Sequoyah Manor, LLC
615 East Redwood, Sallisaw, OK 74955 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 162 certified beds · (918) 775-4881 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $33,270 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-18)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.7% | 13.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 10.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 10.3% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.5% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.4% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.0% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.4% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 74.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.2% | 27.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.4% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.51 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 76.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.4%CMS range 44.5–70.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.4–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 85.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 12.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.4–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 12/16/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure chemicals were secured away from wandering residents on a locked dedicated memory care unit. On 12/16/24 at 10:15 a.m., an unlocked closet (with gauze stuffed in the door latch not allowing the door to shut) had bug spray (Spectracide Bug Stop Home Barrier), a can of paint, shaving lotion, and other personal care items documenting keep out of reach of children. Three residents were observed wandering in the hall aimlessly. At 10:33 a.m., CNA #1 assigned to the locked memory unit stated the key to the door had been lost over the weekend, so the gauze was placed to allow access. CNA #1 stated there were nine residents on the unit and five that wandered independently. At 10:42 a.m., the DON stated the door should be locked and was unaware there was a problem with the lock. The DON viewed the linen closet and stated there was poison and other items that should be locked up. On 12/16/24, the ADON identified there were six of nine residents who wandered on the memory unit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for 2 (#8 and #10) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 77 residents resided in the facility.Findings: 1.An OSDH incident report form, dated 09/12/25, showed CNA #7 witnessed Resident #12 hit Resident #8 on the top of their head. The report showed Resident #8 was assessed and found to be free of injury. The report showed Resident #12 was placed on 1:1 until sent to ER psych evaluation. The report showed Resident #12 had a BIMS score of 1 indicating they were severely cognitively impaired. The report showed Resident #8 had a BIMS of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A nursing note, dated 09/13/25 at 7:29 a.m., showed Resident #12 returned to the facility (after ER psych evaluation) on 09/13/25 at 6:00 a.m., and remained on 1:1 supervision.A nursing note, dated 09/16/25 at 3:33 p.m., showed Resident #12 remained on 1:1 until they were transported to a behavioral hospital.2. An OSDH incident report form, dated 12/21/25, showed CNA #6 witnessed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent burns from hot liquids for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #1 received a second degree burn. ADON #1 reported 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/08/25, showed Resident #1 had a BIMS score (a test for cognitive function) of 12, which was indicative of a moderate impairment for daily decision making and required set-up assistance with eating and drinking. A nurse note, dated 03/09/25 at 10:30 a.m., showed Resident #1 had spilled coffee on themselves. Upon assessment, Resident #1 had a reddened area on their right inner thigh measuring approximately 10 cm x 3.5 cm with a 2 cm by 3.5 cm blister. The note also showed Resident #1 continued to decline with disease and age progression and they required assistance with eating and drinking. A physician's order, dated 03/09/25, showed Resident #1 was to have silver sulfadiazine (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to assisting a resident with hot liquids for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. ADON #1 reported 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/08/25, showed Resident #1 had a BIMS score (a test for cognitive function) of 12, which was indicative of a moderate impairment for daily decision making and required set-up assistance with eating and drinking. A nurse note, dated 03/09/25 at 10:30 a.m., showed Resident #1 had spilled coffee on themselves. Upon assessment, Resident #1 had a reddened area on their right inner thigh measuring approximately 10 cm x 3.5 cm with a 2 cm by 3.5 cm blister. The note also showed Resident #1 continued to decline with disease and age progression and they required assistance with eating and drinking. A review of Resident #1's medical record did not show any care plan interventions related to hot liquids. On 03/18/25 at 1:40 p.m., LPN #1 stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the baseline care plan had been provided to the resident and/or resident representative for three (#2, 15, and #29) of 19 sampled residents whose baseline care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Plans - Baseline policy, dated March 2022, read in part, The resident and/or resident representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand). 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 04/29/24, did not document a resident or resident representative signature in the indicated areas. Review of the clinical record did not reveal documentation the resident and/or the resident representative had been provided a summary of the baseline care plan. 2. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 04/27/24, did not document a resident or resident representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error of less than five percent order for two (#5 and #34) of 27 residents who were reviewed for medication administration. The medication error rate was 7.41%. The DON identified 64 residents who received medications. Findings: On 12/19/24 at 9:00 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer one tab of levothyroxine (hormone) 125 mcg to Resident #34. The order documented to administer the medication daily before the morning meal. The resident was observed to return from the morning meal prior to the medication being administered. Resident #34 stated they had eaten the morning meal. On 12/19/24 at 11:21 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer Refresh eye drops to Resident #5. The order documented to administer two drops into both eyes four times daily. One drop was observed to be applied in both eyes. On 12/19/24 at 12:18 p.m., CMA #2 stated they had made an error. They stated the order was for two drops in both eyes. On 12/19/24 at 12:28 p.m., the DON stated they ensured medications were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. The DM identified the kitchen prepared meals for 64 residents. Findings: A policy titled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, read in parts, Gloves and Direct Food Contact .Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used. Gloves are removed, hands are washed and gloves are replaced .c. between handling raw meats and ready-to-eat foods; and d. between handling soiled and clean dishes. On 12/18/24 at 5:30 p.m., [NAME] #1 was observed serving the evening meal. The cook donned a pair of gloves and handled a resident's menu sheet, obtained a clean plate, handled different serving utensils to place food on the plate, reached into a bag of sandwich bread to obtain slices of bread, and then placed a slice of cheese on the breaded chicken using their gloved hand. The cook continued this process preparing the meal plates without changing their gloves or washing their hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. proper PPE was worn during catheter care for one (#15) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for catheter care; b. hand sanitation was completed during catheter care for one (#4 ) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for catheter care; and c. hand sanitation was completed during medication administration for four (#5, 34, 51, and #60) of 27 sampled residents who were reviewed for medication administration. The DON identified 11 residents who had catheters, 13 residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions, and 64 residents who received medications. Findings: A Catheter Care, Urinary policy, revised August 2022, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. The undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, read in parts, Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities .High-contact resident activities include .Device care or use .urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity with an indwelling urinary catheter for one (#15) of three sampled residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The DON identified 11 residents who had indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: The Dignity policy, dated February 2021, read in parts, Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents .helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy. On 12/16/24 at 3:32 p.m., Resident #15 was observed in their bed with the door to their room open. The urinary catheter bag was observed from the hallway and was not in a dignity bag. On 12/17/24 at 9:16 a.m., Resident #15 was observed in their bed from the hallway. The urinary catheter bag was observed from the hall and was not in a dignity bag. On 12/19/24 at 8:28 a.m., Resident #15 was observed sitting on the side of their bed. The urinary catheter bag was observed from the hall and was not in a dignity bag. On 12/19/24 at 9:43 a.m., Resident #15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for one (#37) of 16 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #37 had diagnoses which included hypertension. The quarterly assessment, dated 10/30/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making and had one fall with major injury since the prior assessment. Review of the state reported incidents and the electronic clinical record did not reveal the resident had experienced a fall with major injury. On 12/17/24 at 8:30 a.m., Resident #37 stated they had not had a fall with major injury. On 12/17/24 at 11:33 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated they had reviewed the clinical record and Resident #37 had not experienced a fall with major injury and the 10/30/24 assessment had been inaccurately coded.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan had been developed for one (#15) of 19 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Resident Mobility and Range of Motion policy, dated July 2017, read in part, The care plan will be developed by the interdisciplinary team based on the comprehensive assessment. The Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, dated March 2022, read in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included history of transient ischemic attack. The significant change assessment, dated 10/02/24, documented the resident had range of motion impairment to one side of their upper body and both sides of their lower body. The Care Plan, revised 12/18/24, did not document the residents range of motion impairment to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion services were provided to one (#15) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for limited range of motion. The MDS coordinator identified 18 residents who had limited range of motion. Findings: The Resident Mobility and Range of Motion policy, dated July 2017, read in part, Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included history of transient ischemic attack. The significant change assessment, dated 10/02/24, documented the resident had range of motion impairment to one side of their upper body and both sides of their lower body. The Care Plan, revised 12/18/24, did not document the residents range of motion impairment to the upper extremity. On 12/19/24 at 9:12 a.m., Resident #15 was observed in bed. Resident #15's right hand was observed to be contracted. The resident stated their hand had been contracted since they had experienced a stroke approximately 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained for indwelling urinary catheters, failed to secure indwelling urinary catheters, and failed to document catheter care in accordance with the care plan for one (#15) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The DON identified 11 residents who had indwelling urinary catheters. Findings: The Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated August 2022, read in parts, Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a securement device to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site .Be sure catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .The date and time that catheter care was given. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy. The significant change assessment, dated 10/02/24, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The Care Plan, updated 12/16/24, read in part, Catheter care q shift. Review of the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were accurately assessed for bedrails for two (#30 and #48) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for bedrails. The DON identified nine residents who had bedrails. Findings: 1. Resident #30 had diagnoses which included pain and left sided hemiplegia. A Physician's Order, dated 05/11/21, documented the resident was to utilize quarter side rails bilaterally for repositioning. The Side Rail Consent, dated 08/15/24, documented the use of quarter side rails bilaterally. The Bed Rail/Assist Bar Evaluation, dated 12/02/24, did not indicate the type of bed rail evaluated. The MDS coordinator had completed the evaluation. On 12/16/24 at 3:48 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in bed with half side rails in the up position bilaterally. On 12/18/24 at 4:06 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in bed with half side rails in the up position bilaterally. On 12/19/24 at 11:19 a.m., the DON stated Resident #30 utilized side rails and was assessed quarterly by the MDS coordinator. They stated they thought the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow the menus for the residents. The DM identified the kitchen prepared meals for 64 residents. Findings: On 12/18/24 at 4:20 p.m., the evening meal was prepared by cook #1. The cook was preparing the pureed diet for the residents. The cook stated they were unsure how many ounces the breaded piece of chicken weighed. The cook weighed the breaded piece of chicken and stated it weighed 1.5 ounces. The cook stated the menu documented one patty per serving. On 12/18/24 at 4:38 p.m., the DM stated the recipe for a breaded chicken sandwich documented to serve one each breaded chicken piece equaling three ounces of meat. The DM stated they were not aware the breaded piece of chicken for the sandwich needed to weigh three ounces. They stated they only knew the menu called for one breaded piece of chicken. On 12/18/24 at 5:21 p.m., the DM stated peas and carrots was to be the vegetable for the evening meal. The DM stated corn was substituted because they did not have peas and carrots. The DM stated the entire meal menu prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure beds and side rails were regularly inspected as part of a maintenance program for two (#30 and #53) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for side rails. The DON identified nine residents who utilized side rails. Findings: The Bed Safety and Bed Rails policy, dated August 2022, read in part, Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. 1. Resident #30 had diagnoses which included pain and left sided hemiplegia. A Physician's Order, dated 05/11/21, documented the resident was to utilize quarter side rails bilaterally for repositioning. On 12/16/24 at 3:48 p.m., Resident #30 was observed in bed with half side rails in the up position bilaterally. 2. Resident #53 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A Physician's Order, dated 09/05/23, documented the resident utilized one side rail to assist in bed mobility and transfers. On 12/18/24 at 4:08 p.m., Resident #53 was observed in bed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to contact a local law enforcement agency within the mandated time frame after being informed of an allegation of abuse for one (#1) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 71 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated July 2017, read in part, Reporting 1. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies: a. The stated licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; b. the local/State Ombudsman; c. The Resident's Representative (Sponsor) of Record; d. Adult Protective Services (where state law provides jurisdiction in long-term care); e. Law enforcement officials; f. The resident's attending physician; and g. The facility medical director. An Incident Report Form marked as an initial report, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the abuse policy for one (#5) of five sampled residents reviewed for abuse and failed to develop an abuse policy with appropriate reporting time frames. The administrator identified 70 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation General policy, dated 05/05/17, read in parts, .Facility will educate all staff about how to recognize signs of possible abuse .All facility employees .are educated that all alleged or suspected violations involving mistreatment, neglect or abuse .are reported IMMEDIATELY to the Administrator .In the event an incident that meets or has the potential to meet one of the definitions stated in the policy on abuse or neglect of an elder is reported to the Administrator or designee, an investigation of the incident will be commenced immediately. The Administrator will contact DHS immedieatly [sic] and the Oklahoma State Department of Health within 24 hours .Reporting .The DON, Administrator or other designated investigating individual will begin their own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for one (#5) of five sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 70 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation General policy, dated 05/05/17, read in parts, .Facility will educate all staff about how to recognize signs of possible abuse .All facility employees .are educated that all alleged or suspected violations involving mistreatment, neglect or abuse .are reported IMMEDIATELY to the Administrator . Resident #5 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and unspecified intellectual disabilities. The quarterly assessment, dated 07/05/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included bipolar disorder. The quarterly assessment, dated 07/29/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The Event Report for Resident #2, dated 08/05/24 at 7:38 p.m., read in parts, .Progress Note .Resident witnessed being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were person-centered for two (#1 and #2) of four sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings: The Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, dated December 2016, read in part, .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will .reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change . 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Rett's syndrome. The quarterly assessment, dated 07/03/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making. Review of the electronic clinical record, including the care plan, revised 08/29/24, did not reveal resident/resident representative preferences had been documented. On 09/10/24 at 2:08 p.m., dietary aide #1 stated they were aware Resident #1's mother did not want male residents around their loved one. They stated they had heard about the mother's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility with only one resident not receiving nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: The Foods Brought by Family/Visitors policy, dated December 2008, read in part, .6. Perishable foods must be stored in re-sealable containers with tightly fitting lids in the refrigerator. Containers will be tabled with the resident's name the item and the 'used by' date . On 08/28/23 at 9:42 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was made and the following was observed. The trash can by the hand washing sink was not covered and there was food splatter on the wall behind the trash can. A cut cantaloupe was observed on a cookie sheet on the counter covered with wax paper. On 08/28/23 at 9:44 a.m., the refrigerator was observed to contain an open can of ravioli with a plastic cup lid covering the top and the metal can lid was down in the ravioli…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advance directives for two (#2, and #9) and failed to ensure a DNR was complete for one (#14) of six residents sampled for advanced directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 31 residents who resided in the facility had advanced directives. Findings: A policy titled Advanced Directives, dated September 2022, read in part, .1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so . 1. Res #2 had diagnoses which included age related physical debility and diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 08/11/23, documented the resident was a full code. An admission assessment, dated 08/24/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and requited extensive assistance with most ADLs. A care plan, dated 08/24/23, documented the resident preferred to be a full code. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and/or implemented to address the residents' needs related to: a. a nutrition care plan for one (#46); b. hospice services and the use of an antipsychotic medication for one (#56); and c. the use of side rails and the resident's use of a vape device for one (#33) of 26 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #46 had diagnoses which included anorexia and muscle wasting. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/13/23 documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, weight was 137 pounds, and they had not lost weight. A care plan, initiated on 07/11/23, documented the resident had an unplanned weight loss due to eating less at meals and refusing supplements at times. The care plan documented the registered dietitian was to review resident's medical record and make recommendations, nursing was to follow, and the dietary manager was to determine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to meet the residents' current needs for one (#56) of 26 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #56 had diagnoses which included heart failure. A DNR form, dated 12/02/22 and signed by the resident, documented the resident had elected to be a DNR. A care plan, dated 12/06/22, documented the resident preferred to be a full code. A physician order, dated 06/27/23, documented the resident was not to be resuscitated in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest. A physician order, dated 07/31/23, documented the resident was to be admitted to hospice care. On 08/29/23 at 7:57 a.m., the resident was observed in their room in their bed. The resident stated they were on hospice and hospice came in and gave them a bath a couple of times a week. On 08/31/23 at 9:55 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated the care plan was not updated in regard to the resident code status. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers, oral care, and nail care, as ordered for three (#2, 18, and #48) of six residents sampled for ADL care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #2 had diagnoses which included age related physical debility, cerebral infarction, and diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 08/11/23, documented to give the resident a bath with hair and nail care three times a week and PRN. An admission assessment, dated 08/24/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required extensive assistance with most ADLs. A care plan, dated 08/24/23, documented the resident required assistance with bathing. A Point of Care history report, for August 2023, documented the resident had not received a bath from admission on [DATE] until 08/21/23. On 08/28/23 at 12:56 p.m., Res # 2 were observed in their bed and stated they had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers treatments were completed as ordered for two (#18 and #19) and failed to ensure wound assessments were completed for one (#19) of four sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented four residents had pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. Res #18 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, paraplegia, and pressure ulcers. A physician order, dated 07/04/23, documented to cleanse full thickness wound to left ischium with wound cleanser and pat dry. The order documented to apply skin prep and pat dry; apply skin prep to peri wound and allow to dry; apply Anasept gel to wound bed; apply calcium alginate, cut to fit wound bed; and cover with silicone super absorbent dressing if available or silicone foam dressing BID. The order was discontinued on 08/25/23. A physician order, dated 07/04/23, documented to cleanse full thickness wound to right ischium with wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess the resident for risk for entrapment, review the risks or benefits with the resident and/or their representative and obtain an informed consent, or attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing bed or side rails for three (#13, 19, and #33) of eight sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 21 residents whose beds were equipped with side rails. Findings: 1. Res #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included rheumatoid arthritis, chronic bronchitis, tremors, chronic kidney disease, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A physician order, dated 01/24/20, documented the facility was to provide the resident with 1/4 side rails to aide with bed mobility, positioning, and transferring. A side rail assessment and consent form, dated 01/24/20, did not document the residents size and weight, sleep habits, medication, acute medical and surgical intervention, existence of delirium,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A physician order for Res #22, dated 05/13/23, documented the facility was to obtain daily weights for the resident as ordered by the resident's cardiologist. A review of the resident's weight records in the EHR documented during the months of July and August of 2023 the resident's weight had been obtained eight times. On 09/01/23 at 11:19 a.m., RA #1 stated they had been pulled to work the floor many times in the previous two months but especially in August. The RA stated it was their responsibility to obtain the residents' weight and had one resident who was on daily weights and stated it was Res #22. The RA stated the facility had pulled them to the floor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately monitored for adverse reactions to medications, goals for treatment, and providing an adequate indication for the medication use, for five (#13, 14, 32, 46, and #56) of five residents who were sampled for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Anticoagulation - Clinical Protocol, revised 11/18, read in part, .1. The physician will prescribe anticoagulation therapy appropriately, consistent with recognized guidelines .2. The physician will collaborate with the consultant pharmacist and nursing staff to identify potentially serious medication interactions with anticoagulants .5. The staff and physician will monitor for possible complications in individuals who are being anticoagulated and will manage related problems. A facility policy titled Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, revised 4/14, read in part, .4. The staff and practitioner shall strive to minimize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. Res #14 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/27/23, documented resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required extensive assistance with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident was taking an antidepressant, an anticoagulant, and a diuretic during the assessment period. A physician order, dated 07/24/23, documented Celexa (an antidepressant medication) administer daily for depression. A care plan, last reviewed 07/24/23, documented the staff were to monitor for effectiveness and side effects of medication use every shift. The MAR and TAR for July and August 2023 were reviewed and did not document target behaviors or monitoring for side effects for the medication Celexa. 5. Res #32 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, depression, and anxiety disorder. A physician order, dated 03/20/23, documented to administer doxepin (an antidepressant medication) at bedtime for insomnia. A physician order, dated 06/13/23, documented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication cart was kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff and to implement the system in which the quantity stored of controlled medications was enacted so a missing dose could be readily detected. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Controlled Substances, dated 11/22, read in part, .3. Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count. 4. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services . On 08/29/23 at 2:32 p.m., the insulin medication/treatment cart was observed to have been unlocked and unattended in the hallway while LPN #5 was in the DON office speaking with staff. At that time, the LPN was interviewed and stated the cart should have been locked before they had left it unattended. On 08/31/23 at 4:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff for food and nutrition services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 60 residents resided in the facility and one resident did not eat from the kitchen. Findings: A document titled SEQUOYAH MANOR LLC MEAL SERVICE POLICY, revised 03/30/2022, read in part, Meals will be served on a routine schedule at set times. Mealtimes are planned according to existing norms in the community. Each client will receive a minimum of three meals daily with appropriate snacks to meet caloric needs .MEAL HOURS: .Breakfast 7:30 a.m. Lunch 12:00 p.m. Dinner 5:00 p.m . On 08/28/23 at 12:20 p.m., the lunch meal service had not started at this time. On 08/28/23 at 12:38 p.m., the first tray was observed to have been taken out to residents. On 08/31/23 07:38 a.m., breakfast had not started at this time. Eggs were observed being cooked at this time. A schedule for the dietary department, for the month of August 2023, documented four employees worked in the kitchen during the weekdays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 60 residents resided in the facility, 20 with a mechanically altered diet and one resident with tube feedings. Findings: 1. On 08/30/23 at 12:09 p.m., the small steam cart for the locked unit unit was sent out of the kitchen. Temperatures of the food, which was placed on the steam cart, were not obtained before it was sent out to the unit. The food which was to be kept cold, was on the steam cart. The other pan of food to be kept cold did not fit and was placed on the second shelf of the cart and was not observed to have been on ice. On 08/30/23 at 12:22 a.m., the steam cart was observed on the unit. The potato salad temperature was 80.4 degrees F and the cucumber and onion salad was 60.8 degrees F. 2. On 08/30/23 at 12:22 p.m., meal service started in the dinning room. The kitchen staff were not observed to obtain temperatures of the food before service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow a therapeutic diet and menu for the residents who received a pureed diet. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 20 residents received a mechanically altered diet. Findings: On 08/30/23 the menu for the lunch meal was documented to have been a meatball sub sandwich, potato salad, marinated cucumber and onion salad, and gooey butter bar. On 08/30/23 at 11:21 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to puree the potato salad. [NAME] #1 assisted [NAME] #2 to puree the cucumber and onion salad. The DM pureed the meat balls for the puree meals. On 08/30/23 at 12:22 p.m., the meal service started in the dining room. The puree residents were observed to receive meat balls, potato salad, and cucumber and onions salad, and a yogurt for dessert. The puree residents were not served bread of any kind or the gooey butter bar or the cake which was substituted for the bar for the regular diets. On 08/31/23 at 9:00 a.m., the DM was asked about the puree meals not receiving any bread with their meal. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program related to: a. the prevention of Legionellosis and Pontiac fever caused by Legionella bacteria. b. appropriate signage for TBP on the door of a room for a resident in isolation. c. the handling and transport of residents' soiled laundry. d. ensuring tubing and catheter bags were maintained in a location to prevent contamination. e. performing appropriate hand hygiene while serving and delivering meals on the locked unit. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Isolation - Initiating Transmission Based Precautions, revised in April of 2012, read in part, .b. Post the appropriate notice on the room entrance door and on the front of the resident's chart so that all personnel will be aware of precautions, or be aware that they must first see a nurse to obtain additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for three (#13, 19, and #33) of three sampled residents reviewed for bed rails. The DON identified 21 residents whose beds were equipped with side rails. Findings: Res #13, 19, and #33 were observed to have side rails attached to their beds. On 08/31/23 at 12:35 p.m., the maintenance supervisor was interviewed and stated they checked the residents' beds for cleanliness twice weekly but did not conduct inspections of the mattresses, frames, or bed rail inspections to identify areas of entrapment.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident or resident representative was informed in advance of the risk and/or benefit of the use of an antipsychotic medication for one (#56) of five residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented eight residents received antipsychotic medications. Findings: Res #56 had diagnoses which included dementia. A physician order, dated 08/01/23, documented the facility was to administer 25 mg of Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) at bedtime daily for a diagnosis of dementia with mood disturbance. A significant change assessment, dated 08/03/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition; had verbal behaviors directed toward others and rejection of care behaviors; was independent to requiring limited assistance with ADLs; and received an antipsychotic mediation for two days of the seven day assessment period. On 08/29/23 at 7:57 a.m., the resident was observed lying in their bed. The resident stated they did not know what medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct a significant change assessment for one (#14) of 20 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #14 had diagnoses which included heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and weight loss. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/23/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition; walked in their room with supervision; and weighed 122 pounds with no weight loss. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/27/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition; walked in their room with extensive assist of one staff person; weighed 113 pounds, and not on a physician prescribed weight loss regimen. On 08/31/23 at 7:20 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated they thought the resident had to have three areas of decline in the ADL section. The MDS coordinator stated they were new to the position and they were instructed a significant change assessment was to be conducted when the ADL section indicated a change.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to refer residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder to OHCA for evaluation for a level II PASRR assessment for one (#9) of three residents reviewed for PASRR and failed to ensure the PASRR level I assessment was correct. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 24 residents had psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: The EHR documented Res #9 had received a diagnosis of other specified depressive episodes on 04/24/21. A PASRR level one assessment, dated 04/28/21, documented the resident did not have a diagnosis of mental illness or intellectual disabilities. The EHR documented the resident received a diagnosis of unspecified mood disorder on 11/03/21. The EHR documented the resident received a diagnosis of behavioral and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence on 11/17/21. An annual assessment, dated 07/20/23, documented the resident was not considered to have a serious mental illness, was intact in cognition, required extensive assistance with ADLs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not using a vape in their rooms for one (#33) of eight residents sampled for accident hazards and failed to have a policy related to vaping in the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled SEQUOYAH MANOR SMOKING POLICY, dated 07/22/14, read in part, .3. Employees and residents must smoke in designated areas .11. All cigarettes, lighters, and e-cigarettes charges, must be kept in the medication room and dispensed according to the designated smoking hours . Res #33 had diagnoses which included heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and SOB. An admission assessment, dated 06/27/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired in cognition and required extensive assistance with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident did not use tobacco. A review of the resident's EHR did not contain an assessment for using a vape. On 08/28/23 at 3:42 p.m., Res #33 was observed to have two vapes, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain urinary catheters off of the floor to prevent possible infections for two (#33 and #48) of three resident reviewed for catheters. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented eight residents with indwelling catheters resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #33 had diagnoses which included retention of urine, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and urinary tract infection. An admission assessment, dated 06/27/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition, required extensive assistance with most ADLs, and had an indwelling catheter. On 08/28/23 at 3:40 p.m., the resident's catheter bag was observed touching the ground by the residents bed. Res #33 was not able to say how long they had the catheter. A nurse note, dated 08/30/23 at 9:17 p.m., documented the resident had purulent drainage from urethra and the physician was notified and gave a new order to obtain a UA. A physician order, dated 08/30/23, documented doxycycline hyclate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#32) of five residnts reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #32 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular diseases. A physician order, dated 09/29/21, documented the facility was to administer Novolog (insulin aspart u-100) solution; 100 unit/mL per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime for diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 11/28/22, documented to administer Lantus (insulin glargine) BID for diabetes mellitus. An administration history report, dated 06/29/23 - 07/29/23, did not document Novolog had been administered three times. The report did not always document the injection sites. A care plan, last reviewed 07/27/23, documented the resident had diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy and to administer Levemir and Novolog per order. An administration history report,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure competent and skilled dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. The form documented three residents with feeding tubes. Findings: 1. On 08/31/22 at 12:10 p.m., the cook in the kitchen was asked to obtain the temperature of the food on the steam table. The chicken strips temperature was 85 degrees, green beans 125 degrees, and the potatoes were 102 degrees. [NAME] #2 stated the holding temperatures for food should be 160 to 165 degrees. On 08/31/22 at 12:15 p.m., the steam table on the locked unit was observed. At that time CNA #4 was asked to obtain the food temperatures of the food on the steam table. She stated she had never obtained the temperature of the food before serving it to the residents from the steam table. On 08/31/22 at 12:27 p.m., on the back hall's small dining room, CNA #5 was asked to obtain the temperature of the food on the steam table. CNA #5 stated she had never done…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not wait an extended amount of time to eat a meal while others were eating around them. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 57 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. A significant change assessment, dated 06/07/22, documented Res #7 required extensive assistance with eating and had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and dysphagia. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/22, documented Res #47 required total assistance with eating and had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and intellectual disabilities. On 08/30/22 at 4:59 p.m., Res #7 was observed sitting at a U-shaped table with other residents who were eating. Res #7 had not been served. He had a glass of milk in front of him which was not offered to him before his food arrived. Res #47 was also sitting in the same small dining room at a table with another resident who had been served and was eating. On 08/30/22 at 5:47 p.m., Res #7 received his meal and a staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quarterly financial statements to one (#9) of one residents reviewed for personal funds. The DON identified 27 residents whose funds were maintained by the facility. Findings: A significant change assessment, dated 8/30/22, documented Res #9 was cognitively intact and the ability to make decisions about their personal belongings was very important to them. On 08/30/22 at 9:09 a.m., Res #9 stated that she did not recall receiving a statement of her personal funds. On 09/01/22, at 1:09 p.m., the administrator stated the former assistant administrator was responsible for sending quarterly statements in the past, but he had recently taken over the task. He was unable to produce any documentation Res #9 had received a quarterly statement of personal funds.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights to request, refuse, or discontinue treatment for four (#4, 7, 12, and #18) of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure: a. the person who signed a DNR form was the health care proxy for Res #4, 7, and #12. b. the resident or representative was offered information on the right to formulate an advanced directive for Res #18. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Advanced Directives, revised December 2016, read in parts, .1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so .6. upon admission of a resident, the social service director or designee will inquire of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents who were discharged from skilled services with benefit days remaining a SNF ABN and NOMNC if the resident remained in the facility and a NOMNC notice if residents were discharged to home. The Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months form documented 24 residents had been discharged from skilled nursing services with benefit days remaining in the previous six months. Findings: 1. Res #157 was admitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 05/08/22 and discharged from skilled services on 07/11/22. The resident was subsequently discharged to home. Res #157 was not provided a NOMNC (CMS 10123) form. 2. Res #8 was admitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 05/07/22 and discharged from skilled services on 07/11/22. Res #8 remained in the facility. Res #8 was not provided a NOMNC (CMS 10123) form or a SNF ABN (CMS-10055) form. On 08/30/22 at 5:00 p.m., the BOM stated the facility did not use NOMNC or SNF ABN notices. She stated they provided a three day notice to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a base-line care plan which documented all required components and failed to provide the base-line care plan to the resident or resident representative for two (#43 and #58) of 20 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Matrix for Providers form documented five residents had been admitted in the previous 30 days. Findings: 1. Res #43 had diagnoses which included diabetes, altered mental status, depression, and hypertension. An admission MDS assessment, documented Res #43 was moderately impaired in cognition, experienced wandering, and was independent to requiring supervision with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident received insulin, antianxiety, antidepressant, and diuretic medication. On 08/29/22 at 12:30 p.m., the resident was observed in her room sitting on a recliner. The resident stated she did not remember getting a copy of the care plan but her daughter may have. On 08/31/22 at 5:23 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated Res #43 had a base-line care plan. She stated to her knowledge,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. Res #19's significant change assessment, dated 08/25/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact, had no rejection of care behaviors, required assistance with ADLs, had no occurrences of bathing, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 08/29/22 at 2:36 p.m., Res #19 stated baths were not getting done. He stated it took 45 minutes or more for them to answer the call lights. He stated he would call his wife and she would call the facility before he would get help. The resident's bathing record documented three baths in June, two in July, and one bath in August 2022. On 09/01/22 at 2:42 p.m., the DON was asked about the resident not receiving baths as scheduled. The DON stated, ''If it wasn't documented, it wasn't done. She stated the resident probably got more baths than it showed but the staff were not documenting correctly. Based on record review, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide baths/showers as scheduled for five (#19, 24, 35, 40, and #56) of five residents sampled for ADL care. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who had DNR status had a physician order for the code status for three (#12, 24, and #35) of seven residents reviewed for advance directives. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Advance Directives Policy read in part .The director of nursing services or designee will notify the attending physician of advance directive so that appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care . 1. Res #24 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and paraplegia. The resident's medical record contained a signed DNR consent form, dated 04/09/21. A care plan, edited 04/18/22 , documented Res #24 prefers to be a DNR. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/15/22, documented the resident was severly impaired with cognition and required extensive to total care with most activities of daily living. The assessment documented the resident was on hospice. On 08/30/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and intervene for a non-pressure wound to a resident's skin for one (#43) of one residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #43 had diagnoses which included diabetes, hypertension, and candidiasis. An admission MDS assessment, dated 08/09/22, documented Res #43 was moderately impaired in cognition and was independent to requiring supervision with ADLs. On 08/29/22 at 12:38 p.m., Res #48 was observed sitting on a recliner in her room. An unidentified friend of the resident was also in the room. The unidentified friend stated Res #48 had an open area on her upper left chest. The friend stated the open area had been there for several days and she had been putting ointment on the area. A nursing skin assessment, dated 08/29/22, documented Res #43's skin was intact. The assessment documented the resident had a scant amount of redness/excoriation present under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record observation, review, and interview, the facility failed to provide physician ordered supplements for two (#23 and #46) of two residents sampled for weight loss. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented six residents with unplanned significant weight loss/gain. Findings: 1. Res #46's annual assessment, dated 05/20/22, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required assistance with ADLs, and could feed himself. The assessment documented the resident was 69 inches tall, weighed 133 pounds, had a significant weight loss, and was not on a physician prescribed weight loss program. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/18/22, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required assistance with ADLs, and could feed himself. The assessment documented the resident weighed 119 pounds, had a significant weight loss, and was not on a physician prescribed weight loss program. A physician order, dated 08/22/22, documented to provide an Ice-Cream Mighty Shake twice a day from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents as determined by the care plan, acuity, and physician orders. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A physician order, dated 06/17/22, documented Res #16 was to have a bath, hair and nail care three times a week and as needed. An admission MDS assessment, dated 06/24/22, documented Res #16 was moderately impaired in cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and hygiene. The assessment documented Res #16 did not bathe during the assessment period. On 08/29/22 at 2:12 p.m., Res #16 was observed in her room and stated the call lights were not answered quickly and she had to wait for a long time for assistance. A review of Res #16's ADL flow sheets documented she received a bath five times out of 12 opportunities for the month of August 2022. On 09/01/22 at 1:34 p.m., the staffing coordinator stated the facility was having a difficult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate an RN to serve as the director of nursing. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/29/22 at 9:43 a.m., during the entrance conference, the administrator stated the current DON was an LPN. On 08/30/22 at 3:58 p.m., the administrator stated he was unaware the federal regulation required the DON to be an RN. He stated the current LPN/DON became the DON last January when the previous DON quit.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for one (#56) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #56's physician order, dated 09/29/21, documented to administer Novolog insulin per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. A physician order, dated 04/20/22, documented to administer 10 units of Levemir insulin subcutaneously twice per day. A July 2022 MAR documented Levemir was not administered on the evening shift on 07/29/22. The MAR documented Novolog was not administered on the afternoon shift on 07/19/22 and the evening shift on 07/29/22. On 09/01/22 at 11:55 a.m., the DON reviewed Res #56's July MAR. She stated she had no explanation for the blanks on the MAR.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one (34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 40 residents received psychoactive medications. Findings: Res #34 had diagnoses which included autistic disorder and major depressive disorder. A physician order, dated 04/23/21, documented Abilify (an antipsychotic medication) 5mg once a day for autistic disorder . A physician order, dated 04/23/21, documented risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) 2mg twice a day for autistic disorder. A pharmacist consult review, dated 10/06/21, documented a request for a GDR for Ability. The physician disagreed and documentated a rationale of continue to need. A pharmacist consult review, dated 01/04/22, documented a request for a GDR for Risperdal. The physician marked disagree, and documented a rationale of mental status monitored. A pharmacist consult review, dated 04/20/22, documented a request for a GDR for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-01 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on obseervation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were held on the steam table at the appropriate temperature. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. The form documented three residents with feeding tubes. Findings: On 08/31/22 at 12:00 p.m., a test tray was obtained from the kitchen and walked directly to the conference room to test. At 12:01 p.m., the temperature of the chicken strips were 136 degrees F, red skin potatoes 101.7 degrees, and green beans 124.8 degrees. The chicken strips and green beans were warm and palatable. The potatoes were cool, had a overwhelming onion and vinegar taste, and was not palatable. On 08/31/22 at 12:10 p.m., the cook in the kitchen was asked to obtain the temperature of the food on the steam table. The chicken strips temperature was 85 degrees, green beans 125 degrees, and the potatoes were 102 degrees. [NAME] #2 stated the holding temperatures for food should be 160 to 165 degrees. On 08/31/22 at 12:15 p.m., the steam table on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for the puree meals. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 20 residents who had a mechanically altered diet including puree and all chopped foods. The form documented three residents with feeding tubes. Findings: 1. The menu for 08/28/22 documented vegetable soup. The menu for 08/30/22 documented Salisbury steak with gravy. The menu for 08/31/22 documented for lunch they were having breaded chicken tenders, red skin potato salad, green beans, and daffodil cake. On 08/31/22 at 12:27 p.m., on the back hall's small dining room, the steam table was observed to have chicken strips, green beans, potatoes, puree #1, and puree #2. CNA #5 was asked what the puree food was. CNA #5 stated she was not sure what the puree was. There was no green puree observed on the steam table. On 08/31/22 at 12:37 p.m., the DM was asked what was served for the puree meal today. The DM stated the puree meal was Salisbury steak, vegetable soup, and ice cream. On 09/01/22 at 2:36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food which was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 57 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. On 08/30/22 at 4:59 p.m., Res #7 was observed sitting with other residents who were eating. Res #7 had not been served. He had a glass of milk in front of him, but he was not offered a drink before his food arrived. Res #47 was also sitting in the same small dining room at a table with another resident who had been served. A CNA was observed plating food from a steam table in the small dining room. She plated food for residents on three halls who were eating in their rooms and for the residents who were eating in the small dining room. On 08/30/22 at 5:47 p.m., Res #7's three bowls of pureed food was served to him. The pureed bowls of food had been had been sitting on a non-heated tray throughout the time other residents were being served. At that time a staff member started to feed him. After the resident was fed a bite of pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and distributed in a sanitary manner. The ''Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 57 residents resided in the facility. The form documented three residents with feeding tubes. Findings: 1. On 08/29/22 at 11:47 a.m., DA #1 was observed in the main dining room with gloves on to touch her mask and then return to the kitchen with hands on hips standing at the steam table. DA #1 then went to the coffee pot to get coffee in same gloves, brought the coffee to the front by the steam table. The DA got a drink from a container in the kitchen, took off gloves and washed her hands. DA #1 placed new gloves on her hands and went out to the dining room to pass meals. On 08/29/22 at 11:52 a.m., DA #1 was observed to touched her mask with gloves on, pulled up her pants, and passed another meal in the dining room. DA #1 picked up a dirty plate, changed gloves, but did not perform hand hygiene before putting on new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to incorporate PASRR level II recommendations into the comprehensive care plan for one (#3) of one residents reviewed for PASRR level II evaluations. The DON identified eight residents who had a PASRR level II evaluation. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disabilities, and recurrent depressive disorders. A PASRR level II, completed 12/05/19, documented Res #3 required monitoring for eye health and recommended activities included taking the resident outside when weather permitted. A care plan, reviewed 03/01/22, did not include monitoring for eye health or the recommended activity documented on the PASRR level II. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 08/25/22, documented Res #3 was severely cognitively impaired, had highly impaired vision, and required extensive to total assistance with all ADL's. On 08/30/22, at 3:03 p.m., the MDS Coordinator stated she recorded which residents required a PASRR on the care plan, but she had not seen the PASRR recommendations for Res #3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record observation, review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by accepted clinical practice to decrease the potential for feeding tube complications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented three residents required tube feedings. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disabilities, and gastrostomy status. The facility policy, Administering Medications through and Enteral Tube revised November 2018, documented to administer each medication separately and flush between medications, and verify placement of feeding tube before giving medications. A physician order, dated 04/21/15, documented to flush PEG tube with 30 cc of water before and after giving medications. A physician order, dated 05/04/15, documented to check patency and placement of PEG tube before and after each feeding or medication administration. A physician order, dated 11/09/16, documented to check for residual before administering medications. A care plan, revised 03/01/22, documented interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$33,270 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-03-18
- $24,160 — penalty dated 2024-11-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-23 for 1 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DELORES O MITCHELL RVOC TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 13% | since 02/01/2002 |
| SEQUOYAH HOUSE INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| BIVIN, JULIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 02/01/2002 |
| JOHNSON, DEANNA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2002 |
| LEIKAM, JO ANNE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 02/01/2002 |
| RONK, VIRGINIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 02/01/2002 |
| VANDELINDER, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 8% | since 02/01/2002 |
| YOWELL, LYNN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 02/01/2002 |
| POINTER, PATRICK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| SEQUOYAH MANOR LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| RYAN, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/20/2014 |
| CHEEK, BENNIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
| DILL, CHRISTINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $344K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375173. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.