No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Higher Call Nursing Center

407 Whitebird Street, Quapaw, OK 74363 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (918) 674-2233 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0604) — most recent Mar 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)5 immediate-jeopardy citations$18,113 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604) — most recent Mar 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $18,113 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-28)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
445 E 10th St · (620) 856-3469 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2303 Military Ave · (620) 856-5555 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Marvins5.4 mi
Military Ave, Baxter Springs, 66713 · (620) 856-2179 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1087 A St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.9%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.9%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.4%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.3%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.0%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.9%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.5%74.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.7%27.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%16.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.072.311.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.962.961.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.9%CMS range 30.7–63.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.7–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.0–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
62.3%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 44.3 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 03/26/24 at 3:33 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to ensure Resident #1's right to remain in their room was not violated. Resident #1 was made to leave their room after stating repeatedly they did not feel well and did not want to go to the dining hall for a meal. On 03/25/24 at 3:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 03/25/24 at 3:33 p.m., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy situation. On 03/28/24 at 1:21 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility plan of removal, dated 03/26/24 at 6:00 p.m., read in part, Grievance book has been established and is an ongoing measure to ensure issues are being taken care of in a timely manner . At Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting we discussed our policy and facility policy on the residents right to refuse any care, activities, or anything they want to refuse . In-service staff on Self Determination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] at 3:33 p.m., and Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to prevent mental and physical abuse to Resident #1 using a gait belt to walk the resident from their room to the dining hall after the resident had stated they did not want to leave their room. Three employees that witnessed the abuse did not intervene to stop the abuse. On [DATE] at 3:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On [DATE] at 3:33 p.m., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy situation. On [DATE] at 1:21 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility plan of removal, dated [DATE] at 5:00 p.m., read in part, Grievance book has been established and is an ongoing measure to ensure issues are being taken care of in a timely manner . At Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting we discussed our policy and facility policy on not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-28 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure cardio-pulmonary resuscitation was provided according to standards of practice to Resident #1 who had become unresponsive and failed to assess a resident when they became unresponsive. On [DATE] 6:45 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On [DATE] at 6:50 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy situation. On [DATE] at 5:00 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal, dated [DATE] at 5:00 p.m., read in part, .LPN #1 was terminated following results of investigation on [DATE] . The DON or designee educating all licensed nurses on the facility's policy and procedure for initiating CPR and location of code status for each resident . RN shift supervisor given responsibility to direct/assign staff roles during code/initiation of code .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 04/01/23, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents who had fallen had interventions put in place to prevent the recurrence of falls. Failed to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and modify the care plan with each fall. Failed to conduct a root cause analysis and/or evaluate the cause for each fall. The facility did not have a fall prevention program, nor have the staff received education regarding falls and fall prevention in the last 12 months. On 04/01/23 at 12:05 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 04/01/23 at 12:17 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 04/01/23 at 2:56 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal, dated 04/03/23 at 2:29 p.m., read in part, 1. All residents that are in the facility will be audited and those that have not had a fall assessment completed within the last 14 days will have one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-04-04 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 03/30/23, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide mental health treatment and services for Res #23 who had a serious mental illness, suicidal ideation, and threats to self-harm. On 03/30/23 at 2:00 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 03/30/23 at 2:17 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 03/30/23 at 6:40 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The facility's plan of removal, dated 03/30/23 at 6:40 p.m., read in part, 1. All residents that are in the facility will have a Trauma Informed Assessment completed within 24 hours. New admissions will have a Trauma Informed Assessment completed within 24 hours of admission. Residents that are identified through the assessment as needing immediate treatment/services will be referred for treatment. 2. All residents with PSTD or suicidal ideation that are in the facility shall receive an adequate comprehensive care plan to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the use of a gait belt as a physical restraint for one (#1) of four sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. A Resident List Report, dated 01/23/24, documented 31 residents were residing at the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and generalized muscle weakness. A facility video recording of the interior of the building, dated 11/02/23, shows at 8:22 a.m. LPN #1 walking behind Resident #1 who was hunched over a walker. LPN #1 was holding a gait belt that was secured around the lower chest of Resident #1. LPN #1's grip on the belt was between the shoulder blades of the resident. At 8:23 a.m., the recording shows the two inside the dining room. LPN #1 continued to walk behind Resident #1 holding the gait belt secured to the resident. A progress note, dated 11/02/23 at 10:25 a.m., written by LPN #1 documented Resident #1 declined to leave their room to go to the dining room for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable for 1 of 2 meals sampled for taste, temperature, and timeliness in being served. The administrator identified 38 residents ate from the kitchen. Findings: On 05/28/26 at 12:57 p.m., the lunch meal provided to the residents, was tasted by the surveyor. The lasagna was observed to have looked like meat with pea size white substances throughout and white yellow cheese across the top. The lasagna had a bad after taste which prevented a second bite. Mixed vegetables were unseasoned and bland, and the garlic bread was a plain piece of white sandwich bread cut diagonally. The kitchen did not have enough lime bars to provide for the surveyor to taste. The menu showed the 05/28/26 lunch meal was to be Italian style lasagna, California vegetable blend, garlic bread, and lime bars. A Food Palatability, Presentation, and Temperature Standards policy, dated 05/29/26, read in part, It is the policy of this organization that all food items prepared and served to residents shall be of the highest culinary quality.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored correctly in the kitchen's refrigerator and freezer and labeled with the preparation and use-by date for 2 of 2 observations.The administrator identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen.Findings: On 05/28/26 at 12:46 p.m., the following foods were observed in the refrigerator of the kitchen, and then identified by the dietary aide:a. thawed chicken thighs sitting in clear liquid inside an unsecured bag inside of a plastic bin at the bottom of the refrigerator. The date on the bin showed 05/28/26,b. four cracked eggs sitting inside undated cartons in the refrigerator, andc. partially used turkey lunch meat with no label or date in the refrigerator.On 05/28/26 at 12:49 p.m., the following foods were observed in the freezer of the kitchen, and then identified by the dietary aide:a. chicken fajita meat in a twisted closed bag in the freezer with no label or date,b. chicken strips in a twisted closed bag in the freezer with no label or date,c. hamburger patties in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received pain medication in a timely manner for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pain management. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A quarterly assessment, dated 03/09/26, showed Resident #2 had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and had pain frequently. The assessment showed Resident #2's pain had been rated at a 10/10 within the previous 5 days. The assessment showed Resident #2's cognition was intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15. An admission summary note, dated 4/26/26 at 2:37 p.m., showed Resident #2 had returned from the hospital at 12:45 p.m. via stretcher and new orders were put into the computer. A physician's order, dated 04/26/26, showed oxycodone (opioid pain medication) 10-325 milligrams one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate pain. A health status note, dated 04/30/26 at 8:20 p.m., showed the ADON was notified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 05/28/26 at 1:06 p.m., a clear plastic bag containing multiple different medications waiting for destruction, was observed sitting on the floor of the ADON's office. The ADON's office door was observed to be wide open, and no staff were inside or around the open office door. A Safe Medication Storage, Security, and Temperature Controls policy, dated 05/29/26, read in part, It is the policy of this facility that all medications and biologicals shall be securely maintained under lock and key, stored under strict environmental conditions, and properly labeled at all times. Access to medication storage areas- including regional medication rooms, localized mobile medication carts, and automated dispensing appliances- is restricted exclusively to licensed nursing staff, practitioners, and the Consultant Pharmacist.On 05/28/26 at 1:14 p.m. the ADON stated if the medications are not controlled, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. prepared food items were labeled with the preparation and use-by dates; b. fresh food items were discarded when wilted and soft to the touch; c. food items were discarded after manufacturer expiration dates; and d. temperature logs were completed for 1 of 2 community refrigerators. The administrator identified 41 residents received meals from the kitchen.Findings:On 01/06/26 at 8:45 a.m., the following observations were made in the refrigerator in the kitchen:a. five serving containers with lids were without labels, preparation, or use-by dates and contained a white pudding type substance,b. two prepared turkey lunchmeat sandwiches, in plastic wrap, were without labels, preparation, or use-by dates,c. an opened one-gallon container of classic Caesar prepared dressing had a manufacturer use-by date of 08/24/25,d. a plastic container with six zucchini squash were wilted and soft to the touch, and e. six heads of iceberg lettuce were wilted, soft to the touch, and discolored. On 01/06/26 at 9:30 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's annual MDS assessment accurately documented the resident's fall history for 1 (#36) of 16 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed.The DON identified 41 residents received MDS assessments.Findings:A facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion, dated August 2024, read in part, According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the RAI specified by the state.A progress note, dated 07/30/25 at 3:45 a.m., showed Resident #36 reported they had rolled out of bed onto the floor. The note showed the resident had reported left shoulder pain and right knee pain. The note showed that the resident's right knee appeared slightly larger than the left.A care plan, dated 07/30/25, showed Resident #36 had a fall on 07/30/25. A corresponding intervention in the care plan showed the resident would use a fall mat next to their bed and was educated not to sleep on the edge of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during wound care for 1 (#2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wound care.The DON identified 15 residents received wound care.Findings:On 01/08/26 at 12:27 p.m., Resident #2 was observed to receive wound care from RN #1. RN #1 was observed lowering themselves to the floor, onto their knees, then placed both gloved hands, onto the tiled floor. RN #1 was observed to touch Resident #2's bare skin and place a gauze dressing to the resident's left shin. RN #1 was observed to leave the room, while wearing their gown, to apply hand sanitizer from a container outside the room. RN #1 was observed to don gloves halfway onto their hands, reach into their pocket, retrieve a pen, then obtained gauze soaked in Dakin's solution, and placed it onto a wound on the resident's right heel. RN #1 was observed to put on the gloves the rest of the way and wrote the date on a dressing. RN #1 took an iodoform gauze soaked in Dakin's solution, placed it into a wound on the right heel, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications for two (#5 and #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The CMS form 802 documented 27 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Resident #5 Resident #5 had diagnoses including depressive episodes and hip pain. A quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident received an antidepressant medication and an antianxiety medication. A physician's order, dated 04/19/24, documented Resident #5 received 10 mg of buspirone (an antianxiety medication) twice a day. A review of Resident #5's health record did not document side-effect monitoring was in place for antianxiety medication. 2. Resident #19 Resident #19 had diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A physician order, dated 03/14/24, documented Resident # 19 had a PRN order for lorazepam (a psychotropic medication). On 05/15/24 at 09:24 am, RN #1 stated residents receiving antianxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The DON identified 37 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: An undated policy titled Food Safety Requirements, read in part, .Food will also be stored, prepared and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety .Monitoring food temperatures and functioning of the refrigeration equipment daily .Labeling , dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including, but not limited to leftovers, so it is used by its use-by date .foods shall be prepared as directed until recommended temperatures for the specific foods are reached .Staff shall follow procedures for dishwashing . On 05/13/24 at 8:30 am, a review of the refrigerator and freezer temperature log for May did not document any temperatures had been recorded since 05/06/24. On 05/13/24 at 8:32 am, a reach in cooler was observed to contain open packages of sliced ham, shredded cheese, and chicken noodle soup, none of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to enter required information on a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Notice of Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) form prior to having a resident sign the document for one (#20) of three sampled resident reviewed for beneficiary notification. A facility daily census report documented 37 resident resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 05/03/24. A review of the residents records found a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Notice of Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) form had been signed by Resident #20 on 05/01/24. The document stated the resident may be charged for services out of pocket starting on 05/03/24. The area of the document where the services to be charged were to be listed along with the reason Medicare may not pay and the estimated cost of those services were blank. The area on the form where the resident checks one of three boxes to declare of they want to continue or discontinue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 16 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed for their ability to safely use bed rails and the resident or their representative gave informed consent in writing prior to the use of bed rails for one (#7) of one resident reviewed for bed rail use. A facility daily census report documented 37 resident resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Proper Use of Bed Rails policy, dated 2023, documented a resident must be assessed for safe use of bed rails and informed consent must be obtained from the resident or their representative prior to use of bed rails. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/11/24, documented the resident required substantial assistance to reposition themselves in bed. The assessment documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #20's medical record did not find documentation of the resident being assessed for or giving informed consent to use bed rails. No documentation of the resident having any accidents related to the bed rails was found. On 05/13/24 at 10:03 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control protocols were followed during wound care for one (#5) of two residents reviewed for wounds. The DON identified 8 residents in the facility with wounds. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Hand Hygiene read in part, .All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors . The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and immediately after removing gloves . Resident #5 had diagnoses which included MRSA and stage 3 pressure ulcers to the left and right heel. On 05/14/24 at 10:14 am, LPN #1 was observed changing the wound dressings on Resident #5's heels. LPN #1 was observed three times removing soiled gloves and putting on clean gloves without performing hand hygiene. On 05/14/24 at 10:23 am, LPN #1 was observed to remove the existing wound dressings from Resident #5's heels and then to support the residents uncovered left heel directly on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect residents from potential abuse by delaying an investigation of possible abuse for one (#1) of four residents reviewed for abuse. A Resident List Report, dated [DATE], documented 31 residents were residing at the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure, revised date [DATE], read in part .An immediate investigation into the alleged incidence, during the shift if [sic] occurred on .The facility will take all steps necessary to ensure that further potential abuse will not occur while the investigation is in progress . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and generalized muscle weakness. A facility video recording of the interior of the building, dated [DATE], recorded LPN #1 walking Resident #1 to from their assigned room to the dining room by use of a gait belt. The video recorded the resident falling repeatedly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify a resident's family of a significant weight loss for one (#5) of three sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. A Resident List Report, dated 01/23/24, documented 31 residents residing at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Notification of Changes, dated 10/2023, read in part, .The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and / or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such a notification .2. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition such as deterioration in health . A monthly weight report, dated April 2023 through March 2024, documented Resident #5 weight 124.8 pounds in January 2024. It further documented the resident's weight declined to 97.0 pounds in February 2024 which was a 22.28% decline in total body weight in one month. On 03/26/24 at 1:20 p.m., a family member of Resident #5 stated the facility had failed to inform them of the resident's weight loss. They stated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct skin and wound assessments and as ordered by a physician for one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for wound care. A Resident List Report, dated 01/23/24, documented 31 residents residing at the facility. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcers and quadriplegia. A physician order, dated 01/22/24, documented starting on 01/23/24 a skin assessment was to be performed on Resident #6 daily and documented in the resident's electronic medical record. A physician order, dated 01/22/24, documented wound assessments were to be conducted weekly on Thursday and documented in the resident's electronic medical record starting on 01/25/24. A review of Resident #6's electronic medical record from the dates of 01/23/24 through 03/26/24 found daily skin assessments were not documented in the resident's electronic medical record on 03/16/24, 02/28/24, 02/17/24, 02/12/24, 02/11/24, 02/10/24, and 02/04/24. The medical record was reviewed from 01/25/24 through 03/26/24 for weekly wound assessments on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for for three (# 23, 36, and #91) of three residents whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented a census of 39 residents. Findings: Res #23 was admitted with diagnoses which include [NAME] depressive disorder, anxiety and PTSD The PASRR Resident Review, dated 05/18/22, documented the following recommendations in parts, .1. Psychiatric care, please ensure proper DSM-5 diagnoses and accordingly a standard of care treatment plan that factors in evidence-based knowledge and avoids polypharmacology (which is no more than four psychotropic medications) and avoids bensodiazepines. 2. Primary Care. Please avoid opioids and sedatives at all cost if possible. But especially in those with substance use disorders, who are elderly, who are on other controlled substances, and/or who have pulmonary disorder. 3. If not already done, then please…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for residents with falls, for two (#18 and #91) of two residents reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented a census of 39 residents. Findings: Res #18 was admitted with diagnoses which included history of falling and muscle weakness. A review of medical records showed Res #18 had eight falls on the following dates: 09/25/22, 10/28/22, 11/11/22, 11/18/22, 12/02/22, 01/18/23, 02/15/23, and 03/25/23. An internal incident report, dated 02/15/23, read in parts, .(Res #18) was on the floor .complained of pain in left hip and when (Res #18) tried to move it he screamed out in pain . An incident report form submitted to OSDH, dated 02/15/23, read in parts, (hospital name withheld) admitted resident with a broken hip . A care plan, dated 11/07/22, was not updated with each fall to include fall interventions. Res #91 was admitted with diagnoses which included abnormalities of gait and mobility and muscle weakness. A review of medical records showed Res #91 had 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were written for an indwelling urinary catheter and oxygen therapy for two (#91 and #94) of two residents whose physician's orders were reviewed. The Administrator identified one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter and four residents on oxygen therapy. Findings: Res #91 was re-admitted from acute care on 02/27/23 with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnoses which included right femur fracture. A re-admission assessment, dated 02/27/23, read in parts, .Catheter 16 FR (size of catheter) 10cc (size of catheter bulb) . A nursing note, dated 03/01/23 at 10:24 a.m., read in parts, .catheter in place draining yellow urine to gravity . A nursing note, dated 03/23/23 at 10:25 a.m., read in parts, .catheter patent draining yellow urine to gravity . There were no physician's orders for care of the indwelling urinary catheter. On 03/27/23 at 10:30 a.m., observed Res #91 with indwelling urinary catheter in place. On 03/28/23 at 11:05 a.m., observed Res #91 with indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were trained and had demonstrated competencies: a. to care for one (#23) of one residents reviewed for serious mental illness, and b. to assess and monitor one (#32) of one residents reviewed for pressure ulcers The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 03//23 documented and four residents with pressure ulcers. Findings: a. Res #23 was admitted with diagnoses which included PTSD, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. A PASSR, dated 05/18/22, documented in parts, . Staff should be familiar with this individual's behaviors, should monitor behaviors, and provide social support for this individual's unique need secondary to mental illness . A Facility Assessment, dated , documented in parts, .Cognitive - Care Requirements: .The need for assistance with behavioral needs has become very evident. Our staff need additional training to help meet the need of our residents to help facilitate redirection . On 03/30/23 at 9:52 a.m., LPN #1 reported they had received no formal in-services or training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for three (#23, 32 and #94) of three residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 03/27/23, documented a census of 39. Findings: Res #23 was admitted with diagnoses which included PTSD, major depressive disorders, and anxiety. A letter from the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, dated 05/23/22, read in parts, .it was necessary for you to receive a resident review Level II assessment to determine your level of mental illness .Client experiences a serious mental illness as defined by CMS . An annual assessment, dated 06/17/22, read in parts, .Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness .No . On 04/01/23 at 9:30 a.m., the DON reported the facility had a new MDS Coordinator and the previous MDS Coordinator should have documented Res #23 had a serious mental illness on the resident assessment. Res #32 was admitted with diagnoses which included diabetes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include a PASRR II evaluation in the comprehensive resident assessment and incorporate the recommendations into the resident's care plan for one (#23) of one resident whose Level II PASRR was reviewed. The administrator identified one resident who received a Level II PASRR review. Findings: A letter from the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, dated 05/23/22, read in parts, .it was necessary for you to receive a resident review Level II assessment to determine your level of mental illness .Client experiences a serious mental illness as defined by CMS . The PASRR Resident Review, dated 05/18/22, documented the following recommendations in parts, .1. Psychiatric care, please ensure proper . diagnoses and accordingly a standard of care treatment plan that factors in evidence-based knowledge and avoids polypharmacology (which is no more than four psychotropic medications) and avoids benzodiazepines. 2. Primary Care. Please avoid opioids and sedatives at all cost if possible. But especially in those with substance use disorders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed to include care of residents with oxygen therapy, for one (#94 ) of one residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 03/27/23, documented a census of 39 residents. Findings: Res #94 was admitted with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. An admission assessment, dated 03/20/23, documented Res #94 had shortness of breath when lying, sitting, and with exertion. The assessment did not contain documentation for Res #94's oxygen therapy. A care plan, dated 03/22/23, did not contain documentation for oxygen therapy. On 03/27/23 at 10:00 a.m., Res #94 was observed with oxygen per nasal cannula at two liters per minute. On 03/28/23 at 8:39 a.m., Res #94 was observed with oxygen per nasal cannula at two liters per minute. On 03/29/23 at 11:00 a.m., Res #94 was observed with oxygen per nasal cannula at two liters per minute. On 03/29/23 at 2:57 p.m., the DON reviewed the resident's medical record and reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate weekly skin assessments were completed for one (#32) of one residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 03/27/23, documented four residents with pressure ulcers. Findings: Res #32 was admitted with diagnoses which included quadriplegia and a stage four pressure ulcer. A physician's order, dated 10/14/22, documented in parts, .Weekly Skin Assessment every night shift every Fri for Assessment Complete Assessment . Weekly Skin Assessments were reviewed from 11/01/22 to 03/30/23. From 11/01/22 to 01/01/23, assessments were completed on 11/13/22 and 12/12/22. From 01/01/23 to 03/30/23, assessments were completed on 01/14/23, 01/27/23, 02/03/23, 02/24/23, 02/27/23, and 03/18/23. Weekly Skin Assessments were not completed for Res #32 for ten out of the 22 weeks reviewed. Wound-Weekly Observation Tools were reviewed from 02/01/23 to 03/30/23, assessments were completed on 02/23/23, 02/24/23 and 03/25/23. Wound-Weekly Observation Tools were not completed for Res #32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess a resident for continued need for an indwelling urinary catheter for one (#91) of one resident reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter. The Administrator reported there was one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings: Res #91 was admitted to the facility from acute care on 02/27/23 with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnoses which included right femur fracture. A re-admission assessment, dated 02/27/23, read in parts, .Catheter 16 FR (size of catheter) 10cc (size of catheter bulb) . A nursing note, dated 03/01/23 at 10:24 a.m., read in parts, .catheter in place draining yellow urine to gravity . A nursing note, dated 03/23/23 at 10:25 a.m., read in parts, . catheter patient draining yellow urine to gravity at bedside . There was no documentation Res #91 was assessed for the continued need for the indwelling urinary catheter. On 03/27/23 at 10:30 a.m., observed Res #91 with indwelling urinary catheter in place. On 03/28/23 at 11:05 a.m., observed Res #91 with indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (#94) of four residents reviewed for oxygen therapy had the tubing and humidifier canister labeled with the date of change. The Administrator reported four residents had oxygen therapy. Findings: Res #94 was admitted with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. An admission assessment, dated 03/20/23, documented Res #94 had shortness of breath when lying, sitting, and with exertion. A physician's order for oxygen therapy and the facility's policy for oxygen therapy were requested and not provided. On 03/27/23 at 10:00 a.m., Res #94 was observed with oxygen per nasal cannula at two liters per minute, neither the tubing nor the humidifier canister were labeled with the change date. On 03/28/23 at 8:39 a.m., Res #94 was observed with oxygen per nasal cannula at two liters per minute, neither the tubing nor the humidifier canister were labeled with the change date. On 03/29/23 at 11:00 a.m., Res #94 was observed with oxygen per nasal cannula at two liters per minute, neither the tubing nor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for three (#26, 28, and # 96) of three residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 03/27/23, documented a census of 39. Findings: An Unavailable Medications policy, revised on 02/24/23, documented in parts, .The facility shall follow established procedures for ensuring residents have a sufficient supply of medications . Res #26 was admitted with diagnoses which included herpes viral infection, diabetes, and idiopathic neuropathy. A physician's order, dated 02/21/23, documented in part, Famiciclovir Oral Tablet 500 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day related to Herpes Viral Infection . A physician's order, dated 03/03/23, documented in part, Voltaren External Gel 1 % Apply to Shoulders and Left Hip topically four times a day for Pain. A physician's order, dated 03/23/23, documented, Soliqua Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100-33 UNT-MCG/ML (Insulin Glargine-Lixisenatide) Inject 20 unit subcutaneously one time a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$18,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $18,113 — penalty dated 2024-03-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SELECTIS HEALTH INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/01/2020
BALLER, LANCEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
DAY, SARAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/26/2021
DESMOND, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
ECKHART, KRYSTALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
SELECTIS MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2020
BISHOP, RACHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2025
BRYAN, VINCENTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
BRYANT, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2022
CARROW, JERIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2024
GRIFFIN, BARBARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/31/2024
HAHNER, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2023
SMALL, NOVETTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2024
TROST, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2022
WHITEEAGLE, KASSIDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
FURSTENBERG, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/24/2025
NEUMAN, CLIFFORDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+34.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$480K
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 6%Other / private 14%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $480K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$153per resident / day
operating cost
$4,651per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$233per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375579. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next