Bradbury Commons

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · G2019-07-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care to one (#56) of one sampled resident reviewed for respiratory services. From 06/19/19 through 07/09/19, it was documented resident #56 had complaints of shortness of breath, a productive cough and adventitious lungs sounds. There was no documentation to indicate the resident was administered respiratory treatments or seen by a physician. The resident required in-patient critical care treatment for pneumonia, severe sepsis, pleural effusion and acute respiratory distress. The facility identified 16 residents who received respiratory treatments. Findings: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bronchiectasis, pseudomonas, pneumonia and dysphagia. A physician's order, dated 06/19/19, documented the resident was to be administered albuterol sulfate via a nebulizer three times a day as needed for pneumonia and albuterol sulfate aerosol inhaler every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The face sheet in the clinical record for resident #55 documented the resident was a do not resuscitate (DNR) status and was to receive no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A physician's order, dated [DATE], documented, No CPR/DNR . There was no DNR consent form found in the clinical record. On [DATE] at 5:10 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3 was asked how staff determined a resident's code status. He stated it was posted on the face sheet of the clinical record. He also stated the color of the resident's name plate on the door indicated the resident's code status. The name plate would be white if the resident was a DNR and green if CPR was to be performed. The LPN was asked the code status for the resident. He stated DNR was documented on her face sheet and physician orders, however there was not a DNR consent form in the clinical record. The LPN then observed the name plate on the resident's door and stated it was green which would mean CPR was to be performed. The LPN was asked if he knew the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available as ordered by the physician for one (#7) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for pharmacy services. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #7 had diagnoses which included compression fracture of the right hip. An undated pharmacy policy, documented, .DELIVERY INFORMATION .Refills faxed before the pharmacy closes will be delivered the next business day with your regular evening delivery. Order when a 4 day supply remains . A physician's order, dated 12/28/18, documented the resident was to receive hydrocodone 7.5 mg (milligrams)-acetaminophen 325 mg every six hours as needed (PRN) for pain. A care plan, dated 04/21/19, documented the resident had the potential for pain. The staff was to assess for pain and provide medication as ordered by the physician. A pharmacy record, dated 05/30/19, documented the facility had received 60 doses of the hydrocodone from the pharmacy. It documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician's response was received in a timely manner for the gradual dose reduction recommendations for two (#27 and #55) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication . This had the potential to affect 32 residents identified as receiving psychoactive medications. Findings: 1. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included dementia and psychosis. A physician's order, dated 02/21/19, documented the resident was to be administered Risperdal 0.5 milligrams two times a day for dementia. A care plan, revised 04/11/19, documented the resident had the potential for drug related complications due to the use of psychotropic medications. The staff was to observe for signs and symptoms of drug related complications, maintain behavior monitoring and report to the physician as needed. The pharmacy consultant was to review the drug regimen. A pharmacist's Consultant Report, dated 04/22/19, documented the resident had Risperdal 0.5 mg two times a day for expressions or indications of distress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed upon transfer to the hospital for one (#57) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for discharge. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #57 had diagnoses which included pneumonia. A nurse's note, dated 05/11/19, documented the resident was sent to the hospital related to abnormal lab results. A nurse's note, dated 05/11/19, documented the resident was discharged from the facility. A discharge summary was not located in the clinical record. On 07/11/19 at 1:48 p.m., the director of nursing was asked who was responsible for completing the discharge summary. She stated the charge nurse was supposed to complete the discharge summary at the time of the discharge. She was asked if a discharge summary had been completed when the resident was discharged on 05/11/19. She stated, No, we did not do one.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one (#58) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for discharge. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #58 had diagnoses which included diabetic dementia, coronary artery disease and pulmonary fibrosis. A nurse's note, dated 06/13/19, documented the resident was to be discharged to home. The clinical record contained an undated and incomplete discharge summary for the resident. On 07/11/19 at 11:30 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) was asked if the discharge summary was to be completed in full upon a resident's discharge from the facility. She stated, Yes. The DON was asked to review the discharge summary for resident #58. She was asked if the discharge summary had been completed for the resident. She stated, Some of it is there. She was asked if the form was complete. She stated, It's not totally filled out. She was asked if it should have been. She stated, Yes.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure contact isolation precautions were followed for one (#257) of two sampled residents on isolation precautions. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #257 had diagnoses which included entercolts Clostrid. A nurse's note, dated 06/25/19, documented, the resident was on isolation precautions due to Clostridium difficile colitis (C-diff) On 07/08/19 at 3:35 p.m., the door outside of the resident's room was observed to have personal protective equipment (PPE) for the contact isolation in a container. A sign on the container gave instructions regarding hand hygiene, gowning and gloving before entering and upon leaving the resident's room. At 3:57 p.m., no red biohazard bags were observed inside the room to dispose of contaminated gowns and gloves. At 3:59 p.m., certified nursing assistant (CNA) #1 was asked why the resident was on contact isolation precautions. She stated, He has C-Diff. She was asked if there should have been biohazard bags to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK