Heartsworth Center For Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 82 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an IJ was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident who had chosen to have a full code status was provided CPR after a life threating medical emergency was discovered. On [DATE] CNA #1 found Res #3 in their room and unresponsive. CNA #1 reported the situation to LPN #1 who checked the blood pressure of the resident then told CNA #1 the resident was dead and to clean them up. CNA #1 stated no code had been called for Res #3 and no CPR had been attempted.On [DATE] at 12:02 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On [DATE] at 12:20 p.m., the DON was notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template.On [DATE] at 4:09 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health.The facility plan of removal, dated [DATE] at 4:09 p.m., read in part, On [DATE], the facility QAPI members met to discuss this event, root cause, immediate implementation of interventions and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment in the kitchen was sanitized. The ADON reported 70 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings:On 09/15/25 at 11:50 a.m., cook #1 was observed recording temperatures of food being held on the steam table. [NAME] #1 was observed to place the thermometer into a container of Brussel sprouts, remove the thermometer from the Brussel sprouts, grab a towel off the counter and wipe off the thermometer. [NAME] #1 then placed the thermometer into the sweet potatoes, removed the thermometer from the container of sweet potatoes and wiped the thermometer off with the same towel. [NAME] #1 then placed the thermometer into a container of sliced ham, removed the thermometer from the container or ham, and wiped it off using the same towel.A facility policy titled Sanitization, revised 11/2022, read in part, The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner.All equipment, food contact surfaces, and utensils are cleaned and sanitized using heat or chemical sanitizing solutions.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen cylinders were stored securely. The ADON reported 19 residents utilized supplementary oxygen. Findings:On 09/15/25 at 1:00 p.m., an oxygen cylinder was observed in Res #9's room. The cylinder was upright and unsecured next to the head of Res #9's bed.An undated facility policy titled Oxygen Safety, read in part, When small-sized (A, B, D, or E) cylinders are in use, they shall be attached to a cylinder stand or to medical equipment designed to receive and hold compressed gas cylinders. On 09/16/25 at 12:20 p.m., CNA #3 stated oxygen cylinders should be attached to the resident's wheelchair or in some type of oxygen tank holder.On 09/16/25 at 12:30 p.m., LPN #2 stated oxygen cylinders should not be unsecured in a resident's room.On 09/16/25 at 1:50 p.m., the ADON stated oxygen cylinders should be stored securely in a carrier.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include a focus of wandering in a comprehensive care plan for one (#4) of two residents reviewed for wandering. The ADON identified two residents in the facility that wandered. Findings: A facility Elopements and Wandering Resident policy, dated 01/01/20, read in part, The facility ensures residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement. Resident #34 had diagnoses which included recurrent depressive disorder. A progress note, dated 01/26/24 at 8:08 a.m., documented the Resident #34 had been wandering and continued attempting to enter other residents' rooms. A progress note, dated 01/26/24 at 10:02 a.m., documented the Resident #34 was found in their room with the shoes of a male resident. A progress note, dated 01/26/24 at 5:12 p.m., documented the Resident #34 had attempted to enter the kitchen while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve foods at a palatable temperature from one of two kitchen service areas. The DON identified 40 residents who ate meals served from the satellite kitchen. Findings: The facility policy titled Food and Nutrition Services, read it part, Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. On 05/01/24 at 11:15 a.m., the satellite kitchen was observed. The mid-morning meal, including breakfast and lunch style options were observed on the steam table. The steam table was not producing steam. The back and sides of the steam table felt only warm to the touch. The holding temperature of the sausage patties was 94 degrees Fahrenheit. The holding temperature of the soup from 118 degrees Fahrenheit. On 05/01/24 at 11:16 a.m., [NAME] #1 stated they were not sure what the holding temperature was for hot foods. The cook stated the steam table was turned on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three substantive meals were served daily. The ADON reported 73 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Frequency of Meals, read in part, .Each resident shall receive at least three (3) meals daily, at times comparable to typical mealtimes in the community, or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and the plan of care . A handwritten document provided by the DM documented that east hall had breakfast served at 7:30 am, the snack cart went out at 7:30 am, brunch was served at 10:30 am, the snack cart went out again around 1:30 pm, supper was served at 4:30 pm, and the snack cart went out again at 6:30 pm. On 04/29/24 at 8:32 am, the DM stated that a breakfast snack was served in the morning and then brunch which has breakfast items was served. They also stated a midday snack was served then an evening meal was served around 4:30 pm followed by an evening snack. On 05/02/24 at 9:10 am, the DM stated that a hot breakfast was served on the skilled unit,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physical environment of the main kitchen and failed to serve cold foods in the satellite dining room in a sanitary manner. The DON identified 79 residents who ate meals prepared in the main kitchen. Findings: On 04/29/24 at 8:32 a.m., the kitchen was observed to not have a dedicated handwashing sink. On 04/29/23 at 8:32 a.m., the dietary manager stated the staff used the two compartment sink to wash their hands. The dietary manager stated the two compartment sink was used to fill pots with with water and other food preparation needs. On 04/29/24 at 8:33 a.m., the kitchen was observed to have: - missing and broken baseboards, - holes in the ceiling, - rusted air vents and lighting fixtures in the ceiling, - multiple yellow and orange water stains on the ceiling, - peeling paint located on the ceiling and above the food preparation areas, - no dedicated hand washing sinks in the main or satellite kitchens, - an unsecured bottom grill hanging from under the left door of the two door refrigerator, and - and two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents binding arbitration agreements that: a. informed the resident or their representative of their right not to sign the agreement as a condition of admission or continued care; and b. does contains an explicit acknowledged by the resident or their representative that they understood the provisions of the agreement; and c. does not include the name of a second nursing facility, in which the resident does not reside or is aware of, in the agreement for two (#50 and #63) of two sampled resident reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility SSD stated 60 residents that resided in the facility had signed binding arbitration agreement. Findings: A facility Binding Arbitration Agreements policy, dated 07/18/19, read in part, This facility asks all residents to enter into an agreement for binding arbitration. We do not require binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assist a resident with their meal in a dignified manner for one (#10) of eight residents observed for dining. The DON identified three residents who required total assistance with meals. Findings: The facility's Assistance with Meals policy, documented that residents who could not feed themselves would be fed with attention to dignity. As examples, the policy documented not to stand over residents while assisting them with their meals and to keep interactions with other staff to a minimum while assisting residents with their meals. On 04/29/24 at 10:53 a.m., Resident #10 was reclined in a geri-chair, in the dining room. Facility staff stood beside the resident and assisted the resident with their meal. The staff member was heard to talk with various other staff members as they stood beside Resident #10. On 05/01/24 at 11:20 a.m., Resident #10 was reclined in a geri-chair, in the dining room. CNA #4 stood beside the resident and assisted the resident with their meal. The staff member was heard to talk with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education about advance directives and provide an opportunity for a resident to have or decline an advance directive for one (#63) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. A facility daily census report, dated 04/29/24, documented 73 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident #63's EMR found any documentation of an advance directive. The EMR did contain an order for full code but no paperwork that it was discussed with the resident or a representative was found in the records. On 05/01/24 at 7:25 a.m., the ADON stated they had reviewed Resident #63's records and did not find documentation of an advance directive. They stated they did find a physician's order for full code status but not the paperwork that code status was discussed with the resident or a representative. On 05/01/24 at 7:59 a.m., the ADON stated the resident did not have an advance directive and there was no documentation in their records they were given education on advance directives or given the opportunity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for one (#44) of one resident observed to have a facility camera in their room. The DON identified there were two residents for which the facility had placed a camera in the residents' rooms. Findings: The comprehensive assessment, dated 01/20/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, experienced an acute change in mental status, and exhibited no behaviors such as wandering or rejection of care. The quarterly assessment, dated 04/10/24, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, experienced an acute change in mental status, and exhibited no behaviors such as wandering or rejection of care. On 04/29/24 at 09:30 a.m., Resident #44 was interviewed in their room while they were in bed. There was a camera positioned on the opposite wall from the resident's headboard and faced toward the bed. Resident #44 stated they had difficulty hearing. The resident responded to open ended questions, including questions regarding the use of a camera in their room, with inappropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,430 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,430 — penalty dated 2025-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK