Callaway Nursing Home
1300 West Lindsey, Sulphur, OK 73086 · For profit - Corporation · 86 certified beds · (580) 622-2416 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.4% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 3.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.7% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 25.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.3% | 17.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 82.6% | 17.5% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.63 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 7.08 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/02/25 at 10:52 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility's failure to effectively assess, monitor, and intervene for Resident #1's failure to have a bowel movement which likely caused the resident to be admitted to the hospital with a small bowel obstruction. On 05/02/25 at 11:14 a.m., the receiver, ADON and MDS coordinator were notified of the immediate jeopardy and provided the immediate jeopardy template. On 05/05/25 at 7:05 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Plan Of Removal 5/02/2025: 1. Systemic changes implemented: a. All residents with no bowel movement within the previous 3 days were immediately physically assessed and educated on the risks and benefits of proper hydration or lack of same for daily bowel movements. b. Physician notified and orders received for medication if applicable. c. Medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for administering medication for 1 (#2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for following physician orders. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #2's hospital discharge papers, dated 08/21/25, showed the resident was diagnosed and treated for bacterial pneumonia during the hospital stay. A health status note, dated 08/21/25 6:24 p.m., showed Resident #2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE].The hospital discharge medication list, dated 08/21/25, showed the resident should had received the following new medications which had not been added to the resident's physician orders upon readmission to the facility: a. Albuterol (bronchodilator) 0.083 % Inhalation Solution, 3 milliliters HHN every 4 hours as needed;b. bumetanide (diuretic) AvPak, 0.5 mg orally twice daily;c. Cobenfy (antipsychotic) 125 mg-30 mg, one capsule orally twice daily;d. digoxin (used to strengthen the heart) 0.125…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of physical restraint use for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for change in condition. The administrator reported 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Notification of Changes showed the facility must immediately inform the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. The policy showed the facility must immediately inform the resident's representative when a need to alter treatment significantly. An annual assessment, dated 04/01/25, showed Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 09. A progress note, dated 04/28/25 at 5:29 p.m., showed the nurse practitioner ordered to send Resident #1 to an inpatient psych facility and ordered a wrist restraint. A progress note, dated 04/28/25 at 6:31 p.m., showed Resident #1's family was notified of the resident's behaviors, order to send to an inpatient psych facility, and new order for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically restrained for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for physical restraints. The administrator reported 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Use of Restraints showed unless there was an actual emergency, a physical restraint would not be initiated until the need for such a restraint was discussed thoroughly with the resident and/or representative and written consent is obtained. The policy showed the resident, or resident representative has the right to refuse the use of a restraint. An annual assessment, dated 04/01/25, showed Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired with a BIMS score of 09. The assessment showed limited range of motion to one side of upper extremity and staff asssistance required with activities of daily living. A progress note, dated 04/28/25 at 5:12 p.m., showed Resident #1 was sitting in their room and placed four fingers down their throat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a registered nurse to serve as full time DON. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Registered Nurse showed the facility would ensure a registered nurse was available for supervision in the facility. The policy showed the facility must designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis. On 04/21/25 at 2:30 p.m., during the entrance conference, the ADON reported the facility did not currently have a DON. The ADON reported the facility did not have an RN acting in the capacity of the DON. On 04/24/25 at 9:20 a.m., the administrator reported the DON resigned the previous week. On 04/28/25 at 2:35 p.m., the administrator reported the previous DON last worked on 04/14/25.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform and provide written information to the resident or their representative regarding an advance directive for 3 (#9, 18, and #38) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility did not provide an advance directive policy. 1. A physician order for Resident #9, dated 01/23/25, showed the resident was a full code status. A MDS assessment for Resident #9, dated 02/09/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed the resident had diagnoses which include congestive heart failure, hypertension, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, depression, and schizophrenia. A care plan for Resident #9, dated 02/09/25, showed the resident was a full code status and staff would follow the full code protocol. A review of Resident #9's hard chart and electronic medical record showed no documentation related to advance directive information. 2. A MDS assessment for Resident #18, dated 01/15/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. perform weekly blood pressure checks as ordered for 1 (#32); and b. follow hold parameters on blood pressure medication for 1 (#31) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for following physician orders. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The ADON reported there was no policy for following physician orders or medication administration and hold parameters. 1. A physician order for Resident #32, dated 05/30/24, showed to take and record the resident's blood pressure weekly on Mondays. A progress note for Resident #32, dated 11/20/24 at 1:52 p.m., showed the resident went to have surgery on their right eye. The note showed the resident's blood pressure was elevated and they were unable to do the surgery. The note showed the resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation due to elevated blood pressure. A progress note for Resident #32, dated 11/20/24 at 5:54 p.m., showed the resident returned to the facility accompanied by a staff member. The note showed the resident had a new order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure the highest practicable well-being of each resident. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated October 2024 through December 2024 showed no RN hours on 10/09, 10/10, 10/11, 10/14, 10/15, 10/16, 10/17, 10/18, 10/21, 10/22, 10/23, 10/24, 10/25, 10/26, 10/28, 10/29, 10/30, 10/31, 11/01, 11/02, 11/03, 11/04, 11/05, 11/06, 11/07, 11/08, 11/09, 11/10, 11/11, 11/12, 11/13, 11/14, 11/15, 11/16, 11/17, 11/18, 11/19, 11/20, 11/21, 11/22, 11/23, 11/24, 11/25, 11/26, 11/27, 11/28, 11/29, 11/30, 12/01, 12/02, 12/03, 12/04, 12/05, 12/06, 12/07, 12/08, 12/09, 12/10, 12/11, 12/12, 12/13, 12/14, 12/15, 12/16, 12/17, 12/18, 12/19, 12/20, 12/21, 12/22, 12/23, 12/24, 12/25, 12/26, 12/27, 12/28, 12/29, 12/30, and 12/31. The PBJ Staffing Data Report dated October through December 2024, showed the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day on 10/11, 10/13, 10/20, 10/24, 10/25, 10/26, 10/28, 10/29, 10/30, 10/31, 11/01,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician provided a rationale when not agreeing with a gradual dose reduction recommendations made by the pharmacist for 4 (#3, 18, 21, and #31) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Gradual Dose Reduction showed a gradual dose reduction may be considered clinically contraindicated if the physician had documented the clinical rationale. 1. A care plan, dated 08/16/24, showed Resident #3 took tramadol (an opiate analgesic), Remeron (an antidepressant), Cymbalta/duloxetine (an antidepressant), and Abilify/aripiprazole (an antipsychotic) daily for diagnoses of pain and depression. The care plan showed to consult with pharmacy and the physician to consider dosage reduction when clinically appropriate. A pharmacist consult, dated 12/16/24, showed a recommendation for a trial dose reduction for one of the following medications: Abilify, Cymbalta, and Remeron. The pharmacist consult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a water management program for Legionella. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A maintenance air and water temperature log, dated 04/22/25 through 04/25/25, showed no testing for Legionella had been conducted. On 04/23/25 at 10:00 a.m., the administrator provided an information packet for Legionella water management. The packet contained no policy. On 04/28/25 at 10:31 a.m., the maintenance supervisor reported they were hired in March 2025. They reported they were trying to organize paperwork for the facility, but stated they do not have a detailed diagram of the facility and do not have a water management program in place. They reported they have not been trained on Legionella but was given a packet of information. On 04/28/25 at 10:50 a.m., the administrator reported no Legionella water management policy was available.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program was implemented for 3 (#3, 18, and #21) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship showed to implement protocols to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring residents who required an antibiotic were prescribed the appropriate antibiotic. The policy showed to assess residents for any infection using standardized tools and criteria. 1. A physician's order for Resident #3, dated 11/29/24, showed Bactrim double strength (an antibiotic) 800 mg -160 mg, give one tablet two times a day for an urinary tract infection. A physician's order for Resident #3, dated 02/27/25, showed Azithromycin (an antibiotic) 250 mg, give one tablet one time a day for a positive COVID test. An annual assessment for Resident #3, dated 02/27/25, showed antibiotic use for the resident. The assessment showed a diagnosis of dementia and the resident's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for the residents. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/21/25 at 2:15 p.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. Floors in the main lobby, hallways, dining room, and common areas were observed to have dirt and brown stains. A common area at the end of the womens hall was observed to have a fast-food sack of trash on the floor and the area smelled strongly of urine. In the same common area, a door was observed to have a plastic bag shoved into a hole where the door knob had previously been. On 04/24/25 at 8:18 a.m., the common area at the end of the womens hall was observed to still have the plastic bag shoved into the hole of the door where a door knob would be. [NAME] wrappers and a soiled brief/diaper was observed in the corner of the room beside a chair. The floor was noted with brown stains/spills. On 04/24/25 at 11:41 a.m., housekeeping staff were observed in the hallway of the womens hall near the common area. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received a shower as scheduled and requested for 1 (#9) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for activities of daily living assistance. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/22/25 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #9 was observed using a wet wipe to clean their body. An undated policy titled Shower/Tub Bath showed the purpose was to promote cleanliness and comfort, relax the resident, stimulate circulation, and facilitate observation of the residents's skin condition. A MDS assessment for Resident #9, dated 02/09/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed the resident had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, depression, and schizophrenia. A progress note for Resident #9, dated 03/15/25 at 9:00 p.m., showed the resident refused a shower when asked by staff. The note showed the resident refused a shower before dinner as well. On 04/22/25 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate a staff member to serve as the infection preventionist. The administrator reported 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, read in part, The facility must establish an infection prevention and control program that must include .A system for preventing, identifying .and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment and following accepted national standards .'infection preventionist' .designated by the facility to be responsible for the infection prevention and control program. An undated staff roster showed no infection preventionist. On 04/21/25 at 2:23 p.m., the DON reported the facility was currently without an infection preventionist.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a refund was completed within 30 days from the resident's date of discharge for one (#8) of one sampled resident reviewed for timely refunds. The administrator identified one resident in the past six months who required a refund. Findings: A Resident Funds policy, not dated, documented in part, Upon the discharge, eviction, or death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility must convey within 30 days of the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the resident .in accordance with State law. A physician's order, dated 01/29/24, documented Resident #8 was to be discharged to another long term care facility. A progress note, dated 01/29/24 at 1:00 p.m., documented Resident #8 was transferred to another long term care facility via private car with their family member. Refund check #5426 in the amount of $328.00, dated 03/25/24, documented a refund for Resident #8 was made to the facility where the resident was transferred. Refund check #5422 in the amount of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency (OSDH) and other officials as required for two (#1 and #5) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified two allegations of abuse in the past 120 days. Findings: An undated Allegations of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment policy, read in part, Purpose: Ensure alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse .the results of all investigations are thoroughly investigated and reported to the proper authorities within required time frames .reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Huntington's disease, depression, vascular dementia, mood disorder, and anxiety. A care plan for Resident #1, dated 07/22/24, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and report the results of the investigations for two (#1 and #5) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified two allegations of abuse in the past 120 days. Findings: An undated Allegations of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment policy, read in part, Purpose: Ensure alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse .the results of all investigations are thoroughly investigated and reported to the proper authorities within required time frames .reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Huntington's disease, depression, vascular dementia, mood disorder, and anxiety. A care plan for Resident #1, dated 07/22/24, documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit completed MDS data to the CMS system within 14 days of completion. The administrator identifed 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated MDS policy, read in part, Policy Objectives .Maintain compliance with quality reporting requirements .Submit MDS data to the CMS database as required .Monitor submission compliance and address issues proactively .Submit MDS data to CMS via the Quality Improvement and Evaluation System within the required timeframes. On 11/13/24 at 4:00 p.m., review of MDS data documented MDS assessments were not submitted from 05/01/24 to 07/08/24. On 11/13/24 at 4:11 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with LPN #1. The LPN reported they had started working for the facility in July 2024 as the MDS coordinator. The LPN reported the facility was having difficulty transmitting MDS data and the issues had just recently been resolved. The LPN reported they were able to transmit a batch of approximately 200 MDS assessments on 10/08/24.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a registered nurse on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, and failed to have a director of nursing on a full time basis. The administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Registered Nurse policy, read in part, .Ensure that a Registered Nurse is available for supervision in the facility .Except when waived, the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week .Except when waived, the facility must designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis. A review of staff time cards and schedules for August 2024 documented no RN or DON coverage on 08/01/24, 08/02, 08/05, 08/06, 08/07, 08/08, and 08/09/24. A review of staff time cards and schedules for September 2024 documented the DON worked 09/23/24, 09/24, 09/25, 09/26, 09/27, and 09/30/24. No other RN coverage was documented. A review of staff time cards and schedules for October 2024 documented the last day the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to grant access to the EMR for the survey team. The administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 11/13/24 at 12:15 p.m., surveyors entered the facility to conduct complaint investigations. The administrator reported the facility utilized an EMR and staff members were observed to utilize the EMR. The administrator was informed surveyors would require access to the EMR for record review during the investigations. On 11/13/24 at 3:50 p.m., the administrator reported they were informed by the receiver their company did not provide access of the EMR to surveyors. The administrator was informed they were required to grant access to surveyors to avoid impeding the survey process. On 11/13/24 at 4:00 p.m., the receiver reported they did not grant access of the EMR to surveyors, but would print off any requested documentation. The receiver was informed they were required to grant access of the EMR to surveyors, but the receiver refused to comply.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-05 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a licensed administrator. The DON reported 47 residents resided in the facility. On 01/02/24 at 12:39 p.m., the facility Receiver reported the facility was currently without a licensed administrator. She stated she had talked with staff at OSDH and explained she was currently filling in until a new administrator could be hired. On 01/05/24 at 10:32 a.m., the DON reported the facility had a couple of administrator applicants and the Receiver had stepped up to fill in while they were without a licensed administrator.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit mandatory direct care staffing information to CMS as required. The DON reported 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility PBJ Staffing Data Report, for Quarter 4 2023, documented the facility had failed to submit the required direct care staffing information. On 01/02/24 at 12:39 p.m., the facility Receiver reported the administrator was responsible for submitting the required data and the facility was currently without an administrator. The Receiver reported they were hoping to train the business office manager to submit the staffing data until a new administrator could be hired. On 01/04/24 at 3:30 p.m., staffing schedules, healthcare authority reports, and agency staff hours were reviewed and documented sufficient staff for the reported resident census.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to ensure a safe environment for all residents. The facility did not screen and conduct a criminal history background check for the billing manager. The DON reported 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility policy, Criminal History Background Checks, read in part, . ensure compliance with state and federally required criminal background checks need to provide a safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors .all background checks are conducted by OKScreen .if the results of a criminal history background check reveal that the subject person has been convicted of .a felony or misdemeanor offense .the employer shall not hire or contract with the person . On 01/04/24 at 10:15 a.m., the DON and ADON reported they were aware the facility's billing manager was a registered offender. They reported the billing manager was in the facility for a couple of hours every one to two weeks to discuss orders for needed supplies and to pick up anything related to bills. On 01/04/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for administration of a medication for one (#36) of nine residents reviewed for medication administration. The DON reported 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Medication Administration policy, not dated, documented in part, .Right Dose .verify against MAR .check the medical record for the physician's order . A physician order for Res #36, dated 09/28/21, documented Exelon Patch, 4.6 mg/24, apply one patch topically daily, date/time patch, and chart site, initial under correct date that old patch was removed and destroyed. A medication administration record, dated January 2024, documented, Exelon patch, 4.6mg/24, 9am site, 9am off. On 01/03/24 at 9:28 a.m., ACMA #1 reported she could not find the old patch anywhere on resident #36 that should have been placed the previous morning. The ACMA was observed to have another CMA go with her to check the resident to ensure the patch was not still on the resident's body. Resident #36 reported she could not remember if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were labeled with a date, when changed per professional standards of care, for five (#1, 3, 6, 14, and #25) of five residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 12/06/22, documented 11 residents received respiratory treatments. Findings: 1. Resident #1 had a diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. The resident's Care Plan, dated 04/10/22, read in parts, .Resident has a history of congestive heart failure, and is at risk for shortness of breath, chest pain, increased edema and elevated blood pressure .Apply oxygen as needed for complaints of chest pain, and labored respirations .Oxygen at 2 liter per minute via nasal cannula to keep O2 sats greater than 90 .Initiate O2 for complaints of shortness of breath and notify the physician . A Physician's Order, dated 08/02/22, documented O2 at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula to keep O2 Sats > 90%, check O2 Sats every shift. The resident's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure: a. the ice machine was maintained and sanitary, and; b. the ice chest used for ice storage remained sanitary throughout the day. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Ice Machine Cleaning and Disinfecting policy, dated 09/15/22, read in parts, .The outside of the ice machine and the basic structure that can be wiped down are maintained by the dietary department on a daily basis while using the equipment .The internal components that require maintenance inspection and further cleaning are the responsibility of maintenance department on a monthly basis to ensure proper operation of the machine. On 12/05/22 at 10:50 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The ice machine was located in the facility's main dining room and was observed to be locked. An ice chest on a rolling cart was observed next to the ice machine and observed to contain ice. An unknown resident was observed using a scoop to get ice out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0851 — patternElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing information, based on payroll data, per CMS requirements. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 44 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Facility staffing records and healthcare authority reports were reviewed. There was no Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) direct care staffing data submitted by the facility. On 12/08/22 at 9:11 a.m., the DON was interviewed regarding staffing and reporting of PBJ staffing data. The DON stated she didn't know much about the PBJ staffing report. The DON stated she wasn't sure but she was under the impression the Administrator didn't think the facility was required to submit this data since the facility did not take Medicare payments. On 12/08/22 at 9:34 a.m., The Administrator was interviewed regarding the PBJ direct care staffing report. The Administrator stated she had been under the impression the facility was not required to submit this report.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the status of the resident for one (#6) of 11 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 44 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia. A Physician's Order, dated 12/03/21, documented an order for hospice services. The resident's Care Plan, dated 07/31/22, read in parts, .The resident has the potential for complications and signs/symptoms related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease .The resident has elected to have hospice care with Centric hospice related to the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 09/04/22, documented severely impaired cognition and no assistance needed with most ADLs. The assessment did not reflect the resident received hospice services. On 12/06/22 at 10:00 a.m. the resident was observed on the COVID unit in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess residents at least once every three months for three (#10, 16, and #30) of three residents reviewed for quarterly assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 44 residents resided at the facility. Findings: The facility policy, Resident Assessments revised March 2022, documented in parts .The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessments and reviews .admission Assessment (Comprehensive) .Quarterly Assessment .Annual Assessment (Comprehensive) .Significant Change in Status Assessment (Comprehensive) .Discharge Assessment. The facility policy, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes revised July 2017, documented in parts .Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes .The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring resident assessments are submitted to CMS' QIES Assessment Submission and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit MDS Assessments within 14 days after completion for two (#11 and #32) of three residents reviewed for timely transmission of resident assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents'' form documented 44 residents resided at the facility. Findings: The facility policy, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes revised July 2017, documented in parts .Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes .The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring resident assessments are submitted to CMS' QIES Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with federal and state guidelines .Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. 1. Resident #11 was reviewed for timely transmission of an MDS assessment. The resident had a comprehensive assessment completed on 10/23/22 but the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in OK
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 37E624. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.