University Village Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable for three (#22, 47 and #54) of three residents who were reviewed for food palatability. The staff engagement coordinator identified 71 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. Findings: A Food and Nutrition Services policy, revised October 2017, read in part, Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the .food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. On 12/02/24 at 11:05 a.m., a hotbox arrived to the satellite kitchen for the [NAME] hall. Food was removed from the hotbox and placed on the steam table. On 12/02/24 at 11:11 a.m., DA #1 was observed to obtain temperatures of the food. The carrots and green beans were observed to be under holding temperature at 128 degrees Fahrenheit. The food temperatures were not obtained again prior to plating at 11:30 a.m. On 12/02/24 at 11:49 a.m., Resident #22 stated lunch was cold. On 12/02/24 at 2:17 p.m., Resident #54 stated the food was not hot in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a sanitary manner in two of two dining areas. The staff engagement coordinator identified 65 resident who ate food in the dining rooms. Findings: A Food Handling policy statement, revised July 2014, read in part, Food will be .served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. On 12/02/24 at 11:17 a.m., in the satellite kitchen on [NAME] hall, DA #1 was observed to pour ice from a large scoop into multiple glasses and used their gloved hand to guide the ice into the cups. DA #1 was observed to have touched multiple objects prior to guiding the ice with their gloved hand without doffing and sanitizing between. On 12/02/24 at 11:32 a.m., DA #3 was observed to deliver meals to two residents without changing their gloves or sanitizing their hands. DA #3 was observed to touch the counter, residents, and themselves between meals. They placed the drinks on the table by handling the top rim of the cup. On 12/02/24 at 12:05 p.m., a family member of a resident eating in the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0848 — pattern
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements contained language which indicated a neutral arbitrator would be utilized and the arbitration would take place at a venue convenient to both parties for three (#20, 38, and #120) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for arbitration agreements. The administrator identified 56 residents who had signed an arbitration agreement. Findings: The admission packet contained the following document which read in part, 8. Arbitration .such Dispute be settled by arbitration, which shall be conducted in Tulsa County, OK in accordance with [company name withheld] Rules of Procedure for Arbitration. The arbitration agreement did not indicate a neutral arbitrator would be utilized. 1. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. Review of the Health Center Long Term Care or Respite Care Agreement revealed the resident signed an arbitration agreement on 02/13/24. 2. Resident #38 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. Review of the Health Center Long Term Care or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during urinary catheter care for one (#2) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for urinary catheters. The staff engagement coordinator identified six residents who had urinary catheters. Findings: The Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated August 2022, read in part, Provide privacy. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy. A physician's order, dated 09/06/24, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and staff were to provide catheter care every shift. On 12/04/24 at 10:13 a.m., CNA #1 and LPN #1 were observed to provide catheter care to Resident #2 with the resident's roommate in the room in their bed. The privacy curtain was observed to be open and not closed between Resident #2 and their roommate during the catheter care. On 12/04/24 at 2:07 p.m., CNA #1 stated they were to close the privacy curtains during personal care, but had not noticed Resident #2's roommate was in the room. On 12/04/24 at 2:18 p.m., LPN #1 stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in locked medication carts for two (#1 and #2) of seven medication carts observed. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Storage of Medications policy, dated 10/2024, documented drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments. On 12/03/24 at 3:08 p.m., medication cart #1 on bluebird hall, outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed to be unlocked. No staff were in view of the cart . On 12/03/24 at 3:17 p.m., medication cart #2, located in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed to be unlocked. On 12/03/24 at 3:18 p.m., RN #1 removed a medication from medication cart #1 and went into room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cart remained unlocked. On 12/03/24 at 3:20 p.m., RN #2 was observed to move medication cart #2 to several different rooms, remove medication and enter the room, leaving the cart in the hallway unlocked and unattended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure records were accurate for one (#21) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 74 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #21 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, and atrial fibrillation. A physician's order, dated 02/19/24, documented staff were to monitor Resident #21 for side effects related to antidepressant medication and to chart in the progress notes if they documented yes that the resident had side effects. A physician's order, dated 02/19/24, documented staff were to monitor Resident #21 for side effects related to anticoagulant medication and to chart in the progress notes if they documented yes that the resident had side effects. A physician's order, dated 10/14/24, documented staff were to monitor Resident #21 for side effects related to antianxiety medication and to chart in the progress notes if they documented yes that the resident had side effects. The October 2024 TAR documented the following side effect…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements contained language residents and/or resident representatives could rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing and signing the agreement was not a condition of admission for three (#20, 38, and #120) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for arbitration agreements. The administrator identified 56 residents who had signed an arbitration agreement. Findings: 1. Resident #20 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. Review of the Health Center Long Term Care or Respite Care Agreement revealed the resident signed an arbitration agreement on 02/13/24. 2. Resident #38 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. Review of the Health Center Long Term Care or Respite Care Agreement revealed the resident's representative signed an arbitration agreement on 05/28/24. 3. Resident #120 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Agreement revealed the resident signed an arbitration agreement on 12/02/24. Review of the admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter tubing was maintained to prevent infection for two (#2 and #27) of two residents who were reviewed for catheter infection prevention. The staff engagement coordinator identified six residents who had catheters. Findings: The Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated August 2022, read in part, Be sure catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included obstructive bladder. On 12/02/24 at 3:22 p.m., Resident #2 was observed to be in bed with their catheter tubing on the fall mat. On 12/03/24 at 8:52 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in their wheelchair in their room with their catheter tubing on the floor. On 12/04/25 at 10:13 a.m., Resident #2 was observed in their bed with their catheter bag and tubing on the floor. On 12/04/24 at 10:27 a.m., CNA #1 covered Resident #2, lowered the bed, and placed the fall mat. The resident's catheter tubing was observed to touch the fall mat. 2. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included neurogenic bladder. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inspect a hospice supplied bed for safety prior to use by a resident for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for bed safety. The administrator identified 68 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated March 2023, read in part, Bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, are checked for compatibility and size prior to use. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included a history of falling. A progress note, dated 10/21/24 at 10:48 p.m., documented the resident was found on the floor next to the bed. The resident's neck was resting on the bed rails and legs were on the ground. On 10/28/24 at 9:58 a.m., Resident #1's representative stated the incident occurred when the headboard separated from the frame of the bed. On 10/28/24 at 10:26 a.m., Maintenance #1 stated they thought they performed bed inspections quarterly and when something malfunctioned. They stated they did not inspect hospice supplied beds when they were brought into the facility. They stated they did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen according to physician orders for one (#213) of four sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/22/23, documented 11 residents received respiratory treatments. Findings: Res #213 had diagnoses which included COPD. A physician order, dated 09/19/23, documented Res #213 was to receive continuous oxygen at 2 L per minute via nasal cannula. The order documented to titrate oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. On 09/21/23 at 10:04 a.m., Res #213 was observed in their room. Their oxygen concentrator was observed to be on and the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen gauge on the concentrator was set above 5 L. On 09/21/23 at 2:17 p.m., Res #213 was observed in the therapy room with a therapy staff member. The resident was observed without portable oxygen on or nearby. On 09/21/23 at 2:20 p.m., RN #2 was asked if the resident had oxygen on, they stated they did not. The RN was asked to check the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK