Clatsop Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 33.9 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.45 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly administer anticoagulant medication to 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for medications. As a result, Resident 2 was hospitalized and required Vitamin K infusion (used as reverse the effects of blood thinning medications). Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 5/2021, with diagnosis including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat caused by poor blood flow). Resident 2's 5/20/22 Care Plan noted the resident received Coumadin (an anticoagulant medication) related to atrial fibrillation. Resident 2's 5/2022 physician orders indicated Resident 2 was to be administered Coumadin 5 mg daily every Tuesday, Friday, and Sunday at 4:00 PM. A review of Resident 2's 11/2023 MAR revealed the following dates and times the resident's Coumadin was administered: - 5 mg on 11/3/23 at 8:00 AM - 5 mg on 11/3/23 at 4:00 PM - 5 mg on 11/5/23 at 8:00 AM - 5 mg on 11/5/23 at 4:00 PM - 5 mg on 11/7/23 at 8:00 AM - 5 mg on 11/7/23 at 4:00 PM - 5 mg on 11/10/23 at 8:00 AM - 5 mg on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-06-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#33) reviewed for hospitalization. This resulted in Resident 33 being transported to the hospital and placed in the ICU on a ventilator. This also placed other residents at risk for hospitalization. Findings include: The Oregon Nurse Practice Act included the following: Oregon Administrative Rule [PHONE NUMBER] Scope of Practice Standards for Licensed Practical Nurses - Standards related to the LPN's responsibility for nursing practice. Applying practical nursing knowledge, at the clinical direction and under the clinical supervision of the RN or LIP (Licensed Independent Practitioner), the LPN shall: - Distinguishing abnormal from normal data, sorting, selecting, recording, and reporting the data discrepancies to the supervising RN or supervising LIP; - Evaluate client responses to nursing interventions, progress toward measurable outcomes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders and the plan of care for 3 of 8 sampled residents (#s 16, 20 and 33) reviewed for hospitalization, dialysis and medications. This resulted in Resident 33 being transported to the hospital where the resident was placed in the ICU on a ventilator and died three days later. This also placed other residents at risk for hospitalization and unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including hip fracture. The facility's Bowel Management Policy and Procedure dated 9/2020 included the following interventions for when a resident did not have a bowel movement: - On day three administer Milk of Magnesia in the evening. - On day four administer a laxative suppository in the evening. - On day five if the resident has not had a bowel movement by after breakfast the nurse will check for impaction, check the abdomen and administer an enema per physician's orders. If the resident has not had a bowel movement by 3:00 PM the nurse will again…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly intervene when a resident experienced severe weight loss for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for nutrition. This resulted in an unplanned severe weight loss for Resident 30 and placed residents at risk for unplanned weight loss. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (disease of the brain and spinal cord). On 6/11/23 at 10:48 AM Witness 1 (Family) stated Resident 30 lost 17 pounds in about a month. Resident 30's diet order dated 5/4/23 included a general diet with regular texture and thin consistency (for fluids). Resident 30's Nutritional Status CAA dated 5/11/23 did not indicate a nutritional problem, a comprehensive assessment of the resident's nutritional status or the impact on the resident. Resident 30's Care Plan initiated on 5/4/23 for ADLs and nutrition included the following interventions: - Set-up assistance for eating. - Explain and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0576 — widespread
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to deliver mail on Saturdays for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communications. Findings include:The Facility's Resident Right to Privacy in Communication Policy, dated 1/1/26, stated the facility would ensure each resident received any mail addressed to that resident promptly, defined as delivery within 24 hours of delivery by the postal service. On 1/28/26 at 1:45 PM during the Resident Council group interview, residents stated their mail was not delivered on Saturdays. Resident 9 stated she/he complained to facility staff three times about not receiving mail on Saturdays and was told no staff worked on the weekends who delivered mail. Resident 9 stated this was very frustrating. Resident 27 agreed with Resident 9's statement, and Resident 4 nodded her/his head in agreement. Resident 25 stated she/he made sure not to have any deliveries for Saturdays due to the lack of mail delivery. On 1/28/26 at 4:10 PM, Staff 9 (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of trauma received trauma informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for mood and behavior. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include:The facility's Trauma Informed Care Policy dated 1/1/26 indicated:-The facility will use a multi-pronged approach to identifying a resident's history of trauma, as well as his or her cultural preferences. This will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event, as well as screening and assessment tools such as the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), admission Assessment, the history and physical, the social/history assessment, and others.-The facility will collaborate with resident trauma survivors, and as appropriate, the resident's family, friends, the primary care physician, and any other health care professionals (such as psychologists and mental health professionals) to develop and implement individualized care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were 2 errors out of 25 medication administration opportunities resulting in an 8% error rate. This placed residents at risk of receiving a sub-therapeutic medication dose and reduced medication efficacy. Findings include:The facility's Insulin Pen Policy dated 1/1/26 specified insulin pens were to be primed with two units of insulin prior to each use to avoid the collection of air in the reservoir. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 10/2020 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition affecting the body's ability to control blood sugar levels).Resident 18's Physician Orders included the following:- insulin glargine (a long-acting mediation for diabetes) 100 units/ml inject 25 units two times daily- insulin lispro (a rapid-acting medication for diabetes) 100 units/ml inject 10 units before mealsOn 1/28/26 at 7:19 AM Staff 10 (LPN) administered insulin glargine and insulin lispro to Resident 18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment with window cleanliness for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for a homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for an unclean homelike environment. Findings include: On 9/9/24 at 3:38 PM Resident 22 stated her/his windows were all very dirty and she/he would like them cleaned. Observation of Resident 22's windows and windows throughout the facility determined the majority of windows were dirty and unhomelike. On 9/13/24 at 9:06 AM Staff 8 (Maintenance Director) stated the outside windows in the facility had been cleaned only twice in the last eight years. Staff 8 confirmed the outside windows needed to be cleaned.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 8, 25 and 83) reviewed for medications, behavior and mood. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate or incomplete assessments and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 83 was admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including recent stroke and delirium. Resident 83's physician orders included the use of scheduled and PRN antipsychotic medication. The 8/29/24 psychotropic CAA did not include a description of the specific behavior necessitating the use of the antipsychotic; causes and contributing factors; or risk factors related to the care area such as increased drowsiness, lethargy or increased risk for falls. On 9/13/24 at approximately 9:50 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the CAAs lacked an analysis of findings. 2. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on 2/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. A review of the 2/12/24 Cognitive Loss/Dementia CAA revealed Resident 8 had dementia. The family was aware and content with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration and implement bowel care timely for (1 of 5) sampled residents (# 17) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and constipation. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 10/2020 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (deficiency of hormones used to regulate heart rate, body temperature and digestion) and constipation. a. A physician order from 12/5/23 stated levothyroxine 50 mg was to be given once a day at 8:00 AM to Resident 17 for hypothyroidism. On 9/6/24 the orders for levothyroxine were modified for the medication to be given at 5:00 AM. Review of the 9/2023 MAR revealed Resident 17 did not receive levothyroxine from 9/6/24 through 9/11/24. On 9/12/24 at 1:29 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 17 did not receive levothyroxine on the dates listed and did not provide any additional information as to why the medication was not administered. b. A physician order from 4/15/23 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with administration instructions for 1 of 5 residents (#11) for whom medication administration was observed. This placed residents at risk for decreased medication efficacy. Findings include: On 9/11/24 at 8:43 AM Staff 6 (CMA) was observed to crush the medication pantoprazole 40 mg DR (delayed release) prior to administration to Resident 11. According to the manufacturer's instruction, this medication is enteric coated to pass through the stomach and should not be crushed. The medication was labled as pantoprazole 40 mg without the DR. There were no instructions on the MAR or the medication bubble pack from the pharmacy to indicate the medication should not be crushed prior to administration. On 9/12/24 at 10:48 AM Staff 7 (Consultant Pharmacist) confirmed pantoprazole 40 mg should not be crushed and was not labeled with instructions not to crush.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were complete and accurate for 1 of 5 residents (#8) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. A review of Resident 8's Physician Orders dated 8/2024, revealed an order dated 8/15/24, discontinued on 8/16/24, for mirtazapine (an appetite stimulant) 7.5 mg, one tablet for appetite stimulation for three days. The medication was administered on 8/15/24. A review of Resident 8's Physician Orders dated 8/2024, revealed an order dated 8/16/24, for mirtazapine 7.5 mg, one tablet for appetite stimulation for 30 days. A review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed no evidence the resident received her/his mirtazapine from 8/16/24 through 8/25/24. In an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:42 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 5 (RNCM) stated both physician orders for the mirtazapine were incorrectly transcribed. Staff 1 stated facility staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed and unmet care needs. Findings include: On 6/11/23 the facility provided a list of residents who: -Required one or two person assistance with bathing: 17; -Were fully dependent for bathing: 17; -Required one or two person assistance for eating: 5; -Were fully dependent on staff for eating: 6; -Required one or two person assistance for toileting: 9; -Were fully dependent on staff for toileting: 25; -Required one or two person assistance with transfers: 12; -Were fully dependent on staff for transfers: 20; -Required one or two person assistance with dressing: 19; -Were fully dependent on staff for dressing: 12. Random observations revealed the following: On 6/12/23 at 8:18 AM seven residents in the 300 dining room for breakfast. Three residents were waiting to be assisted with eating and four residents were eating on their own. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to staff a registered nurse for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 14 out of 103 days reviewed for staffing. This placed all residents at risk for unmet assessment needs. Findings include: A review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports dated 1/1/23 through 2/28/23 and 5/1/23 through 6/14/23 revealed the facility had no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on the following days: 1/4, 1/5, 1/6, 1/18, 1/22, 2/13, 5/15, 5/22, 5/23, 5/27, 5/28, 5/29, 6/2 and 6/10. On 6/14/23 at 9:47 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the facility lacked RN coverage on the identified days.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR