Oklahoma Memory Care Institute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 39.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 01/30/25 related to the facility's failure to supervise and prevent a resident from elopement. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from eloping from the facility which had the potential to result in serious injury or harm. On 02/11/24, the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to protect and prevent accident hazards related to elopement. The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 01/31/25 after the facility put measures in place to prevent recurrence. On 01/31/25 compliance rounds were initiated, the quality assurance committee met, an inservice on elopement risk and documentation of hourly rounds were completed by all direct care staff, outside window locks were replaced by locks that allowed limited opening, Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for supervision. The administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an abuse free environment for 3 (#2, 3, and #4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, implemented 01/2026, read in part, The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property.Establishing a safe environment that supports, to the extent possible, a resident's consensual sexual relationship and by establishing policies and protocols for preventing sexual abuse.1. A quarterly assessment for Resident #2, dated 01/09/26, showed the resident had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognition, and utilized a manual wheelchair for mobility.A nurse's progress note for Resident #2, dated 02/20/26, showed CNA #1 reported Resident #2 was on the floor in a resident's room. The progress note showed CNA #1 observed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform a background check for 1 (PCW #1) of 1 personal care worker contracted by a family to care for an individual resident. The DON identified one resident whose family contracted a private sitter.Findings:A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, implemented 01/2026, read in part, Background, reference, and credentials' checks shall be conducted on potential employees, contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, and consultants.On 03/18/26 at 10:20 a.m., PCW #1 stated they were a home health aide contracted with the family of Resident #5 to provide care and company to Resident #5. PCW #1 stated they worked with Resident #5 for several years and continued to work with them when they moved to the facility in September of 2025. On 03/18/26 at 11:00 a.m., the DON stated they were not aware the facility needed to perform a background check on someone contracted by the family to provide care to a particular resident and doubted the facility had performed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin to required agencies for one (#1) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The DON identified 47 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, anxiety, and frequent falls. A review of incident reports for Resident #1 revealed two incident reports for injuries of unknown origin on 10/26/24 and 12/10/24. Both were bruising, first to the temple and then to the right upper thigh. Review of state reports revealed the injury of unknown origin, dated 01/16/25, for a right subcaptial femoral neck fracture (a fracture that occurs in the neck of the femur, specifically at the junction where the femoral head meets the neck), was reported to OSDH on 01/17/25. No state reports were located for the 10/26/24 and 12/10/24 injuries of unknown origin. On 01/29/25 at 3:00 p.m., CNA #1 stated they reported falls, wounds, skin tears, pain, soreness, and red and purple bruises to the nurse. On 01/29/25 at 3:05 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity by being called their preferred name for three (#18, 20, and #24) and failed to ensure dignity with dining for nine (#5, 10, 12, 15, 18, 26, 33, 34, and #44) of eight sampled residents who were reviewed for dignity. The DON identified eight residents who were dependent on staff for meals who ate in the dining room. Findings: An undated Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes policy, read in part, .All staff will be seated, if possible, while feeding a resident . 1. On 10/28/24 at 8:21 a.m., the DON was observed to assist dependent residents with the morning meal in the dining room. The DON was observed to stand while assisting Resident #44, 33, and Resident #5. On 10/28/24 at 12:12 p.m., the DON was observed to assist dependent residents with the noon meal in the dining room. The DON was observed to stand while assisting Resident #18, 15, 26 and Resident #10. On 10/28/24 at 12:18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred safely with a mechanical lift for two (#21 and #18) of two sampled residents reviewed for mechanical transfers. The DON identified four residents who utilized a mechanical lift. Findings: 1. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, and heart failure. A care plan for Resident #21, initiated 02/28/24, documented to transfer with two staff using the mechanical lift. On 10/28/24 8:04 a.m., CNA #2 entered the room of Resident #21 alone with the mechanical lift. On 10/28/24 at 8:29 a.m., CNA #2 opened the door to the room of Resident #21. The mechanical lift was observed in the room and the resident was observed to be in their wheel chair with the sling under them. On 10/30/24 at 1:37 p.m., CNA #2 stated Resident #21 was transferred using the mechanical lift. CNA #2 stated they did not transfer Resident #21 using two staff because the resident told them to go ahead and get him up without two staff. 2. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin was dated when opened for one (treatment cart #1) of two medication carts observed for medication storage. The DON identified four medication carts in the facility and five residents who were ordered insulin. Findings: An undated Labeling of Medications and Biologicals policy, read in part, .Labels for multi-use vials must include .The date the vial was initially opened or accessed . An undated Insulin Pen policy, read in part, .Insulin pens should be disposed of after 28 days or according to manufacturer's recommendation . On 10/30/24 at 9:58 a.m., treatment cart #1 was observed with LPN #1. The following medications were observed to be opened and not dated. a. Lantus insulin vial for Resident #15; b. Fiasp flex touch pen for Resident #10; c. insulin aspart pen for Resident #27; d. insulin aspart pen and Basaglar pen for Resident #42; e. Levemir pen and insulin aspart for Resident #1; and f. glucose check strips. On 10/30/24 at 10:02 a.m., LPN #1 stated they did not know what date the above…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation was maintained that staff were educated and offered the COVID-19 vaccine for two of two employees reviewed for the COVID-19 vaccination. The COVID-19 Vaccination policy, dated 06/27/23, read in part, .The facility will maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination and includes at a minimum: a. Education to the staff regarding the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine; b. The offering of the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine; c. The COVID-19 vaccine status of staff . On 10/31/24 at 3:03 p.m., the infection preventionist stated they did not have any documentation related to staff education of the COVID-19 vaccination for CNA #2. On 10/31/24 at 3:55 p.m., the administrator stated they did not have documentation for CNA #4 regarding staff education of the COVID-19 vaccination. On 10/31/24 at 4:08 p.m., the administrator stated they discussed the COVID-19 vaccination with new employees during orientation, but they did not maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for one (#9) of one sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The administrator identified 48 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #9 had diagnoses which included dementia. The admission assessment, dated 08/11/24, documented the resident was on an anticoagulant medication and was not on an antiplatelet medication. Review of the physician orders revealed the resident was on Plavix (an antiplatelet medication), but there was no documentation an anticoagulant medication had been ordered. On 10/30/24 at 11:31 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the resident was on Plavix and they had coded the medication as an anticoagulant instead of an antiplatelet medication. On 10/30/24 at 12:59 p.m., the DON stated the corporate office reviewed the assessments for accuracy.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored during nebulizer treatments for one (#20) of one sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified one resident who had orders for nebulizer treatments. An undated Nebulizer Therapy policy, read in part, .Observe resident during the procedure for any change in condition . Resident #20 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician order, dated 10/06/24, documented the resident was ordered ipratropium-albuterol (broncodilator) 0.5-2.5 (3mg/3ml) inhale every six hours. On 10/28/24 at 8:47 a.m., CNA #2 was observed to turn off the nebulizer machine and remove the nebulizer mask from Resident #20. On 10/29/24 at 11:42 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to prepare and administer ipratropium-albuterol via nebulizer to Resident #20. LPN #1 stated, Sometimes [they] keep it on, sometimes [they] won't when they placed the nebulizer mask on the resident. On 10/29/24 at 11:48 a.m., LPN #1 left the resident's room with the nebulizer mask in place.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was accurately assessed for the safe use of bed rails for one (#98) of three sampled residents reviewed for bed rails. The DON identified four residents who had bed rails applied to their beds. Findings: An undated facility Proper Use of Bed Rails policy, read in part, Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails .If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails . Resident #98 had diagnoses which included, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and repeated falls. A review of falls for Resident #98 revealed a witnessed fall on 10/09/24, a witnessed fall on 10/16/24, an un-witnessed fall on 10/17/24, and an un-witnessed fall on 10/30/24 in their room during the hours of sleep. A Fall Risk Assessment, dated 10/23/24, documented Resident #98 was a high fall risk. A care plan, initiated 10/28/24, documented bed rails (two half rails), were added to Resident #98's bed for sacral wound, comfort, and mobility. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,653 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,653 — penalty dated 2025-01-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK