Stigler Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 54.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 07/31/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure Res #1, who was at risk for elopement, did not elope from the facility. Res #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. Res #1 eloped from the facility on 06/29/24 without staff knowledge and was returned to the facility by a community member. The facility did not complete one-on-one monitoring upon the Res #1's return or initiate environmental interventions for prevention. The care plan was not revised for the Res #1 and staff did not have a consistent plan to monitor and prevent elopement for the resident. On 07/31/24 at 3:00 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation related to elopement for Res #1. On 07/31/24 at 3:12 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 08/01/24 at 12:11 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure staff were available 24 hours a day who had current certification in CPR for Healthcare Providers (training to include hands-on practice and in-person skills) and maintain their certifications to be able to provide CPR until emergency medical services arrived. The facility failed to have a CPR policy and ensure staff were familiar with facility policies related to CPR. Three of the facility's 15 nurses had CPR certification, one night shift nurse who worked three shifts a week, one weekend nurse, who worked the day shift, and the administrator/RN, who was not on the schedule. No CMAs or CNAs had evidence of CPR certification. On [DATE] at 3:35 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 3:41 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 12:14 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 02/28/23, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents who had fallen had interventions put in place to prevent the recurrence of falls; monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions; modify the care plan with each fall; conduct a root cause analyses for each fall; and communicate the interventions with all staff. Res #41 had 16 falls in four months with one fall resulting in a fractured hip. Res #41 had sustained a broken hip after six falls and only two falls had steps to prevent recurrence. Res #41 had nine falls after a hip fracture with only two of those falls having interventions to prevent recurrence. The last fall was 02/26/23. Res #24 had five falls in four months, with the forth fall resulting in a fractured hip. Res #34 had eight falls in the last four months with the last fall resulting in a 17 x 2 cm skin tear to arm. The facility failed to consistently put interventions in place to prevent falls for these residents. On 02/28/23 at 1:59 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one (#1) of four residents sampled for abuse. On 08/06/23 CNA #1 sprayed Res #1 in the face for five seconds while the resident was screaming, yelled at the resident, and then sprayed her in the face again again per witness statement and interview. CNA #1 was terminated for abuse on 08/06/23 and rehired on 09/21/23. The administrator identified 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A document titled, [NAME] County Nursing Center, dated 01/11/23, signed by CNA #1, read in part, .Abuse/Incident Reporting/Investigations What is reportable and actions to be taken: 1. Abuse is defined in many ways in the nursing home setting. Abuse can be physical, emotional, mental, verbal, and sexual .4. The most important thing you do is make sure all residents are safe and notify your DON, ADON, and/or Administrator . Res #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a RN was in the facility 08/2025 through 09/2025 at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report, dated 07/01/25 through 09/30/25, showed no RN hours on 08/25/25, 09/19/25, 09/24/25, and 09/25/25. A form titled DON TIME LOG, dated 08/2025, did not show the DON worked on 08/25/25. The DON stated they were considered the eight hour a day RN coverage Monday through Friday for the facility. A form titled DON TIME LOG, dated 09/2025, did not show the DON worked on 09/19/25, 09/24/25, or 09/25/25. The DON stated they were considered the eight hour a day RN coverage Monday through Friday for the facility. A nurse staff schedule for 02/2026 showed the DON was considered the eight hour a day consecutive RN coverage for the facility Monday through Friday. On 02/11/26 at 2:22 p.m., the DON reviewed the DON time log and stated they must have failed to sign the log when they worked on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with advance directive information for 2 (#5 and #10) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility.Findings: A facility policy titled Health, Medical Condition and Treatment Options, Information Resident of, dated 12/2022, read in part, Residents will be informed of their health, medical condition and options for treatment and/or care.Right to formulate an advance directive upon admission and/or if the resident requests to complete an advance directive after admission. 1. A physician order tab in the electronic medical record showed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the electronic health records for Resident #5 showed no advanced directive acknowledgement form. A physician order for Resident #5, dated 02/04/26, showed the resident's code status was do not resuscitate. On 02/11/26 at 1:30 p.m., the administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A skilled services, had benefit days remaining, and remained in the facility were issued SNF ABN and NOMNC notices for 1 (#23) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The MDS coordinator identified nine residents discharged from Medicare Part A skilled services with benefit days remaining in the past six months. Findings:A ''SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form, dated 02/10/26, showed Resident #23 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 10/23/25, discharged from Part A skilled services on 12/19/26, and remained in the facility. The form showed Resident #23 was not provided with a SNF ABN or NOMNC notice.On 02/10/26 at 12:55 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated SNF ABN and NOMNC notices were not provided to Resident #23 but should have been per regulations.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served food in a manner that would reduce the risk of cross contamination during one of one kitchen observation. The DM identified 53 residents received meals prepared by the kitchen and one resident who received nutrition via peg tube. Findings: On 02/11/26 at 12:00 p.m., meal service was observed. CNA #1 approached the kitchen window to obtain a meal prepared by the dietary staff. The dietary staff prepared a plate, desert dish, and drinks for the staff to transport to a resident's table. CNA #1 picked up the uncovered meal plate and the desert dish in each hand. There were two drink glasses remaining to be transported. CNA #1 picked up the glasses by the rims using their third, fourth, and fifth fingers of each hand and transported the meal the resident's table. CNA #2 approached the kitchen window to obtain another resident's meal. CNA #2 picked up the uncovered plate and placed the desert dish in the middle of the plate touching the food items. CNA #2 then picked up two drink glasses with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure walls were kept clean for 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 1 room observed for infection control concerns.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/05/26 at 1:30 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. There was 3 to 4 inches of the base board pulled away from the bottom of the wall next to the bathroom door. There was a moderate amount of a black substance on the wall under and around the base board. On 02/05/26 at 1:40 p.m., housekeeper #1 stated they had worked at the facility for three months. Housekeeper #1 stated the black substance on the wall looked like mold. They stated it had been that way since they have worked at the facility. Housekeeper #1 stated they had tried to clean it off the wall several times, but it would not come off. On 02/11/26 at 10:46 a.m., the maintenance supervisor stated the black substance looked like mold. They stated they used spackling to adhere the base board back to the wall and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage eight consecutive hours seven days per week. The Resident List Report documented 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Timecards from 06/16/24 to 07/31/24 documented RN coverage was not provided for eight consecutive hours on: 06/16/24, 06/17/24, 06/28/24, 07/02/24, 07/03/24, 07/04/24, 07/10/24, 07/13/24, 07/17/24, 07/18/24, 07/27/24, and 07/28/24. On 08/01/24 at 1:15 p.m., staff #4 stated there was not a RN in the building on 07/27/24 and 07/28/24. They stated they were unaware the RN on shift was clocking out before a full eight hours was worked.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident with wounds for one (#1) of three sampled residents whose wound documentation was reviewed. LPN #2 identified ten residents who had wounds. Findings: Res #1 had diagnoses which included paraplegia, end stage renal disease, hepatitis c, diabetes and pressure ulcers. Wound care assessments, dated 05/22/24, documented Res #1 had pressure ulcers to their coccyx, left heel, outer right ankle, outer right foot and spinous process lower. Res #1's comprehensive care plan did not include a care plan for their pressure ulcers. On 05/23/24 at 12:32 p.m., LPN #2 reported they missed the wounds when auditing new physician's orders and reported the wounds should have been care planned.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care assessments were accurate for a resident with wounds for one (#1) of three sampled residents whose wound documentation was reviewed. LPN #2 identified ten residents who had wounds. Findings: The Pressure Ulcer Treatment policy, undated, read in part, .Suspected Deep Tissue Injury: Purple or [NAME] localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear .Unstageable: Full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed . Res #1 had diagnoses which included paraplegia, end stage renal disease, hepatitis c, diabetes and pressure ulcers. A wound care assessment, dated 05/22/24, documented Res #1 had a SDTI (Suspected Deep Tissue Injury) of the spinous process lower. A progress note, dated 05/22/24, documented in part, .Contacted doctor about wound care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to update the comprehensive person-centered care plans to reflect the residents' current needs for four (#2, 19, 30, and #46) of 15 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, read in part, .This facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident . The resident, family members, and/or legal representative are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan . 1) Resident #2's current physician's orders dated 07/31/23, documented may apply oxygen via nasal cannula at 2-4 LPM to keep oxygen saturations above 92%. Resident #2's quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had no cognitive impairments and was not on oxygen therapy. On 04/15/24 at 12:15 p.m., an oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hot water was provided for the residents for approximately a month. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An invoice dated 01/09/24, documented two inch pipes were replaced with gas line thread tape to prevent gas leaks. An invoice dated 01/15/24, documented the valve ball fitting was replaced and pipes were replaced again. An invoice dated 01/16/24, documented a water heater connector and pipe had to be replaced. An invoice dated 01/19/24, documented the couple fitting, pipes, copper caps, an adapter, and a lower and upper thermostat were replaced. An invoice dated 01/23/24, documented a lower and upper thermostat was replaced with a water heating element. An invoice dated 01/26/24, documented parts were purchased again to repair the old water heaters. The plumber replaced the water heater pump and the gate valve. Once the pump and gate valve were repaired then the valve that was replaced blew off causing damage again. The pump was replaced with copper adapter, and ball…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$66,206 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $20,772 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
• $45,434 — penalty dated 2024-02-07
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-13 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $89K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK