Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 203 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 78.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow the resident's plan of care to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for falls with injury. Findings include:Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including a stroke and dementia.A 3/13/26 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 3 had severe cognitive impairment.A 3/31/26 care plan indicated Resident 3 required 1 one-person participation for mobility while in a wheelchair and to use a tilt back wheelchair or stretcher for all transportation.A 5/11/26 post fall note revealed Resident 3 was at a dental appointment on 5/7/26 and slipped out of her/his wheelchair onto the ground. The resident was taken to the emergency room to be assessed and no injury was found.On 6/15/26 at 11:17 AM Witness 1 (Dental Provider) stated Resident 3 struggled to stay upright in her/his wheelchair during the appointment and eventually slid out of her/his wheelchair onto the floor. Witness 1 stated staff at the dental clinic were unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents only received medication as ordered by a physician for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7 and 8) reviewed for medication errors. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of unnecessary medications. Findings include:1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (bone infection). Resident 7's 6/10/26 Physician's Orders included the following: -ferrous sulfate (iron medication) 65 mg one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. -vitamin C 500 mg in the morning every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The 6/2026 MAR indicated Resident 7 was administered vitamin C and ferrous sulfate on Thursday, 6/10/26. On 6/17/26 at 10:22 AM, Staff 10 (RN) stated Resident 7's ferrous sulfate and vitamin C were entered into the resident's electronic medical record incorrectly. Staff 10 stated she entered the orders at the end of her shift on 6/10/26 and the next shift nurse, Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for blood clots and excessive bleeding. Findings include:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 4/2026 with diagnoses including sick sinus syndrome requiring pacemaker insertion (a heart rhythm disorder requiring a pacemaker to assist with the irregular heartbeat) and acute deep vein thrombosis (blood clots) to bilateral legs.Resident 4's 4/2/26 admission Orders included the following:-Warfarin (anti-coagulant - blood thinner) 3.75 mg every Thursday, Saturday and 2.5 mg every Friday until 4/21/26. -Start Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate (Pradaxa) (anti-coagulant - blood thinner) 150 mg two times a day on 4/22/26. The 4/2026 MAR indicated Resident 4 was administered Warfarin on 4/10/26 and 4/12/26. Resident 4 received one dose of Pradaxa on 4/10/26, two doses on 4/11/26, 4/12/26, 4/13/26 and one dose on 4/14/26 even though the order indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide colostomy care according to professional standards for 1 of 2 sampled residents (# 8). This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown and infection. Findings include:Resident 8 admitted to the facility with diagnoses including renal failure. Resident 8's 8/27/25 Care Plan indicated the resident's colostomy bag was to be changed as needed per the resident's provider order. Resident 8's 9/22/25 Physician Orders indicated the resident used a colostomy bag. On 12/18/25 at 11:57 AM, Resident 8 stated she/he recalled not having a colostomy bag for about a day and stated staff covered up her/his stoma (a surgically created opening in the abdomen that allows bodily waste to be diverted out of the body) with a brief and other pads. Resident 8 stated she/he was irritated because she/he could not attend activities on that day. On 12/18/25 at 1:25 PM, Staff 16 (Activities Director) stated the vendor the facility had ordered colostomy bags from discontinued orders due to changes in Medicaid funding.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication storage was free of expired biologicals for 1 of 3 sampled medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for diminished treatment efficacy. Findings include: The 2014 Oregon Health Authority HIV, STD, TB, Viral Hepatitis Program specified the following:- Vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to oxidation and degradation which may affect potency.The facility's 11/2020 Storage of Medications Policy specified the following:- Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.On [DATE] at 10:09 AM, two open, undated vials of tuberculin (used for the testing in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis) and two open, undated insulin pens were observed inside the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide equipment to maintain ROM to a resident with limited mobility for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#63) reviewed for mobility. This placed residents at risk for decrease in ROM. Findings include:Resident 63 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain)The 6/2/25 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 63 was cognitively intact, utilized a wheelchair and walker, and was impaired on side.The 6/6/25 Care Plan indicated Resident 63 was non-ambulatory and was wheelchair bound.A 2/18/25 progress note indicated an AFO (Ankle Foot Orthesis) was ordered for Resident 63 in January. The note indicated staff reached out to orthotics and prosthetics and the referral did not include a provider signature and chart notes to support necessity of the AFO.A 3/5/25 Progress Note indicated Resident 63 was still waiting for the AFO to be delivered to start an ambulation restorative program. Resident 63 attended group therapy with the wheelchair.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received trauma informed care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include: The facility's 8/2022 Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care Policy indicated to provide trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and to address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. It directed staff to identify and decrease exposure to triggers that may retraumatize the resident.Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, mental condition with intense emotional and/or physical reaction after a traumatic event or experience).Resident 8's 6/19/25 admission MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact, able to make herself/himself understood and understood others without difficulty, and had a PTSD diagnosis.Resident 8's 6/16/25 Trauma Informed Care Evaluation was marked as The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide speech therapy services in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#63) reviewed for mobility. This placed resident at risk for communication barriers. Findings include:Resident 63 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including hearing loss.The 4/14/25 Audiologic report AVS (after visit summary) indicated Resident 63 was to start an aural rehabilitation program and to obtain a referral to speech pathology.The 6/24/25 Care Conference indicated Resident 63 did not hear with her/his hearing aids and requested staff to communicate in written form.A review of Resident 63's orders indicated a speech evaluation and treatment orders was entered on 8/7/25. No evidence was found in the resident's medical record to indicate she/he saw a speech pathologist. On 8/4/25 at 2:55 PM, Resident 63 stated she/he preferred to communicate via written form. Resident 63 proceeded to point at her/his ears and said she/he was not able to hear.On 8/8/25 at 9:07 AM, Staff 5 (Director of Rehab)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident refrigerators were free of expired and/or unlabeled foods for 2 of 2 resident refrigerators reviewed for food safety. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: On 3/20/24 at 9:14 AM the following was observed in the resident refrigerator located in the conference room: - one container of homemade spaghetti, dated 3/8/24. - one unlabeled six ounce yogurt, with a use by date of 3/11/24. - one labeled Rm 6 homemade food container with no date. - one opened pina colada mix with a best by date of 9/23/23. - one open paper bag with three bagels, unlabeled and undated. - three bottles of soda labeled Activities. - four unlabeled and undated lunch boxes with food inside. On 3/20/24 at 12:35 PM one 32-ounce yogurt, with a best by date of 11/23/23, was observed in the resident refrigerator located in the supply room. On 3/21/24 at 9:22 AM Staff 27 (Housekeeping Manager) stated housekeeping staff deep cleaned the conference room refrigerator twice a month and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the required written notice of a bed-hold policy before or upon transfer to the hospital for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11 and 47) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed of their rights. Findings include: The facility's revised 10/2022 bed-hold policy indicated all residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: a. Notice 1: Well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and b. Notice 2: At the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). 1. Resident 47 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including vascular dementia. A 1/19/24 progress note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR