Stilwell Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 86.2 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the estimated costs of services was included on form CMS-10055 (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) for 3 (#37, 78, and #79) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications reviews. MDS Coordinator #1 stated there had been 28 discharges from Part A services in the past six months (09/01/24 through 04/01/25). Findings: A facility policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, dated September 2022, read in part, If the director of admissions or benefits coordinator believes (upon admission or during the resident's stay) that Medicare (Part A of the Fee for Service Medicare Program) will not pay for an otherwise covered skilled service(s), the resident (or representative) is notified in writing why the service(s) may not be covered and of the resident's potential liability for payment of the non-covered service(s). 1. A document titled Form CMS-10055, dated 2024, showed Res #79 had signed the form on 10/28/24. The section of the document…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a care plan intervention for tracheostomy self care for 1 (#60) of 1 sampled resident whose care plan was reviewed. The DON reported one resident with a tracheostomy resided at the facility. Findings: On 04/07/25 at 12:18 p.m., Resident #60 was observed to have a tracheostomy. A treatment administration record, dated 03/01/25 through 03/31/25, showed Resident #60 had diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the lung. Resident #60's care plan was reviewed. The care plan did not include self care for their tracheostomy. On 04/08/25 at 2:55 p.m., MDS coordinator #2 reviewed Resident #60's care plan. They stated Resident #60's self care of their tracheostomy was not care planned. They stated self care should have been added to their care plan. On 04/08/25 at 3:15 p.m., the DON stated Resident #60 performing self care for their tracheostomy should have been care planned.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0848 — isolated
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a binding arbitration agreement did not require mediation be held in a specific county of the state of Oklahoma for 1 (#45) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. The DON stated 76 residents at the facility were offered the opportunity to sign the facility's arbitration agreement. Findings: An undated facility document titled Mediation and Arbitration Agreement, read in part, It is understood and agreed by [blank line for resident's name] ('Resident' or 'Resident Authorized Representative') that in the event of any legal dispute, controversy, demand or claim that arises out of or related to the admission Agreement or any service or health care provided by [NAME] Nursing Home (the 'Facility') to the Resident, such shall first be submitted to mediation, and not a lawsuit or resort to court process. Such mediation will be held in Tulsa County, Oklahoma in a place agreed to by the parties. A facility policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of infections for 1 (#40) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The DON identified 12 residents received wound care. Findings: On 04/09/25 at 12:00 p.m., LPN #1 gathered supplies to complete wound care for the Res #40. LPN #1 donned a gown, mask, and a pair of gloves for the wound care. LPN #1 cleaned the resident's wounds to both lower extremities with wet gauze and disposed of the gauze in the trash container on the side of the treatment cart in the hall. LPN #1 did not change their gloves or wash their hands. LPN #1 applied calcium alginate (wound dressing) and a Kerlix (bandage roll) dressing to both lower legs and wrapped with Coban (a self-adherent wrap). LPN #1 removed their gown, mask, and gloves then placed them in a trash container on the side of the treatment cart in the hall. LPN #1 did not change their gloves or wash their hands during the wound care. A policy titled Wound Care, Revised October 2010,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for a diabetic for one (#17) of one sampled resident whose record was reviewed for insulin usage. The DON identified 24 residents who required insulin. Findings: Res #17 was admitted with diagnoses which included diabetes. A physician order, dated 04/11/23, read in part, Novolog Solution, inject as per sliding scale .for glucose over 450, recheck in 1 hour, if glucose is still above 401 call physician . The TAR for October 2023 was reviewed with the following findings: On 10/02/23 at 8:00 p.m., Res #17's blood sugar was 468. No documentation blood sugar was rechecked an hour later. On 10/03/23 at 6:00 a.m., Res #17's blood sugar was 571. No documentation blood sugar was rechecked an hour later. On 10/09/23 at 4:00 p.m., Res #17's blood sugar was 571. No documentation blood sugar was rechecked an hour later. On 10/10/23 at 11:00 a.m., Res #17's blood sugar was 500. No documentation blood sugar was rechecked an hour later. On 10/15/23 at 8:00 p.m., Res #17's blood sugar was 454. No documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the services of an RN was available in the facility eight hours daily seven days a week. The administrator identified 74 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A document titled, Time Care Report, documented an RN was not present in the building on the dates of 09/16/23 and 09/17/23 for the month of September. A document titled Time Care Report documented an RN was not present in the building on the dates of 10/08/23 for the month of October. A document titled Time Care Report documented an RN was not present in the building on the dates of 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/25/23, and 11/26/23 for the month of November. On 12/14/23 at 1:37 p.m., the DON stated they did have an RN in the facility every day for at least 8 hours per day. On 12/14/23 at 1:40 p.m., the administrator stated there was an RN in the facility every day. On 12/14/23 at 1:56 p.m., the BOM stated they were not aware that an RN was not here on certain days related to the corporate nurse never said anything about no RN coverage.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 12/12/23 at 11:45 a.m., Res #24 stated they ate meals in their room. The resident stated the food was usually cold. On 12/12/23 at 9:03 a.m., Res #51 stated they ate in the dining room sometimes and sometimes in their room. The resident stated the food was always cold. 2. On 12/13/23 at 1:24 p.m., a test tray was obtained as the last tray on Hall 6. The tray included black eyed peas with a temperature of 119 degrees; green beans at 111 degrees and did not taste seasoned; pork chop at 98 degrees which tasted lukewarm to cool; a roll at 109 degrees; and ice cream. On 12/14/23 at 11:35 a.m., CNA #1 reported the food was cold all the time and the residents complained of cold food. On 12/14/23 at 11:36 a.m., the DA reported the residents always complained of cold food. On 12/14/23 at 11:38 a.m., the DM stated. they had tried everything they could to help keep the food warm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure trash cans were clean and in working order. The DON identified 73 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 12/11/23 at 9:30 a.m., there were three sensor trash cans in the kitchen. None of the trash cans were working and did not have foot pedals. All three trash can lids were covered with dried liquid, brown stains, and food debris. On 12/11/23 at 9:45, the DM reported the batteries in the trash cans were low and needed to be replaced. The DM reported the staff would have to raise the trash can lid with their hands to dispose of trash. The DM reported the trash cans were supposed to be cleaned on the weekend but they were not. On 12/13/23 at 11:45 a.m., the trash can beside the handwashing sink was covered in dried liquid and had food substances/debris on the outside lid, underneath the lid, and around the inside rim of the trash can. On 12/13/23 at 12:00 p.m., the DM reported the trash can beside the handwashing sink was not clean.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the code status was identified and correct for one (#40) of five resident whose code status was reviewed. The administrator identified 74 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #40 had diagnoses which included acute embolism and thrombosis or unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and sarcopenia. On 06/07/23, a DNR was signed by the primary care physician. A significant change assessment, dated 06/09/23, documented the resident's cognitive skills were severely impaired and was dependent with ADLs. On 06/19/23, Res #40 was admitted to hospice. A physician order, dated 09/09/23, documented the resident's code status was DNR. On 12/11/23 at 10:55 a.m., an observation was made of a green sticker by resident's name on doorway, indicating the resident was a full code. On 12/13/23 at 2:30 p.m., CNA #3 stated the green sticker on the door meant the resident was a full code.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify OHCA of a new diagnoses of serious mental illness for two (#3 and #66) of three sampled residents whose PASARR records were reviewed. The DON identified 74 residents who residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, dementia, depression, and repeated falls. A PASARR I form, dated 01/09/23, documented the resident did not have a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. The EHR documented on 01/30/23 the resident received a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. On 12/13/23 at 3:04 p.m., the DON reviewed the resident's clinical record and stated a new diagnosis of serious mental illness was added to the resident's diagnoses list on 01/30/23. The DON stated a referral should have been made to the OHCA. 2. Res #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression and anxiety. A level I PASARR was completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $677K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK