, employees on cell phones too much, and different food request made by the residents. The resident council reports, dated 09/13/23, documented the residents were getting tired of jello and pudding for snacks and nothing else offered. There was also concerns about items missing from laundry. The resident council reports, dated 01/17/24, documented items being missed from laundry. On 02/12/24 at 9:00 a.m., an observation was made of four children being on hallway 200 with staff member. The children were observed to be standing in the doorways of the resident rooms while aides were assisting residents and passing medications. On 02/12/24 at 10:46 a.m., Res…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to document required daily staffing information. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/12/24 at 9:30 a.m., and throughout the survey the staffing board was observed to have no documentation of the facility name, date, census, staff names, hours of nursing staff, or titles. On 02/15/24 at 3:36 p.m., the administrator and the DON stated they were not aware of the requirements regarding posted staff information.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for one of one meal service observed. The administrator identified 55 resident who resided in the facility. Findings: On 2/14/24 at 10:39 p.m., the menu for lunch this day documented beef tacos, refried beans, Mexican rice, and desert of the day. On 02/14/24 at 12:15 p.m., the lunch service was observed and the resident were served white rice for the noon meal. On 02/14/24 at 12:27 p.m., a test tray was sampled and the white rice was very sticky and bland to the taste. On 02/15/24 at 1:23 p.m., the DM stated they did not make the Mexican rice because they did not have all the ingredients to make it.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. The administrator identified 55 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/14/24 at 11:11 a.m., the yogurt was taken out of the refrigerator and sat on the counter. At 11:17 a.m., it was place on some of the trays for the hall meals. On 02/17/24 at 12: 20 p.m., the DM was plating meals for hall 300. The yogurt remained on the hall trays. At 12:22 p.m., the cooperate dietary manager obtained the temperature of the yogurt and it was 59.2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 02/15/24 at 1:23 p.m., the DM stated the temperature on cold food should be no higher than 41 degrees when serving.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to honor resident's choice of entertainment for one (#11) of two sampled residents who was reviewed for choices. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Finding: Res #11 had diagnoses which included recurrent depressive disorders and diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. A significant change assessment, dated 12/27/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required assistance with most ADLs. On 02/12/24 at 10:37 a.m., an observation was made of Res #11 having a television mounted on the wall approximately four foot from another television mounted on the wall for the other resident which resided in the same room. The resident stated the remote control operates both televisions in the room. They stated every time the other resident utilizes their remote control for their television it operates both televisions. Res #11 stated they could not watch what they wanted related to their television being controlled by the other resident's remote. On 02/14/24 at 3:42 p.m., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the code status was identified and correct for one (#44) of 24 residents whose code status was reviewed. The administer identified 55 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #44 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. An advanced directive acknowledgment form, dated [DATE], documented the resident did not have a DNR. An admission assessment, dated [DATE], documented the resident was intact with cognition and required substantial to maximal assistance with most ADLs. A care plan, dated [DATE], documented the resident had full code status. On [DATE] at 11:29 a.m., a red name tag was observed on the outside of the resident room. A review of the EHR, documented the resident's code status was full code. A DNR was not found in the resident's hard chart. On [DATE] at 3:29 p.m., LPN # 3 stated when a resident had a red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary services to maintain their scheduled baths for one (#42) of one sampled resident for assistance with bathing. The administrator identified 55 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #42 had diagnoses which included history of falling, reduced mobility, and osteoarthritis. A quarterly assessment, dated 12/21/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with bathing. A care plan, revised 12/28/23, documented the resident has a self care deficit related to impaired balance and pain. The care plan documented the resident required limited physical help from staff participation with bathing. The residents bathing schedule was bath on Monday and Thursday on the 7 to 3 shift. The resident should have received baths on 01/15, 01/18, 01/22, 01/25, 01/29, 02/01, 02/05, 02/08, and 02/12. A review of the bathing sheet for 30 days documented the resident had a bath on 01/23, refused on 01/24, refused on 01/29, was bathed on 02/01,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed as ordered for one (#17) of three sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Res #17 had diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation, arthropathy, chronic pain, and stage II pressure ulcer. Weekly skin assessment, dated 10/27/23, documented there was no skin problems with res #17. Weekly skin assessment, dated 11/10/23, documented there was no skin problems with res #17. A physician order, dated 11/16/23, documented apply skin prep to spine every day and evening shift for wound management/prevention. A skin assessment summary documented on 11/22/23, the resident had a pressure ulcer. There was also documentation of a wound consultant visit on this day. A physician order, dated 11/22/23 documented cleanse mid back with normal saline, pat dry, apply medihoney, cover with calcium alginate, and secure with bordered foam every day shift, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the services of an RN was available in the facility eight hours daily seven days a week. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A document titled Time & Attendance Detail, date range: 11/01/23 through 01/31/23, documented an RN was not in the facility for eight hours on 12/16/23. On 02/15/24 at 3:07 p.m., the corporate nurse stated on 12/16/23 there was only 6.50 hours for RN coverage.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed required competency demonstrations annually for one (CMA #2) of five staff reviewed for annual competency. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/15/24 at 11:42 a.m., competency documentation was requested. On 02/15/24 at 1:43 p.m., HR stated they did not have an annual competency for CMA #2. On 02/15/24 at 2:54 p.m., the DON stated CMAs competencies were to be completed annually.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand while feeding residents for two (#14 and #206) of 24 sampled residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/04/23 at 8:26 a.m., LPN #1 was observed standing at the bedside while feeding Res #206. On 01/04/23 at 8:30 a.m., CNA #1 was observed standing at bedside while feeding Res #14. On 01/04/23 at 5:12 p.m., a staff member was observed standing at bedside while feeding Res #14. On 01/09/23 at 10:16 a.m., the DON stated that the staff should be eye level with the resident or seated while assisting them to eat.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented during resident council meetings or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be met. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The resident council minutes were reviewed for 02/11/22, 03/23/22, 04/27/22, 05/23/22 and 09/30/22, which were all of the meeting minutes provided for review for the last 12 months. There was no documentation the residents' grievances had been acted upon. On 01/05/23 at 1:33 p.m., a resident group meeting was conducted with nine residents attending. During the meeting, residents stated that they were not sure who the grievance official was, but they thought it was the administrator. They stated none of the staff, including the administrator, ever responded to their concerns or gave a reason as to why the concerns were not addressed. On 01/05/23 at 3:40 p.m., the president of the council was asked if he was allowed to have council meetings without a staff member present. He stated several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide mail delivery to residents on Saturdays. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents identified 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/05/23 at 1:33 p.m., a group meeting was held with nine alert and oriented residents. They all agreed the mail came to the facility but did not get distributed every day and especially not on Saturdays. They stated the mail is distributed by social services. On 01/05/23 at 2:48 p.m., social services was observed delivering the mail to residents. On 01/05/23 at 4:03 p.m., the social services director stated the mail usually came to the facility and they would put it in her mail slot. She stated she then would separate the mail by resident and deliver the mail to the residents on the days she is schedule to work, when she had time.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for 2 (#12 and #33) of 18 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #33 had diagnoses which included dementia and delusional disorder. A significant change assessment, dated 11/09/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required extensive to total assist with activities of daily living. The assessment documented the resident had no behaviors and received an antipsychotic medication. The assessment documented the resident had a physician documented contraindicated GDR on 10/26/22. The resident's medical record did not document a contraindication for a reduction of the antipsychotic medication on 10/26/22. On 01/06/23 at 1:37 p.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated she got the date in October from a mental health progress note which documented to continue current medication. 2. Res #12 had a physician order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure one of three medication carts were locked when unattended. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/03/23 at 1:23 p.m., an observation was made of an unlocked medication cart on hall 200. The staff member was in a room administering medication to a resident. The cart was between rooms and the drawers were facing the hall way. A resident in a wheel chair was in the hall by the medication cart. The CMA came out of the room and closed the drawer and locked the cart. 01/03/23 at 1:25 p.m., CMA #1 stated she thought she had locked the medication cart. On 01/09/23 at 3:30 p.m., the DON stated all medication carts should be locked at all times when not occupied by staff.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to serve appealing options for alternative food items for residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 01/03/23 at 4:40 p.m., the evening meal was observed. On the steam table the dietary staff were serving 6 oz of chicken spaghetti, 4 oz of mixed vegetables and 4 oz of broccoli, a slice of white bread and a pre packaged oatmeal cream cookie . On 01/03/23 at 4:54 p.m., the DM stated the kitchen staff came out and talked to the residents to see what they wanted to eat. She stated they always have a soup and sandwich of some kind. The DM stated if a resident is not feeling well and they and want chicken noodle we will fix that for them. On 01/03/23 at 5:10 p.m., the dinner meal was observed written on the board outside the kitchen door. The menu documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 01/03/23 at 1:28 p.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted and the following was observed: Two plates of food covered with plastic wrap and three drinks on the counter by the hand washing sink with two open with no lid covering, Four sandwiches and gelatin were observed in the refrigerator not dated, A cut onion in a bag tied in a knot in the refrigerator was not labeled or dated, A bowel of tamales were not labeled or dated, A plate of food in a plastic bag not labeled or dated. Five 20 pound rolls of hamburger meat were observed thawing in the refrigerator with a bag of fajita chicken laying on top of the thawing meat, On 01/03/23 at 1:36 p.m., cook #1 stated she was the evening cook and did not know when the tamales were cooked or the onion cut up and placed in the refrigerator. [NAME] #1 stated they should be labeled and dated before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct COVID-19 testing at a frequency which was consistent with current CDC guidance/standard of practice for conducting testing during an outbreak. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The CDC website, read in parts, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Updated Sept. 23, 2022 .3. SETTING-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS .NURSING HOMES .Responding to a newly identified SARS-CoV-2-infected HCP or resident .Testing is recommended immediately (but not earlier than 24 hours after the exposure) and, if negative, again 48 hours after the first negative test and, if negative, again 48 hours after the second negative test. This will typically be at day 1 (where day of exposure is day 0), day 3, and day 5 .If no additional cases are identified during contact tracing or the broad-based testing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the OHCA of a resident with a new serious mental illness for one (#33) of two sampled residents reviewed for PASRR evaluations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented six residents who received antipsychotic medications. Findings: Res #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A PASRR level I was completed on 03/21/22 and documented the resident did not have a serious mental illness. On 05/04/22, Res #33 received a new diagnosis of delusional disorders. A significant change assessment, dated 11/09/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required extensive to total assist with activities of daily living. The assessment documented the resident had no behaviors and received an antipsychotic medication. On 01/06/23 at 9:07 a.m., the business office person stated she had been doing the PASRR I for the past three weeks. She stated she had not been fully trained and educated on what to do if a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans to meet the needs of one (#21) of 18 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The director of nursing (DON) identified 56 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right non-dominant side, intrinsic eczema, and hypertension. An annual assessment, dated 03/04/22, documented the resident's cognition was intact and was total assist with transfers, dressing, toilet use, and did not walk. The care plan, last revised on 03/21/22 documented the resident required interventions to minimize skin breakdown in general. A quarterly assessment, dated 10/21/22, documented the resident's cognition was intact and was a total assist with transfers, dressing, toilet use, and did not walk. A nurse note, dated 05/11/22 at 2:51 p.m., documented a CNA alerted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during wound care for one (#16) of two residents sampled for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented one resident who had a pressure ulcer. Findings: Res #16 had diagnoses which included COPD, diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A physician order, dated 10/30/22, documented to cleanse buttocks, pat dry, apply hydrophilic, and leave open to air every day and evening shift. A quarterly assessment, dated 12/07/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition, required extensive to total assistance with ADLs, and did not have a pressure ulcer. A care plan, last reviewed 12/23/22, documented to cleanse buttocks, pat dry, apply hydrophilic leave open to air. The care plan documented daily during daily ADL care, to observe the residents skin for redness, open areas, scratches, cuts or bruises, and report changes to the nurse. A weekly skin assessment, dated 01/03/23, documented the resident had no new skin issues.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide physician ordered monthly weights for one (#16) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 50 resident who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #16 had diagnoses which included COPD, diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A physician order, dated 01/16/22, documented to weigh the resident on day shift the 16th of every month. The weight record, dated 10/16/22, documented the resident's weight as 250 pounds. This was the last weight documented in the resident's EHR. A quarterly assessment, dated 12/07/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required extensive to total care for ADLs except eating which he was independent. The assessment documented the resident's weight was 250 pounds. A care plan, last reviewed 12/23/22, documented Res #16 had potential nutritional/weight problem related to dysphagia and impaired mobility. On 01/03/23 at 2:32 p.m., Res #16 was observed in his room in the bed and his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to a pharmacist recommendation for one (#14) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #14 had diagnoses which included brief psychotic disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. A MRR, dated 05/11/22, documented a request to attempt a reduction in the following medications: Zoloft 50mg every day, valproic acid 250mg three times a day, Seroquel 50mg twice a day, and Buspar 7.5mg three times a day. The physician response for May's MRR was not documented in the resident record. On 01/09/23 at 10:51 a.m., the pharmacist stated the facility could not find the physician response for May's MRR. She stated the medication had not been changed at that time. She stated she should have followed up better after the MRR was sent.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one (#33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented six residents in the facility who are receiving antipsychotic medications. Findings: Res #33 had diagnoses which included dementia, senile degeneration of the brain, and delusional disorders. A MRR, dated 03/18/22, documented Res #33 was admitted on Seroquel 12.5mg at bedtime for insomnia. The MRR documented the antipsychotic had a black box warning for increased risk of death in elderly patients with dementia. The MRR documented if insomnia was the intended diagnosis the recommendation would be to taper off the medication. The provider documented an agreement to the recommendation on 03/24/22. The MARs for March and April 2022 were reviewed. Res #33 continued to receive the Seroquel at 12.5mg until 04/24/22. A significant change assessment, dated 11/09/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$303K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 12%Other / private 18%

This home reported $303K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$256per resident / day
operating cost
$7,775per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375494. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next