Tulsa Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained while residents were assisted with meals for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dignity.The administrator identified eight residents who were dependent on staff for eating.Findings:On 05/14/26 at 12:30 p.m., LPN #3 was observed standing while assisting Resident #2 with the noon meal.A quarterly assessment, dated 04/22/26, showed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment showed Resident #2 was dependent on staff for eating.On 05/14/26 at 12:50 p.m., LPN #3 stated staff should sit while assisting residents with eating to maintain dignity when dining.On 05/14/26 at 1:10 p.m., the DON stated staff should be seated next to the resident they were assisting to ensure dignity with dining.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control for residents with indwelling urinary catheters for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control.The administrator identified 11 residents with indwelling urinary catheters.Findings:On 05/14/26 at 11:00 a.m., CNA #3 and LPN #3 were observed to transfer Resident #5 from their bed to their wheelchair using a mechanical lift. CNA #3 was observed to place the catheter drainage bag on the floor. CNA #3 was observed to run over the catheter drainage bag with the wheel of the mechanical lift. CNA #3 was observed to slide the catheter bag along the floor from the front of the wheelchair to the back of the wheelchair.An annual assessment, dated 04/02/26, showed Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The assessment showed Resident #5 had an indwelling urinary catheter and was dependent on staff for transfer from bed to chair.On 05/14/26 at 11:08 a.m., CNA #3 stated catheter bags should not be placed on the floor.On 05/14/26 at 11:10 a.m., LPN #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning for 3 (#4, 6, and #8) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for functioning call lights. The administrator identified 121 residents resided at the facility.On [DATE] at 5:24 a.m., the call lights in room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] were observed to be on in the hallway. The call light alert box at the nurses' station was observed to show cord out for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. On [DATE] at 10:50 a.m., the call light box for room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be missing. Bare wires were observed to hang from the wall where it had been located.A policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, dated 2025, read in part, Assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside.Staff will report problems with a call light or call system immediately to the supervisor and/or maintenance director and will provide immediate or alternative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 125 residents resided in the facility. Findings:An undated facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, read in part, Identify, assess, care-plan, and monitor residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect, such as residents with a history of aggressive behaviors, residents with self-injurious behaviors, residents with communication disorders and those that require heavy nursing care or are totally dependent on staff. Monitor the resident for early warning signs or any changes that would trigger abuse behavior and reassess strategies on a regular basis. An undated admission record showed Resident #5 had diagnoses which included violent behavior, dementia, depression, mood disorder, anxiety, and conduct disorder. An Incident Report Form, dated 10/27/25, showed Resident #5 threw soda on CNA #2 who threw a drink back in Resident #5's face. The form showed as CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained according to physician orders for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for daily weights.The administrator identified 114 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A 24-hour skin assessment, dated 09/05/25 at 8:11 p.m., showed Resident #1 had bilateral lower extremity pitting edema and weeping of the right leg.A review of the vitals tab in the facility electronic health record showed on 09/06/25 Resident #1 weighed 256.3 pounds and on 09/23/25 Resident #1 weighed 273.2 pounds. Daily weights were not obtained in the month of September after an order was received from the hospital for daily weights on 09/23/25.A review of the vitals tab in the facility electronic health record showed on 10/14/25 Resident #1 weighed 267.5 pounds. Daily weights were not obtained in the month of October.A comprehensive assessment, dated 09/15/25, showed Resident #1 had a brief score for mental illness of 15 which indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, who was ordered a routine blood test to monitor blood sugar levels, received the test for 1 (#2) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON stated 60 residents at the facility had diabetes and all had their A1C tested at least annually.Findings:A facility policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting, dated 07/2025, read in part, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law.A face sheet, dated 08/01/25, for Res #2 showed the resident had diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.A physician's medication order, dated 08/01/25, showed Res #2 was to be administered Lantus Solostar (a brand of insulin) 100 units/ml. The order showed Res #2 was to receive 5 units of the insulin in the morning and 27 units in the afternoon.A physician's lab order, dated 10/04/24, showed Res #2 was to have a blood sample collected for an A1C…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were secure for 1 of 3 carts on the Southeast Hall. The DON identified 108 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 08/20/25 at 10:47 a.m., a green capsule in a plastic medication cup was observed sitting on top of the medication cart unattended on the Southeast Hallway. A Policy dated 04/2018, titled Medication Storage In The Facility, read in part, The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. 08/20/25 at 10:54 a.m., LPN # 2 stated they had left the medication on top of the medication cart. LPN # 2 stated they had intended to administer it to a resident but forgot. They stated leaving the medication unattended on the cart could result in the wrong resident taking the medication and could cause a medication error. They stated it should not have been left out on top of the cart and should have been secured inside the cart.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection prevention protocols during the provision of tracheostomy care for 1 (#5) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The administrator identified 3 residents with a tracheostomy resided in the facility. On 08/20/25 at 12:48 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to provide tracheostomy care for Res #5. After starting care, LPN #1 discovered supplies needed were not available in the room, LPN #1 removed their gloves and gown and left the room. On 08/20/25 at 1:15 p.m., LPN #1 returned to the room with supplies and donned a gown and gloves in the room. LPN #1was not observed to sanitize their hands. LPN #1 then opened a pair of sterile gloves, removed the gloves they had on and donned sterile gloves. LPN #1 was not observed to sanitize their hands between glove changes. LPN #1 then opened supplies, opened an alcohol wipe and wiped off inner cannula with the alcohol wipe. LPN #1 cleaned the area around the tracheostomy site and placed the inner cannula. LPN #1 was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the OSDH within two hours for one (#4) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator reported the census was 104. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised 10/2023, read in parts, Reporting of alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes .Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia and generalized anxiety disorder. An Incident Report Form, dated 08/10/24, documented around midnight on 08/10/24, Resident #4 and their significant other were having a physical altercation in the resident's room and the police were called. The inbound notification documented the report was received by the OSDH on 08/10/24 at 4:13 p.m. On 12/27/24 at 2:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to use a gait belt for one (#3) of three residents who were sampled for assist with transfers. The administrator identified 106 resident resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #3 had diagnoses which included dementia and amputation of left lower leg. An Incident Report Form, dated 09/24/24, documented staff was assisting the resident with a transfer without using a gait belt. The resident suffered a right knee abrasion. On 10/16/24 at 2:46 p.m., the administrator stated the staff member had been suspended, then terminated, due to not following the facilities standards regarding the use of gait belts during transfers. They stated the incident had been added to the QA on 10/01/24, re-education had been provided to the direct care staff on 10/01/24, and weekly monitoring of the use of gait belts during transfers was begun on 10/01/24, and is still ongoing with a completion date of monitoring of 11/15/24. Documentation of QA, education, and monitoring was provided by the administrator. On 10/17/24 at 11:18 a.m., the DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK