No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sequoyah East Nursing Center, LLC

701 South Taylor Road, Roland, OK 74954 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (918) 427-7401 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (918) 427-7401 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$115,864 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $115,864 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-07)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
205 E Ray Fine Blvd · (918) 503-6235 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
303 E Ray Fine Blvd · (918) 427-0400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
100 E Ray Fine Blvd · (918) 427-5322 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.0%13.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.7%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection11.2%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.3%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.6%13.7%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.2%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.2%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.4%17.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.3%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine25.9%74.1%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.722.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days8.392.961.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.0–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified65.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 47.5 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent falls for two (#1 and #5) of seven sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A facility resident roster, dated [DATE], documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy, revised date [DATE], read in part, .Based on previous information and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling .If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions, or indicate why the current approach remains relevant .If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various interventions, based on assessment of the nature of the category of falling, until falling is reduced or stopped, or until the reason for the continuation of falling is identified as unavoidable . 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically assaulted by another resident with a history of assaulting others for 1 (#1) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The ADON reported 46 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy, dated August 2006, read in part, Our facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, and any other individual. 1. A progress note in Res #2's medical record, dated 01/24/25 at 9:34 a.m., showed Res #2 had hit a nurse during a conversation. A progress note in Res #2's medical record, dated 03/03/25 at 9:01 a.m., showed Res #2 had hit and scratched a certified occupation therapy assistant during therapy. A progress note in Res #2's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a resident-to-resident physical assault for 1 (#1) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The ADON reported 46 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse Investigations, dated April 2014, read in part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, injuries of unknown source shall be thoroughly and promptly investigated by facility management. 1. A progress note in Res #1's medical record, dated 06/22/25 at 8:00 a.m., showed another resident had kicked Res #1 in their leg while in the dining area. 2. A progress note in Res #2's medical record, dated 06/22/25 at 8:00 a.m., showed Res #2 had kicked Res #1 in the lower left leg while they were in the dining area. The facility investigative material was reviewed. The material did not contain documentation of residents having been interviewed to determine if other residents other than Res #1 had been harmed by Res #2. On 07/02/25 at 1:25 p.m., the DON was asked to describe the investigation they had conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required PBJ staffing data was submitted to CMS within the mandated timeframe. The administrator stated there were 51 residents residing at the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 10/01/24 through 12/31/24 (Fiscal year Quarter 1 2025), showed the facility had not provided staffing data to CMS for the PBJ staffing data report for that quarter. On 04/14/25 at 3:18 p.m., the administrator stated the staffing data was not submitted for that quarter because the task was just overlooked. They stated it was now their job to submit the data at this time and in the future. On 04/15/25 at 2:01 p.m., corporate nurse consultant #1 stated they did not have a policy or procedure for submitting the PBJ data. The stated the administrator was sent a form this morning (04/15/25) from CMS about the issue and the administrator had signed the document. They stated the administrator would now be responsible for PBJ data being sent in to CMS on a timely basis.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained when residents were assisted with meals for 3 (#31, 28, and #23) of 8 residents observed during dining. The MDS coordinator identified six residents who were dependent on staff for eating. Findings: On 04/14/25 at 12:27 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to stand while assisting Resident #31, Resident #28, and Resident #23 with the noon meal. On 04/16/25 at 12:44 p.m., CNA #3 was observed to stand while assisting Resident #31, Resident #28, and Resident #23 with the noon meal. The policy titled, Assistance with Meals, dated March 2022, read in parts, Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity, for example: a. not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/08/25, showed Resident #31 had a diagnosis of dementia, was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making through a staff assessment of mental status, and required substantial/maximum assistance from staff for eating. A quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a written notice of transfer prior to being transferred to an acute care hospital for 1 (#40) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for discharges. The DON stated 49 residents had transferred to a hospital from [DATE] through 04/14/25. Findings: A facility policy titled Discharging the Resident, dated December 2016, read in part, If the resident is being discharged to a hospital or another facility, ensure that a transfer summary is completed, and a telephone report is called to the receiving facility. A progress note, dated 06/20/24 at 3:30 p.m., showed Resident #40 was transferred to an emergency room related to shortness of breath. A progress note, dated 02/11/25 at 3:07 p.m., showed Resident #40 was transferred to a hospital related to abnormal vital signs. On 04/15/25 at 1:31 p.m., LPN #1 stated when they had sent Resident #40 to a hospital they had sent the resident's face sheet and physician orders with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately coded for 1 (#26) of 17 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. Findings: The DON identified 51 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A review of the Resident Census form in the electronic clinical record, dated 08/22/22 through 02/17/25, showed Resident #26 had discharged from the facility-return anticipated on 02/05/25 and was readmitted on [DATE]. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/12/25, showed a completion date of 02/13/25. A 5-day assessment, dated 02/24/25, showed Resident #26 had a BIMS score of 00, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognition, and had received an antipsychotic medication. A medication administration record, dated February 2025, did not show Resident #26 had received an antipsychotic medication. On 04/16/25 at 9:01 a.m., the MDS coordinator reviewed the assessment dated [DATE] and the electronic clinical record and stated they had inaccurately coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for 2 (#22 and #45) of 9 sampled residents whose baseline care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 51 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated March 2022, read in part, A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight [48] hours of admission. 1. An undated face sheet showed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. An admission assessment, dated 11/05/24, showed Resident #22 had a BIMS score of 08, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making. A review of the electronic clinical record and the baseline care plan binder, provided by corporate nurse consultant #1, did not show a baseline care plan had been completed for Resident #22. 2. An undated face sheet showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antipsychotic medication had: a. an appropriate diagnosis for 1 (#17); and b. side effect monitoring was in place for 2 (#17 and #22) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON reported 42 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, read in part, Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition .Residents receiving psychotropic medications are monitored for adverse consequences. 1. Resident #17's physician order, dated 09/10/24, showed an order for olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg three times a day for unspecified dementia. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/15/25, showed Resident #17 had a staff assessment of mental status and was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The assessment also showed Resident #17 received an antidepressant and an antianxiety medication. A treatment administration record, dated 04/2025, did not show Resident #17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who wanted a pneumococcal vaccination received the vaccination for 2 (#3 and #14) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The DON stated 21 residents had been admitted to the facility in the past six months and had been assessed for the need and desire to receive pneumococcal immunizations. Findings: A facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated October 2023, read in part, All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. 1. A Pneumococcal Immunization Informed Consent form, dated 05/28/24, showed Resident #3 had given consent to receive a pneumococcal vaccination. 2. A Pneumococcal Immunization Informed Consent form, dated 03/31/25, showed Resident #14 had given consent to receive a pneumococcal vaccination. On 04/16/25 at 7:34 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the process for collecting immunization consents happened during the admission process. They stated the social services director would facilitate that process and once completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 (#36) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. The DON reported 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy Comprehensive Assessments, read in part, A significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident status that: a. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease related clinical interventions. The decline is not considered 'self-limiting', b. impacts more than one area of the resident's health status; and c. requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. A care plan, initiated on 05/01/23, showed Resident #36 had diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer) and depression. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/14/25, showed Resident #36 had a BIMS score (a test for cognitive functioning) of 11, which was indicative of moderate impairment for daily decision making. A physician's order, dated 02/28/25, showed Resident #36 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice services were included on the care plan for 1 (#36) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospice. The DON reported 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, read in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. A care plan, initiated 05/01/23, showed Resident #36 had diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer) and depression. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/14/25, showed Resident #36 had a BIMS score (a test for cognitive functioning) of 11, which was indicative of moderate impairment for daily decision making. A physician's order, dated 02/28/25, showed Resident #36 was admitted to hospice services for liver cell carcinoma. A care plan, edited 01/01/25, was reviewed and did not include hospice services. On 04/16/25 at 11:17 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess a resident for smoking safety prior to a resident smoking at the facility for 1 (#103) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 10 residents who smoked at the facility. Findings: On 04/14/25 at 1:01 p.m., Resident #103 was observed in their room lying in bed watching television. Two packs of cigarettes were observed on the resident's bedside table. On 04/15/25 at 2:39 p.m., Resident #103 was observed smoking in an indoor smoking room while supervised by a staff member. A facility policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents, dated October 2023, read in part, Resident smoking status is evaluated upon admission. If a smoker, the evaluation includes: a. current level of smoking consumption; b. method of tobacco consumption (traditional cigarettes; electronic cigarettes; pipe, etc. [further/similar things]); c. desire to quit smoking; and d. ability to smoke safely with or without supervision (per a completed Safe Smoking Evaluation). A facility document titled Sequoyah East…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facilty failed to ensure a resident with bed rails was assessed for the use of the bed rail for 1 (#45) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for bed rails. Corporate Nurse Consultant #1 identified eight residents who utilized bed rails in the facility. Findings: On 04/14/25 at 2:12 p.m., an enabler/assist bed rail was observed on the left side of Resident #45's bed. Resident #45 was observed to pace in the in the hallway. On 04/15/25 at 7:49 a.m., Resident #45 was observed in bed with an enabler/assist bed rail, on the left side of the bed, in the up position. On 04/15/25 at 11:45 a.m., Resident #45 was observed in bed with an enabler/assist bed rail, on the left side of the bed, in the up position. A policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated August 2022, read in part, Prior to the installation or use of a side or bed rail, alternatives to the use of side or bed rails are attempted.If attempted alternatives do not adequately meet the resident's needs the resident may be evaluated for the use of bed rails. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urine sample was successfully cultured prior to the use of an antibiotic medication for a suspected urinary tract infection for 1 (#40) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The IP reported there were six residents prescribed antibiotics at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Surveillance for Infections, dated September 2017, read in part, When infection or colonization with epidemiologically important organisms is suspected, cultures may be sent, if appropriate, to a contracted laboratory for identification or confirmation. Cultures will be further screened for sensitivity to antimicrobial medications to help determine treatment measures. A facility document titled Individual Resident Infection Report, dated 04/07/25, showed Resident #40 had hematuria (blood in the urine), the resident had a possible UTI, the resident had not had a urine culture done, and showed the medication order for Bactrim DS (an antibiotic medication) twice daily for 10 days. A physician's medication order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were safeguarded against unauthorized use. The administrator stated 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility document titled Notice of Privacy Practice's Acknowledgement documented newly hired staff members signed they had received a copy of Sequoyah Manor's Notice of Privacy Practices. A facility document titled HIPPA Residents Rights Implementation read in parts, .Sequoyah Manor will take reasonable steps to limit the use or disclosure of and requests for protected health information to the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose . 1. A list of terminated employees documented LPN #1 had left the employment of the facility on 03/01/24. A PHI audit log documented LPN #1 had accessed 11 different areas in the EHR charting system including five areas of Res #5's documentation. On 04/10/24 at 3:30 p.m., the administrator stated this employee's last date to work was 02/27/24. The administrator stated they had been told by other employees LPN #1 was in an office and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement facility policy and procedures to ensure that applicants employment history and references were checked; and ensure that applicants registry checks were completed prior to employment. The administrator reported the census was 45. Findings: A facility policy titled Background Check Policy, read in part, The background checks of new employees will be completed prior to the first day of assigned work. The background check results will be documented in the employee file and kept confidential .Following the application, interview, and decision to hire, an offer of employment will be made pending a background check consisting of at least the following: prior employment verification, reference check, license verification and criminal background check . If all background checks meet the facility standards, the applicant will be offered the position . On 03/04/24 at 10:23 a.m., the buisiness office manager stated that they were responsible for checking applicants employment history and references. They also stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse to their administrator within the timeframe indicated in state regulations for four (#1, 2, 3, and #7) seven sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A facility resident roster, dated 02/29/24, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility abuse reporting and investigation policy, dated September 2022, read in part, .If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of an unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law . immediately is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury . 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, and heart failure. An annual assessment, dated 12/21/23, documented the resident's cognition was intact. An incident report, incident date 02/08/24, documented an allegation of abuse which involved Resident #1 and CNA #2. It further documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to revise resident care plans related to falls for three (#1, 5, and #6) of seven sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. A facility resident roster, dated [DATE], documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Goals and Objectives, Care Plan policy, dated [DATE], read in part, .Goals and Objectives are reviewed and/or revised: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident condition; b. when the desired outcome has not been reached; c. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital /rehabilitation stay; and d. at least quarterly . 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, and heart failure. A facility face sheet documented Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. A review of Resident #1's progress notes from [DATE] through [DATE] found the resident had eight falls during that period. Three of the falls resulted in injury. On [DATE] the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure showers were given as ordered for two (#5 and #6) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The administrator reported the census was 45. Findings: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included hypertension and emphysema. A Medicare 5-day assessment, dated 11/15/23, documented the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and required moderate assistance with ADL's. A point of care history sheet, dated February 2024, documented the resident had received two showers and refused two showers during the month of February 2024. 2. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included mild intellectual disabilities and anxiety. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/10/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and required partial assistance from staff. A point of care history sheet, Dated February 2024, documented Resident #6 had received two showers and refused three showers during the month of February 2024. On 03/05/24 at 8:50 a.m., CNA #8 was asked to review the February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a certified nurse aide did not use their bare hands while providing personal care to residents for two (#2 and #3) of seven sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A resident roster, dated 02/29/24, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Standard Precautions, dated September 2022, read in part, .Standard precautions apply to the care of all residents in all situations regardless of suspected or confirmed presence of infectious disease . 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia and cerebrovascular disease. A quarterly assessment, dated 12/16/23, documented Resident #2's cognition was severely impaired. 2. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A quarterly assessment, dated 12/08/23, documented Resident #3's cognition was severely impaired. A handwritten statement by CNA #6, dated 02/17/24, documented CNA #1 had been observed putting their bare hand down the brief of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified of transfer for one (#6) of 1 resident who was reviewed for notification of change. The administrator reported the census was 45. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included mild intellectual disabilities and a fractured left femur. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/10/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and required moderate assistance from staff. A nurse noted dated 03/01/24 at 4:10 p.m., documented the resident had been transferred to another facility for therapy. A review of the resident's record did not document the resident's representative had been notified of the transfer. On 03/05/24 at 11:00 a.m., the administrator stated they did not notify the resident's representative because they thought the facility the resident transferred to had contacted them. On 03/07/24 at 10:00 a.m., the administrator stated that when a resident transfers the resident's representative should be notified, and it should be documented in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a certified nurse aide from mentally abusing one (#7) of seven sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A facility resident roster, dated 02/29/24, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility abuse reporting and investigation policy, dated September 2022, read in part, .Abuse is defined . the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment, with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish . Resident #7 had diagnoses which included dementia and psychosis. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/07/24, documented Resident #4's cognition was moderately impaired. A progress note, dated 02/04/24 at 1:01 p.m., documented Resident #7 had made the statement, The Indians are after me and they are going to kill my children. It further documented the staff changed the television channel away from a channel that showed old movies. A progress note, dated 02/04/24 at 5:22 p.m., documented Resident #7 again made statements about Indians eating children as well as the regret…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a licensed nurse from allowing a staff member to work outside their scope of practice by attempting a blood draw for one (#2) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. A facility resident roster, dated 02/29/24, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy and procedure, titled Obtaining Blood Specimens from a Direct Venipuncture, revised date March 2022, read in part, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe and aseptic sampling of the resident's blood via direct venipuncture . Resident #2 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia and cerebrovascular disease. On 02/29/24 at 11:06 a.m., the ADON stated they had observed the SSD attempt to collect a blood sample from Resident #2. They stated the SSD did use a phlebotomy set to attempt the blood draw in one arm of the resident and check the other arm for a good site. They stated they told the SSD not to try again as the resident would require hydration. They stated they did not give the SSD directions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a facility assessment was updated annually. The administrator identified 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/04/23 at 10:39 a.m., an entrance conference was conducted with the administrator. They were made aware a facility assessment was required to be provided within four hours of entrance. There was no documentation a facility assessment had been updated annually. On 12/05/23 at 1:53 p.m., the administrator stated they did not have a facility assessment.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8. Res #27 had diagnoses which included COPD, GERD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified viral hepatitis C, pain, depression, and anxiety. The EHR documented a quarterly resident assessment was due on 11/06/23 and the status of the assessment was late. On 12/06/23 at 12:47 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was asked when the last quarterly resident assessment was completed for the resident. They reviewed the EHR and stated a quarterly assessment was due on 11/06/23. They stated it was not completed. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed every three months using the quarterly review instrument for eight (#2, 18, 25, 26, 27, 35, 40, #42) of 15 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User ' s Manual Version 1.18.11 October 2023 documented in part .RAI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physicians orders were followed for administering 02 for two (#5 and #15) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The administrator identified nine residents who received O2. Findings: 1. Res #5 had diagnoses which included congested heart failure. A physician order, dated 03/17/23, documented O2 via nasal cannula at 2 LPM to maintain O2 saturation above 89 percent twice a day PRN. On 12/04/23 at 1:00 p.m., the resident was observed with O2, but the prongs of the nasal cannula were not in their nostrils. The O2 setting on the concentrator was 4 1/2 to 5 LPM. On 12/05/23 at 11:55 a.m., the resident was observed with O2 in place. The O2 setting on the concentrator was 3 LPM. 2. Res #15 had diagnoses which included COPD. A physician order, dated 01/03/23, documented O2 at 2 LPM via nasal cannula to keep O2 saturation above 89 percent. On 12/04/23 at 12:39 p.m., the resident was observed with O2 in place. The O2 setting on the concentrator was 3 LPM. On 12/05/23 at 11:23 a.m., the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. PRN psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days for two (#15 and #39), b. side effect monitoring was conducted for the use of psychotropic medications for one (#27), and c. unnecessary psychotropic medications were not administered for one (#27) of six sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 39 residents who had orders for routine psychotpice medications and seven residents who had orders for PRN psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Res #15 had diagnoses which included anxiety. A physician order, dated 11/04/23, documented lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 2 mg/ml. Give 0.25 ml by mouth every four hours PRN. There was no documentation the medication was limited to 14 days or a rationale to extend the medication. The November and December 2023 MARs were reviewed. It was documented lorazepam was administered one out of one opportunity beyond the 14 day limit. 2. Res #39 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia with agitation. A physician order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated medications were stored in a manner to maintain the integrity of the medications and failed to dispose of expired medications. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. The administrator stated all 45 residents received medications. Findings: On 12/07/23 at 12:40 p.m., a tour of the medication room on hall 500 was conducted. A black mini-fridge was observed with a blue plastic storage container in the door of the refrigerator. The container was removed and ice was observed flaking from the bagged medication in the container. Upon lifting one of the medications from the container it was observed the medications were stuck together in approximately 1 inch of ice in the bottom of the container. There was approximately 1/2 inch of water remaining in the container when the ice was lifted. The medications extracted from the ice included 12 separate plastic bags containing bisacodyl suppositories, two of which had standing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0772 — pattern
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were collected as ordered by the physician for one (#27) of five sampled residents reviewed for lab services. The administrator identified 45 resident resided in the facility. Findings: Res #27 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus, neuromuscular dysfunctional bladder, and unspecified viral hepatitis C. A physician order, dated 02/06/23, documented to collect a CBC, CMP, HbA1c, lipid panel, TSH in March, June, September, and December. It documented to collect an urine microalbumin annually in September. There was no documentation a CBC, CMP, HbA1c, lipid panel, and TSH were collected in March and September 2023. There was no documentation an urine microalbumin was collected in September 2023. On 12/06/23 at 12:39 p.m., the DON was asked to provide documentation the above labs were collected. On 12/06/23 at 2:08 p.m., the DON stated the labs were not collected.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish an infection surveillance program and failed to follow infection control practices during medication pass. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, titled, Administering Medications, revised December 2012, read in parts, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .22. Staff shall follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications . 1. On 12/05/23 at 1:20 p.m. the infection control surveillance program documentation was requested. On 12/05/23 at 1:52 p.m., the administrator stated they did not have any documentation infections were being tracked or monitored. They stated they were unsure if an infection surveillance program was established in the facility. On 12/05/23 at 2:02 p.m., the administrator stated there was not an established program in the facility to track infections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 12/05/23 at 1:20 p.m. the antibiotic stewardship program documentation was requested. On 12/05/23 at 1:52 p.m., the administrator stated they did not have any documentation of antibiotic stewardship. They stated they were unsure if an antibiotic stewardship program was established in the facility. On 12/05/23 at 2:02 p.m., the administrator stated there were not established protocols or a system to monitor antibiotic use.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in reach for one (#20) of 16 residents observed for call lights. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, titled, Answering the Call Light, revised October 2010, read in parts, .General Guidelines .5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . Resident #20 had diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, seizures, and pain. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/15/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, was totally dependent on staff for most all ADL's, was incontinent of bladder and bowel, and received anti-anxiety and hypnotic medications. On 12/04/23 at 11:07 a.m., Res #20 was asked where their call light was. They stated they had not seen a call light in a very long time. The resident's call light was observed laying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident assessment was completed for one (#39) of 13 sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for resident assessments. The administrator identified 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with agitation, pain, HTN, and pain. The EHR documented an annual resident assessment was due on 11/07/23 and the status of the assessment was late. On 12/05/23 at 10:01 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was asked when the annual resident assessment was completed for the resident. They reviewed the EHR and stated they missed completing the annual assessment.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment within 14 days after a resident received hospice services for one (#25) of three sampled residents who were receiving hospice services. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included severe dementia with agitation, chronic atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. A significant change in status assessment, dated 01/11/23, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance with most all activities of daily living. A physician order, dated 03/07/23, documented to admit the resident to hospice services. On 12/05/23 at 11:24 a.m., the MDS coordinator was asked if a significant change assessment had been completed within 14 days of the resident being admitted to hospice services. They stated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the state authority of a new mental health diagnoses for one (#25) of two sampled residents reviewed for PASRR's. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A level I PASRR screen, dated 04/06/21, documented Res #25 was screened and a level I was completed. It was documented there were no indicators for a level II PASRR. On 06/21/2022, Res #25 received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. There was no documentation the state authority had been notified of the resident's new diagnoses to see if a level II PASRR was required. On 12/05/23 at 11:24 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated Res #25's level one PASRR documented no serious mental illness. They stated they should have notified the state authority of the new bipolar diagnosis.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure PEG tube feeding containers were properly labeled for one (#20) of one sampled resident observed with PEG tube feedings. The MDS coordinator identified three residents receiving PEG tube feedings. Findings: A facility policy, titled, Enteral Feedings-Safety Precautions policy, revised May 2014, read in parts, .Preventing errors in administration .2. On the formula label document initials, date and time the formula was hung/administered . Resident #20 had diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease, gastrostomy status, abnormal weight loss, dysphagia, and vascular dementia. A physician's order, dated 05/19/23, documented to administer Jevity 1.5 at 50 ml/hr continuous via peg tube with 60 ml/hr continuous water. On 12/04/23 at 11:36 a.m., a container of Jevity 1.5 on a continuous pump running at 50 ml/hr was observed. There was no date, time, or nurse initials on the Jevity container. On 12/06/23 at 9:21 a.m., LPN #2 was asked what the facility policy was when hanging a new Jevity container. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one (#3) of six sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON identified there were no residents who had physician orders to self administer medications. Findings: An Administering Medications policy, revised 12/2012, read in parts, .Medications shall be administered in a safe .manner, and as prescribed .Medications must be administered in accordnace with the orders .Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely . Res #3 had diagnoses which included COPD. A physician order, dated 03/15/23, documented ipratropium albuterol (bronchodilator) solution for nebulization 0.5 mg-3 mg (2.5 mg base)/3 ml one vial four times a day. On 12/05/23 at 3:12 p.m., the resident was observed seated on the side of their bed with a nebulizer mask covering their nose and mouth. Medication was observed being filtered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to pharmacist DRRs for one (#27) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #27 had diagnoses which included overactive bladder. A DRR, dated 06/06/23, documented the pharmacist made a recommendation to reduce ditropan (antimuscarinic medication) from TID to BID. There was no documentation the physician reviewed and responded to the recommendation. A DRR, dated 09/06/23, documented the pharmacist made a recommendation to reduce ditropan from TID to BID. There was no documentation the physician responded to the recommendation. On 12/06/23 at 12:39 p.m., the DON was asked was shown the DRRs for June and September 2023. They were asked to locate documentation the physician had responded to the recommendations. They stated they would not have a response to the June DRR. On 12/06/23 at 2:08 p.m., the DON stated they did not have documentation the physician responded to the DRRs. They stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with three errors. The total medication error rate was 12.0%. A Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 12/05/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #29's physician order, dated 12/04/23, documented to administer florastor 250 mg by mouth twice daily for abnormal weight loss. On 12/06/23 at 8:48 a.m. CMA #1 asked LPN #2 if they were supposed to administer the florastor. LPN #2 stated no because it was the same med as the lactinex. On 12/06/23 at 8:55 a.m., CMA #1 was observed during medication pass to crush and administer enteric coated ferrous sulfate 325 mg tablet and a potassium chloride tablet ER 10 meq. On 12/06/23 at 9:12 a.m., CMA #1 was asked if they administered any medications that should not be crushed according to the standards of practice. They stated the potassium chloride tablet ER. On 12/06/23 at 9:17 a.m. LPN #2 was asked to review the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespread
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that properly trained personnel (certified in CPR for Healthcare Providers) were available immediately 24 hours per day and/or maintained their certification to be able to provide CPR until emergency medical services arrived. The Resident Census and Conditions report, documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, dated [DATE], read in part Personnel have completed on the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and basic life support (BLS), including defibrillation, for victims of sudden cardiac arrest .Preparation for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. 1. Obtain and/or maintain American Red Cross or American Heart Association certification in Basic Life Support (BLS)/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for key clinical staff members who will direct resuscitative efforts, including non-licensed personnel .3. Select and identify a CPR Team for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents code status was documented correctly throughout the residents' clinical records for three (#1, 2, and #3) of nine residents reviewed for code status. The Resident Census and Conditions report, documented 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Advance Directives, dated April 2013, read in part .7. The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive .16. Changes or revocations of a directive must be submitted in writing to the Administrator. The Administrator may require new documents if changes are extensive. The Care Plan Team will be informed of such changes and /or revocations so that appropriate changes can be made in the resident assessment (MDS) and care plan . 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included falls, weight loss, and dementia. A physician order, dated 05/09/23, documented the resident was a full code. A care plan, dated 07/21/23, documented the resident was a full code. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide bathing assistance to residents who were unable to bathe themselves for three (#1, 2, and #3) of six residents sampled for ADL assistance. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction, shortness of breath, and muscle spasms. A point of care bathing records for the months of June, July, and August of 2023 documented 46 baths were not given out of 99 opportunities. A discharge assessment, dated 09/26/23, documented the resident required extensive assistance with most ADLs and did not receive a bath during the assessment period. On 10/03/23 at 2:13 p.m., CNA #2 stated the staffing was low so baths/showers were missed. 2. Res #2 had diagnoses of hypertension, left above knee amputation, right below knee amputation, and muscle spasms. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/06/23, documented the resident was intact in cognition and required assistance with bathing. On 10/03/23 at 1:10 p.m., Res #2 stated it had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to implement proper infection prevention and control practices related to the transmission of COVID-19 for two (#3 and #5) of six sampled residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) -Identification and Management of Ill Residents, revised 09/2022, read in part, .Resident Placement 1. Resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection are placed in a single-person room. The door will be kept closed (if safe to do so). Ideally, the resident will have a dedicated bathroom .4. Transport and movement of the resident outside of the room is limited to medically essential purposes .Duration of Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) for residents with SARS-CoV2 Infection .18. Resident with mild to moderate illness who are not moderate to severely immunocomprimised will remain on transmission based precautions until: a. at least 10 days has passed since symptoms first appeared; and b. at least 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform and provide written information concerning the right to accept or refuse to formulate an advance directive for Res #16 and failed to ensure the DNR form for Res #27 included the authorized signature and date for two (#16 and #27) of five residents sampled for advanced directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 40 residents with advanced directives. Findings: 1. Res #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician order, dated 12/31/12, documented Res #27's code status as DNR. The DNR document in the resident's record documented a family member's signature. The facility did not have POA or guardianship documentation which authorized the signer permission to sign the DNR document. The DNR document did not include a date. An annual assessment, dated 08/23/22, documented the resident had severely impaired cognition. On 10/19/22 at 3:23 p.m., the administrator stated the facility could not locate the paper work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the ABN form CMS-10055 to residents who received skilled services and afterwards stayed in the facility for three (#1, 29, and #34) of three residents sampled for beneficiary protection notification review. The ADON identified 21 residents who had discharged from skilled services in the last six months. Findings: According to Res #1's medical record, Res #1 started skilled services on 07/01/22 and was discharged on 09/26/22. The ABN form was not provided. According to Res #29's medical record, Res #29 started skilled services on 07/05/22 and was discharged on 10/01/22. The ABN form was not provided. According to Res #34's medical record, Res #34 started skilled services on 07/08/22 and was discharged on 09/26/22. The ABN form was not provided. On 10/18/22 at 1:23 p.m., the ADON stated she did not know she had to give the ABN 10055 notice to the residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure bath linens were available when needed for resident bathing. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/18/22 at 10:10 a.m., Res #3 stated she needed a shower because she had somewhere she needed to be at 10:30 a.m. The resident turned on the call light. On 10/18/22 at 10:13 a.m., CNA #1 answered the light. Res #3 stated she did not have time for a shower and needed a bed bath instead. She said I have something to do at 10:30. The CNA responded and stated, I don't have enough towels to give you a bed bath. When questioned, the CNA stated the facility ran out towels sometimes. On 10/18/22 at 10:25 a.m., the activity director/CMA was asked where the towels were stored in the facility. The 600 Hall linen closet had two towels and two wash cloths. The 500 Hall linen cart held one towel and three wash cloths. The 300 Hall closet held four towels and three wash cloths. The 300 Hall linen cart on the locked unit had three towels and two wash cloths.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to correctly identify an individual with a mental disorder for two (#18 and #32) of two residents sampled for PASRR screening and failed to notify OHCA when residents received new mental illness diagnoses. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 10 residents had documented psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: 1. Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder and depression. The resident's medical record documented the resident had received a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition on 08/26/22. An admission assessment, dated 08/30/22, documented Res #32 had delusions, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, was moderately impaired in cognition, and was independent to requiring limited assistance with ADLs. A care plan, initiated on 08/31/22, documented Res #32 received psychotropic medications and to assess if the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a base-line care plan which documented all required components and failed to provide the base-line care plan to the resident or resident representative for two (#156 and #157) of 20 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Matrix for Providers form documented four residents had been admitted in the previous 30 days. Findings: 1. Resident #156 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, myalgia, and diabetes. An admission assessment was not available for review. A review of Res #156's medications documented the resident was to receive 11 different medications and was to received daily FSBS. A document titled, ''Interim Plan of Care,'' dated 10/14/22, was reviewed and did not document the physician ordered medications or treatments. On 10/18/22 at 7:15 a.m., Res #156 was observed sitting in his room with his wife. On 10/20/22 at 10:39 a.m., the MDS coordinator confirmed the base-line care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (#157) of five residents reviewed for medications. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #157 had diagnoses which included dementia, disorder of the cornea, diabetes, hypothyroidism, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. A physician order, dated 10/06/22, documented the facility was to administer divalproex (an antiseizure medication) 125 mg three times daily for a diagnosis of dementia. A review of the resident's MAR revealed the facility did not provide the medication to the resident on one or more of the doses on 10/06/22, 10/07/22, 10/08/22, 10/12/22, and 10/13/22. A physician order, dated 10/06/22, documented the facility was to administer gabapentin (a medication used for neuropathy) 100 mg three times daily for a diagnosis of diabetes with polyneuropathy. A review of the resident MAR revealed the facility did not provide this medication to the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to insulin use and diabetes for one (#44) of one residents reviewed for insulin use. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #44 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia. A physician order, dated 09/01/22, documented the facility was to administer Novolog Flexpen Insulin four times daily per sliding scale for a diagnosis of DM. An admission assessment, dated 09/12/22, documented Res #44 was severely impaired in cognition and had a diagnosis of renal insufficiency and diabetes. The assessment documented the resident received insulin daily during the assessment period. A care plan for Res #44 was reviewed and did not document a plan of care for diabetes or insulin use. On 10/18/22 at 7:13 a.m., Res #44 was observed in her room sitting on a recliner. At that time, a family member stated the resident used insulin and stated the resident's blood sugar was frequently over 200…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular weekly assessments on resident wounds for one (#44) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented four residents who resided in the facility had pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident #44 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcers of heel and sacral region, personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and diabetes. An EHR entry under events, dated 09/06/22, documented the resident had a stage II pressure ulcer on the coccyx. The note documented the physician was notified and an order was received to clean the wound with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply collagen and Anasept and cover with Duoderm every three days until healed for 14 days then reevaluate. At that time, the coccyx wound was documented as 3.0 x 1.0 cm in size. A EHR entry under weekly wound assessment, dated 09/07/22, documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement an intervention to prevent potential falls and update the care plan to reflect the intervention for one (#157) of one resident reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #157 had diagnoses which included dementia, diabetes, and cervical and intervetebral disc degeneration. An incident report form, dated 10/10/22, documented the resident had fell in his room, striking his forehead on the nightstand, sustaining a laceration to his head. The incident report documented an initial step to prevent recurrence of falls as non skid socks while in bed. The final incident report, dated 10/10/22, documented to place the resident on one hour visual checks for 30 days. A care plan, developed to prevent the recurrence of falls, dated 10/14/22, documented Res #157 had a history of falls related to being unaware of safety needs. The care plan documented an intervention for the fall which occured on 10/10/22 documenting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of significant weight loss for one (#16) of two residents sampled for nutrition. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented five residents with unplanned significant weight loss/gain. Findings: Res #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, abnormal weight loss, dietary folate deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency anemia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, nausea with vomiting, and heartburn. The weight record, dated 05/11/22, documented the resident weighed 97.7 lbs. On 05/24/22 Remeron (an antidepressant) was ordered by the physician to help with abnormal weight loss. The weight record, dated 07/05/2022, documented the resident weighed 96.4 lbs. A quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills, independent with eating with set up help only, was 60'' tall, weighed 96 lbs and was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$115,864 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $50,381 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $27,031 — penalty dated 2023-10-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-23 for 34 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-07 for 28 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DELORES O MITCHELL RVOC TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 10/31/2024
BIVIN, JULIEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/01/2002
JOHNSON, DEANNAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2002
LEIKAM, JO ANNEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2002
RONK, VIRGINIAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 02/01/2002
VANDELINDER, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/01/2002
YOWELL, LYNNIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/01/2002
SEQUOYAH EAST NURSING CENTER LLC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/30/2025
RYAN, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
SEQUOYAH HOUSE INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2002
CHEEK, BENNIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$211K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 10%Other / private 12%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $211K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$213per resident / day
operating cost
$6,472per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$204per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375394. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next