Corn Heritage Village And Rehab Of Weatherford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.96 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] at 4:27 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an Immediate Jeopardy Situation. The facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement. Resident #1 resided on the memory unit. A quarterly resident assessment, dated [DATE], showed Resident #1 had moderate cognition impairment, had no wandering behavior seven days prior to the assessment, could walk 150 feet, and had a diagnosis of dementia. Resident #1's care plan, dated [DATE], showed they were at risk for elopement. Behavior notes showed Resident #1 had been experiencing increased behaviors. On [DATE], Resident #1 was getting dressed and stated they had to get out because their daughter died. There were no interventions implemented after the increased behaviors. An incident report, dated [DATE], showed the facility received a phone call at 3:35 p.m., telling them Resident #1 was approximately two blocks away from the facility. Shift assignment sheets for [DATE] on the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift, showed two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Hcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and anxiety disorder. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/06/22, documented the resident's cognition was intact. An incident report, dated 06/01/22, documented the resident spilled her cup of noodles on her the previous night and received burns with blisters to her left upper arm, neck, and chest area. On 06/24/22 at 12:31 p.m., the resident reported the water was too hot and the cup of noodles burned her when she spilled the noodles on her. The resident reported she picked up the cup and her arm jerked and water splashed her on the left upper arm and a few areas on her chest. The burn areas on her chest are now healed. The burn area to left inner arm is healing with no signs of infection. On 06/24/22 at 1:17 p.m., LPN #2 reported the resident still ate noodles almost on a daily basis either as a snack or for a meal if she did not like what was on the menu. The LPN was asked what intervention was put…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours for two (#47 and #218) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:00 p.m. with diagnoses which included dementia and unspecified mood [affective] disorder. The baseline care plan for Resident #47 documented an implementation date of 01/06/25 at 9:40 a.m. A total of 63.75 hours following the resident's admission. 2. Resident #218 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD and encounter for orthopedic aftercare (pelvic fracture). The baseline care plan for Resident #218 documented an implementation date of 01/20/25 at 8:10 a.m. A total of 72 hours following the resident's admission. On 01/22/25 at 2:28 p.m., MDS coordinator #1 was asked what was the facility policy on completion of the baseline care plan for newly admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their legal representative were informed in writing of alternative treatments and side effects of the use of a psychotropic medication for one (#47) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A Psychotropic Medication policy, undated, read in part, Consent: Provide the resident/resident representative with information on the medication, indication, dose, side effects, adverse consequences, and goal of treatment. Obtain informed consent from the resident/resident representative. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and unspecified mood [affective] disorder. A physician's order, dated 01/09/25, documented Resident #47 received olanzapine oral tablet (antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety and aggressive behaviors related to unspecified mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medication for one (#31) of one sampled resident reviewed for self administering medications. The DON identified nine residents received nebulizer breathing treatments and 68 residents received medications from the facility. Findings: The facility's Self Administration of Medication policy and procedure, dated 04/10/14, read in part , A physician order must be obtained and permission given. The policy also read, The resident will review with the nurse all medications that they are taking identify the accurate dosage, correct time and why they are taking the medication. Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes, tremors, adjustment insomnia, depression, other amnesia, and acute kidney failure. Resident #31's quarterly assessment, dated 11/12/24, documented their cognition was intact with minimal impairments. Resident #31's physician's order, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a MDS assessment for one (#47) of five sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility Findings: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and unspecified mood [affective] disorder. A nurse's note, dated 01/06/25 at 3:10 p.m., documented Resident #47 was threatening to leave the facility and a WanderGuard device was placed on their left ankle by the nurse on duty. An admission MDS assessment, dated 01/10/25, documented in section P, item P0100 E, Resident #47 did not use a wander/elopement alarm. On 01/22/25 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #47 was observed sitting on the side of their bed. A WanderGuard device was noted on their left ankle. On 01/22/25 at 2:30 p.m., MDS coordinator #2 was asked if Resident #47 wore a WanderGuard device. They stated, Yes. After reviewing Resident #47's MDS, the MDS coordinator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was labeled and dated for one (#218) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for labeling and dating of oxygen tubing. The DON identified 18 residents had physician orders for supplemental oxygen. Findings: The facilty's Oxygen System Change Out policy, revised 10/11/17, read in part, Each new oxygen set will be labeled with the date of change and the nurses initials. Resident #218 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of the pelvis, fracture of the fifth cervical vertebrae, and osteoporosis. Resident #218's physician's order, dated 01/17/25, read in part, 2L via nc to maintain spo2 [greater than] 89% PRN every shift. On 01/21/25 at 12:21 p.m., Resident #218 was observed in their bed wearing oxygen with a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator There was no date or label on oxygen tubing concentrator indicating when the oxygen tubing was administered. On 01/23/25 at 11:51 a.m., Resident #218…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a family representative and physician were notified of an abuse allegation for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for notifications. The administrator identified 66 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit and major depressive disorder. A comprehensive assessment, dated 09/05/24, documented Resident #1's cognition was significantly impaired. The facility's Incident Report Form, dated 08/18/24, documented Resident #1 alleged allegations of abuse/mistreatment by an unidentified direct care staff. The facility's electronic health record did not document the family representative or physician was notified of the abuse/mistreatment allegation on 08/18/24. On 10/10/24 at 11:30 a.m., a family representative was asked if they were notified of the abuse allegation on 08/18/24. The family representative stated they were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide restorative services for one (#49) of two sampled residents reviewed for restorative services. The DON identified 39 residents received restorative services and the resident census was 66. Findings: Resident #39 had diagnoses which included repeated falls and a fracture of the right femur. A physical therapy Restorative Care Program form, dated 10/21/22, documented Resident #49 was to receive restorative services three times a week as tolerated. ARestorative Care Flow Record, dated 09/03/23 through 09/30/23 did not document Resident #49 had received restorative services for five of twelve opportunities. ARestorative Care Flow Record, dated 10/01/23 through 10/28/23 did not document Resident #49 had received restorative services for six of twelve opportunities. On 10/31/23 at 10:41 a.m., the RA and was asked if restorative services had been provided three times a week for September and October 2023. They stated they were unsure. They were asked who provided the restorative services if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure controlled medication counts were correct, and controlled medication counts were completed every shift for two (#10 and #39) sampled residents reviewed during narcotic count. The DON identified the resident census was 66. Findings: A undated Controlled Medications-Administration policy, read in parts, .When a controlled medication is administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters all of the following information on the accountability record .At each shift change, a physical inventory of all controlled medications is conducted by two licensed nurses and/or one nurse and a CMA .is documented on an audit record . 1. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included peripheral autonomic neuropathy, restless legs, and high blood pressure. A Physician Order, dated 04/18/23 documented Resident #10 was to be administered Pregabalin 50 mg two times per day. 2. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included Anorexia, pain, and dementia. A Physician Order, dated 01/18/23, documented Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide letters of NOMNC to two (#50 and #56) of three residents reviewed who were reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. Page three of the entrance conference worksheet documented seven residents were discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the last six months. Findings: 1. Res #50 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 02/11/22, discharged from Part A skilled services on 04/06/22, and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide Res #50 with a NOMNC letter. 2. Res #56 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 02/25/22, discharged from Part A skilled services on 04/22/22, and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide Res #56 with a NOMNC letter. On 06/22/22 at 2:44 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated she only provided an ABN letter to residents who remained in the facility when they were discharged from Part A services and had benefit days remaining. The MDS coordinator stated she was unaware the NOMNC letter was required to be provided as well.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive resident centered care plans to address the residents' current needs for four (#12, 19, 29, and #56) of four residents sampled for accident hazards. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, titled FALL INJURY PREVENTION, read in part: .4. ANY INFORMATION RECEIVED REGARDING A RESIDENT'S FALL RISK WILL BE RELAYED TO THE CAREPLAN COORDINATOR SO THAT MEASURES CAN BE IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT FALL INJURIES AND ATEMPT [sic] TO DECREASE FALL OCCURANCES. IF THE MEASURES IMPLEMENTED ARE NOT EFFECTIVE, THEN THE CAREPLAN WILL BE MODIFIED TO BETTER SUIT THE RESIDENT . 1. Res #56 had diagnoses which included fracture of unspecified neck of right femur, dementia, and lumbago with sciatica. An admission assessment for Res #56, dated 12/29/21, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, required supervision with most ADLs, and had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-05-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK