Vian Nursing & Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 55.7 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.36 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not burned by a hot drink for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards related to hot drinks.The administrator identified 53 residents resided at the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Safety of Hot Liquids, dated October 2014, read in part, Residents will be evaluated for safety concerns and potential for injury from hot liquids upon admission, readmission and on change of condition. Appropriate precautions will be implemented to maximize choices of beverages while minimizing the potential for injury.The potential for burns from hot liquids is considered an ongoing concern among residents with weakened motor skills, balance issues, impaired cognition, and nerve or musculoskeletal conditions.A significant change assessment, dated 05/20/25, showed in Section C Res #1 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 06 (a score of 06 indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired). Section I of the assessment showed Res #1 had the diagnosis of acute and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure form CMS-10055 included an estimated cost of skilled services the resident would need to pay in the absence of Medicare coverage for 3 (#31, 37, and #60) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. MDS Coordinator #1 stated nine residents had been discharged from skilled nursing services between 10/21/24 and 04/21/25. Findings: 1. A review of a CMS-10055 form, dated 12/03/24, for Res #37 showed an estimated cost for ending skilled nursing services was not provided to the resident. In the section of the form where the estimated cost of services was to be provided the word Pending was written. 2. A review of a CMS-10055 form, dated 01/21/25, for Res #31 showed an estimated cost for ending skilled nursing services was not provided to the resident. In the section of the form where the estimated cost of services was to be provided the word Pending was written. 3. A review of a CMS-10055 form, dated 03/12/25, for Res #60 showed an estimated cost for ending skilled nursing services was not provided to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received prescribed supplemental feedings for 1 (#50) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for neglect. The administrator reported the facility census was 56. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 04/2021, read in part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. An admission record, dated 08/28/23, showed Res #50 had diagnoses which included dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A physician order, dated 07/08/24, read in part, If resident eats 50%or less of meal, administer Jevity 1.5 [a nutritional supplement] via bolus [a single large dose] feeding method. An initial incident report, dated 01/20/25, showed an allegation of CMA #1 not administering Res #50's breakfast and lunch tube feedings and they documented the feedings had been given. The report also showed CMA #1 had been suspended pending an investigation. A final incident report, dated 01/20/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a written notice of transfer prior to being transferred to a hospital for 2 (#1 and #21) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The DON stated 52 residents were transferred to a hospital between 10/23/24 and 04/23/25. Findings: A facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility Initiated, dated 2001, read in part, Notice of transfer is provided to resident and representative as soon as practicable before the transfer and to the long-term care (LTC) ombudsman when practicable (e.g., in a monthly list of residents that includes all notice content requirements). 1. A progress note for Res #1, dated 01/22/25 at 12:13 p.m., showed the resident was transferred to a hospital for shortness of breath and diminished lungs sounds. Res #1's medical records were reviewed for the presence of written notices of transfer. None were found. 2. A progress note for Res #21, dated 04/17/25 at 6:49 p.m., showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect for 1 (#50) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for neglect. The administrator reported the facility census was 56. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation of Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised 09/2022, read in part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management.The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum: .interviews staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident: .interviews other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services. An admission record, dated 08/28/23, showed Res #50 had diagnoses which included dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A physician order, dated 07/08/24, read in part, If…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission MDS assessment was completed within 14 days of admission for 1 (#110) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator reported the facility census was 56. Findings: An admission record, dated 04/02/25, showed Res #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res 110's electronic health record was reviewed. The health record showed the status of the admission MDS was in progress. On 04/23//25 at 9:14 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated an admission MDS should be competed within 14 days of admission. They also stated Res #110's admission MDS had not been completed in the required timeframe.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not prescribed and administered an antipsychotic medication for the diagnosis of dementia for 1 (#44) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON stated 11 residents at the facility were prescribed antipsychotic medications. Findings: A facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated July 2022, read in part, Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. Medication orders, dated 01/03/25, showed Res #44 was prescribed Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 mg one tab by mouth twice daily for the diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances and was prescribed quetiapine fumarate (the generic name for Seroquel) 50 mg one tab at bedtime for the diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. A medication administration record for January 2025 showed Res #44 was administered 62…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their abuse prevention policy by not obtaining criminal background checks and reporting an allegation of abuse with the two hours time frame. The DON identified 50 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A facility policy, Background Screening Investigations, dated March 2019, read in part, .For purposes of this policydirect access employee means any individual who has access to a resident or patient of a long term care (LTC) facility or provider through employment or through a contract and has duties that involve (or may involve) one-on-one contact with a patient or resident of the facility or provider, as determined by the state for purposes of the national background check program .Background and criminal checks are initiated within two days of an offer of employment or contract agreement, and completed prior to employment . The surveyor reviewed five employee files with CNA #1 being one of them. CNA #1 did not have a clearance letter from the state of Oklahoma in her file. On 03/21/24 at 2:41 p.m. the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were reported within two hours of the reported incident for one (Res #1) of four residents sampled for abuse. The DON identified 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, dated September 2022, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, read in part, .Immediately is defined as : a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in in serious bodily injury; or b. within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury . Res #1 had diagnoses of malnutrition, rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety disorder, and depression. A significant change assessment, dated 02/01/24, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required substantial to maximal assistance with most ADLs. A review of the OSDH 283 form dated 02/29/24 contained a fax cover page with the time of 1:27 p.m., when the 283 was sent to OSDH. On 03/21/24 at 12:25 p.m., the administrator stated the allegation was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The administrator identified 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/18/23 at 8:43 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. On 12/18/23 at 8:46 a.m., scoops were observed in the sugar bin and in the salt bin. A 50 oz can of cream of chicken soup and a 50 oz can of cream of celery soup were on the shelf and not dated. On 12/18/23 at 8:48 a.m., a pan in the refrigerator with foil over the top was labeled birthday cake and dated 12/15 and the foil was torn open to air. A cut onion was observed in a sealed bag not labeled or dated. There were two open and used out of bags of lettuce which did were not labeled or dated. A sealed bag of cut celery dated 12/5 was in the refrigerator. On 12/18/23 at 8:59 a.m., the DM stated the scoops should not be in the bins and they were removed. The DM stated the food should be dated when it came in and put up. The DM stated the food in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to consistently monitor antibiotic use for two (#10 and #22) of three sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility failed to evaluate the need for antibiotics prior to ordering and administering antibiotics. The ADON identified 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Antimicrobial Stewardship policy, dated December 2012, documented in part .antimicrobial stewardship is the act of using antibiotics appropriately that is, using them only when truly needed and using the right antibiotic for each infection. It is called stewardship because it protects the effectiveness of the most important tool we have to fight life-threatening bacterial infections. Res #10's physician order date 12/14/23, documented Cefdinir 300 mg by mouth twice a day until 12/20/23 related to urinary tract infection. Res #22's physician order, dated 12/18/23, documented ceftriaxone sodium 1 gram to be injected daily for 3 days related to urinary tract infection. The EHR was reviewed on 12/20/23 and there was not evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-07-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK