Montereau, Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 310 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 59.4 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 88% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, monitor, and intervene for a resident with a history of skin breakdown. The facility failed to accurately identify the status of a resident at high risk for skin breakdown, failed to accurately and timely document the resident's skin condition, failed to accurately care plan, provide, and monitor the success or failure of interventions for the resident's deteriorating skin condition, and failed to communicate the resident's deteriorating skin condition to other disciplines of the resident's care team. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and intervene for 1 (#1) of 7 sampled residents who had pressure ulcers/wounds or were at high risk for the development of pressure ulcers/wounds. The facility's Census and Condition, dated [DATE], showed five residents with pressure ulcers and 41 resident receiving preventative skin care. Findings: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address immediate needs of residents for 2 (#1 and #48) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility.Findings:1.On 03/30/26 at 2:20 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in a wheelchair in their room with a urinary catheter in place.A physician order for Resident #1, dated 02/27/26, showed to admit the resident to the SNF.A physician order for Resident #1, dated 02/27/26, showed the resident had an order for apixiban (an anticoagulant) 5 mg every morning and at bedtime.An admission assessment for Resident #1, dated 03/05/26, showed the resident had medical diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and heart failure. The assessment showed Resident #1 had an indwelling urinary catheter and they were on anticoagulant therapy.A care plan for Resident #1, revised 03/15/26, showed focus areas for anticoagulant therapy and catheter use, but did not show interventions for those areas.On 04/02/26 at 2:10 p.m., the ADON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for 1 (#56) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for timely administration of medications. The administrator identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An admission record for Resident #56, dated 08/07/24, showed the resident had diagnoses which included dementia, restless leg syndrome, and anxiety.Physician orders for Resident #56, dated 08/09/24, showed to administer the following: a. ropinirole (dopamine agonist) 2 mg, give one tablet by mouth at bedtime andb. ropinirole 1 mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day. A policy titled Medication Reordering, revised 2025, read in part, each time a nurse is administering medications and observes a seven day supply or less, that nurse will reorder the medication, time permitting.A Medication Record for Resident #56, dated December 2025, showed missed doses for the following:a. ropinirole 1 mg on 12/17/25 at 3:00 p.m., because the medication was on order and awaiting delivery andb. ropinirole 1 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to answer call lights in a timely manner for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for call light response.The DON identified 46 residents resided at the facility. Findings:Review of the Alarms by Room report, dated 08/07/25 through 08/25/25, for Resident #1, showed:a. on 08/07/25 at 4:11 p.m., call light initiated on bed for 1 hour 19 minutes 18 seconds;b. on 08/07/25 at 4:33 p.m., call light initiated on bath for 30 minutes 46 seconds; c. on 08/07/25 at 5:06 p.m., bath call light initiated on for 27 minutes 8 seconds;d. on 08/08/25 at 5:11 a.m., call light initiated on bed for 1 hour 6 minutes 12 seconds; e. on 08/12/25 at 12:35 a.m., bed call light initiated on for 59 minutes 54 seconds; f. on 08/15/25 at 8:09 a.m., bed call light initiated on for 38 minutes 30 seconds; g. on 08/20/25 at 5:24 p.m., bed call light initiated on for 45 minutes 6 seconds; h. 08/21/25 call log until 6:00 p.m., showed call light times up to 23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 2 (first floor North treatment cart #2 and second floor South treatment cart #2) of 2 treatment carts observed to be unlocked and unattended.The DON identified six treatment carts and six medication carts in the facility. Findings: 1.On 10/27/25 at 1:57 p.m., in the chateau on the second floor, the South treatment cart #2 was observed to be unlocked next to the nursing station. Three staff were observed to be behind the nurses' station and one staff was observed to be in front of the nurses' station. On 10/27/25 at 1:59 p.m., two staff were observed to be behind the nurses' station and the one staff in the front of the nursing station left. One staff remained behind the nurses' station, talking with a contracted provider. On 10/27/25 at 2:01 p.m., LPN #2 was observed behind the nurses' station, talking to a nursing student then left the nurses' station. The unlocked cart was unattended. The cart contained the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appointments were scheduled for a resident for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for appointments.The DON identified 46 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An admission assessment, dated 08/10/25, showed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of heart failure and a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making.A progress note, dated 08/13/25 at 11:13 p.m., showed Resident #1 had a nosebleed and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment.Hospital discharge paperwork, dated 08/13/25, showed Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room for a nosebleed. The hospital discharge paperwork, read in part, Follow-up with ENT for further evaluation of your recurrent nosebleeds. The hospital discharge paperwork showed Resident #1 was to follow-up with an ENT physician within five to seven days.A progress note, dated 08/14/25 at 2:47 a.m., showed Resident #1 had returned to the facility from the hospital.Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were implemented for the treatment of pressure ulcers for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for nutritional supplements.The DON identified 20 residents received nutritional supplements. Findings:An admission assessment, dated 10/11/25, showed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 03, which indicated they were severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The assessment showed Resident #3 had diagnoses which included coronary artery disease, hypertension, and Alzheimer's disease.A Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment, dated 10/13/25, showed Resident #3 had an increased protein need related to physiological changes as evidenced by the presence of a stage three pressure ulcer to the coccyx. The assessment showed an intervention to add liquid protein twice a day to optimize protein intake.A physician's order for Resident #3, dated 10/13/25, showed to give one packet of active liquid protein by mouth two times a day for wound, in order to optimize protein intake for wound healing. An October…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered at the ordered time for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON identified 46 residents received medications in the facility. Findings:An undated Medication Administration policy, read in part, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection.Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed .e. Right time .Example guidelines for Medication Administration (unless otherwise ordered by physician), this list is not all-inclusive .Medication timing .BID 7am-11am, 7pm-11pmAn admission assessment, dated 08/10/25, showed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included heart failure, hypertension, and renal insufficiency.A physician's order,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized during indwelling urinary catheter care for two (#4 and #6) of three sampled residents who were reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The DON identified eight residents with indwelling urinary catheters and 25 residents on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated March 2024, read in part, .EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities .Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include .device care or use .urinary catheter . 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy. The admission assessment, dated 07/03/24, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Physician's Order, dated 07/19/24, read in part, .Place resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to the presence of a [catheter] . On 10/11/24 at 10:48 a.m., CNA #1 was observed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity and respect for one (#7) of one resident sampled for dignity and respect. The Administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, undated, read in part, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. The policy also read, All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights. Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and dysphagia. Resident #7's annual assessment, dated 05/04/24, documented the resident was dependent on staff for assistance with all ADL's. A physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for three (#7, 40, and #208) of seven sampled residents whose advance directive acknowledgements were reviewed. The administrator identified 67 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Residents Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, policy, undated, read in part .On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine weather the resident would like to formulate an advance directive . 1. Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and dysphagia. A physician's order, dated 1/31/23, documented Resident #7 was a full code. A care plan, revised on 06/27/24, documented Resident #7 was a full code. Resident #7's medical record did not contain an advance directive acknowledgement and there was no social services assessment documenting the resident's choice. 2. Resident #40…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-05-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK