The Highlands at Owasso

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 87.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A past noncompliance immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to exist effective [DATE] related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. the correct resident was identified before administering medications; andb. a resident was free from significant medication errors for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The ADON identified 88 residents received medications from the facility. Findings:Resident #1's face sheet from their electronic health record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and person history of a traumatic brain injury.A quarterly assessment for Resident #1, dated [DATE], showed the resident's cognition was significantly impaired with a brief score for mental illness score of 03. The assessment showed Resident #1 was taking and antidepressant,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident using a mechanical lift for 1 (#2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for the safe use of a mechanical lift for transfers. The ADON identified 14 residents utilized a mechanical lift for transfers. Findings:On 01/07/26 at 2:21 p.m., Resident #2 was observed in their room, sitting in their recliner. Resident #2 was dressed and their call light was in reach. An undated facility policy titled Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, read in part, In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait,/transfer belts, lateral boards) and mechanical lifting devices. Mechanical lifting devices shall be used for heavy lifting, including lifting and moving resident when necessary, only staff will documented training on the safe use and care of the machines and equipment used in this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were given as ordered for 1 (#16) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for physician's orders.The administrator identified 83 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A hospital discharge medication list for Resident #16, dated 01/09/26, showed Resident #16 was to continue taking furosemide (a diuretic medication) 60 mg by mouth every day.A physician's order for Resident #16, dated 01/09/26, showed that Resident #16 was to take furosemide 40 mg by mouth every day.An admission assessment for Resident #16, dated 01/16/26, showed Resident #16 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, and received a diuretic medication.On 01/22/26 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #16 stated at the hospital they were taking 60mg of furosemide every day and since they had been admitted to the facility, they were only receiving 40 mg a day.On 01/22/26 at 12:20 p.m., the ADON stated Resident #16's discharge order from the hospital indicated they were to receive 60 mg of furosemide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to secure medications for 1 (#13) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for medication storage.The administrator identified 83 residents received medications in the facility. Findings:A physician's order for Resident #13, dated 11/06/25, showed Resident #13 received zinc oxide 20% external paste topically to the sacrum and buttocks every shift for skin integrity. A nurse's progress note for Resident #13, dated 11/06/25, showed Resident #13 had a stage II pressure ulcer to their coccyx with redness to the surrounding tissue. The progress note showed the nurse cleaned the wound, dried the wound, and applied a zinc cream and a padded dressing to the wound. A nurse's progress note for Resident #13, dated 11/09/25 at 9: 00 a.m., showed when the nurse entered Resident #13's room, they observed the resident mixing zinc oxide paste in with their oatmeal. The progress note showed Resident #13 responded yes when asked if they ate some of the oatmeal mixture. A comprehensive assessment for Resident #13, dated 11/13/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide medically appropriate dental services for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dental services.The administrator identified 83 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 01/07/26 at 2:21p.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed with a denture cup at bedside. A social service progress note for Resident #1, dated 10/23/24 at 2:09 p.m., showed the guardian for Resident #1 provided contact information and wanted the resident to receive dental services. The progress note showed the guardian wanted Resident #1 to be assessed and fitted for dentures. Review of the clinical record did not show Resident #1 had been assessed and fitted for dentures. An e-mail provided by the social service director, dated 11/04/25, showed Resident #1 had impressions made for upper and lower dentures.An e-mail provided by the social service director, dated 11/18/25, showed Resident #1 received upper and lower dentures. The e-mail showed Resident #1's denture fitting needed no adjustment. An e-mail provided by the social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the DON had not worked as a charge nurse when the facility census was above 60 residents and failed to ensure the DON worked 40 hours each week. The Administrator stated the facility had a census greater than 90 residents for 36 days from 04/01/25 to 05/06/25. Findings: An undated policy titled Director of Nursing Services (DNS), read in part, The DNS may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. The policy also showed the DON was to work at least 40 hours a week. On 05/06/25 the facility administrator provided the survey team a document titled Highland's Daily Census that showed each date on and between 04/01/25 and 05/06/25 having had a daily census greater than 90 residents. On 05/06/25 at 12:19 p.m., the DON was asked if they were the director of nursing for the facility. The DON stated they were the director of nursing of record. The DON stated they generally work every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday on 12-hour shifts. The DON stated their primary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a water management plan to prevent waterborne pathogens had been implemented. The administrator reported 95 residents reside at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Legionella Water Management Program, dated September 2022, read in part, As part of the infection prevention control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team. The document also showed: a. There was a water management team consisting of the infection preventionist, the administrator, the medical director or their designee, the director of maintenance, and the director of environmental services; b. A detailed description and diagram of the water system in the facility which would show areas of the system that could encourage growth and spread waterborne bacteria, and c. Specific measures would be used to control the introduction or spread of Legionella including a system to monitor the effectiveness of the control measures. On 05/06/25 at 4:24 p.m., when asked to provide the facilty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of skilled services for 2 (#99 and #100) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The administrator identified 46 residents who had been discharged from skilled services from 11/06/24 through 05/06/25. Findings: An undated policy titled Policy on Issuing Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), read in part, The NOMNC must be delivered at least two days before Medicare-covered services are scheduled to end. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form for Resident #99 showed the resident's skilled services would end on 12/19/24. The form further showed the resident signed the form on 12/18/24 which one day prior to the end of services. A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form for Resident #100 showed the resident's skilled services would end on 01/24/25. The form further showed the resident signed the form on 01/23/25 which was one day prior to the end of services. On 05/06/25 at 11:47 a.m., the SSD was asked to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 04/18/25, a past non-compliance situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to protect residents. An Incident Report, dated 02/25/25, showed Resident #165 got out of the building and was found a mile away from the facility by police. Resident #165 was returned to the facility where the resident signed out of the facility against medical advice (AMA). On 04/09/25 Resident #165 eloped and was located a half mile away from the facility on a four-lane busy road. Resident #165's care plan did not address interventions of exit seeking behaviors on 02/16/25 and was not updated until 04/09/25 with interventions. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision and interventions to prevent elopement for 1 (#165) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The administrator identified 96 residents reside in the facility. Findings: On 04/27/25 at 12:45 p.m., the doors of the building were visually observed to be closed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in a locked medication cart for 1 (treatment cart #1) of 1 medication cart observed on the center hallway. The administrator identified 117 residents reside in the facility. Findings: On 04/28/25 at 2:02 p.m., treatment cart #1 was located across the hall from the nurses station and was observed to be unlocked and unattended. On 04/28/25 at 2:05 p.m., LPN #1 returned to the cart and locked it. They stated the cart should be locked when not in use to secure medications. On 04/30/25 at 1:00 p.m., the ADON stated all medication carts should be locked if the CMA or nurse was not at the cart.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff members wore a beard guard for 1 (cook #1) of 1 staff members observed for beard guards. The administrator identified 95 residents received meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: On 04/28/25 at 1:29 p.m., an intital tour of the kitchen was conducted. [NAME] #1 was observed preparing food without wearing a beard guard. On 04/28/25 at 1:35 p.m., [NAME] #1 stated they did not know the facility policy regarding wearing beard guards, no one had told them they had to wear one. They stated the facility did not have any beard guards. On 04/28/25 at 2:32 p.m., the administrator stated they should have been wearing a beard guard.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were utilized during medication administration for one (#16) for one resident sampled for medication administration. The administrator reported the census was 97. Findings: Resident #16 had diagnoses which included chronic pain syndrome and hypertension. A physician order, dated 09/05/24, documented Resident #16 was to receive oxycodone 20 mg (pain medication) every 6 hours as needed for breakthrough pain. On 01/15/25 at 11:45 a.m., CMA #1 was observed administering Resident #16's oxycodone. CMA #1 punched the medication out of the card into their bare hand and then placed the medication in the medication cup. On 01/15/25 at 11:47 a.m., CMA #1 stated the medication should have been punched out of the card directly into the medicine cup without touching it. On 01/15/25 at 11:54 a.m., LPN #1 stated medication should not be touched with a bare hand. On 01/15/25 at 4:01 p.m., the ADON stated medication should be punched out of the card directly into the cup and should not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,179 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-03-13
• $8,278 — penalty dated 2026-02-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK