Mennonite Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards for 1 of 3 (#10) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to properly attach the sling with the lower leg straps to the Hoyer (a mechanical lift device used to transfer residents) during a transfer. As a result, Resident 10 sustained a left leg femoral (largest leg bone) fracture and an avulsion injury to the left foot (occurs when an injury causes a ligament or tendon to break off a small piece of a bone that is attached to it). Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 8/2015, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's and restless leg syndrome. The resident was was not able to be observed or interviewed as she/he had passed away. The 1/1998 Mennonite Village Policy and Procedure on Mechanical Lifts stated to follow the manufacturer's instructions when using any type of mechanical lift. The undated Invacare Owner's Operator and Maintenance Manual for Electric Portable Patient Lift included the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely evaluate and analyze repeated falls to ensure fall interventions were effective for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) and failed to ensure fall interventions were followed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. As a result, Resident 1 fell and sustained a fracture. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2018, with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. A 11/2/23 Significant Change MDS revealed Resident 1 had dementia and did not ask staff for ADL assistance. Resident 1 was assessed to be at risk for falls and interventions included a motion sensor (device placed near the resident and alerts staff when the resident moves) was to be used when she/he sat in a recliner. The assessment indicated Resident 1 liked to sit in a recliner near the dining room. An Investigation revealed Resident 1 fell on 3/13/24 at 6:19 PM. The investigation indicated Resident 1 had a history of falls and staff were to place a motion sensor near her/him to detect movement. The motion sensor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were logged and maintained for 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication. Findings include:1. On 3/25/26 at 8:24 AM the third floor medication refrigerator temperature logs were observed to be blank on the following dates: 3/1/26; 3/4/26; 3/7/26; 3/8/26; 3/13/26; 3/14/26; 3/15/26; 3/16/26; 3/17/26; 3/18/26; 3/19/26; 3/21/26; 3/22/26; 3/23/26 and 3/24/26. The medication refrigerator contained insulin and other medications. On 3/25/26 at 8:24 AM Staff 3 (LPN) acknowledged the temperature logs were blank on the identified dates and acknowledged the refrigerator contained insulin and other medications. On 3/25/26 at 9:04 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the identified dates with blank temperature logs and provided no additional information.2. On 3/25/26 at 8:55 AM the second floor medication refrigerator temperature logs were observed to be blank on the following dates:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents the right to a dignified dining experience for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include:Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including hospice care and Alzheimer's disease. The 1/28/26 Care Plan revealed Resident 32 needed limited to one-on-one assistance with all food and fluids, to assist as needed with meals, and required two-person assistance with mobility. The 2/3/26 admission MDS revealed Resident 32 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial to maximum assistance with eating.On 3/23/26 at 12:00 PM Resident 32 was observed in a wheelchair in the dining room while staff served meals to other residents. At 12:31 PM Resident 32 received her/his meal and a CNA assisted with one bite. The CNA then walked away from the resident and did not return until 12:46 PM, 15 minutes later. During that time Resident 32 did not independently feed herself/himself and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and the resident's responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained, for the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent of psychotropic medications. Findings include:Resident 4 admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including mild episode of depressive disorder.A 12/13/25 physician order indicated the following medications to be administered to Resident 4:- Duloxetine (antidepressant) for depression and pain.A review of the clinical record revealed no indication the risks and benefits of the antidepressant medication were reviewed, or consent was obtained for the use of Duloxetine for Resident 4.On 3/25/26 at 1:54 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he was unable to locate any information to indicate the risks and benefits were reviewed, or a consent was obtained for Resident 4's use of the antidepressant.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide hygiene and grooming care to 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet hygiene and grooming needs. Findings include: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including hospice care and Alzheimer's disease. The 1/28/26 Care Plan revealed Resident 32 needed one-person assistance for hygiene and bathing. The 2/3/26 admission MDS for Resident 32 revealed she/he needed substantial to maximum assistance with hygiene tasks, was dependent for mobility, and received a BIMS score of 1 indicating severe cognitive impairment.The daily care documentation for 3/2026 revealed Resident received no bathing or nail care from 3/1/26 to 3/19/26. On 3/26/26 at 12:45 PM Witness 2 (Family Member) expressed concern for Resident 32's cleanliness and hygiene, as well as the length and cleanliness of her/his fingernails and toenails. Witness 2 removed the resident's blanket and socks and prompted her/him to open her/his mouth. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received seizure medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for seizures. Findings include:Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body). A 1/22/26 Physician Order revealed prescriptions for two anti-seizure medications: Briviact 50 mg given twice daily, and Clobazam 10 mg given at bedtime. The 2/2026 MAR revealed Resident 25 missed her/his dose of Clobazam on 2/3/26, 2/4/26, and 2/5/26, as well as a dose of Briviact on 2/5/26. Each missed dose was documented as med not available by Staff 10 (Certified Medication Assistant). On 3/26/26 at 3:10 PM Staff 10 (Certified Medication Assistant) acknowledged he was able to order medications but did not order Resident 25's anti-seizure medication when he saw it was out. Staff 10 stated nursing staff, not him, was responsible for contacting a physician regarding missed medications but was unable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 dining rooms. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 12:14 PM the lunch meal service was observed on the third floor dining room. Staff 7 (CNA) donned gloves and touched multiple surfaces including cupboards, clean cups, clean plates, a refrigerator and serving utensils multiple times throughout the meal and did not change her gloves. On 11/18/24 Staff 7 stated gloves were to be worn in the kitchen, and staff should change gloves after touching multiple surfaces in the kitchen before touching clean plates, cups, or food items. On 11/19/24 at 8:42 AM the breakfast meal service was observed in the second floor dining room. Staff 11 (Cook) served multiple food item and touched plates and serving utensils, but did not wear gloves throughout the meal service. On 11/19/24 at 11:58 AM the lunch meal service was observed on the third floor dining room. Staff 6 (RNCM) donned gloves and touched multiple surfaces…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 10 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Finding include: Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 11/2023 with diagnoses including kidney disease. On 11/18/24 at 12:24 PM during the lunch meal on the third floor Resident 29 and Resident 7 were observed seated at a dining table together. Staff delivered Resident 7's lunch but not Resident 29's. Staff then proceeded to deliver lunch to other residents in the dining room. Resident 7 was observed to stop and ask multiple staff multiple times where Resident 29's lunch was. Staff acknowledged Resident 29 waited for a long time for lunch since Resident 7's lunch was served. Staff's response to Resident 7 was Resident 29's meal was getting dished up. Resident 29 began asking staff were her/his meal was and staff stated her/his lunch was being dished up. Staff 7 stopped eating and stated she/he did not want to eat in front of Resident 29, so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely inform the resident representative of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication use for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for the lack of informed consent. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including dementia. An 10/24/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 18's cognition was severely impaired. A review of Resident 18's 11/2024 MAR revealed she/he had an 10/18/24 order to for lorazapam (an anti-anxiety medication) as needed, and received the medication on 11/1/24, 11/3/24, and 11/10/24. A Consent for Treatment for Anti-Anxiety to administer lorazapam was completed on 11/12/24 by Resident 18's representative. In an interview on 11/20/24 at 10:42 AM Staff 3 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated Resident 18 did not have a consent for lorazapam, so she completed one on 11/12/24 after the medication was administered.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within the required timeframe for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 6/2018 with diagnoses including respiratory failure. The Assessment Lookup for Resident 2 revealed the following MDS assessments were completed: 9/7/23 Annual MDS, 12/8/23 Quarterly MDS, 3/9/24 Quarterly MDS, and 6/10/24 Quarterly MDS. A 11/15/24 Annual MDS was open and in progress. On 11/18/24 at 10:50 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the facility did not complete the Annual MDS due in 9/2024 for Resident 2 within the required timeframe.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for limited range of motion. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: Resident 31 admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and Type 2 Diabetes The admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 31 had no limitations of her/his upper extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand). Review of Resident 31's Active Care Plan dated 10/3/24 revealed the resident had impaired functional status in bed mobility, transfers, walking, toileting, dressing, locomotion, eating, grooming, hygiene, and bathing. Interventions included to insert a rolled ace wrap or washcloth in her/his hands daily to prevent progression of her/his bilateral hand contractures (fingers bent toward the palm of the hand, the affected fingers could not straighten completely). On 11/18/24 Resident 31 was observed to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,934 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-03-04
• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-07-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $191K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR