No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avalon Care Center - Portland

12640 SE Bush, Portland, OR 97236 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 40 certified beds · (503) 761-6621 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
14601 SE Division Street · (888) 875-7820 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12710 SE Division St · (503) 988-3410 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3552 SE 122nd Ave. · (503) 719-4161 · Call to confirm hours
Park
12839 SE Holgate Blvd · (503) 823-2525 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12330 SE Powell Blvd · (503) 761-3436

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%2.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.5%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.5%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.0%13.9%17.1%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
39.1%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 39.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.89 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the facility's smoking policy was implemented and followed for 1 of 3 (#2) sampled residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. As a result, Resident 2 sustained a second degree burn to her/his left hand. Findings include: The facility's 1/20/23 Smoking Policy indicated the facility will furnish a supervised designated smoking area where smoking and smoking paraphernalia items will be managed and distributed by staff. The facility indicated residents who smoke must return all smoking and smoking paraphernalia items to the facilities centralized storage box. Residents who smoke were to be informed that a violation of the facility smoking policy could place other residents at risk for endangerment which could lead to a facility initiated discharge. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024, with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease. A 10/4/24 Facility Incident Report stated Resident 2 set her/his hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-07 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in writing of the facility's bed-hold policy and notice of transfer at the time of hospital transfer for 3 of 3 residents (#s 4, 7 and 8) reviewed for notification. This placed residents and responsible parties at risk for not being informed of transfer and bed-hold policy fees. Findings include: The facility's 7/2018 Notification of Changes of Condition Policy instructs the facility to promptly notify the resident representative when there was a decision to transfer a resident from the facility to the hospital.a. Resident 7 was admitted in 6/2024 with diagnoses including urinary tract infections (UTIs) and sepsis (an infection that enters the bloodstream).Resident 7's admission Profile indicated she/he was responsible for themselves.Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on 2/12/26 but no evidence was found in Resident 7's clinical record to indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination to support a resident's preference for health care providers for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of self-determination and autonomy. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights: Right to Self-Determination Policy, dated 7/2018, indicated the following: -The facility would support each resident to have the opportunity to exercise his or her autonomy regarding those things that are important to his or her life. This included the resident's interests and preferences. -The resident had a right to, and the facility would promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices, including but not limited to the rights specified in the regulation. -The resident had the right to choose activities, schedules, health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments and plan of care. -The resident had a right to make choices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a hospital transfer for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for notification of changes. This placed residents and responsible parties at risk for not being informed of transfers: Findings include:The facility's 7/2018 Notification of Changes of Condition Policy instructs the facility to promptly notify the resident representative when there was a decision to transfer a resident from the facility to the hospital.Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2/2025 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (a condition that restricts blood flow usually with legs and feet).Resident 4's admission Profile indicated Witness 4 (Complainant) was the resident's responsible party and emergency contact.A review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/18/25. No evidence was found in Resident 4's clinical record to indicate the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for a decrease in their quality of life and at risk for psychosocial difficulties. Findings include: The facility's 11/2017 Freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy defined sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident who appears to want the contact to occur but lacks the cognitive ability to consent or a resident who does not want the contact. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 11/2017 with diagnoses including relapsing multiple sclerosis (a disease where the immune system attacks the lining of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord) and mild cognitive impairment. Resident 2's 11/26/25 Quarterly MDS indicated she/he had severe cognitive impairment.Resident 2's 10/27/25 care plan identified the resident had past sexual assault trauma, preferred female staff, and had impaired cognition. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a dignified existence with use of a power mobility device for 1 of 1 resident (# 19) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for diminished independence and freedom of socialization with other residents. Findings include:The facility's Resident Right Policy dated 7/2018 indicated the resident has a right to and the facility will promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (blockage of blood flow to the brain) and depression.A 5/8/25 Occupational Therapy Evaluation included a goal for Resident 19 to operate a power chair with standby assist in the facility to maximize socialization skills.Review of Occupational Therapy Encounter Notes from 5/8/25 through 7/21/25 revealed Resident 19 received therapy services from Staff 5 (Rehabilitation Director)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an appropriate PASARR (Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder and/or individuals with intellectual disability) was completed for 2 of 3 sampled resident (#s 8 and 34) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents at risk for not receiving specialized services. Findings include: An 8/2018 facility policy revealed, a PASARR will be completed for each resident prior to admission. The applicants are evaluated for a serious mental disorder. Specialized services will be offered to individuals with mental disorders.1. Resident 34 admitted in 2/2025 with diagnoses including schizophrenia and anxiety.A PASARR I assessment completed on 5/5/24 revealed Resident 34 should receive a PASARR-II due to her/his diagnoses of schizophrenia.A review of Resident 34's electronic health record revealed no PASARR II was completed for Resident 34.On 7/24/25 at 10:06 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed a PASARR-II had not been completed for Resident 34 to address her/his schizophrenia diagnoses.2. Resident 8 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure activities were honored for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for boredom, and loneliness. Findings include:Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including dementia and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder).The resident's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS score of six which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed it was very important for Resident 9 to be around animals such as pets, do her/his favorite activities, go outside when the weather was good, and listen to music she/he liked.The resident's care plan initiated on 12/20/24 revealed Resident 9 liked music. The resident was provided an activity calendar, invited to activities, and calling family/friends. The care plan did not include specific preferences for Resident 9 which included, pet visits, listening to music of her/his choice, doing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care planned transfer interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 2 sample residents (#4) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for physical injury. Findings include:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including right leg amputation.Resident 4's 4/2025 and 6/2025 care plan revealed the resident required two-person assistance with a mechanical lift when moving from bed to a shower chair. A Fall Incident dated 5/21/25 revealed Resident 4 had a fall while being transferred out of bed into a shower chair. The resident was transferred by one CNA who did not utilize a mechanical lift.On 7/24/25 at 2:19 PM Staff 11 (CNA) stated she was told by Resident 4 she/he no longer used the mechanical lift and only needed one staff person to assist with her/his transfer status because the resident was working with therapy.On 7/24/25 at 3:00 PM Staff 13 (LPN) stated Resident 4's transfer status in 5/2025 (before the fall) was a two-person mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's prophylactic use of an antibiotic was reviewed and a rationale for continued use was documented when duplicate antibiotic treatment occurred for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#12) reviewed for antibiotic usage. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences and drug-resistant infections. Findings include: The facility's Infection and Control: Antibiotic Stewardship policy, last revised 3/2019, indicated the facility would validate antibiotics were prescribed for the correct indication, the correct dose, the correct route and the correct duration. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, dysuria (painful or uncomfortable urination) and urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder). A 10/15/24 physician order indicated Resident 12 was prescribed Bactrim (an antibiotic) one time a day for UTI prophylaxis (ongoing antibiotic administration not intended to treat an existing infection, but to reduce the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and sexual abuse for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 3 and 12) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical and psychological harm. Findings include: 1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including a communication deficit and dementia. Resident 12's behavioral care plan initiated on 6/7/23 indicated the following: -The resident had a behavior issue related to a lack of spatial awareness (Resident does not recognize when she/he is close to others personal space.) -[Staff] consistently check on whereabouts of resident if found in room other than her/his or attempting to enter other rooms . -Intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. Approach/Speak in a calm manner. Divert attention. Remove from situation and take to alternate location as needed. Resident 12's 3/10/24 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident had short and long-term memory problems, no memory recall ability, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 facility kitchens (dining room kitchenette) reviewed for sanitary food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and contamination. Findings include: On 5/28/24 at 11:34 AM during the initial tour of the dining room kitchenette, the following was observed: Refrigerator: -One piece of cake with whipping cream not covered, labeled or dated. -One small plastic container of an unknown substance not labeled or dated. -One covered plate with a pork chop, baked potato and corn not labeled or dated. -One tray with multiple covered juice drinks not labeled or dated. -One opened container of prune juice on the top shelf that spilled to the lower shelves and out onto the floor. Freezer: -Seven small plastic containers with unknown substances not labeled or dated. -Two individual strawberry yogurt containers with a use by date of 5/20/24. -Two opened one pint ice cream containers with resident names not dated. -One opened gallon of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident needs and preferences related to lighting were accommodated for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 13) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for lack of access to lighting and an unhomelike environment. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including a non-pressure chronic ulcer and Type 2 Diabetes (a condition that happens as a result of the way the body regulates sugar as fuel). A review of Resident 13's 4/4/24 admission MDS revealed her/his cognition was moderately impaired. On 5/29/24 at 9:34 AM Resident 13 stated her/his overbed light switch only had a short cord and she/he could not reach it to turn her/his light on or off. Resident 13 stated she/he reported it to staff but she/he was still waiting for it to be fixed. On 6/3/24 at 1:42 PM Staff 19 (Maintenance Director) stated he expected CNAs to report maintenance issues to him using the facility's work order system. He also stated he is notified of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain copies of advance directives and inform residents of the right to formulate advance directives for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 8 and 13) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk of not having their health care decisions honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 8/2017 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes (a condition that happens as a result of the way the body regulates sugar as fuel) and morbid (severe) obesity. Resident 8's 2/16/24 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 8's Care Plan revealed the following: -Focus: I have a Living Will or other Advance Directive: Health Care Agent. -Goal: I will have my desires and wishes followed according to my signed directive. -Interventions: Facility will place my Advance Directive in my medical record. Staff will review my healthcare directives with me at least quarterly to verify that my wishes have not changed. Staff will understand and follow my healthcare directives. (Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of an appointment out of the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#289) reviewed for notification of change. This placed residents at risk of their representatives being uninformed. Findings include: Resident 289 was admitted to the facility in 12/2016 with diagnoses including chronic congestive heart failure (a long-term condition in which the heart cannot pump blood efficiently) and type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens as a result of the way the body regulates sugar as fuel). A review of Resident 289's 8/29/22 CAA related to cognition revealed she/he had severe cognitive decline including impaired memory and decision making. Resident 289's admission agreement indicated her/his representative/legal guardian was her/his daughter. A review of Resident 289's health record revealed she/he was sent out of the facility for an appointment on 11/10/2022. No evidence was found in Resident 289's health record to indicate her/his representative was notified she/he would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 13) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including a non-pressure chronic ulcer and type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens as a result of the way the body regulates sugar as fuel). A review of Resident 13's 4/4/24 admission MDS revealed her/his cognition was moderately impaired. On 5/29/24 at 9:40 AM a gouge approximately 16 inches in length and 36 inches above the floor was observed in the wall adjacent to the head of Resident 13's bed. On 6/3/24 at 1:42 PM 19 (Maintenance Director) acknowledged the gouge in the wall and stated it should have been fixed prior to the resident moving into the room. On 6/3/24 at 3:39 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the gouge in Resident 13's wall was unacceptable and she expected residents' rooms to be painted and homelike before they move in.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure written summary of a baseline care plan was provided to residents within 48 hours of admission for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 7 and 241) reviewed for baseline care plans. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their plan of care. Findings include: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including kidney failure and anxiety. On 5/31/24 Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. No record was found to show Resident 7 had a baseline care plan reviewed or provided to her/him. On 5/31/24 at 7:40 AM Resident 7 stated she/he had not been provided a baseline care plan. On 5/31/24 at 10:39 AM Staff 3 (LPN/RCM) and Staff 4 (RNCM) stated they were not aware baseline care plans were to be provided to and reviewed with residents. 2. Resident 241 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including heart failure and high cholesterol. On 5/31/24 Resident 241's clinical record was reviewed. No record was found to show Resident 241 had a baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 of 4 residents (#16) reviewed for mood and behavior. This placed residents at risk for lack of care planning. Findings include: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The Mood State CAA from Resident 16's 2/6/24 admission MDS noted Resident 16 had a diagnosis of PTSD and the care plan addressed the PTSD symptoms with interventions to assist with mood. A review of Resident 16's comprehensive care plan (last revised 4/14/24) revealed no focus, goals or interventions for Resident 16's PTSD symptoms. On 6/3/24 at 9:30 AM Staff 16 (Social Services Director) stated he completed a PTSD evaluation for Resident 16, and thought he completed the comprehensive care plan. Staff 16 confirmed Resident 16's comprehensive care plan related to PTSD symptoms with interventions to assist with mood was not completed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding wound care for 1 of 1 resident (# 241) reviewed for wound care. This placed residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 241 was admitted to the facility in 1/2018 with diagnoses including lymphedemia (swelling of the extremities) and erythmia (skin redness caused by swelling or irritation). A cognitive assessment from 1/18/24 indicated Resident 241 had normal cognitive function. A Physician Order from 4/3/24 instructed staff to apply ACE wraps to both lower extremities in the morning before Resident 241 got out of bed and take them off at night. Review of the 5/2024 TAR revealed the ACE wraps were documented as not applied to Resident 241's lower extremities on the following dates: - 5/20/24, - 5/21/24, - 5/22/24, - 5/23/24, - 5/24/24, - 5/25/24, - 5/26/24, - 5/28/24, - 5/29/24, - 5/30/24 and - 5/31/24. On 5/28/24 at 1:13 PM Resident 241 was observed wearing ACE wraps which appeared ragged and nearly falling off. Resident 241 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate care and hazard removal for 2 of 2 residents (#s 239 and 240) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk of injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 239 was admitted to the facility in 5/2022 with diagnoses including obesity and dementia. A Care Plan from 3/16/23 included instructions for two staff members to be present when providing all care. An 8/18/23 Progress Note stated Resident 239 rolled out of bed onto the floor when care was provided. On 5/30/24 at 1:13 PM Staff 10 (CNA) stated she recalled Resident 239 falling out of bed. Staff 10 stated care was provided by only one staff member when Resident 239 experienced the fall out of bed when care was being provided. On 5/31/24 at 2:37 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed Resident 239 was ordered to receive care from two staff members but care was only provided by one staff member when the fall occurred. 2. Resident 240 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including dementia. A cognitive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment and ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 4 and 21) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This placed residents at increased risk for respiratory failure. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 4/25/24 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact. On 5/28/24 at 1:28 PM Resident 4 was observed to use an oxygen concentrator. The external filter on the oxygen concentrator was observed to have a thick layer of dust. On 5/29/24 at 8:44 AM Staff 7 (LPN) observed the resident's equipment and acknowledged the external filter of the oxygen concentrator was not clean. On 5/29/24 at 8:56 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated it was her expectation the external filters were cleaned once a month. 2. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and chronic respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately document wound care being provided which followed physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident (# 241) reviewed for wound care. This placed residents at risk of unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 241 was initially admitted to the facility in 1/2018 with diagnoses including lymphedemia (swelling of the extremities) and erythmia (skin redness caused by swelling or irritation). A cognitive assessment from 1/18/24 indicated Resident 241 had normal cognitive function. A Physician Order from 4/3/24 instructed staff to apply ACE wraps to both lower extremities in the morning before Resident 241 got out of bed and to take them off at night. Review of the 5/2024 TAR revealed ACE wraps were documented as being off of Resident 241's lower extremities on the following dates: - 5/20/24, - 5/21/24, - 5/22/24, - 5/23/24, - 5/24/24, - 5/25/24, - 5/26/24, - 5/28/24, - 5/29/24, - 5/30/24 and - 5/31/24. On 5/28/24 at 1:13 PM Resident 241 was observed wearing ACE wraps which appeared ragged and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 30 out of 127 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assessments and care. Findings include: Review of the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports from 7/1/22 through 9/30/22 and 2/1/23 through 3/7/23 revealed there was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on: -7/17, 7/31, 8/1, 8/7, 8/8, 8/9, 8/10, 8/14, 8/15, 8/16, 8/19, 8/20, 8/24, 8/31, 9/6, 9/9, 9/13, 9/20, 9/22, 9/27, 9/29, 9/30; -2/4, 2/11, 2/12, 2/13, 2/18, 2/20, 2/28, 3/6. On 3/8/23 at 9:46 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) was notified of the findings of this investigation. Staff 1 stated the facility had struggled to hire RN's.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication consent was provided for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for not being informed of risks and benefits of medications. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a central nervous system disorder that affects movement), depression, and anxiety disorder. Resident 30's admission Record dated 3/8/23 indicated her/his family member was the resident's responsible party. Resident 30's 11/29/22 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 30's physician orders dated 12/11/22 indicated the resident had orders for the following scheduled medications: - Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) twice daily for psychotic disorder with hallucinations. - Zoloft (psychotropic medication used to treat depression) once daily for depression related to anxiety disorder. - mirtazapine (psychotropic medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided information related to the formulation of an Advance Directive for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#10, #23, #32) reviewed for Advance Directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their treatment decisions honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (degenerative neurological disease). Resident 10's admission Record dated 3/6/23 indicated the resident was her/his own responsible party. Resident 10's clinical record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident had an Advance Directive or was provided information concerning the right to formulate an Advance Directive. On 3/9/23 at 10:37 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated there was no documentation Resident 10 was provided written information concerning her/his right to formulate an Advanced Directive. 2. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. A review of Resident 23's digital and physical clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were documented and resolved in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. On 3/6/23 at 12:15 PM Resident 5 stated an unknown CNA broke her/his watch band more than a month ago and the facility had not replaced it. On 3/9/23 at 10:47 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he offered to replace Resident 5's watch band. Staff 1 stated he received the watch and was researching a new band for the resident. Staff 1 reported the resident asked for her/his watch back and the item was returned to the resident and was not repaired. On 3/9/23 at 11:06 AM Staff 1 reported there was no documentation regarding this grievance. On 3/14/23 at 9:24 AM Staff 5 (Social Service Director) stated grievances were documented on a grievance log including documentation detailing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 21) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. On 3/6/23 at 10:20 AM Resident 21 stated her/his leg was pinched in a mechanical lift on 12/30/22. An incident report dated 12/30/22 indicated Resident 21 informed staff there was an accident earlier in the day on 12/30/22 involving a mechanical lift transfer. On 3/9/23 at 11:54 AM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed an accident occurred causing a bruise and small cut to Resident 21's toe. Staff 2 further confirmed an incident report should have been completed. 2. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes. An incident report dated 12/30/22 indicated Resident 21 had an unwitnessed accident with her/his power chair where she/he was found against the closet door. The incident report indicated Resident 21 believed she/he may have run into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer oxygen and medications according to physician's orders for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 10 and 30) reviewed for medications and oxygen administration. This placed residents at risk for pain and unnecessary oxygen administration. Findings include: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (degenerative neurological disease). a. Resident 10's current physician's orders as of 3/6/23 indicated the resident had an order for oxygen at three liters per minute PRN to keep O2 sats above 90%. On 3/6/23 at 9:45 AM and 3/7/23 at 10:23 AM Resident 10 was observed in bed receiving oxygen at three liters per minute continuously. Resident 10's TAR, Progress Notes and O2 Sats Summary for 3/6/23 and 3/7/23 revealed no documentation to indicate which staff had initiated the oxygen administration, an assessment to indicate the need for oxygen administration or resident O2 sats below 90%. On 3/7/23 at 11:53 AM Staff 10 (LPN) stated he did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at increased risk for falls. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a central nervous system disorder that affects movement) and Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder). Resident 30's 11/29/22 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of two or more staff for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated the resident was not steady to transfer between the bed and her/his wheelchair and was only able to stabilize with staff assistance. Resident 30's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated she/he was at risk for falls due to multiple chronic diagnoses, decreased muscular coordination and non-ambulatory status. Resident 30's Care Plan dated 12/3/22 contained a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident 28's current physician orders indicated her/his oxygen tubing was to be changed weekly on Mondays. On 3/6/23 at 10:10 AM Staff 19 (LPN) confirmed the date on Resident 28's nasal canula read 2/21/23. On 3/6/23 at 12:30 PM Staff 19 stated she did not know who was responsible for changing the oxygen tubing. On 3/9/23 at 2:28 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 28's oxygen tubing read 2/21/23 and should have been changed weekly for resident health.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was appropriate evaluation and monitoring of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled resident (#21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure. A review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed the resident had orders for the following psychotropic medications: - Sertraline (Anti-depressant) - Abilify (Antipsychotic) - Buspirone (Anti-anxiety) The most recent Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) in Resident 21's record was dated 8/27/22. The most recent Psychotropic medication review in Resident 21's record was dated 9/28/22. On 3/13/23 at 12:18 PM staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the AIMS should have been completed at least every 3-6 months, and psychotropic review should have been completed at least monthly.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to handle, label and store food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for sanitary food handling and serving practices. This placed residents at risk of cross contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. On 3/8/23 at 10:23 AM a tray in the main dining room refrigerator was observed to contain 12 individually-covered beverages. Ten of the 12 beverages were not labeled or dated. A tray that contained nine uncovered puddings and two uncovered fruit cups was observed on the counter adjacent to the refrigerator. On 3/8/23 between 11:00 AM and 11:35 AM six residents were observed participating in a chair yoga activity with Staff 18 (Activities Assistant) in the area immediately adjacent to the counter and tray of uncovered puddings and fruit cups. On 3/8/23 at 1:00 PM one remaining cup of uncovered pudding was observed on the counter. Staff 4 (Dietary Manager) verified the temperature of the pudding was 62 degrees F and stated these items should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 38E173. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next