Latimer Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 28.6 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of urine odors for 1 of 2 halls. The Point of Care Rooms/Beds roster showed there were 14 residents residing on the South hall. Findings: On 05/05/25 at 12:30 p.m., there was a strong urine odor present on the South hall. On 05/06/25 at 7:50 a.m., there was a strong urine odor present on the South hall. On 05/07/25 at 7:55 a.m., there was a strong urine odor present on the south hall. On 05/07/25 at 4:07 p.m., LPN #3 stated in the morning the South hall smelled of urine. LPN #3 stated the odor got stronger when they opened the hopper room door. LPN #3 stated the strong urine smelled like the residents on the hall needed to drink more water. LPN #3 stated they provided water to all their residents and encouraged them to drink. On 05/07/25 at 4:29 p.m., CNA #3 stated the odor on the South hall was urine. CNA #3 stated they thought the strong urine odor was coming from one particular room. CNA #3 stated they changed the resident in that room and changed their linen, but even after cleaning the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their pain medication as ordered by the physician for 1 (#20) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for narcotic pain medication use. The MDS coordinator identified 15 residents received narcotic pain medications. Findings: Resident #20's quarterly assessment, dated 03/24/25, showed Resident #20 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Physicians orders, dated 03/26/25, showed Resident #20 was to receive: a. hydrocodone/acetaminophen (narcotic pain reliever) 10/325 mg, Give one tablet every six hours; b. cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant) 10 mg. Give one tablet in the morning, afternoon, and at bedtime; c. ibuprofen (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) 600 mg. Give one tablet every six hours as needed for pain; and d. Voltaren arthritis pain gel 1%. Administer topical every four hours as needed. A May 2025 medication administration record showed Resident #20 did not receive their hydrocodone/acetaminophen on 05/11/25 at 12:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize EBP for 1 (#21) of 1 resident who was observed to receive catheter care. The Matrix for Providers identified three residents with urinary catheters. Findings: On 05/05/25 at 1:13 p.m., Resident #21 was observed in bed with a catheter bag hooked to the side of the bed. There was no sign to utilize enhanced barrier precautions nor was there enhanced barrier precaution equipment visible near the entrance to the resident's room or in the resident's room. On 05/08/25 at 2:50 p.m., CNA #4 was observed to drain the resident's urinary catheter. There was a towel, washcloth, and gloves lying on the floor near the foot of the resident's bed. CNA #4 was observed to remove gloves from their pocket, don gloves, kneel in front of the urinary catheter drainage bag, pull the towel and wash cloth from the foot of the bed and position the towel under the urinary drainage bag. CNA #4 removed the drainage tube and drained the urine from the bag into a used urinal. CNA #4 wiped the drainage tube with the wash cloth lying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission resident assessment was completed within the required timeframe for 1 (#126) of 12 sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An admission assessment, dated 01/20/25, showed Resident #126 admitted on [DATE]. The assessment was signed as completed on 04/14/25. The assessment should have been completed by the resident's fourteenth day in the facility. On 05/07/25 at 2:08 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated the admission resident assessment was not completed timely. They stated the assessment dated [DATE] was not competed until 04/14/25.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with incontinent care for 1 (#20) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for ADL care. The administrator identified 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/05/25 at 1:39 p.m. CNA #1 was observed to assist Resident #20 with incontinent care. Resident #20's brief was observed to be very saturated with dark yellow substance. There was a very strong urine odor in the room. An undated policy titled Behavioral Programs and Toileting Plans for Urinary Incontinence, read in part, A 'check and change' strategy involves check the resident's continence status at regular intervals and using incontinence devices or garments. The primary goals are to maintain dignity and comfort to protect the skin. Resident #20's quarterly assessment, dated 03/24/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis and urinary incontinence. The assessment showed Resident #20 was totally dependent upon staff for assistance with all of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed develop, implement a policy and procedure for a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building water systems. The administrator identified 23 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: There was no policy and procedure for Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. On 05/03/24 at 10:16 a.m., the maintenance man stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure for Legionella at this time, but they were working on writing a policy and procedure for Legionella and other waterborne pathogens for the facility.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate advanced directives for three (#17, 20 and #25) of six sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The administrator identified 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #17 was admitted with diagnoses which included hypertension and diabetes. There was no advance directive or advance directive acknowledgement in Res #17's electronic health record or paper chart. 2. Res #20 was admitted with diagnoses which included diabetes. There was no advance directive or advance direcgtive acknowledgement in Res 20's electronic health record or paper chart. The ADON was unable to provide documentation Res #17 and #20 had been offered the choice to formulate an advance directive. 3. Res. #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including convulsions, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, and anxiety disorder. An admission assessment, dated 01/10/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact and maximum assist with showering and dressing the upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for three (#2, 5, and #16 ) of 14 sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed for accuracy. The administrator identified 23 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type II, atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, depressive disorder, heart failure. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/22/23, documented the resident was cognitively intact and dependent on most ADLs. This assessment also documented the resident was taking an anti-anxiety and anit-depressive medications. On 02/07/24, a physician's order, documented bupropion 100 mg, give one tab by mouth daily for depressive disorder. On 05/03/24 at 11:16 a.m., the ADON/MDS Coordinator stated the resident was only taking antidepressive medication and they marked anti-anxiety by mistake. 2. Res #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of transient cerebral ischemic attack, HTN, convulsions, injury of kidney, and depressive disorder. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan: a. for five (#6, 8, 10, 16, and #25) of five reviewed for bedrails, b. for one (#13) of one reviewed for hospice care, c. for two (#2 and #13) of two reviewed for respiratory care, and d. for three (#13, 16, an #21) of 4 reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 23 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A. Bedrails 1. Res #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorders, and cardiomegaly. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/01/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required total assistance with all ADLs. On 04/30/24 at 9:51 a.m., an observation was made of the resident lying in their bed with bedrails on each side of the bed. On 05/02/24 at 8:36 a.m., CNA #3 stated the resident cannot remove or lower the bedrails but they do use them to help roll from side to side. On 05/03/24 at 1:08 p.m., the ADON/MDS Coordinator stated there was no assessment for bedrails and the bedrails were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to attempt appropriate alternatives and perform an entrapment risk assessment prior to installing bed or side- rails for (#6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, and #25) of eight residents reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified 23 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A restraints policy, written in by hand and read in part, .6. Full bedrails/siderails (assist rails or ½ rails is not restraints) NO RESTRAINT WITH LOCKING DEVICEs WILL BE USED. NOTE: Restraing assessment will be done prior to use . 1. Res #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorders, and cardiomegaly. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/01/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required total assistance with all ADLs. On 04/30/24 at 09:51 a.m., an observation was made of the resident lying in their bed with bedrails on each side of the bed. On 05/02/24 at 8:36 a.m., CNA #3 stated the resident cannot remove or lower the bedrails but they do use them to help…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$101,970 in federal fines across 18 penalties.

• $14,679 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK