Sunset Estates Of Purcell

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained in good repair in the laundry room. MDS Coordinator #1 identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 11/14/24 at 11:21 a.m., a tour of the laundry room was conducted. Behind washing machine #2 water was observed on the floor coming out from under the machine. A blanket and a small rug were observed on the floor against the wall behind the washing machine. Both items were observed to be wet. On 11/14/24 at 12:04 p.m., Laundry #1 reported the washing machine had been leaking for about one week. They reported it happened about this time every year. They were asked about the blanket and rug on the floor behind the washing machine. They reported they did not know there was anything on the floor. On 11/14/24 at 1:25 p.m., the administrator reported they had not been told the washing machine was leaking.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff wore eye protection when entering residents' rooms who were COVID-19 positive. MDS Coordinator #1 identified 56 residents resided in the facility. The IP identified 16 residents had tested positive for COVID-19. Findings: An undated Sequence for Putting on Personal Protective Equipment form, documented goggles or faceshield were to be placed over face and eyes. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included COVID-19. A Progress Note, dated 11/11/24 at 4:01 a.m., documented Resident #50 was on isolation due to positive covid test. It documented the resident had a cough at times and was not feeling well. A Progress Note, dated 11/12/24 at 10:46 p.m., documented Resident #11 was covid positive. It documented the resident had fatigue, body aches, cough, and sore throat. A Progress Note, dated 11/12/24 at 10:35 p.m., documented Resident #34 was covid positive. It documented the resident had complaints of cough and congestion. A Progress Note, dated 11/13/24 at 4:43 a.m., documented Resident #16 was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a level I PASRR for one (#14) of one resident sampled for PASRR. MDS Coordinator #1 reported 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #14 admitted with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and delusional disorder. A PASRR level I, dated 11/01/19, documented the resident did not have a mental health diagnosis. On 11/14/24 at 10:33 a.m., the ADON was shown the level I PASRR and was asked if the form was filled out correctly. The ADON reported it was not filled out correctly.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 52 residents resided in the facility. The dietary manager identified one resident did not receive nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: On 09/07/23 at 9:15 a.m., a brief initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed in the walk in refrigerator during the tour: a. cooked hamburger patties in gallon Ziploc bag, dated 09/04/23, b. pre-cooked sausage patties in an opened box, dated 09/03/23, c. an open box below the pre-cooked sausage patties containing raw, uncooked bacon, dated 09/01/23, d. an unopened box below the raw bacon of pre-cooked sausage patties, dated 09/05/23. On 09/07/23 at 09:25 a.m., the dietary manager DM stated storage of leftovers is dependent on what the leftovers were. They stated the cooked hamburger patties should have been discarded. They stated the boxes should not have been stacked in that manner as it could cause cross-contamination.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or resident representative was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the use of a hypnotic medication and informed of, and participate in, their treatment plan for one (#9) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented three residents received hypnotic medications. The MDS coordinator identified care plan meetings were conducted for 52 residents. Findings: A facility policy, revised December 2016, titled Resident Rights, read in part, 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to .e. self-determination .h. be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights; i. exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal from the facility .o. be notified of his or her medical condition and of any changes in his or her condition; p. be informed of, participate in his or her care planning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a fall care plan was reviewed and revised for one (#9) of 24 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/06/23, documented 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, revised March 2018, titled Assessing Falls and Their Cause read in part: .Performing a Post-Fall Evaluation: 4. The intervention to prevent reoccurrence will be placed on the care plan. Res #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included arthritis, right shoulder and arm fracture, and left AKA. A significant change MDS assessment, dated 05/23/23, documented Res #9's cognition was moderately impaired. The CAA documented cognitive loss, falls, psychotropic medication use, were triggered for care planning. The focus on the fall care plan, initiated 05/29/22, documented Res #9 was a low risk for falls r/t AKA. An incident report, dated 06/08/23 at 11:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent weight loss for one (#17) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/06/23, documented 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #17 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, GERD, diabetes, and adult failure to thrive. A vital sign record, dated 03/03/23, documented the resident weighed 186.2 lbs. A physician order, dated 03/28/23, documented the resident received a mechanical soft diet with nectar thick liquids for dysphagia. A vital sign record, dated 04/01/23, documented the resident weighed 182.6 lbs. A vital sign record, dated 05/03/23, documented the resident weighed 176.6 lbs. A vital sign record, dated 06/01/23, documented the resident weighed 177.6 lbs. A vital sign record, dated 07/01/23, documented the resident weighed 187.4 lbs. An annual MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of side rails with the resident or resident representative; and obtain an informed consent prior to installation for one (#9) of one sampled resident reviewed for side rails. The corporate nurse consultant #1 identified 10 residents had grab bars and six residents had side rails. Findings: Res #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included arthritis, right shoulder and arm fracture, and left AKA. A facility policy, revised December 2016, titled Proper Use of Side Rails, read in part, .5. consent for using restrictive devices will be obtained from the resident or legal representative per facility protocol .7. documentation will indicate if less restrictive approaches are not successful, prior to considering the use of side rails . A facility policy, revised August 2022, titled Bed Safety and Bed Rail, read in part, The use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were not administered when a resident's blood pressure was below parameters for one (#6) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/06/23, documented 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #6 had diagnoses which included HTN, heart failure, and chest pain. A physician order, dated 02/08/23, documented to administer lisinopril 2.5 mg one time per day for HTN. The order documented to hold the medication when the systolic blood pressure was below 110. A July 2023 MAR, documented the resident received the lisinopril when systolic blood pressure was below 110 six times. A physician order, dated 08/02/23, documented to administer isosorbide mononitrate 10 mg one time per day for heart failure and chest pain. The order documented to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was below 110. A physician order, dated 08/02/23, documented to administer lisinopril 2.5 mg one time per day for HTN. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to correctly identify an individual with a mental disorder for two (#16 and #33) of two residents sampled for PASRR level I screening. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 18 residents had documented psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: 1. Res #33 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, delusional disorders, and hallucinations. A PASRR I screening, completed on 11/01/19, documented, No to all questions regarding mental illness. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/10/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and had no behaviors during the look back period. A care plan, last reviewed 09/18/22, documented to monitor, document, and report a change in behavior, mood, cognition, hallucinations, delusions, social isolation, suicidal thoughts, and withdrawal. On 10/18/22 at 10:45 a.m., the DON stated she was not here when the PASRR was filled out for the resident. She stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK