Rainbow Terrace Care Center
300 West 9th Street, Weleetka, OK 74880 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (405) 786-2244 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0607), cited Sep 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $60,140 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-12)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.7% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.8% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.7% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.9% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.4% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.5% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.8% | 17.5% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 33.1 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 08/17/23 at 5:45 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to be in existence related to the facility failing to ensure background screenings were completed for four of 29 employees hired between 2022 and 2023. The facility failed to ensure residents were not at risk for abuse related to staff background screening and finger printing not being completed. On 08/17/23 at 5:50 p.m., the charge nurse on duty was informed of an Immediate Jeopardy situation and the IJ template was emailed to the DON at that time. The administrator, assistant administrator, and DON were not in the facility at that time. On 08/21/23 at 4:38 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health by the assistant administrator. The facility plan of removal, read in entirety, Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal 8/18/2023 On 8/17/2023 at 5:50 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy situation was announced to the ADON, [name withheld]. The Immediate Jeopardy was due to the facility not having up to date background checks on 4 out of 29 employees hired between 2022 and 2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-05-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective [DATE] based upon the facility's failure to immediately contact EMS when CPR was initiated for Res #26 with a full code status who was found not breathing and without a detectable heart beat. On [DATE] at 11:21 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 11:26 a.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 1:38 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was provided. The plan of removal documented: ''Rainbow Terrace Care Center Immediate Jeopardy Plan for Removal [DATE]. On [DATE], a resident was found to not have viable vital signs, resulting in CPR being initiated. Although the Charge Nurse directed for someone to call 9-1-1, there is no documentation to support a call being made. After 25 minutes of CPR being performed, Dr. [name withheld] called time of death. While it is unknown if EMS would have arrived or transferred the resident to the nearest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. complete pressure ulcer assessments which included measurements and description for one (#128); b. notify the physician of a wound area and unstageable pressure ulcer timely for one (#128); and c. have a care plan in place and/or updated to prevent pressure ulcers for residents at risk for ulcers for two (#128 and #115) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Res #128's medical records documented a scabbed area to the resident's coccyx that continued through June and July 2023 without assessment or physician notification. On 07/28/23 the unstageable ulcer was assessed and measured at 3.0 x 5.0 x 1.0 cm. The physician was notified on 07/31/23 and an order for treatment was obtained. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented no with resident pressure ulcers. Findings: A facility policy and procedure titled, Pressure Ulcer Treatment, documented a stage I pressure ulcer was a persistent area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. The administrator identified 29 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The work schedule for July 2024 through August 2024 documented no RN coverage for 7/12, 8/6, 8/16, 8/17, 8/18, 8/23, 8/24, 8/25, 8/29, and 8/30. On 01/08/25 at 12:46 p.m., the DON stated in July and August they were short staffed on RNs and did not have RN coverage every day.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during a mediation pass and failed to ensure EBP was followed during wound care for one (#11) of one sampled resident observed during wound care. The DON identified 29 residents who resided in the facility and four residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: A document titled Medical Glove Policy and Procedure, read in parts The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the proper use of medical gloves in order to prevent the transmission of infections and ensure the safety of residents and healthcare workers .Change gloves between tasks and procedures on the same patient to prevent cross-contamination. A document titled Policy and Procedure: Enhanced Barrier Precautions, read in parts Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation to provide guidance for use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in facilities for preventing the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a referral was made to the LOCEU for one (#18) of three sampled residents reviewed for PASSARs. The DON identified five residents with a PASSAR level ll after a referral to the LOCEU. Findings: Resident #18 had diagnoses which included delusional disorderes and major depressive disorders. A PASSAR level l, dated 05/25/21, documented the resident had a diagnosis of a serious mental illness. The form documented a referral was to be made to the LOCEU for consultation. On 01/07/25 at 12:08 p.m., the DON reviewed the resident's PASSAR level l and stated per the documentation a PASSAR level ll referral should have been made to the LOCEU. The DON stated per documentation a referral had not been completed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program with a system to monitor antibiotic use for the residents. The DON identified five residents who were currently receiving an antibiotic medication. Findings: A policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, read in part The purpose of our Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. On 01/07/25 at 2:53 p.m., the DON stated there had been no documented infection control monitoring completed since November 2023. The DON stated they were not aware they were responsible for infection control or antibiotic stewardship monitoring. The DON stated there was no tracking/ monitoring for the use of antibiotics in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment as directed for one (#2) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/wounds. The DON reported the facility had one resident in the facility with a wound. Findings: A facility policy, revised January 2002, titled Wound Care, read in part .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wound to promote healing. 1. Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure .If the resident refuses the care, inform your supervisor .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: .If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why .Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Res #2 had diagnoses which included edema, paraplegia,and dementia with behaviors, A quarterly assessment documented the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had MASD. A physician order, dated 10/09/23, documented Santyl external ointment to apply to affected area every 72 hours for open areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for seven (#101, 103, 110, 111, 115, 125, and #127) of seven resident reviewed for privacy. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, documented a census of 27 residents. Findings: 1. Res #101 was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder and dementia. An admission assessment, dated 08/09/23, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and was independent with most ADLs. On 08/16/23 at 9:05 a.m., there were no curtains or covering of any kind on the window in the resident's room. Res #101 stated they would like to have a window covering but could not afford one. The resident's room was on the west hall facing the parking lot and street. On 08/16/23 at 9:50 a.m., maintenance staff #1 stated they were waiting for new curtain rods to come in and then would put the curtains up. On 08/18/23 at 8:47 a.m. the DON stated we cannot provide privacy at this time for the residents. We are in the process of buying and installing new curtains rods and we…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-12 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure OHCA was contacted when residents had serious mental illnesses for two (#101 and #111) of two residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 27 residents had documented psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: 1. Res #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disorder. A PASRR level I, dated 07/27/23, did not document the resident had a serious mental illness and OHCA was not contacted. A physician order, dated 07/27/23, prescribed Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) for the resident. On 08/16/23 at 3:13 p.m., an interview was conducted with the DON and they stated the hospital informed them a PASRR II was not required for vascular dementia and they had not spoken with anyone from DHS. 2. Res #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of schizophrenia and recurrent depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — patternProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure colostomy care was provided by professional standards of practice for two (#109 and #117) of two residents reviewed for colostomy care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented two residents with an ostomy. Findings: The facility Colostomy/Ileostomy Care Policy documented the staff were to document the date and time the colostomy/ileostomy care was provided. The policy documented the staff were to document the name and title of the individual who provided the colostomy/ileostomy care and any breaks in the resident's skin, signs of infection, or excoriation of skin. 1. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included colostomy status and local infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. A skills checklist, dated 07/03/23, for CNA #2 did not document competency for colostomy care or colostomy bag changes. The annual assessment, dated 07/07/23, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in locked compartments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form dated 08/15/23 documented 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/16/23 at 10:10 a.m., an observation was made of two cabinets storing medications behind the nursing station was opened and unlocked. On 08/16/23 at 10:11 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN #1 and they stated the cabinet draws should be closed and locked to prevent any resident from getting into the medications.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to complete a facility assessment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/15/23 at 8:09 a.m., an entrance conference was conducted with the administrator and the entrance conference worksheet was reviewed. They were made aware of the information required to be submitted from the facility to the survey team. They were provided a copy of a facility assessment template for review. On 09/12/23 at 3:41 p.m., the DON was asked if she had located the facility assessment. They stated they could not find it anywhere and they had looked all over for the facility assessment form but didn't find it. They also stated the administrator may have the facility assessment form.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0851 — patternElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing data based on the facility payroll to CMS. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 27 residents reside in the facility. Findings: The Quality Improvement and Evaluation System was reviewed and did not reveal PBJ data for the facility during the previous two quarters. On 08/21/23 at 9:46 a.m., an interview was conducted with the BOM, and they were not aware of a staffing report needing to be submitted to CMS for direct care for residents. They also stated the only care report they needed to complete was the quality of care for the state. The BOM stated the administrator was probably doing these reports, but he has been out of the facility with health issues. On 08/21/23 at 9:50 a.m., the acting administrator was not currently available for an interview. On 08/22/23 at 10:27 a.m., the acting administrator was not currently available for an interview. On 08/22/23 at 10:29 a.m., an interview was conducted with the DON and they stated the administrator, nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess a resident for an infection using standardized tools and criteria for the initiation of an antibiotic for one (#105) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented no residents were currently receiving antibiotics. Findings: The care plan, dated 08/14/22, documented the resident was a high risk for UTI's due to catheter and urine backflow. The care plan documented to monitor/document/report to the physician as needed for signs and symptoms of UTI such as frequency, urgency, malaise, foul smelling urine, dysuria, fever, nausea , vomiting, flank pain, supra-pubic pain, hematuria, cloudy urine, altered mental status, loss of appetite, and behavioral changes. The most recent assessment, dated 08/29/22, documented the resident was not impaired for daily decision making, was independent with most ADLs, and had not received an antibiotic the past seven days. A physician order, dated 07/20/23, documented Bactrim DS BID for 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide staff training over behavioral health issues. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 27 residents reside in the facility. Findings: An Abuse Prevention Program policy read in part, .Required staff training/orientation programs that includes such topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior .Handling verbally and physically aggressive residents behavior. On 09/12 23 at 12:50 p.m. an observation was made of [NAME] #1's employee file and the file only had an application for employment in it. a. LPN #2; hire date 07/16/23, b. [NAME] #1; hire date 08/08/23, c. [NAME] #2; hire date 08/26/21, d. DA #1; hire date 04/28/23, and e. DA #2; hire date 09/17/20. On 09/12/23 at 9:55 a.m.,an interview was conducted with the SS/BOM, they stated they did not provide training/orientation for verbally and physically aggressive resident behaviors for the five employees upon hire.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an advance directive acknowledgment for one (#101) of four residents reviewed for advance directives. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, documented a census of 27 residents. Findings: Res #101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder, and dementia. An admission assessment, dated [DATE], documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and was independent with most ADLs. The assessment documented the resident had delusions and received antipsychotic and antianxiety medication. On [DATE] at 10:20 a.m., the resident's hard chart was reviewed. The hard chart had a green dot on the outside of the chart. The chart contained a document titled Physician Order which had CPR marked on the form. The chart did not contain documentation of the resident or representative being offered an advanced directive. On [DATE] at 3:09 p.m., the DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to have evidence a thorough investigation was conducted related to an allegation of abuse and prevent further potential abuse/mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for one (#111) of two sampled residents for abuse. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #111 admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included myocardial infarction, depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/15/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required limited to extensive assistance with ADLs. On 08/15/23 at 4:18 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in their room on the bed. Res #111 stated a male aide got mad at them last night because they used the call light to call for ice water. Res #111 stated most of the staff are good. Res #111 stated they threaten them all the time with sending them to room with another resident which the resident did not wish to be around. During the interview a NA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN worked eight consecutive hours seven days a week. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/13/23 at 4:04 p.m. an observation was made of all staff working in the facility this date. There was no RN identified working in the facility this day. On 08/13/23 at 4:06 p.m., the charge nurse/LPN #1 was interviewed regarding the RN coverage for the day. The LPN stated she had not seen an RN today since she arrived about 7:00 a.m. this morning. The LPN stated there was an RN scheduled for day shift, but she had not seen an RN and did not know if they would have one today. The LPN stated the facility did not always have RN coverage, usually once or twice a week, especially on the weekend. On 08/13/23 at 4:35 p.m., the DON entered the facility. The DON stated she did not know there was no RN coverage today. The DON stated she received a text message from a staff member advising the state surveyor was in the facility, but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were collected for one (#111) of five sampled resident's reviewed for lab service. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #111 admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included myocardial infarction, depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/15/23, documented the resident was intact with cognition and required limited to extensive assistance with ADLs. A physician order, dated 05/31/23, documented to decrease Coumadin (an anticoagulant medication) to 6 mg daily and redraw PT/INR in one week. A physician order, dated 06/01/23, documented Coumadin 6 mg one time a day related to myocardial infarction. A nurse note dated 06/01/23 at 7:15 a.m., documented the resident was sent to the ER. A nurse note, dated 06/01/23 at 5:00 p.m., documented the resident would be monitored overnight related to PT/INR and Coumadin changes. A nurse note, dated 06/02/23 at 2:00 p.m., documented the resident returned to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to train/orient new employees on abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 27 residents resided in the facility. An Abuse Prevention Program policy read in part, .Protect our residents abuse by anyone including, but not necessary limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individual .Required staff training/orientation programs that includes such topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior .Abuse, neglect, and exploitation toward residents. On 09/12/23 at 9:10 a.m., the SS/BOM was asked about staff training related to abuse, neglect, and exploitation on hire. On 09/12 23 at 12:50 p.m. an observation was made of [NAME] #1's employee file and the file only had an application for employment in it. a. LPN #2; hire date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident assessments were completed within 14 days of admission and annually for four (#128, 17, 23, and #127) of 26 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #128 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension and unspecified osteoarthritis. On 05/11/22 at 11:16 p.m., Res #128 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. A review of Res #128's clinical record was conducted on 05/17/22 and did not document a comprehensive admission assessment had been completed. 2. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included disc degeneration, thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, and diverticulitis of intestine. A review of Res #17's clinical record was conducted on 5/17/22 and documented the most recent annual assessment had been conducted on 02/25/21. 3. Res #23 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a resident assessment at least quarterly for six (#78, 6, 1, 14, 2, and #5) of 26 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #6's clinical records were reviewed and the most recent resident assessment was dated 12/16/21. 2. Res #1's clinical records were reviewed and the most recent resident assessment was dated 12/20/21. 3. Res #14's clinical records were reviewed and the most recent resident assessment was dated 12/06/21. 4. Res #2's clinical records were reviewed and the most recent resident assessment was dated 12/22/21. 5. Res #5's clinical records were reviewed and the most recent resident assessment was dated 12/29/21. On 05/12/22 at 4:59 p.m., the DON stated the assessments had not been completed. 6. An annual MDS assessment, dated 08/07/21, for Res #78 was completed. The quarterly assessment, dated 11/07/21, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were transmitted to CMS within seven days of completion for three (#21, 19, and #24) of 26 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #21 had diagnoses which included acute embolism of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity, diabetes, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. On 05/17/22, a review of Res #21 clinical record showed a quarterly resident assessment had been completed on 04/01/22. 2. Res #19 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, paranoid schizophrenia, and epilepsy. On 05/17/22, a review of Res #19's clinical records showed a quarterly resident assessment had been completed on 04/07/22. 3. Resident #24 had diagnoses which included amnesitic disorder, suicidal ideation, and impulse disorder. On 05/17/22, a review of Res #24's clinical records showed a quarterly resident assessment had been completed on 04/07/22. A CMS transmittal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist requested a GDR for one (#18) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications and failed to ensure the MRR policy documented time frames for each step in the process. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews, dated April 2007, read in part: .The primary purpose of this review is to help the facility maintain each resident's highest practible level of functioning by helping them utilize medications appropriately and prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible . Res #1 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and extrapyramidal and movement disorder. A physician order, dated 07/16/19, documented the facility was to administer risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) 3 mg tablet twice daily for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. A physician order, dated 09/04/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain lab services as ordered by the physician for two (#126 and #127) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #126 had diagnoses which included dementia, adult failure to thrive, and chronic embolism of deep vein of lower extremity. A physician order, dated 03/25/22, documented the facility was to obtain a CBC, CMP, lipid panel, and liver lab test every six months in March and September. A physician order, dated 03/25/22, documented the facility was to obtain a HgBA1C lab test every three months in March, June, September, and December. A physician order, dated 03/25/22, documented the facility was to obtain a TSH lab test every 12 months. Res #126's admission assessment, dated 04/06/22, documented Res #126 was moderately impaired in cognition and was independent with most activities of daily living. On 05/16/22 at 3:20 p.m., Res #126's clinical record was reviewed and found to contain no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents lived in the facility. Findings: On 05/12/22 at 3:17 p.m., two ceiling tiles in the kitchen were observed drooping down and were discolored. One was over the refrigerator and one was over the vent hood. The fan levers were observed to be covered with dust and cobwebs some were hanging down from the fan levers and ceiling. On 05/12/22 at approximately 3:20 p.m., a cleaning schedule for September 2021 was observed hanging in the kitchen. There was no one on the list assigned to clean the ceiling fan levers. On 05/12/22 at 3:30 p.m., cook #1 stated it was maintenance who cleaned the fan levers, but the facility does not have a maintenance man at this time. On 05/12/22 at 3:24 p.m., the dietary aide was observed to return to the kitchen from the dining room and did not wash her hands before touching the drink pitchers made up for the residents. On 05/12/22 at 3:32 p.m., cook #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an open shelved insulin cart with different residents' medications did not enter resident rooms. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/12/22 at 4:38 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to roll a three shelf open cart into Res #21's room. The cart was positioned in front of the resident who was sitting in his W/C. The cart contained different residents' insulin, insulin syringes, insulin pens, and glucometer on the top shelf, along with gloves, disinfected wipes, and a sharps container. The resident received a FSBS and two types of insulin. On 05/12/22 at 4:46 p.m., LPN #1 rolled the same cart into Res #78's room. The resident received a FSBS and two types of insulin. The resident's roommate also received insulin. On 05/12/22 at 4:52 p.m., LPN #1 was asked about taking the cart with different residents' insulin and supplies into each room. She stated she has always taken the cart into the rooms. She stated they did not have an enclosed locked cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of bed bugs and roaches. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/11/22 at 10:10 a.m., Res #23's room was observed. The mattress was turned up and leaning against the wall. Two bed bugs were observed on the bottom of the mattress cover and spots of blood were observed on the wall next to the bed. At that time, the administrator stated the facility had been treated with Diatomaceous Earth that morning. The administrator stated the exterminator would be called. On 05/11/22 at 10:19 a.m., CNA #2 stated the facility has had bed bugs for several months. CNA #1 also stated they had observed bed bugs in multiple residents' beds and on the room divider curtains and the window curtains. They said the administrator was aware. On 05/11/22 at 12:26 p.m., Res #17's bed was observed with blood on the bedding. A dead bed bug was observed in the bed. A live bed bug was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on the resident assessment for one (#13) of ten residents whose records were reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 33 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #13 had diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, epileptic seizures, and dementia. An admission assessment, dated 03/01/22, documented Res #13 had moderate difficulty hearing and vision impaired, had verbal behaviors directed toward others, and was independent with most activities of daily living. On 05/11/22 at 2:24 p.m., Res #13 was observed sitting on the front porch and had a cochlear implant and hearing aides. Res #13 stated the wire on the cochlear implant was cracked and their left hearing aide was broke. Res #13 stated one of the lenses of their glasses kept falling out and a tooth was bothering them. On 05/16/22, a review of Res #13's clinical records did not contain a comprehensive care plan. On 05/16/22 at 2:55 p.m., the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the the physician, obtain orders for treatment, and assess a pressure ulcer in a timely manner for one (#78) of two residents sampled for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented no residents had pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident #78's quarterly assessment, dated 11/07/21, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, was independent to requiring limited assistance with ADLs, and had impairment on one side of his upper and lower extremities. The assessment documented the resident did not have pressure ulcers. On 05/11/22 at 11:00 a.m., the resident stated he had a sore on his ankle. CNA #2 was called in to help position the resident to visualize the ankle. The CNA stated she had noticed a discolored area on his ankle but it was not open. The resident's lateral (exterior) left ankle was observed to have an approxiatmate 1 cm open area with full thickness skin loss and pink drainage on the linens. The CNA stated she would tell the nurse. The CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assist a resident to obtain dental services for one (#13) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The DON identified two residents in the facility who had obvious dental caries. Findings: Res #13 had diagnoses which included epileptic seizures, bipolar disorder, Parkinson's disease, and schizoaffective disorder. A resident admission assessment for Res #13, dated 03/01/22, documented Res #13 was intact in cognition and had obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. A nurse note, dated 03/28/22 at 2:20 p.m., read in part: .Resident wants tooth filled. Nurse explained insurance only provides payment for tooth to be pulled. Resident yelled at nurse that [pronoun deleted] isn't having a tooth pulled. On 05/11/22 at 2:22 p.m., Res #13 was observed sitting on the front porch of the facility. Res #13 was observed to have several upper and lower teeth. Res #13 stated they needed to go to the dentist for treatment of a sore tooth for some time and no one at the facility would help with arranging an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$60,140 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $60,140 — penalty dated 2023-09-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in OK
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 37E204. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.